₦airaland Forum

Aemmyjah:
I'll create a new thread and acknowledge you and publicly say I'm a liar if you show us where 30 people were shot

Aemmyjah:
Are you a liar
If not, back up your claim even if na fake news website, that 30 people were shot

Aemmyjah:
Boy
Show where 30 people were shot or killed or anything

Aemmyjah:
If you think I'll ever support you over my brother, you're really fooling yourself

Show us the source of where 30 people were 'gunned down' or remain a miserable,envious ,little lying boy

Aemmyjah:
I did that
Rest boy

Aemmyjah:
We respect the authorities
They took acknowledge us
We don't insult them
Protest against them
Use hate speech against them or abuse currency

Paul did not fight wars but when he heard that opposers were planning to kill him on the road as they even swore not to eat or drink as he traveled to making an appeal, they sent some soldiers to guard him

You're just too unreasonable

Aemmyjah:
quote

Michael547:
Watchtower never said that spirit don't leave the body when a person dies.

We have said that the spirit in man is the same as 'the breath of life' in Genesis 2:7. The spirit is not the person as shown in Psalms 146:4 in the screenshot below.

Where does Job 32:8 shows that the spirit in man is different from the breath of God in that same verse?

You are a liar. You've said here that spirit and soul that goes to hell don't 'need' to go to God 'in heaven' before going to hell fire. And I have asked you where you got that interpretation from?

You are a fraud to say that versions that uses spirit in Ecclesiastics 3:19 is wrong. What is the Hebrew word for spirit? Explain why different versions use spirit and breath in Psalms 146:4 in the screenshot below?

Michael547:
😁😁😁.....I agree that all 'spirit' of good and bad people returns to God who lives 'in heaven' as Ecclesiastics 12:7 shows.

Oya answer my questions before we proceed.

So Why are you saying that some spirit and soul do not return to God 'in heaven' before going to hell fire?

Which other bible verse shows that God created man and put 'His Spirit' in man that is different from the 'breath of life' in Genesis 2:7?

If you say the spirit of man and Animal is different, explain Ecclesiastics 3:19 in the screenshot below?

Michael547:
Which other bible verse shows that God created man and put 'His Spirit' in man that is different from the 'breath of life' in Genesis 2:7?

If you say the spirit of man and Animal is different, explain Ecclesiastics 3:19 in the screenshot below.




Oga you are giving an interpretation of spirit and soul returning back to God in Ecclesiastics 12:7 according to your personal opinion.
If you said and agreed that both spirit and soul of good and bad people return to God who lives in heaven, why are you trying to twist the meaning According to your opinion that some soul and spirit do not need to get to God in heaven before going to hell fire?
Where are you getting this interpretation from?

Michael547:
Please identify what the spirit of man is in Genesis 2:7.

Do animals have spirit?

If yes, do their spirit differ from that of men?

You have no proof that the spirit and soul does not 'need' to go to heaven before going to hell since you've agreed that all spirit and soul must return to God who lives in heaven. It's just your personal opinion.
If you don't agree then Which location do the spirit and soul return to God before going to either heaven or hell fire?

Janosky:
Other youths are filthy Casanovas. iniquities is their norm not exception.
"Their churches have lost the glory."

Nah JW's write those screenshots evidences?

Aemmyjah:
Envy will kill that small boy
😂

Janosky:
Emusan LYING miscreant.

Bring the evidence of 30 people that died in your head.

Michael547:
But you agree that God's spirit appears in Genesis 1:2.

Is God's spirit in Genesis 1:2 the same as the breath of life in Genesis 2:7 that generate life in both man and animals?

You are a very dubious man😁😁😁....

So because God can operate more than the speed of life

he revealed to you that the soul and spirit do not 'need' to return to him in heaven before going to hell fire?😁😁

I agree the spirit which is the life force in man and animals returns to God at death.

Michael547:
Oga holy spirit in Genesis 1:2 is the active force of God used for creation.

The 'breath of life' in Genesis chapter 2:7 Is the spirit that generates 'life' in both humans and animals.

Oga how do you know that the spirit and soul do not 'need' to get to heaven before God acts on it since you agree that they return to God who lives in heaven?

Michael547:
Oga the spirit of 'life force' is different from the holy spirit. The spirit of life force can also be referred to as breath in a man or animal.

You are very dubious😁😁😁....you have said that every spirit and soul returns to God who lives in heaven.
So how do they not get to heaven before going to hell or don't they return to God again?
How do you know that they don't need to get to heaven?😁

Michael547:
Watch tower teaches that the spirit is the life force which operates in humans and animals and that it is not the person. So a person does not exist after death.

So you areMO saying that Every spirit and soul first gets to heaven before going to hell, right?

Michael547:
Yes the spirit which is the life force goes back to God.

Now answer my question.

Michael547:
I don't understand.....The spirit and soul goes to Hell fire after going to God in heaven?

Michael547:
Yes.

And you said the soul is inside the spirit.
So which soul and spirit goes to hell fire?

Michael547:
Lol....so which soul and spirit goes to hell fire?

Michael547:
So when everyone dies, their spirit and soul returns to God?

Michael547:
Soul nko?

Michael547:
So where does the soul and spirit go when a person dies?

MaxInDHouse:
Ọmọ people throughout the earth knows!

cathodekazim:
Obingoes are really illiterate and kinsmen with zero IQ. A man was said to have seizures and couldn't be saved because of the remote area but see them displaying their stewpidness and low reasoning capabilities

jaephoenix:
The Bible is a book adored by Christians. It has been found to contain a lot of errors, lies and contradictions and thus not a reliable book. I made a thread about it here, in case ya'll wanna check it out and debate on the points there. Unfortunately for Christians, the gaffess were so many, and they could not come up with any defenses.
But in this thread, I'm gonna concentrate on the creation story, cos a Christian challenged me to(Just like another christian challenged me to open a thread about the bible errors and in the end he never gave any defenses). The errors are so much that I have to take them in parts. So this is only Part 1

What are the factual errors in the Genesis creation account?
There are several errors, since it’s a creation myth based on the knowledge, superstitions and misconceptions of the people who wrote it, just like any other creation myth. Let’s consider just some of them:

1. Duration time for the creation. This is the first considerable problem. Genesis says that, from the early stages of the earth’s formation to the dawn of man, only six days passed, which is obviously wrong. We know this whole process took about 4 billion years.

Many apologists try to solve this crude mistake by declaring that the word “day” has a more vague meaning, such as six general divisions of time. We don’t know this, however, and the whole context of the story seems closer to 24 hour days (for example, we constantly read “And the evening and the morning were the first day.”).

2. The order of creation days. The order in which the creation events happened in the bible and the true geological and biological evolution of the earth are completely different. Some examples follow:

a. In Genesis 1:7 it says God divided the waters above and under the firmament. The only logical way to interpret this “firmament” or “heavens”, is the atmosphere, where water in vapour form is stored and eventually falls as rain. If this was done in a subsequent stage of the earth’s formation (day two), we would expect that the amount of water vapour in the atmosphere should increase over time. We however know that the exact opposite happened, as carbon dioxide and water vapour were partly replaced by oxygen.

b. In Genesis 1:11 it suggests that plants were the first form of life to appear, what is obviously wrong. It also suggests that plants and animals appeared in different times, what we know not to be true. Last, if compared to Genesis 1:16–18, it indicates that plants came before the sun, which would be impossible since sunlight is a fundamental ingredient to the process of photosynthesis, which is how plants produce their food.

c. In Genesis 1:16–18, as discussed before, the sun comes only after the plants appeared on the planet, which is obviously absurd. Some apologists try to save this by alleging that the sun already existed but wasn’t visible until the fourth day, since the earth’s atmosphere was thicker. First of all, the atmosphere was already transparent enough to see the sun when the first plants appeared in the planet. Moreover, the organisms from which plants evolved had already “invented” the process of photosynthesis and hence needed a substantial amount of sunlight. Finally, there are several studies who show how a plant’s growth is deeply affected by an increased period of cloudy days, and so it’s absurd to suppose that big trees and others could have appeared in a time of thick atmosphere, where the portion of light entering the planet was so weak that the sun wasn’t even visible.

d. Genesis 1:20 and 24 suggests that flying animals came before land animals, which is just wrong due to the fossil and DNA knowledge we have.

3. Magical elements. Some apologists argue that the creation myth in Genesis has a special status, since it’s much more “sober” in terms of reality than the creation myths of other religions. First of all, what matters is the truth. To construct a fable with elements closer to reality doesn’t change the fact that it is a fable. Secondly, the fact that the Genesis account seems less mesmerizing than others is just because the israelites followed monotheism (or at least monolatrism), and hence their creation story was devoid of the many struggles between gods that commonly take place at the beginning of other myths. Finally, it’s important to remember that there are many magical elements surrounding the Genesis story: the book of Revelations talks about a war in heaven between a dragon and his hosts and an angel and his hosts; Genesis itself, just a few pages afterwards, talks about talking serpents, magic fruits and a universal flood that occured just because God was in a bad mood with humanity

jaephoenix:
2. I can show you screenshot of the Christian that challenged me to do the thread. His name is Emusan. Check his profile and his posts and you'll see it. And u owe me an apology for insinuating otherwise

SALLYBERRY01:
What did you use to design this

chatinent:
I'm irreligious rn.

SALLYBERRY01:
GOD HAVE MERCY