Emmynator's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Emmynator's Profile › Emmynator's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 (of 42 pages)
Neobulletzz:You have no idea what you are saying, if you buy benz, and it's not working, will you be satisfied with pakufa motto because it is carrying you to your destination? Won't you try to get the benz to work? Those players are investment, not playing them is wasting that investment, the board will never be content with that. Tuchel is just starting so he will be excused for trying to stabilise the team and increase our top 4 hopes, but the board putting pressure on him to play is a matter of "when" not "if". |
CaveAdullam:I have a friend who is red pilled to the core, even though he isn't involved in the manosphere. He knows the red pill principles from heart and experience. He is currently having a LTR with plans to marry, On this nugget, he said and I quote "women don't know what they want, if you want to cater for every whim of a woman, you can never satisfy her". I was interested in listening to him more on this point, so I asked him for practical insights on how he deals with requests from his fiancée. Here's what he said: 1. He doesn't give answer to her request immediately (even those that won't take him anything to do), the reason for this is to gauge the seriousness of the need. He said "women hardly think long term, they make request according to how they feel at the moment", so he uses delay to separate the wheat from the chaff. If she isn't persistent about it, then it probably wasn't important. 2. Make her used to rejection, he said she heard "no" so much that, she thinks twice before asking and gives more reason than "I just want it". So she doesn't bother him with requests that don't have reason to back it up. 3. Change it for her when she starts giving attitude because of rejection: she will surely try to use giving attitude to make you succumb to her, but man must warn sternly to put an end to attitude cause by rejection. 4. Give in to genuine and urgently important needs, one has to balance it by actually giving when it's absolutely necessary. I learnt a lot from this conversation. |
Griffon:Which league be this ![]() |
TheHulk616:She accused Johnny deep falsely, Johnny lost his contract with WB and disney, and Johnny countered with evidence that she domestically abused him. The court hearing will be on May. |
pu7pl3:I share your sentiments on Amber's shout facial beauty, I don't like Amber's face. Her body is OK, although her body type isn't my spec. I will still pick Emilia Clarke over her sha. |
Mortal kombat is getting the hype it deserves.
All over my status, I see it.
Every where online, I see it.
I hope WB don't mess this up. |
Skepticus:I get your point and agree with it, many of us here failed the test and are as culpable as the derailers. It's a challenge really, since our worst enemies are those who parade themselves as having the same goals as us, but have different motives. such events is even more dangerous to those are just starting their red pill journey, as they could easily be misled, this is one reason why I feel rebuttals to be important, so we can separate the wheat from the chaff, however when things starts going to the dogs, we should learn to refrain, as heated arguments often leads to a lot of impulsive statements that can be against our purpose. I believe we can only get better after these events, and I hope we can deal with such situations better next time. |
luminouz:@luminouz, I have been practicing over time and I have become better at the eye contact thing, I noticed a change in confidence levels as a result, I am still practicing as I can't hold for long, what I do now is stare for some seconds, take a break, then continue, like that till I am done with the conversation. Thanks for the tips that worked. |
Do not simp for virgins. I realise most guys once they meet a girl a virgin, and confirm it, they start simping for her, giving her a lot of head room and apportioning a lot of unreal trust to her. I say do not simp for virgins. Hypergamy is real, if you loose frame and stop vetting in a relationship, then you will meet the same fate as simps. A lot of guys disvirgined a girl, not knowing they were simply removing the milage, they gave her full access to LovePeddler around, while maintaining the chaste status with the guy. Not to mention unholy virgins lol, having all forms of sex without penetration. Authority: vet virtuously, no exceptions. |
For those complaining that we focus a lot on women in our discourse here, here are some points for you. 1). Look around, you are in romanceland. Romance has to do with relationships dynamics, which involves male or female. 2). Man isn't totally independent of woman, and as such he needs to understand female dynamics to get a better deal from females. Except he is a MGTOW monk, he needs to know how to deal with women. Even MGTOW monks, for large part their decision to go their way is a result of the deep knowledge of women. 3). There is no red pill without women, I don't know how that sounds to you, but it's the truth. The red pill started as a medium for men to beat women at their game, it was later this knowledge evolved into men deciding to win by not playing the game at all, so if you think it unnecessary to relate with women, at least respect the process that brought the red pill as you know it. 4). We all want different things, yeah, some red pillers are involved in spinning plates, red pill for some parts also have to deal with maintaining frame in a long term relationship. The difference is with the red pill we deal with women on our own terms. I hope with this few points of mine, I hope I have been able to convince you that we talking about women is not out of place. |
My understanding of AWALT, is that it isn't in terms of absolutes, but is a general consensus. For instance, the red pill highlights solipsism, hypergamy, whoring as female natural tendencies. AWALT means a woman isn't entirely free from either of these characteristics, a woman could exhibit low hypergamy but high degree of solipsism. Believing NAWALT, could be a recipe for disaster, as one who discovers a woman with low hypergamy, could label her a unicorn and make her the subject of his oneitis. AWALT teaches men to be on guard always and not loose frame so as to avert the risk of danger. If you are in contact with a lady, you have to observe what female tendencies she has in high degree and tailor the relationship to checkmate the said tendency, that's the red pill. There are no unicorns, some are just better than others. AWALT. |
So many emotional outbursts in the last few pages. I posit that this is due to inability to compromise on the part of both parties, cus both parties have raised valid points. But still the argument goes on and on. Mainly cause everyone wants to be right, but the truth is that there is no right or truth, just what we believe to be. Some truths are more factual than others, but then again these "factuality" is based on our perception of what is factual. Anyone following the arguments keenly will come to the conclusion that both parties can either be right or wrong depending on the context, and context they say is everything. I often found myself agreeing with both parties, in the sense of applicable contexts. Its for this reason I find the endless debacle pointless. If I understand Mrcoldsweat main point to be the fact that men are enslaved by the tag "man" (which is true), and thus man need to free himself from this shackles, the onus then lies on me to determine the extent to which I need to modify my masculinity (or perhaps my perception of it) to meet up with the current social dynamics and also fulfil the ultimate goal of self preservation. Although I will admit his position could be a double edge sword, in the sense that one who do not fully grasp his concepts could end up applying this in the wrong way. It could lead to a general loss of frame on the long run. The truth remains that masculinity remains different things to different people, and that some components of masculinity aren't meant to be changed, what components that is, is still up to personal interpretation. The red pill is a personal journey, not a social convention. Hence there is no need for endless arguments and banter. My suggestion is let everyone post his opinions and position, the onus should be on the reader to digest what he is reading and come to a conclusion on his own. If perhaps you disagree with it, you can highlight constructively the flaws you see in the argument and not personal attacks and jibes, with this healthy exchange, you are helping the manosphere better as those who are reading can have more insights and can be able to come to a better conclusion. Let peace reign abeg, there has always been conflicting beliefs on this thread, and there always will be. We should ensure that we don't end up destroying the purpose of the thread. |
Mrcoldsweat made some valid points, but he ruined it, trying to use those points to push an unrealistic gender equality schema. The thing is feminism have tried to colour gender to be what it's not, men are different from women at basic level, levels that have nothing to do with societal construct. Many idealism of gender equality is mostly based on the inherent belief that men and women are equal at the core, and that's a big lie. I believe the red pill to be a map that leads to many roads, and its left for one to take the road he feels to be advantageous to himself, since the red pill is all about a man putting himself first, but truth be told, so paths are counter productive. Gender equality will always remain an idea, inequality is durable, it doesn't end, it only turn tables. History has proven that those who fought against oppression and won, often ended up becoming oppressors themselves. Preaching that gender constructs (I call it constructs for lack of better term) should be abandoned is a double edged sword, it can give one the ability to do only what is beneficial to himself (which the red pill teaches), but it could also lead men to confusion, in the sense that he looses what makes him a man at the very core. We see in US, where gender confusion which is a result of feminism propaganda of equalism have led to disintegrating societal standards, less self confidence, higher suicide rate, divorce etc. Yes, men need to redefine what it means to be a "man", but one must redefine with the purpose of becoming a better version of himself. I strongly suggest not throwing away the baby with the bath water, but a man is (or should be) free to chart his own course, that's why we have game, mgtow, mra, and many more options for redpill aware men. It's only logical that one makes a choice that helps him in his immediate context and leads to satisfaction. |
Soulrebel2:Get in line bro. We plenty wey want am as mentor, lol. |
That was Werner's 10th goal of the season, with 9 assists that's 19 goal contributions, 9 penalties won. Not flopping like a flop. His first touch is still poor though. |
2emotional:Lol, calm down bro. Me and some guys were having this conversation, so I decided to post it here. Some people believe pep can use Sheffield to win world XI if world XI is coached by an amateur. |
You are coaching world XI.
Pep is coaching Sheffield United.
Who wins? |
Redpillers in the house, I came across "men are from Mars, women are from venus", is the book a massively blue pill book or still OK for red pillers? I actually need to start relating with women I will be involved with in a blue pill way but with a red pill frame, hence the temptation to read the book. |
CaveAdullam, you are truly a wise man, I wish I can become your disciple, lol. Abeg where the cave wey you dey get these inspiration from, make I tap small abeg. |
If you hear/see something, say something. Make we dey save ourselves abeg.
|
I was reading a chapter of the rational male book that exposed the female double standards in relation to criteria for partners. Ladies post stuff like, he must be so so height, have specific amount of money, handsome, kind, treats her like a queen etc, but once a man does the same, he is labelled a misogynist. Most of them don't even worth the standard they expect of their man, most of them have over bloated value of self, which is reinforced by simp who make average girls feel like a queen. Have a standard as a man, you are a king, don't go for just any woman, you too have the right to want a woman of a particular size, height, level of beauty, status etc. There is nothing misogynist about that, the female imperative must be overcomed. |
Trevor012:Phil foden Jack grealish James madison Jadon sancho Mason Mount. |
MSGAMBLE9:REST bro. ☺ |
TheHulk616:Guy, rest. You are trying hard to sound like a troll. You are an introvert, so you shouldn't be rambling about, you are disgracing us. Hope you are old enough to watch R-rated movies now? Deadpool 3 is coming out soon, I will hate if you aren't eligible to watch it. |
TheHulk616:I give up. One simple question, is abduleez1 a Chelsea fan? You can't evaluate anything, low level thinker. LowIQhulk616. |
Progenix:He is suffering from paranoia, every new moniker that quotes him is now a mystery to unfold |
pu7pl3:2016 with my other moniker. I and hulk have had numerous exchanges here sef, its seems he has short term memory. |
TheHulk616:Lol, for a acclaimed high level thinker, I am really disappointed in you. You also have short memory to add to your "high level thinking". Someone should please give this guy his clown certificate, I think he lost it. Clownhulk616. |
TheHulk616:Phewwww, some things never change, hulk is still a crybaby troll. Crybabyhulk616. |
I don't understand where some men come from. |
Chelsea faithfuls.
Can havertz be considered a flop so far this season? |
luminouz:A 20 year old girl with 20 body counts, is a young girl in an old pussy, lol. You sir, are a wise man. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 (of 42 pages)



Emmynator has been on this thread since 2017