₦airaland Forum

dermmy:
NATO is not ready to take Ukraine into the fold.

They will gladly do but there are some specific requirements, socioeconomic, political and some other redundancies that you have to meet to be accepted

Ukraine should just become a member of NATO and all these aggressive behavior will cease to exist.
Ukraine with a US-led NATO military base.

Russia would never want to see that happen though

Build people and those people will in time build your business.

If you are interested in making passive income as a side hustle or you are tired of being a yes-man and want to be your own boss. Join me on telegram at 8pm today as I open the door for you to "creating wealth".
Copy the link below and replace (dot) with "."

https://t(dot)me/real_estate_ng

Build people and those people will in time build your business.

If you are interested in making passive income as a side hustle or you are tired of being a yes-man and want to be your own boss. Join me on telegram at 8pm today as I open the door for you to "creating wealth".
Copy the link below and replace (dot) with "."

https://t(dot)me/real_estate_ng

garfield1:
What about the screamer he scored against psg

we're making the same point... Majority of people here don't watch Barca play on a regular so they don't know he can score goals like that. They still believe that old myth that Ronaldo score long range goals and Messi don't.

DrayZee:
It's not a random cherry-picked statistic. Most standard football fields have the 25-yard line clearly distinguished. It's part of those stripes you see on the field...it's the next stripe immediately after the one on the edge of the penalty bbox.

Standard pitch don't bother with 25yds line... Majority of the pitch don't use that horizontal grass cutting design ish. Except you're saying majority of the football pitch are not standard

DrayZee:
There's a reason I put *25 yards and above*.
At least, if it's long-range we want to talk about, let's talk about VERY long range.

that's a difficult stats to prove. 25yds is very close to the box which is where most of Messi goals comes from.

DrayZee:
The funny thing is that this Ronaldo guy they're insulting has more long-range goals (25 yards and above) than Messi.

But it's mostly banter. If Messi crashes out of the Copa America, you'll still see Ronaldo fans come out with their own agenda.

really? Because it's a fact (which you can check) that Messi has scored more outside the box goals than Ronaldo.
This is not 2009

the answer is in the name.. "meth...." "mental"

Evolution3x:
[s][/s]from apple inventing the notch to telling me what the notch does.
Who cares about what the notch does?

Dude, just shut the Bleep up. It's not hard to admit you are ignorant of something and move the Bleep on.

The design is outdated, who gives a shit about what is inside the notch. Are other companies that gave us more modern design didn't have ways to unlock the phone securely without ugly notch?

You have Samsung giving us beautiful displays and one of the most secure under screen fingerprint.

But we must digest stupid outdated design in 2021 because some phones wants to read my face.

What is wrong with these zombies?

when it has been proven that face recognition is more secured that fingerprint.
But you don't know that.
Google is your friend.. Ciao

Evolution3x:
[s][/s]iPhone didn't start topnotch, Essential phone did.
And top notch has been on phone way longer than that.

Cheap phones that copied apple style have moved away from it while apple is still stuck in 2017. But here we are, zombies still chopping outdated design in the name of defending apple.
Ignoramus calling someone ignorant.

Shiorr..

displaying your ignorance again.. I tire for you guy.
For android the notch was a design choice. For iPhone the notch is not just a design, it's houses its Face ID, please since you know too much, check out the two Android phone that employed 3D facial recognition scan and tell me what design they use. P.S, Huawei Mate 20, Google pixel and LG G8. Then compare when they dropped the 3D Face scan from their phone if they still used the notch design.
Like I said, it's 2021 and you're still confidently displaying your ignorance in a public space

mrfreestuff:
Hmmm. Twitter is currently a loss making company at a time most of its competitors are making gains. At a loss of half a trillion naira, Twitter needs the strategic Nigerian market if you check out their lose making 2020 financial report released here https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/twitter-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2020-results-301225278.html#:~:text=2020%20revenue%20was%20%243.72%20billion

I don't think their Ghana office has fully taken off though.

This your everytime Twitter is making a loss like it's Nigerian market that kept them in profit...
A company that almost went under around '08 - 2010

MJBOLT:

shut up abeg,the first smartphone to use the notch display was an Android phone


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essential_Phone

when you know how to engage in public discussion. I will likely talk with you then. For now go take a course on manners and responsibilities

Spy360:
What's special about iPhone compared to Android?

nothing

Evolution3x:
oh really now..

Is this the new excuse the army of ediots can come up with for apple dishing out a design that looks like Infinix phone from 2017?


Pathetic

smh... you just ended up displaying your ignorance.
the notch is an iPhone OG design, that Android OEMs copied it in 2017 doesn't mean Apple has to change it. Do you even know what tech is behind the notch?
it's 2021, before you display your ignorance in public at least do some research, it will help you. THIS IS NOT A DISS, it's a legit advice.

seunny4lif:
Have you forgotten that Austria is the country birth of Hilter.
The killing of price of Austria and Hungry empire was the cost of WW1.
France, Russia and UK were part of the allied against German empire and Turks empire.
One of the reason Hitler attacked France and Austria was the angrier of WW1

What are you talking about. You said Poland had similar NATO with France and UK but they didn't show up when it was invaded by Germany. Which is twisting the narrative.
my reply doesn't mean you don't know what you're saying, I'm just pointing out the twist in your narrative.. Germany invaded Austria first. Then when the got to Poland, UK and France declared war on Germany because of that treaty they signed! Implying that they did show up when Poland was attacked.

seunny4lif:
I never said USA can’t use nuclear weapons.
Remember when the French and UK sign something similar to NATO with Poland before WW2.
Did any of them show up to German Nazi even after both countries declared war on German.
I like making it more funny with those mojo signs because some people takes things to serious, that’s the reason I like using it.
Both Nations no care about us

Germany backed by Russia invaded Poland, it's why France and UK declare war on Germany because of that defense treaty. Remember Germany started with Austria but Austria unlike Poland never signed any treaty with France and UK.

seunny4lif:
Na you jump come joor
Go read and read my replies.
No need going front and back

Dude you're the first one that quoted me on my reply to noisy45. Except you're noisy45 then you're the one that jumped on a thread you had no idea about

seunny4lif:
Says a guy who know nothing about NATO.
I asked you do you think USA will trade NY, WDC and CA for any Baltic state.
You are shouting Russia is struggling economically

If I ignore a question, that implies that I think you just asking them to be hilarious and not actually serious about it.
Since it seems you're serious:
Answer: Like I said previously which I'm sure you didn't read. Latvia and its ilk don't have any reason whatsoever to attack Russia. They only joined NATO to avoid Russia imposing influence on them. Same reason Ukraine is trying to be a NATO member. Same reason more South China Sea states are signing defense agreement with the US.
The Baltic countries are not joining NATO to stand against Russia, they are trying to avoid Russia's influence. So if war ever occur in the Baltic Region, then Russia is the aggressor and yes NATO will come to those countries Defense.
It erroneous of you to assume that because Russia has nuclear weapons they are going to use it all willy nilly. Nuclear war is no joke. Most countries only have it as a deterrence not first use basis. If Russia fires nuke against any country, then Russian will be nuked by any country or countries with Nuclear weapon. That's a clause in the treaty signed by the UN Security Council of which Russia is a founding member.
You can't use chemical weapons in wars nowadays or you'll be targeted too.
so you assuming that Russia can nuke the US and errthing will be alright is one of the reasons I didn't care to respond to the question. It lacks substance

seunny4lif:
Choice you said yet left Turkey to the bear �.
Tell me one country that is ready to be nuked because of UK?
German is facing population problems as in the next 30 years, Germany will be filled up with non Germans.
82M people but only around 45M are real German as the rest are Turks.
You think Germany will go to war against Russia

Dude you lack what to argue about. if I want to come down to your level, I'd say Russia are struggling to some extend economically, do you think Russia will want to fight NATO, then put a laughing emoji next to that because we're all comedian.
ciao

seunny4lif:
You don’t answer my questions, do think the Baltic will go on war against Russia because the last time I checked, Russia don’t need to invade those countries as there are more Russians there to fight.
For your mind you think the USA will risk NY, CA and WC to be nuke for Baltic? You think this is a Video game.
When Bush supplied Georgia weapons and said USA will come to their aids, if Russia attack back 2008.
The USA disappeared when Russia started carpet bombing of Georgia after Georgia have killed Russia peace keepers.
Which makes the Georgia President to say it on live TV, that USA betray them .
Georgia was luck former French president was a good friend of Medven and Putin been PM then was close friend of Angela M of Germany

smh, you just jumped on a thread without knowing what it was about. Dude said Russia can conquer Europe in one week if the US stays neutral. In that scenario Russia is the aggressor so your question makes no sense. Focusing on your question, why would Latvia or Estonia want to attack Russia in the first place? Reason those small states joined NATO was to avoid Russia imposing attitude, same reason Ukraine is trying to become a NATO member state.
If Russia declare war on NATO, today, there fight will be in the Baltic region for sure so yes the likes of Estonia will join the fight by offering up their state to act as the first line of defense. Poland just recently installed the Aegis Ashore Defense system. Something Russia was wailing that the US shouldn't do is now a reality. Russia like China is a regional power, most countries surrounding Russia don't have the might of Russia, that's a fact but saying Russia can defeat NATO minus the US is total BS or you just being sarcastic which in that case, the jokes is on me

seunny4lif:
Choice you said yet left Turkey to the bear �.

Are you going to be serious or you just want to be laughing ignorantly. Pick one so I don't waste my time schooling you.
Turkey first enquired about the Patriot defense system but the USA refused to sell to them because of their provocation against Greece which is another NATO member and that's something that's frown upon.
They went an purchased the S-400 because they needed to beef up their defense systems. Got sanctioned by the US and deprived of the F-35 fighter jets. Now Turkey and US are in negotiations to come to a common ground. The Russian engineers that were in Turkey to operate the S-400 has been kicked back to Russia by Turkey. Read up so you won't have to be parading stale news

seunny4lif:
Abeg which state in the Baltic region can last 1 days with Russia.
You have never been to those places, I can see .
Do you know Baltic state under NATO has more Russians than anywhere
Lativa, Estonia and Lit 40% of their citizens are also Russians.
Just a bridge separated Estonia from Russia and a very small bridge.
Most people living there are Russians
Take USA away.
You think the French will go on war against Russia

No NATO MEMBER has a choice when one of them is attacked. I really don't know why you're laughing your ignorance.
Why do you think the same US is trying to form QUAD to contain China?.
Unlike like Russia alliance with Iran where they can choose to come to their rescue or not, NATO defense clause stipulate that once a member is attacked by an outside enemy, the rest of the member MUST come to its rescue.
Sure Latvia is no match for Russia but can it contain the might of the rest 28 members??

frankson1:
I just love how they are refusing to be bullied. The US would have invaded Russia long ago if they were soft.

These countries know what each of them are capable of doing and so they handle things with respect for themselves. They won't do more than just war of words.

Why'd the US invade Russia?? For what purpose exactly??

noisy45:
Most of you Nato and west boot and ass lickers underestimate Russia because of that CNN and BBC Russia stereotype they paint Russia and give you guys as back ward people with oboslete military equipment . Even Trump said it thatthe only country existing and that is capable of reducing the US to nuclear dust is Russia, the POTUS self didn't rate China. What does that tell you.

Dude do you even know what you are saying?? Russia has more nuclear warheads than any other country. Obviously it's a threat. But saying Russia can conquer Europe in one week that's pure BS.
Most of their warheads are ICBM. They are very easy to intercept, it's why they are rebuilding their SLBM submarines. That's the difference between USA and Russia, while Russia was busy parading their ICBM, US were decoupling theirs to fit into their submarines. One can be detected immediately it's launch and tracked all the way to its destination. A sub on the other hand can move close enough to the target but firing making it harder to intercept.
Saying CNN and BBC doesn't make you sound like you know what you're talking about. Read up before you come up with another blunder

noisy45:
Did you know Adolf Hitler luftwaffe air planes raided London with bombs like no other. No USA modern air raid like that of Iraq was close to what Hitler bombed London.

While Hitler was at the Eastern front, which country was raiding Berlin?? Atlantis??

noisy45:
Make research about Russia military capabilities not even Britain plus Germany plus Turkey can match the total number of armoured tanks Russia alone will throw at them. Russia alone has over 30,000 armoured tanks you think say uk can try shit with dem, Russia has the largest air fleet after the USA. You talk without making research. It will take Russia no sweat compared to Nazi Germany to conquer the whole Europe if the USA just sit down and look.

Please go and read on the countries that make up NATO, then add up their military equipments and gadgets and then compare it to Russia. How will Russia move their armoured tank all the way to land at Britain? Using the sea? The Royal Navy alone is already a formidable force on its own at sea. Through land? Most countries surrounding except the few that are loyal to Russia are all NATO allies.
Dude you funny.

Reference:
And how do you hope to end NATO.
NATO is presently the largest and most resourced military alliance in the history of the world.

The industrial and technological capacity of NATO States dwarfs anything any eastern axial alliance (Russia and China) can muster. Then they have powerful and resourceful allies in Japan, Korea and Australia in Asia....

Oga. Forget it. Russia and China at this stage are simply not strong enough in the factors that matter in a prolonged conflict.

The only hope is that being civilised nations, knowing the implications of a global conflict, NATO and western powers are thankfully the last people to opt for that end game.

thank you. They way some people reason will leave you baffled.

noisy45:
If Adolf Hitler committed the world war 2 resources he used on that offensive against Russia (USSR) London will be captured in one week.

Go and learn your history, Hitler wouldn't defeat Britain.