Elliot2's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Elliot2's Profile › Elliot2's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 (of 85 pages)
gabazin080:Yes, God knows everything. he predestined everything. despite that he still gave everyone a choice, and that choice is called rational mind. whatever action a man takes in the midst of several choices was as a result of his rationalisation of that choice over others. What God does is to set the outcomes just like it's written-the soul that sins will die; the soul that does good will live. these are facts and laws. U now have the choice to do good or bad. |
SuperSuave:Yes, nothing can happen without God’s knowledge. But since we don't know, de best we could predict is through our choices and actions. judas was predestined to betray Jesus, yes. But his choices brought it to fruition. there was no point in time Judas stopped being a rational mind. Even when he was told the prophecy, He rationed the 30 pieces of money over anything else. |
michaelwestern:like everything else that follows a pattern works by law. nothing happens randomly. God has programmed existence with a law-the soul that sins will die; the soul that does good will live. like a job interview, God knows the percentage to take, he already knows those to take. U can only wish u r among. And that wish means to strife. Since God plans alone, U neva know u kuld be among the chosen. to think that out of 10, 100 persons r applying makes it impossible for u to be among is not true. it only means u refuse to prove that u r d best for the job |
malvisguy212:things don't happen randomly. outcomes r results of a structured actions. the soul that sins will die; the soul that does good will live- that's God's law of predestination. He has given us free will to chose the path to follow. |
malvisguy212:things don't happen randomly. outcomes r results of a structured actions. the soul that sins will die; the soul that does good will live- that's God's law of predestination. He has give us free will to chose the path to follow. |
gabazin080:predestination?! I think yes! Like a job interview, God already knows the amount of persons he would employ, he knows the question or test, he knows the standards to use to filter everyone to arrive at the numbers He wants. if it were just 10 vacancies, and 100 r applying. it is left for you to strife to be among the 10. So far as God has not told you personally that u r his special candidate, even though he might take favour in you, ur choices in the process determines what u would get. Even if he takes special interest in u, u av the choice to ruin it. Or u av the choice to strife to be among the ten, or u kuld chose to fail cos u feel it's impossible for u to be among the ten. God plans alone, he does not consult anyone; so even if he has predestined us, you won't know it, the little u knw is through ur own actions, u can tell a little. Whateva u play or freestyle is the role he has given u. Now basically, he has given u an expo-the soul that sins must die; the soul that does good would live. this is the law of God's predestination. |
koboko69:my dear, what u r saying does not count. it does not matter at what point the truth is unveiled, the truth will surely crumble every foundation, even the lintel or roof level sef. if such a student is not termed illegal, then wat is the term for such a person. it does not matter how many of the requirements u met,so long it's not complete, u r not fit (legal). No one is saying pmb is not a Nigerian; as all things being equal, despite having other credentials that make him eligible, one is only challenging his eligibility based on his wasc result. I don't hate pmb for ur info, in fact I am looking at the positive side of the whole drama, just how this kuld boost his integrity profile should he comes clean. |
koboko69:my dear, what u r saying does not count. it does not matter at what point the truth is unveiled, the truth will surely crumble every foundation, even the lintel or roof level sef. if such a student is not termed illegal, then wat is the term for such a person. it does not matter how many of the requirements u met,so long it's not complete, u r not fit (legal). No one is saying pmb is not a Nigerian; as all things being equal, despite having other credentials that make him eligible, one is only challenging his eligibility based on his wasc result. And that is on |
realGURU:one thing that shatters ur argument meaningless is the fact that almost if not all the quotes are from the old testament. Even though we Christians r encouraged not to discard the old law as indicated by Jesus, we are made to understand that we are in a new era or covenant! Jesus has atoned for all our sins (de case of the adulteress he saved from death by the mob ),so that u don't need to kill the sinner or use the blood of animals to please God or carry out his judgement on His behalf. whatever sin a man commits now stays with him until he dies n faces God, there he will give account. Now concerning the old law, all those sins God dislikes them, and ordinarily they deserve death by His standards. He will not apologise to you anyway, but now he only chose differently- a diff approach. most of those laws that now seem inhuman now were worth it then cos of the prevalent situation. this is just like what every govt does by making certain laws nd annul them as they feel such laws are not needed anymore. |
lorbah001:I disagree with u. military way without any form of democratic way will not yield any positive results-but a democratic way with military back up. you are not controlling some animals which would respond to ur whips. in the case of NDA, since pmb met amnesty policy as a precedence. what he should have done if he does not buy into the idea was to continue the program ( as a primary solution), while declaring his own conditions to continue or end the programme. from there, he can map out a permanent solution to the issue. just lyk d apc promise to pay unemployed youths 5k in order to alleviate poverty and reduce poverty induced crimes among the youths. while they do this, they look for permanent solutions for it. likewise that is what he ought to have done. If there is anyone to blame for this continued issue of militancy, it is obj. this is true because due to his military tactics without any forrm of dialogue and consultations, he failed to address the root of the cause. |
koboko69:buh I tot d exam at Cambridge has made it known dat only pmb could order for the said result. |
koboko69:I don't agree with u. an illegal student kuld as well be one who has been attending classes and making good grades therefore qualified to run for the SUG post, but in the electioneering process it's been revealed that he used a forged waec. automatically, such a student is an illegal student. |
koboko69:he kuld av presented a PSLC or nepa bill receipt instead since there were other variables. but now, it does not matter if pmb has masters degree or phd in any field of study,but as far as dis matter is concern, he should produce de original or a believable wasc result that himself so claim he has in his affidavit he tendered to inec. that is the bone of contention. he should collect it from the military or Cambridge and show us. I am not against pmb, but nw here is a simple litmus test for him to lay a precedence on what integrity means in anti-corruption fight... |
keletex2000:true talk. Since it was wasc result (affidavit)he tendered to inec, he must prove same to be true-by providing the true copy of the certificate. weda him get masters degree or phd, it does not matter, since it was wasc result he tendered. |
mightykay:well f dat is de reason then y didn't she tell him straight, so he knws y she is leaving. I bet u if she did, OP wouldn't av written dis. Y her well no go dey too deep for am wen she done let guys dig her well till dem don discover oil dia wey fit serve Buhari budget. She na olosho, de guy no fit match am |
Beremx:na mumu dey worry u! so all those effort dem wey she put to go sch, no be hard work ba? y d market women too no go de sch? na only her corrupt cos she work hard use pen steal, all dos market women dem wey dey inflate prices dem anyhow no corrupt? gerrara hia mehn, shit! |
mobinc:I agree with u. this age has more benefits as regards infrastructures n more! And we r more intelligent, this is so, cos the average person even without education can solve certain problems due to exposure-Education is not closed-ended anymore whereby it's only gotten in the class room. however,the problem of this age as u rightly say is the fall in our value system-motivation and reward! we rr motivated by the wrong people or things-and rewarded with wrong things or giving rewards to the wrong people, punishing the right people while the wrong people go scot free. For example,when hardwork and integrity r not reward,whereas indiscipline and people without good characters are rewarded in the society. |
Horus: |
bolafex:true talk! they r heroes! the disfavour most of us give to people like them is to cowardly align with the tyrants in govt to label them enemies of the state. |
PharmAlfred:nice say! we don't know that as youths, we ought to be the force that should guide the path we want the country to go. With our youthful energy, we kuld fight every injustice and tyranny of our govt n leaders who are mostly expired old men who don't know what is democracy n development of a nation. those guys r heroes, they are role models! That shows our youths should go, using every means necessary to fight injustice. |
Holarz:u did not read where it was mentioned that one person died n few others injured as a result ba? let's not be bias in any debate. if at the initial time, after those guys made their demands, and being that they all have merits, and as a responsible govt, IBB had accepted it, then there wouldn't have been any more of the unfortunate drama as de actors would have gladly surrendered. But u see, despite the merit in their intentions, they were still jailed. and justice was not still served. Likewise in de case of Biafra n NDA,if only de govt had looked into the merits of their agitation, it wouldn't have gotten to these levels. U remember the Aburi accord ryt? if only Gowon had obeyed those resolutions, dat war would have been averted. we Shld understand that it is the tyranny of govt that influences most pipo to become rebellious |
wizzakosh:if to sey dat biafra war was just between the ibos n yorubas-i no dey sure sey u for dey today? Or just imagine sey na yoruba man bin dey rule and not Gowon-chai! Na oyo for be naija case. from ma personal experience with a yoruba taxi driver wey carry me n we jam police for road n I carry electronic appliances with receipts wey bear ma fwend name as owner, and de police accuse us sey we dey carry stollen goods, na dia I carry knw sey yorubas sabi fear! come see ma guy na! Lol. though i stil give dem de benefit of doubt, make one of dem disprove de fact. |
southniyikaye:I don't agree that it's misguided. cos at that time in point, that is the only way they deem fit to protest the tyranny in de part of IBB led military govt. At that point in time, they don't have that kind of port folio which will command respect should they go peaceful protest with placards, they kuld av wasted all their youthful energy fuming n cursing in their minds,without any result; whereas that dormant energy kuld be used to drive a serious msg. And that is what they achieved, that is, injustice of any kind must be dealt with by any way necessary. They r heroes! |
JoyceMeyersFan:thank God sey pipo eyes don dey clear. tribalism for naija no be today, n d end no dey for sight yet. U see for example , wen some group of men in kaki decided on their own and hunt down n kill pipo in a coup whom they felt were not helping the country to progress, simply cause most of d players came frm a certain region n de victims came mostly frm a particular region, it was termed and implied as a tribal coup(igbo coup), nobody cared to find out if their real intents were genuine, to sanitise de system. it has continued that way ever since, whenever one person from one section rules or makes certain decisions, others won't objectively critic it. it will alway be biased . it's just a pity. pray dis present govt finds a way to resolve dis issue of tribalism, mistrust among units; resolved in a way we think n judge objectively, as patriots of one naija. |
lordizak:obligation u mean? obligation to fight against an indigenous people whose only desire is to be left alone, a desire (freedom) that the whole world agreed is a fundamental right. my dear, if there is any obligation they have to keep this country as one, first they should value the lives they are wasting unnecessarily? secondly, let it be included in their obligations the duty to tell the govt that force is not always the solution, that the govt should be more concerned about the causes of such agitation. |
specimenC:Resource Control: Northern Arrogance and Historical Distortion By Moses Ebe Ochonu ebe_28@yahoo.com I refrain from counterfactual speculation wherever I can. It is not good scholarship to peddle “what ifs.” But I wrestle constantly with issues which tend to lend themselves to such speculation, and my wandering mind occasionally seeks out imaginary scenarios and possibilities founded on non-existing situations. One issue which has recently tasked my resolve to only discuss what ‘is’ rather than what might or could have been is the on-going controversy over derivation and resource control. Privately and publicly, we have confronted and contemplated a slew of counterfactual questions on the raging controversy over the demand of the South-South for an initial 25% of oil revenues, with a target of 50% at the end of five years. These questions all turn on one overarching question: what if the oil was in the North…. Apart from satisfying the inquisitive proclivities of commentators, this question raises a whole set of historical issues which undermine the North’s attempt to cast the resource control agitation of the South-South as a modern-day, oil-fueled greed that negates the historical trajectory of resource sharing and allocation in colonial and post-colonial Nigeria. Let me be more specific. In response to questions such as the one above, and in articulating an answer to the struggle of the South-South people for a fair share of resources located in their territory, several contemporary Northern Nigerian politicians, some of them prominent actors in the present political arrangement, have often asked the South-South to take a cue from the generosity of their Northern brothers before oil was discovered in the Niger Delta in the 1950s. The North, it is said, generated remarkable wealth from groundnut, cotton, and other agricultural exports, wealth which it purportedly shared with the South, and some of which, according to some variants of this story, was used to subsidize colonial administration in colonial Southern Nigeria. This is an ahistorical claim. It bears no historical veracity whatsoever, and, as a response to or a strategy to obfuscate the poignant, if counterfactual, question of what would happen if the North had all the oil, it fails woefully. As someone who studies Nigeria’s colonial political economy for a living and who specializes in the politics and economy of Northern Nigeria during the colonial period, I can categorically state that there is irrefutable evidence in the historical sources which show conclusively that, far from subsidizing the administration of any part of the South, the North in fact received several grants and emergency funds from revenue pools which originated largely from the more expensive agricultural exports of the South—cocoa, timber, rubber, palm produce—and from customs and excise receipts collected on Southern coasts. Before I interrogate the Northern claim further, let me state that there is a flip side of this ahistorical claim, which is no less incorrect. It is a claim which is often made by Southerners about colonial Northern Nigeria having been a fiscal leech and burden on the robust financial anatomy of the South. It is said that the South subsidized Northern colonial administration. This is at best an exaggeration. Northern contributions to the revenue pool of colonial Nigeria was considerably less than that of the South throughout the colonial period. But Northern colonial administration paid for itself for the most part. Whatever disproportionate fiscal burdens the North placed on the Federal colonial resource-pool went to fund capital projects such as roads, railways, bridges, and other infrastructures, whose benefits often accrued less to Northern Nigerians than to the colonial system and its goal of building imperial prosperity on the backs of the colonized. At any rate, direct income taxation was adopted in Northern Nigeria almost a decade before it was in Southern Nigeria, and the North was consistently taxed more heavily than was Southern Nigeria. Back to the myth of Northern colonial generosity as a leveler in the current debates about resource control and increased derivation. The North, as a colonial entity, did generate significant wealth from agricultural exports. However, due to a multi-layered mercantilist infrastructure of produce-buying peopled rather hierarchically by European, Lebanese, and African traders, and due to a constantly rising export duty, only a small percentage of the proceeds from these exports entered the personal and group economies of Northern Nigeria colonial farmers and the federal colonial revenue pool, much of the wealth going to British shipping and produce-buying firms. This reality, to be sure, also applied to Southern Nigerian export producers. What made the difference, then, in terms of Northern and Southern contributions to the federal colonial revenue pool was a constellation of natural and circumstantial factors. The agricultural resources of the South commanded higher prices in the world produce market than those of the North. The North’s range of agricultural resources was narrower, owing to its ecological realities. The North was also more susceptible to crop failures, droughts, and reduced harvests than was the South. Thus, in the largely agricultural colonial economy of Nigeria, the South naturally provided the bulk of the colonial state’s revenue. The point here is that the discourse of colonial-era altruism and/or forced sacrifice which is being invoked by the North is a fallacy, as is the claim of Southern colonial-era altruism. The South’s larger contribution to the national colonial treasury was not acquiesced to or consciously advanced by its people as an altruistic gesture, or a sacrificial act of brotherly love. On the contrary, it was compelled by colonial administrative and unitary imperatives, which were anchored on colonial goals and anxieties, not on the interests of Northern Nigeria. Moreover, the differential contributions to the national colonial treasury by the North and the South can and should be explained within the context of geo-ecological, and mercantilist realities; it should not be discussed as if it was a self-conscious act of selflessness by the South. The pattern of greater Southern Nigerian contribution to the nation’s coffers was disturbed with independence. It has been sustained and re-inscribed into the national order of things by the discovery and exploration of crude oil in the Niger Delta. Thus, instead of speaking in terms of ruptures and discontinuities with past colonial practice, arrogant and historically-ignorant Northern politicians should recognize the fact that there has actually been a remarkable continuity and consistency in the pattern of revenue generation and sharing as far as regional contribution is concerned. There have been two notable changes since the discovery of oil and since independence. First, the percentage of Northern contribution to the federal revenue pool has shrunk further, as agricultural exports have all but disappeared under the economic bazaar of oil wealth, which now makes up an alarming 85% of Nigeria’s export earnings. Second, the discourse of Southern (or South-south) sacrifice and subsidy is empirically true of the post-colonial period, the dominating and oppressive political hegemony which sustains this reluctant sacrifice having merely changed from a colonial state to a post-colonial nation-state. The term “sharing,” which was certainly true of the colonial period, can now give way to “subsidy.” These changes are peripheral and do not detract from the overarching fact that there has been more continuity in patterns of revenue mobilization and extraction between colonial and post-colonial Nigeria than there have been discontinuities, and that these curious continuities undermine the break with the past that is suggested by the fallacious claim of Northern colonial-era subsidy of the South. The subtleties and changes outlined above should also not vitiate the fact that, since 1914, Northern Nigeria has, for good or bad, been the beneficiary of state appropriation of regional and sub-regional resources. The reality of the post-colonial period, especially of the last two decades, is that the oil resources of the Niger Delta have subsidized the lifestyles, necessities, and comforts of the rest of the country. Another hallmark of this continuity between the past and the present is that, like the colonial state, the post-colonial Nigerian state, has not bordered to consult with the people from which it appropriates resources, forcing the Niger Delta, much like the colonial state forced Southern Nigeria, to make more contributions to the national treasury than other parts of the country by invoking the rhetoric of higher national interests. In view of these historical realities, it is therefore the height of arrogance and insensitivity for Northern politicians and self-interested bureaucrats to continue to repeat the lie that the North had, in colonial times, subsidized the South with its resources and that this supposed historical fact justifies the on-going subsidy of the whole country (especially the North) by the oil resources of the Niger Delta. It is morally offensive when such a historical fallacy is used to dilute and confuse the just and moral struggle of the South-south for a fair share of the revenue derived from the exploration of its resources and for adequate compensation for the environmental degradation that it has to endure. This argument is understandably typical of the arrogant and self-serving posturing of the Northern political class, which dreads the prospect of having to engage in the hard work of devising wealth-generating mechanisms for an endowed but impoverished section of the country. But it is an argument without historical basis. Even the more moderate and correct claim that the North shared its colonial resources with the South is useless as a response to the poignant questions thrown up by the latest derivation controversy—useless because both the North and the South had to share their resources with each other, since, by colonial decree, regional resources were amassed into a common pool without regard to the preferences of subalterns. Let the Northern political class and its intellectual underlings come up with a better reason—if there is one—for opposing what is an incredibly generous act of accommodation on the part of the Niger Delta: the demand, not for all revenue minus taxes accruing from crude oil, but of a meager 25%. I hate it when history is subjected to such vulgar distortion in the attempt to scuttle an unpalatable event. The Niger Delta people have accommodated the interest and survival of Nigeria through their reasonable demand for a graduated 25-50% derivation. Let us see similar acts of national preservation on the part of the North, and the West, and the Southeast. Since I have broken with my own resolve and have dignified a counterfactual question, let me conclude by speculating on something so curious it may answer the question of what would happen if the oil were in the North. I have never ceased wondering why, after several decades of vehemently resisting the unitary outcome of the amalgamation and of curtailing its reach in Northern social and political life, the North suddenly changed course, the beginning of a rather fanatical Northern commitment to a federal Nigeria having even a semblance of national symbolic uniformity coinciding roughly with the discovery and exploitation of oil in the Niger Delta. It is very curious, and I have never been able to explain that dramatic Northern shift from a jealous and uncompromising guardian of regional autonomy and separatism to a fierce protector of an inherited post-colonial state structure. And I am not convinced that the shift came about solely as a result of the North’s capture of political power at the center. |
Niyinficient:That is non of our business! it only shows that the govt and the companies are not ready to do the right things. there is no excuse that u gave people funds and the abscond with it. The fact still remains that the ND are badly treated. U don't expect less when the govt chose few set of corrupt individuals without consulting widely, and those people abscond with those funds, what is the business of the ordinary man in the village whose backyard produces the oil, with such lame excuses? the truth is that, the govt and companies operating on our soils are not sincere? in fact they corrupt our people in order to continue in their divisive rule. As a matter of fact, I come from an oil producing community, these companies would rather corrupt a certain portion of the people with few changes as bribe, rather than doing those things that have been agreed on especially MOU. As long as these companies and the govt are not sincere, we would always have the issue of militancy on the ND. |
funkydislo:Terrorism is terrorism. Doesn't matter the types. Have you heard of dictatorial terrorism? when the military or leaders use tyrannical force and intimidations,that is it. |
[quote author=omonla555 post=46457311]I am a die hard Yoruba man and passionate about Yoruba and self determination. I cried when Ken saro wiwa was murdered and during the reign of Colonel Komo genocide in Rivers state. My concern about the touts and criminals in the Niger delta is not about the struggle we started during ERA (Ethnic Right Agenda) now Environmental Right Agency, and Campaign for Democracy (CD) Beko Kuti, Tunde Oladunjoye and host of others. Saro wiwa we knew, any other agitator from the Niger delta is a criminal stealing oil. I know and it will come to pass that, any independent for the Niger delta and resource control will wipe the region from the world map. [/quote) u have spoken de truth. ND don't have genuine activists or opinion leaders who have the interest of the people at heart; we no longer have the likes of ken saro wiwa,all others are criminals who capitalise on the issue of ND being neglected. |
hundredhunndred:Having captured Port Harcourt, what else? You expect that they would surrender. But they now went and built Uga and Uli airports and planes were flying there. Two airports at the same time; ingenious! Uga in Anambra State and Uli Ihiala in Imo State of today which was the main one receiving all the main aircraft, it was just a road. They just widened the road and it worked. Looking at the ingenuity of de ibos,very creative. una get luck,ss no fully support Biafra then, Nigeria for go down. it will dis time. |
hundredhunndred:lol! Godwin Alabi Isama's father is from delta,while his mother is from Ilorin. |
Ikeg48: |
