₦airaland Forum

AlBaqir:
Any correlation between An-Nisa 24, Al-'Aĥzāb 52 and Al-Mu'minūn 6?. These verses seem to be talking about same thing. Isn't ? If mut'ah literally means "enjoyment", this so far doesnt legalize temporary marriage. I was thinking you would link it with 'malaka Yamin' which i will explain my view later. As for those defending Misyar, i need you to give definition and explanation of it before i say my view on that and the view of Saudi women. Hope our Sunni brothers here will come forward to explain to us.

chinedumo:
you call this the full hadith?

So who are the believing women?

malvisguy212:
mr interlingent,you havent answer my qustion.why the quran dint mention this important prophet of God,isaiah?
I only chose to answer you on this one. No more. I said earlier that there were as many as 124k prophets sent to the world. Only 25 mentioned in the Quran (the most important ones) by name. There are others also mentioned in the Quran only described as prophets but their names are not mentioned. Meanwhile, 5 are more powerful out of these 25 prophets, Allah selected 5 most powerful prophets with solemn covenants mentioned in Sura 33:7
"And when We exacted a covenant from the prophets, and from thee (O Muhammad) and from Noah and Abraham and Moses and Jesus son of Mary. We took from them a solemn covenant;"

[s]Abraham smash the idol of his father but muhammad join his family in worshiping idol,infact he was in the cave of hira praying to idol when his allegdly calling,even the hadith prove it,the way of worship in islam is the same way pagan worship there gods.[/s] this is rubbish

alexis:
I wanted to respond to a thread I saw where our Muslims brother were claiming Jesus was a Muslim; unfortunately I couldn't because to respond to a thread on the Islamic section - you have to agree that you are a Muslim . Incredibly isn't it.

So, can anyone explain to me how Jesus was a Muslim - also, please back it up with examples

Rilwayne001:
Another Mumu..

Joshua 24:2 Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, 'From ancient times your fathers lived beyond the River, namely, Terah, the father of Abraham and the father of Nahor, and they served other gods .'"

LMAO

malvisguy212:
Muhammad is not a prophet because he has a pagan baground,all God prophet ,non of them has a pagan in there family ONLY MUHAMMAD HAS,WHY? Why will God violate his principle of chosen a prophet by chosen a. man from pagan baground?

limamintruth:
Yes they are

limamintruth:
Yes, i made reference to apostle Peter because ur beloved Rilwayne quoted a biblical verse abt Peter's statement.
[s]And you were the one who deviated the OP's post, not me. So blame urself for that. Its obvious u do brothels dats y its the 1st thing u cud think of; issokay.

The Holy Bible is not ur business since u dont believe in its content, [/s] so kindly concentrate on ur Quran et al.
Peace.

limamintruth:
Sorry for my late response cos my vry busy daily schedule makes it difficult to spend quality tym here on nl.

Now back to ur post, i want u to know dat i really appreciate d way u hav suddenly metamorphosed into a believer of d Holy Bible's New Testament verses, lol. But i jst hope u did study d entire chapter u quoted completely sha for a better understanding of Apostle Peter's message there.

Back to the issue, Apostle Peter, in Acts 2:25-36, did refer to King David as a prophet for d sole reason that David is one of the few men of old to whom d prophecy of d coming of our Lord and . Saviour Jesus Christ was revealed. All these is explained by the Apostle in verses 25-36 of chapt. 2 (Acts). The term 'prophet' there was used by Peter specifically for clarity sake because Peter knows that so much respect n honour is accorded to the David by d Jews; as such he cited d examples of David (amongst others) to prove to d Jews that Jesus is indeed Lord.

Furthermore, kindly note that apart frm David, there were other different men(and women) of God in days of old to whom "prophecy" was revealed, but who were NOT prophets still. Prophethood is a calling, however, there were indeed men of old that communed wit God directly & prophecies were directly revealed to them, but are not prophets and were called by God to be (or to serve him) as Judges, Leaders/kings, Priests e.t.c. E.g Gideon (Judges 7:2-, Miriam (Exodus 15:20) and others.

So mallam Rilwayne, i still stand by my earlier submission that King was not a prophet; as such, he isnt included in d order of d old Testament Prophets. The prophet that served God during his time & reign was Nathan; alongside Samuel.
David's primary call (by God) in life was to be king over Isreal (His people) [1 Samuel 16:1-13].

limamintruth:
@empiree, hmm its now clear to me dat u ar nothing bt a confused islamiyya student pretending to be scholar.
Its good u called ur e-warriors to assist u because d way u'r going is to say d least, pathetic.
All ur long epistles are utter b.s, sorry to say. I dont bliv in ur Quran one bit so anythin u quote frm there makes no sense to me as a christian. Nevertheless, i'v read d Quran myself many tyms over, so i know wot its all abt.
Bt because of d respect i hv for oda pple's religious beliefs, i wont want to condemn ur holy book by harshly critiquing it. Peace

And congrats on ur self acclaimed victory @empiree (lol). D last tym i checkd i wasnt in any competitn wit u, but to xpose all ur false doctrines here. So winner empiree, congrats for showing us all hw clownish u are, lol; funny dude.

Let me add also dat Jesus is God and no body (not even ur nl islamic e-warriors or ur best ulamas) can prove otherwise. So u better concentrate on hw best to repair d damaged reputatn of ur beloved prophet M instead of spreading lies on nl.

malvisguy212:
i told you to give me verse were this names where written,this are the major prophet of God,why the quran dint mention there names?they are the ones that prophecies the birth of jesus.

The verse you qoute is wrong,dont you think it wrong to mention the name of the two sons of abraham? [s]God has no convenant with ishmeal,both the quran and bible prove it[/s].

malvisguy212:
so you mean someone change the word of God?david was a king.did the quran mention the following prohet.elijah,isaiah,jerimaiah,ezekiel,elisha,amos and the rest?

limamintruth:
@empiree i wont blame u for ur beliefs in this respect because its obvious u ar only saying wot ur Quran tells u. Thus i wont be surprised sef, if the Quran's annabi Daud & Suleiman are different frm the Holy Bible's Kings David & Solomon.
So no need trying to force ur belief down our throats.

limamintruth
;Dlolzzzzz
@empiree, are u sure u properly read my initial posts b4 replying at all? Kindly go back and reread my last post properly pls.

No one condemned Kings David & Solomon; they were men who knew God & obeyed His instructions. However, they werent perfect; at such, there were times they made mistakes. And which ever way God choses to judge them is not for me to decide.

Christians RESPECT & HONOUR these biblical figures for the outstanding things they achieved as leaders and the virtues they exhibited in their lifetime (one of which is: King David was alwys quick in seeking God's forgiveness whenever he erred (as can be seen in 2 Samuel 12:1-17).

Nonetheless, King David & King Solomon are not Prophets pls. They were leaders/kings who knew God & worshipped Him. Note that not being prophets does not & will not stop them frm making heaven; so why then are u desperately trying to portray them as such?

And since you are being disrespectful towards the Holy Bible by alleging all sorts of theories that it has be tampered, may i remind u that ur hadiths did confirm that after d death of ur prophet muhd, there existed different versions of the Quran as memorised & compiled by different islamic scholars during that period; which prompted Caliph Uthman to establish what he termed 'the standard version' of Quran & that is what y'all muslims use now. So in essence, i wont be wrong if i say the present Quran is partly Caliphs Uthman's creation. So my dear frnd, u better remove the GIANT LOG OF WOOD IN UR OWN EYE FIRST B4 POINTING UR FINGER AT UR NEIGHBOR'S EYE.

In conclusion @empiree, David & Solomon were not prophets, but they were good men who served God in their positions as kings & leaders and we christian respect them n also learn alot frm them too. So all ur prophethood arguments are irrelevant n unnecessary since its not only prophets that wil make heaven & not being a prophet doesnt automatically mean one is a candidate of hell fire.