Emusan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Emusan's Profile › Emusan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 (of 399 pages)
MaxInDHouse:You! |
MaxInDHouse:Example If someone is doing something before but later felt it's wrong and changed what do you call that?The fellow has Repented. So, have you repented? |
MaxInDHouse:Simple question you can't answer. So, tell me what it means. |
MaxInDHouse:Why is your blood high? |
MaxInDHouse:CJStar copy that |
Truthseeker10:So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
MaxInDHouse:But he has the right to do anything against you after those serious warning. |
Truthseeker10:So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
MaxInDHouse:And you and your brothers do engage in it. Now forming saint ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:I'm only saying what the PERSON SAYS. Or you want to lie that he has never told you to STOP QUOTING that post. At least you have others which you can still be using for your proud mind, just respect his wishes. |
Truthseeker10:So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
MaxInDHouse:Where did I agitate? Are you not the one complaining about someone using abusive words which it HURTS YOU SO MUCH? ![]() So you can prove to be a true Christian not by hurting people with your words but by building them up! Colossians 6:4I've done that in still doing it. I don't need the praise of men. |
Truthseeker10:So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
MaxInDHouse:He said HE DOESN'T LIKE IT. Can you respect his wishes? Hypocrite! |
Truthseeker10:So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
Truthseeker10:So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
MaxInDHouse:Smile....you think everyone is a proud person like you. Remember, one of your deluded brothers gave a standing ovation for my post. Do you know what that means? so he wants me to stop using it to torment you but that's if you will behave otherwise what i have earned from him cannot be undone.He openly said JE DOESN'T LIKE IT and has even have a change of mind. But see the lie you're pulling to continue in your arrogance. ![]() |
Truthseeker10:So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
Truthseeker10:So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
Truthseeker10:Do the first assignment first. Since "The God" is not in the Diagram and the kjv English translation, tell me the possible grammatical error that can occur by adding "The God" to the kjv English translation.I've even clarified that I DIDN'T ADD ANYTHING TO THE KJV but you are still vomiting this lie. Already answered! So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
Truthseeker10:Swear that I never answer your question and I'll provide the screenshot here. This show you don't know what you're doing. Since "The God" is not in the Diagram and the kjv English translation, tell me the possible grammatical error that can occur by adding "The God" to the kjv English translation.Already answered! So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
Truthseeker10:I've told you the possible grammatical error, the assignment for you is to go back to my previous posts even the one I posted this morning. You'll find it there. Stop taking us backward. This excuse won't save you because you know you're already out of your own POV. So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
Truthseeker10:There's no question you asked me that I ever dodged. But you do boycott my questions which sometimes I'll just overlook it. So, a failure is the person who turn a blind eyes to questions My proof from my Diagram can only be presented when you show me "The God" in the Diagram and the kjv English translation.If not that you lack comprehension, I've already said this countless times. There's NO "THE GOD" IN THE DIAGRAM AND KJV Why do you so empty upstair? And when you tell me the possible grammatical error that can occur by adding "The God" to the kjv English translation.I've told you several times. You're just going in circles as a confuse being. So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
Truthseeker10:I've told you several times. If you don't answer my question then, you have failed already. So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
MaxInDHouse:Even one of the people you keep quoting has WARMED YOU SEVERAL TIMES TO STOP DOING SO. What does that tell you? |
MaxInDHouse:But you boast yesterday! And everything I said came to pass not even up to 12hrs ![]() Didn't you change your mouth now? Hypocrite! |
Truthseeker10:So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? I am following your grammatical accuracy and correctness.Explained multiple times. So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? |
MaxInDHouse:I don't need to convince them, I have plenty evidence. |
Truthseeker10:Your eyes went blank on this. So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? My point is exactly how the king James put it. There is No "The God" in the king James English Translation.Yes! I never disputed that there's "THE GOD" in KJV. You said it might be so for Grammatical accuracy. So why are you putting what is not there?Where did I put anything in KJV? I never even quote any translation, you brought KJV issue and I made POV on it. Now, you're accusing me of PUTTING WHAT IS NOT IN KJV THERE as if I rewrite the whole KJV. What Grammatical error are you making by adding it?Explained countless times I see "God" and not "The God" in the king James version and I stick to it for grammatical accuracy according to youBetter, now let turn your own question around. Can the word(God) be with God? According to that diagram of yours |
Truthseeker10:I'm smart before thank God I'm not trying to be daft Show me "Being" in the Diagram.No being in your diagram. So, what do you want to proof from that diagram? So explain the Grammatical accuracy that you alleded to.....The grammatical accuracy is that the word WAS GOD not a god! What Grammatical error are you making by adding The God to this discussion that we are having in English since the Kjv does not add it in its English translation?I've said I use "The God" for explanation purpose. To clarify that God which the word was with is different from God who the word IS. What is your point exactly? |
Truthseeker10:Useless question. You already lost in the midst of your own diagram. Below in the screenshot is the reason you said that kjv did not add "The God" in John 1:1.Gosh..... The @underline shows you're a liar and low in comprehension. Your screenshot shows I used "MIGHT NOT" yet see how you put it up. O ma se oooo |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 (of 399 pages)

