Emusan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Emusan's Profile › Emusan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 (of 400 pages)
MaxInDHouse:This is how you'll know you have quack interpretation of God's word. If Jesus said ONLY THE FATHER KNOWS means The Father is a person and Holy Spirit isn't a person, then remember Jesus and ALL THOSE WHO DIDN'T KNOW can't be PERSON. ![]() Remember Jesus personalized WISDOM {Luke 7:35} God's word personalized other lifeless things.There's nothing that makes a being to be PERSON that the scripture didn't apply to the Holy Spirit. A being is regards as a PERSON because of: 1. The have ability to KNOW 2. Have MIND 3. can REASON 4. Speak So saying Holy Spirit is not a PERSON is pure lies against God and His word.
|
MaxInDHouse:This is why people like you FAILED IN EXAM. The term FIRSTBORN isn't about human given BIRTH in this context of Col 1:15-18 but about POSITION/RANK Why this simple English is so hard to comprehend for you? |
MaxInDHouse:That is why I rehearse that logic to you people. The Father KNOWS to you it means The Father is a person But the same scripture says The Holy Spirit KNOWS and to you it means He is not a person. Very whacked and dubious logic ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Firstborn is the point here! It means PREEMINENCE. If Chief Obafemi wasn't the FIRSTBORN of the family and he was CALLED the FIRSTBORN it means it's not about being BORN but RANK/POSITION. This is very clear from the point of Col 1:15-18 |
Jozzy4:In your own logic only The Father KNOWS makes the Father to be a PERSON But Holy spirit KNOWS the very mind of God shows Holy spirit isn't a PERSON. If Jesus didn't know, that automatically means it's not a person.. Can you imagine... ![]() |
Jozzy4:God the Son isn't a Position! O ma se oooo The Title God the Son is to show Jesus was FULLY GOD AND EQUAL TO THE FATHER. |
Jozzy4:The Father knows the Day and Hour. The Holy Spirit knows the very MIND OF GOD. You haven't disagree with that. |
Jozzy4:Yes! He got the Title 'SON' during His mission on earth. Can you just accept there wasn't God the Son or trinity before Jesus came to earth ?God the Son is also a Title. Reason I said, you don't understand the discussion you jump into. Jesus is The ETERNAL WORD OF GOD. |
MaxInDHouse:NOTICE THE KEY WORD: being BORN not being CREATED The two words are different! |
Jozzy4:That was because you don't understand the discussion you jump into |
Jozzy4:Holy Spirit is a person and He KNOWS THE VERY MIND OF GOD! Only then you will understanding why Jesus said ONLY THE FATHER KNOW. |
MaxInDHouse:No! He is the Creator. FIRSTBORN is preeminence The FIRSTBORN of anything means the first to be created through that source!Only you know why you change FIRSTBORN to first to be created ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Good! Human is the one the term FIRSTBORN always applied to. You yourself take Jesus as NOT HUMAN that is as someone who exists somewhere before he was BORN as human. So, the term FIRSTBORN has ALWAYS BEING ABOUT HUMAN not NOR HUMAN. Logically, if Jesus existed somewhere before being BORN AS HUMAN he can't be called FIRSTBORN as someone who was FIRST GIVING BRITH TO AS HUMAN, the only logical way the term FIRSTBORN was used for Jesus will be PREEMINENCE which Col 1:18 specifically TALKED ABOUT. Any understanding of FIRSTBORN than this is a corrupt/fraudulent interpretation. |
Jozzy4:The Holy Spirit knows the VERY MIND of God. So, why won't He know the Hour and day? |
MaxInDHouse:FIRSTBORN is different from FIRSTCREATED Firstborn is used among human to mean human can give birth NOT CREATE, you can never say your father CREATED YOU. Firstborn is used among RULERS to mean HIGH RANK, FIRST POSITION, PREEMINENCE E.T.C The writers of the New Testament know the two words exist yet NEVER USED the word 'FIRSTCREATED' for Jesus Christ. And Col 1:15-18 expressly shows that The firstborn used for Jesus IS ABOUT PREEMINENCE not as being BORN AS HUMAN. Simple English! |
Jozzy4:Jesus became 'SON' for His mission on earth how is that hard for you to understand? If Jesus never come to earth for man salvation He won't have had the Title SON. Col 1:15-18 already proved that Jesus is the CRRATOR. A CREATOR can't be CREATED. |
Jozzy4:He was Son of God and FIRSTBORN when he became part of creation. This was the point Col 1:15-18 addressed. Every occurrence of Son in the scriptures was applied to peope with beginning.The Father is also THE BEGINNING don't forget. That is why no such word is ever applied to the Father at any point in history.Liar! The Father called Himself THE BEGINNING. Beginning of what? If I may ask? |
Jozzy4:No! He is the creator according to verse 16-17 Among all things and personalities created, he is the First.He created ALL THINGS! He can't be among ALL THINGS again. |
Michael547:According to New World Translation. If you see from any where Jesus used the name Jehovah bring it! I am waiting!
|
achorladey:Actually, I don't have it but I think it's from the same Matthew Poole's or Geneva Bible. That is why you see them just screenshot the little part that suits them. |
You actually paint it as it should be. Even Paul himself explained why Jesus is called FIRSTBORN. In verse 18 "Christ is also the head of the church, which is his body. He is the beginning, supreme over all who rise from the dead. So he is first in everything." Key note from this verse is that: 1. Jesus is called THE BEGINNING Just as God called Himself the Beginning 2. preeminence is @underlined |
Janosky:First of all, this line of your delusion isn't new to me. Secondly, Watchtower is a product of Seventh Day Adventist which means they actually copied that doctrine from them. Lastly, this reinforced my point that NOT ONLY WATCHTOWER has the truth. In fact, the best caption here will be 'Watchtower simply copied the TRUTH OF TRINITARIAN' ![]() |
Michael547:What is the meaning of ARCHANGEL? Where in the New Testament Jesus was the only one called ARCHANGEL Michael? |
Michael547:Even the TRINITARIAN never said Jesus was called ARCHANGEL in the New Testament. You can only see their comments on Dan 10:13 So. What is the meaning of ARCHANGEL? Where in the New Testament Jesus was the only one called ARCHANGEL Michael? |
Michael547:What is the meaning of ARCHANGEL? Where in the New Testament Jesus was the only one called ARCHANGEL Michael? |
Michael547:You both are brothers as well and have the SAME TRUTH. Where is in the Scripture Jesus was called only ARCHANGEL Michael? |
Michael547:You don't know their address to go and ask them? At least you can't deny that they have the TRUTH. Since you're still in fight with the TRUTH. Just provide where Jesus was called ONLY ARCHANGEL MICHAEL IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. OR HAVE YOU LOST YOUR BIBLE? |
Michael547:TRINITARIAN HAVE THE TRUTH IS THE KEY WORK. Where did scripture say Jesus is the ONLY ONE EVER CALLED ARCHANGEL MICHAEL? |
MaxInDHouse:Default mode! And the funny thing is how you people thought your comments of wonderful thread, nice thread is doing this thread a huge favor without knowing you are actually causing more damge. because you don't have idea of how search algorithm works. ![]() |
achorladey:You can even imagine the nonsense coming from such empty brain of self acclaimed elder. |
Michael547:Yes! It's the truth from the scripture. If you are in doubt. Provide where Jesus was called ONLY ARCHANGEL in the Scripture. Wow what of the believe of your fellow Trinitarians that Jesus is Michael, is that Jesus truth too?TRINITARIAN HAVE THE TRUTH ACCORDING TO YOU. QED. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 (of 400 pages)

