ChristianNorth: Of late, I don't know what have been drawing me to this board. Before I am anti-Islam but now I am open minded.
I don't even believe it that I would abandon work and start researching on Islam. The funny thing is that I wasn't doing that to criticize it, but to be a bit open to it.
Once fantasied how it would look like being a moslem.
Someone once told me that you are the best moslem here, so I follow your post bumber to bumber.
Believe me, I was disappointed.
The first time I personally reached out to an Islamic Evangelical team, I don't what you guys call them but Christians call them missionaries. Instead of telling me what Islam is and why it is good for my soul. They were busy attacking Jesus in a bid to demarket him, misquoting scriptures to paint him bad.
I told them to leave Christianity alone and teach me Islam. They agreed but after few sentences, they started bringing Jesus into the discuss.
I told the guys "don't sale Islam to me by demarketing people's religion. Christians don't do that"
Instead of heeding to the advice, they started pulling links from newspapers about pastors in sex scandals in the USA. I was disappointed and I started pulling those of their imams.
I told them I am no longer interested, those guys threatened my life. I have not even converted yet.
I was in Lagos, few weeks ago. I was staying in our family residence close to a mosque. The Alfa or whoever was in charge was preaching but the only thing I picked up from what he was saying was "Jesus, Christians, pastors, tithe"
I don't understand yoruba, so I don't know the context he was using them but each time he mentions them, his people would shout "Allahu Arkbar"
Since I became active on this board, I noticed you are doing the same thing.
One common thing I noticed is that all you guys are Sunni.
I made a decision, if I am ever going to convert to Islam, I am going for Shia and Sufism.
Anyway from my experiences, the worst of Christianity is the best of Islam. I will rather stay with people I feel safe with.
Only Christians and Shiites offer me that level of comfort.
Back to our story, Hijab was a pre-islamic way of dressing for ancient Arabians because of their windy and sandy environment.
Same old trick you just used. I know how Christian evangelism works. That's exactly what you are doing. In Islam, from God's view, there is nothing like Sunni, Shia, Sufi etc. Islam is Islam. It is when you guys are insincere that's when you bring in sectarian nonsense. If you want to embrace Islam, you don't start talking about which sect is good.
And for your information, there is no way of discussing Islam without mentioning CHRISTIANITY, Judaism, Jesus, Moses etc. This shows that you don't understand anything.
I don't really need to appeal to you or anyone. If my posts are not satisfactory to you, the same posts have been commended by your fellow CHRISTIAN who became Muslim recently on NL and his parents have threatened his life and he had packed out and lives with friend. I won't reveal identity of the fellow.
Again, I didn't post anything on NL to appeal to anyone. A sincere reader doesn't need to get himself in sectarian dissonances. Islam is one. We talk base on the level of the one we are talking to. If discussion has nothing to do with other religion we won't talk about it. For instance, this threads https://www.nairaland.com/3633308/seeing-angels-malaika
We are not concern about other religion. But this thread and similar threads have something in common with CHRISTIANITY. So get your facts right next time before you jump the gun.
Yes, hijab predated Qur'an but Quran is complementary to all previous Revelations. This is why we have some things in common. How is this difficult?. There is no way to discuss some topics in Islam without making reference to Jesus or CHRISTIANITY. And making reference to Jesus is not abusive. No Muslim on Earth would abuse Jesus. It is forbidden in Islam to do that. Yet, majority of your fellow CHRISTIANs would call Muhammad(saw) all sorts of unprinted names but you came here to tell me I talk abusively about CHRISTIANITY. Point to me where I did so.
ChristianNorth: I have been active on this board and I have noticed that in every argument you would always find a way to smuggle christianity into it.
Can't you guys preach Islam without bringing Christianity into it?
FYI, Arabian lands are so sandy and windy, so both their males and females wear hair covering to protect against dust.
Sarah (wife of Abraham), Rebecca (wife of Isaac)Mary (mother of Jesus), Mary Magadelen (a female follower of Jesus) and Hebrew ladies wear hair coverings.
No as an act of modesty, but because of their environment.
Hijab is never a religious wear. Islam is an extension of Arabic culture.
You want to each me my religion now?. You said why did I bring christianity into this, then why do you think you are right?. Covering is in the Quran. Isn't your bible alluded to this fact?. Hijab is not cultural. What is cultural is what is subjective to culture. For instance, see the way our mamas in yorubaland dress their hijab compared to arab and other places. Why did those western women back in the days covered their head?
true2god: When does making a rational point become an 'emotional' response? It seems you are fasting and you need concentrate on it and stop making a frivolous claim. The fact remains that your quran makes no sense without the hadith, and the hadith is the compilation of rumors and gossips by a man, 250 years after Mohammed's death, who never saw Mohammed or any of his companions and this same hadith (rumors and gossips) are what you guys use in the interpretation of the quran. This is an 'expo' bro and try open your mind to a more critical reasoning free from religious dogma.
you are still emotional
You have strengthened my faith and led me to believe more the reason Quran said 'no soul will be unfairly treated Afterlife'. Tell me how you gonna plead innocent when you have already built evidence against yourself?
I know your write-up was emotional. Kpele true2god false2god. You are a definition of ignorance just by reading your first two paragraphs. I don't expect you of all people, someone who claimed to be learned but devoid of simple fundamental teachings.
I'm not interested in everything else you said. My only concern is this ayat below that refute you.
And We have not sent you, [O Muhammad], except as a mercy to the worlds. 21:107
“Blessed is He Who sent down the Furqan (The Distinction of right and wrong) upon His servant that he may be a Warner to the worlds;” Furqan 1
Say, [O Muhammad], "O mankind, indeed I am the Messenger of Allah to you all, [from Him] to whom belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth. There is no deity except Him; He gives life and causes death." So believe in Allah and His Messenger, the unlettered prophet, who believes in Allah and His words, and follow him that you may be guided. 7:158
Honestly I didn't need to have to quote anything knowing too well you are just deceiving yourself due to emotions which cloud your judgement. Maybe after you calm down you will rethink, retract and sober.
shadeyinka: The statement above was made by you not by someone else in a dead thread! You have been replied! Answer the questions asked or the issues raised and stop being an escapist!
i ignored your comment bcuz, after reading your first question, I realized your answer was in my post you commented on. So I wouldn't wanna waste my time over silly repetitive questions again. For this reason I decided to expose you to recycle threads where we already dealt with your concern.
Don't even take my silence for weakness bcuz ain't get your time. It is Ramadan. I'm tayad
shadeyinka: Why would you make up an untrue defence as if the people you are addressing don't have an iota of knowledge of Islam.
1. It is known that the Qur'an was written and memorized as soon as Prophet Mohammed was recieving it! Yes or No! 2. If your answer is YES, then, the Qur'an was memorized sequencialy as it was revealed. 3. Then it was impossible to reorder the Qur'an until the whole Qur'an was revealed. 4. The fact that at the compilation of the Qur'an some companions knew of some chapters and not all means that at the time of Prophet Mohammed, people just recited the chapters without any particular order. This was reflected in the compilation.
Arrangement wasn't by Allah else, the Al Fathia would have been the first revelation. You remember when it was reported vthat a tame goat ate part of the revelation. This wouldn't have been possible if it was memorized according to a certain rule.
When Ibn Umar—son of the second Muslim caliph—heard people declaring that they knew the entire Qur’an, he said to them: “Let none of you say, ‘I have learned the whole of the Koran,’ for how does he know what the whole of it is, when much of it has disappeared ? Let him rather say, ‘I have learned what is extant thereof’” (Abu Ubaid, Kitab Fada’il-al-Qur’an).
Hear what imam Muslim said:
Sahih Muslim 2286 —Abu Musa al-Ash’ari sent for the reciters of Basra. They came to him and they were three hundred in number. They recited the Qur’an and he said: You are the best among the inhabitants of Basra, for you are the reciters among them. So continue to recite it. (But bear in mind) that your reciting for a long time may not harden your hearts as were hardened the hearts of those before you. We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara’at. I have, however, forgotten it with the exception of this which I remember out of it: “If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust.” And we used to recite a surah which resembled one of the surahs of Musabbihat, and I have forgotten it . . .
This shows that entire chapters of the Qur’an were forgotten. If this is true, how could there have been an arrangement!??
this is just like recycle topic. We dealt with these stuffs long ago and I wouldn't wanna waste my time
Go through these threads. They have useful informations. You will read provocative posts that challenges your religion.
Allah revealed the Qur'an but Muslims re-ordered the Suras in a random manner! Allah revealed the Qur'an but Muslims allowed a tame goat to eat part of it (incomplete Qur'an) Allah revealed the Qur'an in at least 7 Arabic tongue (dialects): But Muslims deleted all but one.
What kind of editing could be more serious than BURNING all versions and circulating a single "palace version" for all by Muslims. It's called destroying Evidence!
The present arrangement of the Quran is not the work of later generations, but was made by the Prophet, peace be upon him (p), under God’s directions. Whenever a chapter was revealed, the Prophet (p) summoned his scribes, to whom he carefully dictated its contents, and instructed them where to place it in relation to the other chapters. The Prophet (p) followed the same order of chapters and verses when reciting during ritual Prayer as on other occasions, and his Companions followed the same practice in memorizing the Quran. It is therefore a historical fact that the collection of the Quran came to an end on the very day that its revelation ceased. The One who was responsible for its revelation was also the One who fixed its arrangement. The one whose heart was the receptacle of the Quran was also responsible for arranging its sequence accordingly. This was far too important and too delicate a matter for anyone else to become involved in.
sagenaija: Don't be too quick to respond to posts.
Take time to understand what has been posted.
unfortunately you don't tell me when to post I am always ahead of you because I knew and I already dealt with this subject 5yrs ago.
The Bible has its ORIGINAL manuscripts. It is from these that KJV, RSV, etc are translated. The English of KJV may differ from RSV but the messages remain the same.
It is not so with the Koran that was only out together in the last century. Mohamed never wrote the Koran. It was supposed to be RECITATIONS; right? Why were several copies of the recitations burned after Uthman used his accepted fragments to compile a copy?
I have said earlier that I really don't have problem with translation sometimes. That's not the big issue with the Bible and that's not my concern here. Discrimpancies or distortions of the Bible we are talking about is by way of expunging some passages and inserting something different. Sometimes translations themselves are not tandem. Some passages are missing from, for instance, GOOD news Bible but you still find them in other Bibles etc. This is what I'm talking about.
I wanted to save my time that's why I posted this link before. Help yourself
sagenaija: Empire, the guy said: “My major problem with the bible is the many many MAJOR REVISIONS of the original "BOOK"”
Revision means amendments, modifications, changes, etc.
The question is ‘How has he proved this?’. He just listed great grandfather, grandfather, etc write up and you immediately bought into this? If his great grandfather wrote a book and the subsequent generations revised it how EXACTLY did this same apply to the Bible? Who first wrote what and who revised what? Where is the logic in his argument? Are you so shallow as to just accept ANYTHING just because it is against your opponent?
Is the Genesis of the Catholics different from that of the Protestants? How does additional number of books by one party amount to changing the rest of the collections?
IF there were anything wrong in the Bible how does that make Islam right? How does that make the CONTRADICTIONS, SCIENTIFIC ABSURDITIES, HISTORICAL ERRORS and GENERAL LACK OF ORDER of the Koran justified? A book Allah had in heaven before Mohamed was born which could not be arranged in any logical order; and that is a god? A book where a god PRAYS for his subject? A book where a god makes supplications to himself? A book that takes other books to be understood and yet claims to be CLEAR?
EMP.IREE, it is not a matter of copy and paste. Christians are NOT afraid of scrutiny of their book or attack on their position. Shadeyinka has pulled out what you think is a MAJOR BLOW against Christianity by that man. Already the loopholes are showing up. So, just because a man says something against Christianity does not make it correct. It has to stand up scrutiny. Just believing it means you are not thorough in looking at things. Maybe that is why you are in Islam.
I know you guys are ignorant of your bible for real but i am quiet reluctant at this point bcus we have already dealt with this issue 5yrs ago. Malvisguy is well aware of this. But allow me to drop a point from RSV which rebuked KJV of various contradictions and distortions. On the preface of RSV, it reads:
"The King James Version has grave defects. By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as to call for revision."
Ponder on this for a while. i have a lot more but i am not just interested in this right now. You can check preface of RSV made this claim. I also read KJV sometimes ago condemned RSV as well. Distortions are so obvious to everyone except you and your like. So if RSV claims that KJV has defects, then, that can not be from God. This is definition of defect;
a shortcoming, imperfection, or lack. "genetic defects" synonyms: fault, flaw, imperfection, deficiency, weakness, weak spot/point, inadequacy, shortcoming, limitation, failing, obstruction;
sagenaija: You need to understand this: The Bible in its original languages has remained the same. So, the analogy or whatever he was trying to make is IRRELEVANT. NO ONE has changed the original Hebrew manuscripts. NO ONE has changed the original Greek manuscripts.
Translations may be made by different bodies at different times in history. But the originals REMAIN the same!
Sometimes it appears that one needs to repeat and repeat and repeat before you guys get a simple issue because you have bought into a propaganda that has STUCK into your heads no matter what.
Empi.ree, do you now get it?
No, this is not the case. There are different bibles with difference missing pieces if messages. If you want examples i will post them at your request. For a quick review, Catholic contains 73 books. Protestant has 66. Who missed or who added to bible?. This alone places question mark on veracity of the bible
shadeyinka: Do the needful! Why do you think every imam of repute has deamed it fit not to touch the ancient scripts of the bible and translate?
FEAR!
Fear of the truth!
shaking my head. looks like you dont research. There are pastors who went to jerusalem on ministry mission. They were introduced to Greek Library and they wen through and found old manuscript bible which mentioned Muhammad. The pastor converted to islam. His name is Pastor Matthew Oyewole. He exposed how Britain, Israel and US funded christian evangelism in 1990 to end islam in by year 2000 but their mission failed.
shadeyinka: It's a lie you want to believe anyway! But until Muslims translated the Bible into English themselves to show us the discrepancies, distortions and lies: they should keep their mouths permanently shut!
Quran already did that for you and we have told you countless times
shadeyinka: That is exactly what contemporary Islam is preaching as if the bible is "English".
Anyone including you can decide to translate the bible from the original languages into any language you are comfortable with. No one will stop you: even as a Muslim, if you want your own translation, you have access to the original manuscript to use.
Unfortunately, as Muslims, it takes a Christian to reveal to you that over 120 English translations of the Qur'an exist AND some of them has done a few editions ( the same offence you ascribe to the bible, if you need Evidence, I'll gladly provide).
There is no tribe under the sun that doesn't have the bible in their own language. That is beautiful because everyone can interpret the plain words according to how their conscience move them from the position of KNOWLEDGE and not IGNORANCE!
Do Muslims have the Arabic Quran translated into other languages including English? YES! Do some of these English translations have several Editions? YES!
So, what's your point?
Cc: Emp.iree
see why you didn't understand everything we have been saying?.
The guy didn't talk about translation. He's was talking about MAJOR REVISIONS. He even put it in block letter for you to see but somehow you failed to read correctly.
We have no problems with translating Bible to different languages. Major revisions to the Bible means DISCRIMPANCIES, DISTORTIONS & LIES
Enuoyan: My major problem with the bible is the many many MAJOR REVISIONS of the original "BOOK". Just look at it this way....
My great great grand father wrote a book Then my great grand father made some major revisions And my grand father also made his own major revision My father made his own major revision And I made my own revisions
At this point in time, this book is no longer my great great grand father's book anymore, because everything he said in the book has been completely altered.
This is how I see bible as of today
thank you. You used very reasonable analogy. Maybe he and his buddy, sagenaija will understand better now. When we said Bible is distorted this is exactly what we meant.. You perfectly analogized discrimpancies of the Bible
Excel70: Salam alaykum brothers and sisters in the house What is the ruling and punishment for one who breaks his or her fast intentionally in ramadhan
walaikum salaam.
I hope you do understand that this is a major tenet. Abandoning it is kufr. Intentionally breaking fast without valid excuse attracts kafara - 60 consecutive days of fasting.
true2god: It is like anything that conform to Islamic culture and religion automatically retain 'part of religion of Abraham'. Meaning that Islam is, to Muslims, a standard for all other cultures and religion. [s]This is a supremacist mindset which fuel extremist views and often leads to terror.[/s]
shaking my head. This is Quran, a REVELATION for God's sake not Hadith. Hadith is where Arab culture crept in. Since Quran is UNIVERSAL for ALL MANKIND AND JINN, Commands therein are for all people who embrace it regardless of tribe, race, color, ethnicity, nationality. Some cultures or traditions may bend the rules to fit their culture. Nothing wrong with this because Islam recognizes cultures as long as it doesn't stand in conflict to it. This is not supremacists but religious fact. Talking about supremacists, didn't your CHRISTIAN colonial masters force their ways on Africans?. Now they wanted to try it again but were busted. Watch this few minutes British attempt to invade Africa again
No way. Not again. This is 21st century not stone age. I remembered growing up in primary school. They would distribute that little terrorist manual called new testament Bible in schools. They tried their efforts to no avail. They would make us sing those silly Christian terrorist hymns every morning assembly. They would tell us at lunchtime to pray to muhammad and Allah for food. After praying for 5-10 mins and no food, they would tell us to close our eyes and pray in Jesus name and said to open our eyes.
By the time we opened our eyes, these crazy people already put plates of food on our desks. After we opened our eyes, they said Jesus answered our prayers but Muhammad and Allah don't. This fraud. This fraud is what gave birth to modern CHRISTIAN stupidity in churches today by faking miracles. Our eyes are open now. All these frauds they committed against us Muslims were painful but had little to no effect on many of us. Guess who funded this madness?. The so called Abrahamic faith aka Judeo/Christian from international community. They failed woefully with all their devilish plans.
The Japanese' Shintos, the Chinese Buddhist and the Indian Hindus have nothing to do with the Abrahamic faith and their religion has been in force thousands of years before Islam, Judaism and Christianity. How can these religions retain the religions of Abraham when they existing long before the Abrahamic religions?
Do I need to teach you this all over again?. That Islam was the first and only religion that came with the first creation, Adam?. Therefore, these religions you mentioned were fabricated to corrupt message (Islam) sent to them. The least you could have said was that Quran came after these religions.
The Abrahamic faith is the exclusive belief and views of the Judaeo-christian world; the Muslims just attached themselves to 'The Abrahamic faith' for legitimacy in the west. You said the christian world is the most indecent part of the world but you have forgotten that the Muslim world is the most bloodletting, intolerant and oppressive part of the world. The christian world, according to Muslims, is bad but Muslims are hustling to relocate to the so-called christian world in their millions and over 60 million Muslim immigrants are in western Europe now and more are still coming. The US, being geographically lucky, has fewer Muslims bcause of the distance from the Arab/Muslim world and yet Muslims want the US to open, and relax their immigration policy, their border for easy entry. If the Muslim world is so good, Muslims wont be rushing to relocate to the society they so much despise. What an irony!
Aponle ni tapa... Hausa ni Hausa nje we dey respect you for saying "Abrahamic faith". There is no such thing. If you say there was such a thing called "Abrahamic faith", abeg, which of the two religions did Abraham practice?. Don't tell me both religions because that would be hypocrisy but Abraham was not hypocrite. His religion was Hanif (pure Islamic monotheism). Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian but a true muslim.
The nonsense called Abrahamic faith was nothing but bogus attempt to hijack Islam. As for other nonsense you talked about on immigration, I am glad you said Western nations are CHRISTIAN Nations which make them guilty of slavery following their Bible. Maybe you should ask yourself why they "migrated" to Africa in the first place to steal their resources?. History tells us that 30% of Africans on slave ship were muslims and forced to convert to CHRISTIANITY.
Maybe you need educational course on forced conversions of muslims.
After CHRISTIAN West stole their resources and ran off, they built their nations on stolen Muslim goods and they are still doing it in the middle East and Africa in 21st century. These CHRISTIAN terrorist Nations can't stand on their own the moment Africa and middle East countries get their act together. They would collapse like remote demolition. They always hide behind 'terrorism'. This is camouflage. This is what France did under Nicolas Sarkozy by sending military to secure his country interest in Mali few years ago yet, it is telling the world that the locals who were trying to take control of their land are terrorists.
It is clear that Judeo CHRISTIAN world is a terrorist ideology that is driving mankind to destruction. Abeg, me no get time for argument or debate. It is Ramadan
We shall be conducting quizzes of between 6 to 10 questions or more in this thread before Ramadan is over. However, this will be made possible if there are enough participants. In sha Allah, we are increasing number of participants to 7 this Ramadan.
ikupakuti: There is a misunderstanding here! I knew those shildren would display their nuisance here if indulged. Thats why I didnt want to share any personal story here...one bat from no where will just open his trap & call you a liar.
@LadunaI, @empiree was right, partly though. @emekaRaj‘s affair as I came to realize later on from his subsequent posts is not just KASHF but what is called in TASSWOF as التصريف في الكون thats an authourity to interfere in the affairs of the universe. The KASHF is just a bonus. Even in WILLAYA, such position is a lofty one reserved only for the big cats, b‘cos the rigor that comes with carrying such responsibility no be here, you need to measure up. Some WALLIY are born some are made. The issue with those born like that of @emekaRaj is that they are usually disguised & they continue operating even after death.
I was with my Sheikh of blessed memory around ‘05 and an old woman begger came looking for alms, imediately he sighted her he said to me “do you have any money with you?“ I said “yes“ & gave the woman some, after she turned, he said “do you know who that is ?“, I said “no“ he said “thats Sheikh ... (ra), go and greet him properly“ I went & search everywhere but couldnt find him/her, he said “I know you‘d never find him“
They are like special agents of God just like the angels, designed & assigned to carry out specific operations & equiped with befitting powers to do so & like he had stated, the signs are usually evident from birth.
@emekaRaj, I can relate with the story of that boy.
Do you guys remembered that Quranboy bore by a christian mum in Lag around 2011?
When I saw the news then, I was like WHO IS THIS ?
I promptly got to work, using M.A & numerology to scan through his datas, what i saw blew my mind. If I were a rasta, I‘d say he is a re-incarnation of the holy prophet (s.a.w). The precision in their natal datas is just too much & other aspects too. Sometimes God does override any of his laws to show his awesomeness.
Question: Some people have said that they feel a degree of apprehension in the heart when they sit down for muraqaba. Can you shed some light upon this?
Answer: Actually this is not apprehension but a natural uneasiness that comes with starting anything new, but this goes away with time and experience. For example, a new driver is extremely scared, a fear compounded by the pressure of having an instructor next to him. The new driver fears every car that races past or toward him from the opposite direction, and clutches the steering wheel for dear life as if the car is going to run away. Moreover, he tells everyone in the car to be quiet so he can concentrate on his driving, and he gets mentally and physically exhausted after a mere half an hour of driving. This same person can tolerate more time behind the wheel the more he drives and actually begins to enjoy taking long drives. In exactly the same way, a person feels the same kind of uneasiness and tension when he first begins muraqaba. However, with time and repeated sittings of muraqaba, this tension turns into joy and the heart looks forward to drowning in the remembrance (dhikr) of Allah subhanahu wa'tala.
In the heart lies the image of the Beloved Look inside whenever you wish
Hijab is an Arab word which also confirm the the people and race from which the fashion emanates. The Japanese women, till date, still put on their traditional dress called Kimono which covers women from head to tow (no face covering though) and they never make a noise about it or try to forcefully culturally export it to other part of the world as an instruction from their Shinto God.
Every race, from time immemorial, have a peculiar dress pattern that appeal to their environment and culture. Arabian land is sandy and windy and nature makes it compulsory for their men and women to cover their hair so that winds don't carry sands into their hair and at times eyes. And this has always been the practice hundreds of years before Islam; it is part of Arabian culture among the pagans, Jews and Christian women in the Arabia.
The issue we now have is the appropriation of Arabic culture into Islamic culture which makes it look as if hijab is an Islamic dressing. Go and study the origin of the 'hijab fashion'. The problem the modern world has with hijab is its use for identity politics among the Muslim ummah all over the world. This identity politics, using the hijab, was not available as at 10years ago; it is a new trend which seems to have been agreed upon my modern Muslim. Hence all over the world it is always the official dress codes against the Islamic hijab. Here in Nigeria, it is the school uniform against the Islamic hijab. In France and Germany, it is the Islamic hijab against the schools and the larger society.
The modern hijab has nothing to do with religion but identity politics for easy identification of Muslims women from the kafir women. In Iran and Saudi Arabia many women are now in jail for failing to put on their hijab. Hijab in these countries are not by choice but by force.
Whatever you say, pal. For as long as hijab made its way to Quran, it becomes part of the religion whether it is wajib, fard or mustahab it doesnt matter. What you mentioned about Japanese even Hindus, Sikh etc means they retained that part of religion of Abraham(as). Since Islam has always been religion of God from day 1 mean hijab was always worn prior to advent of nabi Muhammad(SAW).
Interestingly, 'mother of your god' had hers on. So modern christianity deviated from modest ways of dressing. They are the most indecent people on earth today bcus even traditional people across the globe still honor hijab. They can call it different names it doesn't matter. The only two forms of christianity that i respect are orthodox christianity and Amish in the sense of mode of dressing. But this modern christianity(which is majority, which you and many nigerian christians belong) is driving mankind to their total destruction. BUt you are all still guilty of shirk whether protestant, orthodox, Mennonites, catholic etc.
true2god: The Torah and the Injil are also products of medieval Jewish society. If I say medieval, I don't mean to say the books are bad because it seems you have already conditioned your mind to stereotype anything the word 'medivial' is attached to, and you see it as an insult to use the words 'medieval' and 'quran' in the same sentence. I believe you are mature and equally have a good grasp of what I mean but chose to play into Islamic gallery. We sometimes hate hearing or telling ourselves the truth.
no. You are now panelbeating your statement because I mentioned Bible. I am not a fool. Na today I know you?
This^^ dealt with the issue too. They've all shy away from it.
But then I must confess that you really had time to go in circle with this guy. He's obviously a time waster. Lol
You see, they dont understand definition of God. If they do, this guy would not be comparing witnesses to adultery and witnesses to God's Miracles. If they truly understood meaning of God, they would know God is not bound by any laws even His Laws.
For instance, He requires 4 witnesses to adultery. This becomes a legal case. If a witness account conflicts other 3, adultery case is automatically dismissed even if adultery actually took place. Only God knows that. He doesn't need eyewitnesses for Himself. Sufficient is Allah as witness over everything. Witnesses are only for humans and Jinns. God is not bound by Laws.
If he understands this post, he would know this post is not meant for rilwayne but himself bcus i simply don't want to quote him. He is annoying.
This^^ dealt with the issue too. They've all shy away from it.
But then I must confess that you really had time to go in circle with this guy. He's obviously a time waster. Lol
Abi na. I was trying to make sure the message is conveyed so that he doesnt have excuses in the future. Yet, he still asked. This is very shameful. I am actually waiting for sound christian to see if they would understand better. I thought malvisguy would do better but unfortunately, he joined shaku shaku christians. Let's wait to see if credible christian would come forward and understand better. I am done replying his silly question.
shadeyinka: You don't need to be abusive! Islam accused Christians!
Simple question was asked Islam!
Islam couldn't answer or had no answer!
Yet Islam is angry that her accusation was even contended against!
Even in Islam, accusation of Adultery required at least two other witnesses for the accusation to stand. You remember the hadith about those who accused Aisha of Adultery? What was their punishment? Even Islam takes false accusations grievously!
You are shaku shaku christian. Let's wait for brilliant christian if they are very understanding. Your case is closed now.
true2god: The Quran, the hadith and the seerah are products of medieval Arab society.
I need not read further. Abeg, if they are medieval products, i wonder what Bible is.
You are very delusional. This is 'Mary' drawn by christians. Keep living in denial. You need to decide which side you on. Those who drew rhe picture understood definition of Hijab. Tell us now, Mr true2god false2god that you dont believe in mother of your god. This way we know where you stand.
Or if Mary was here today he would dress in bikini or skirt to church?. smh..you watch 'God' and sinning right before him. Fantastic
You are duly answered. To you is your religion. To us is ours
I think you need serious mental evaluation. This is probably 6th time or more you repeated this silly thing. It is getting annoying. We understand our religion far better than you do. And i leave you with this verse Quran 2:18