Engineerboat's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Engineerboat's Profile › Engineerboat's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 (of 273 pages)
BERNIMOORE:One Party System!!!!!!! Ko le work. No wonder Oshiomole the Life Pension Gomina keep ranting on Air and abusing everybody just because he want to seek for favour from PMB |
Ajibel:What happen to verification of facts. Just any topic about Apostle sulaiman, just at the click of submit, its already on front page (whether right or wrong) This does not look healthy |
Whatever their aim is, still it will not, 1. Make people forget that Nigeria is currently bleeding 2. People are getting tired of all this ding-dung noise just on one man. 3. Dollar keeps rising everyday. |
Its very surprising how they keep creating thread on Sulaiman this, Sulaiman that. What are they trying to achieve. So much noise |
comos:Tnk You. The recounting will be after the defense of all the respondents |
This marks thr end of todays sittings. Tribunal resumed back on wednesday 15th March 2016 when the 3rd Respondent (APC) is expected to call in more witness to defend the election of Governor Obeseki Godwin. |
Counsel to the 3rd respondent raised a motion that their case be adjourned till Wednesday 15th of March 2017. In his ruling the judge, adjourned the sitting to resume on the 15th day of March 2017. |
The 4th witness Mr. Daniel Ogudo, a businessman from Ekpoma in Esan West LGA, he is been cross examined with exhibit PO 4(1,6,7,8 ). Kemi Pinheiro (SAN) asked the witness if he Was there when results of unit 5 ward 4 was entered into form EC8A, the witness responded by saying l wasn't there. Would you be surprised that in the entire Ward PDP is only challenging result in unit 5, Yes or No? He said am surprised. Kemi - Do you agree with me that PDP won and defeated your party in your ward resoundingly. His answer was No but when He read paragraph 16 of his deposition, it Was stated that PDP won in his ward resoundingly. The judge discharges the witness. |
The 3rd witness Mr. Francis Akpedi (3RW12) a public servant from Agenebode in Etsako East LGA, he is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 4(44). Kemi Pinheiro (SAN) ,asked the witness to confirm exhibits PO 45-54(ECBA), PO 4(41 50) and PO 3G, please confirm these are the results of all the units in ward 2 in your LGA, is it the results entered into form EC8A to ECBB to ECBC, yes or no, the witness said Yes. Kemi - The actual used ballot papers in your entire ward is 29,901 while the total returned votes is 31,914, where is the difference of 2013 ballot papers? He replied, I don't know. |
The 2nd witness Mr. Maliki Fatai (3RW11) a businessman and politician from Igarra in Akoko-Edo LGA, he is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 4(2). A. Oyeyepo (SAN) counsel to the 2nd respondent told the witness to be showed exhibit PO 197(9) item 756, that is you on the voters register the counsel asked he answered Yes, Was your name ticked, Yes, was it ticked to the left or right? To the left and not to the right he replied. Kemi Pinheiro (SAN) asked the witness if he still stands by paragraphs 12,13,15,17,18 of your deposition, the witness answered, I will haye to see the document, Kemi - I suggest to you that the actual ballot papers used in ward 2 was 3,894 and not 4,161 declared by INEC, I don't know he said. Kemi - The actual used ballot papers in your entire ward is 40,199 while the total returned Votes is 39,630, where is 569 ballot papers? He replied, I don't know about those figures. |
the 1st witneess Mr. Oladele Ebenezer (3RW10) a farmer from Ibilo in Akoko-Edo LGA, he is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 4(4). During cross examination by Onyinye Anuwonye counsel to INEC, the deponent affirmed that the entire process of accreditation and voting was done properly as reported by his polling unit agent under his supervision as the ward collation agent and also that there was no omplain of improper and lack of accreditation and over voting. In addition, when it was time for A. Oyeyeo (SAN) counsel to the 2nd respondent to Cross examine, he was given the voters register used in his polling unit to confirm if there was any tickings besides his name he answered that he can only see just one ticking to the right. Kemi Pinheiro (SAN), gives the witness exhibits PO 4(4), PO S(1) to confirm why the total ballot papers used is 5,052 while the total votes returned is 4,985 leaving unexplained 67 ballot papers unaccounted for. This question was vehemently objected by A. Akintola (SAN) but after a brief debate between Kemi Pinheiro and A. Akintola (SAN), the judge in a short ruling said the witness already wrote in paragraph 73 of his deposition that he confirmed that all the results are correct and accounted for, so counsel to the petitioner can Cross examine the witness concerning his earlier statement in his deposition. Back to my question, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN) said ,but in his response the witness affirmed that the result is correct. |
After much delay and deliberations coupled with network issues, We are back again on the edo state governorship election tribunal. Good afternoon |
S.L Akintola (SAN), informed the court that they have exhausted their witnesses list for today,so he prays the court adjourns sitting till tomorrow. The judge just adjourned sitting till tomorrow 10th March 2017. |
The 9th witness, Mr.Charles E.Osagiator, a businessman and politician, Oredo LGA, he is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 4(78). In the course of quizzing the witness, he said he isn't surprised that his party didn't train him with any INEC document and that he isn't bothered. |
The 8th witness, Mr.Enogheghase Johnson, a farmer from Agbonmwonba Village, he is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 4(78). During cross examination, the witness was asked if he isn't surprised that his party didn't train him with any INEC document for example, the INEC 2016 manual his response was that he isn't surprised at all. Asked if he used the INEC voters register to produce his deposition, he answered Kemi Penheiro (SAN) added, so your statements in paragraphs 13,16 & 17 of your deposition wasn't based on any INEC manual or Voters register? But before he could answer, his counsel raised an objection that the witness be shown his deposition so as to identify those paragraphs, Kemi Penheiro (SAN) did by asking the witness to read out those paragraphs to the hearing of the court, after he executed that task, he was referred back to that same last question and he said "It was based on INEC documents" this answer threw the court into great laughter. |
Sorry for delay since. Na network hooo |
The 6th witness (3RWO6), Mr. Omoruyi Eboehi Samuel from Ovia South-west LGA. Did your party train you with any INEC document? Witness - No. Your party trained you that accreditation is important? Witness- Yes Sir, Are you a staff of INEC? Witness - No sir, Kemi - So can you tell if there was any complain to the INEC official present at your poling unit? Witness -I was there and lI saw everything that happened. Please answer my question Kemi Penheiro (SAN) went further to ask, he said I don't know my Lord. Kemi - Did your party train you on ticking on the voters register, in accordance with INEC manual 2016? Witness - No I wasn't. Kemi - Did you observe any tickings in your unit Witness - I observed. Kemi - Please show the witness exhibit PO 271 (1) item 794, page 51, Confirm that there IS ticking on your left side of the voters register of your p paragraph? Witness - No Sir. |
The 5th witness (2RWO5), Mr. Osadolor Odumamwen, resides at 7 Uwa street off Mission road, Iguobazuwwa, Ovia South-west LGA, he is a businessman and farmer. Kemi Penheiro- Were you present in all units, he said No. So you didn't observe any tickings in the Voters register in unit 18 and 19? Witness - I didn't observe them because I didn't go to those units. Kemi -But in your paragraph 17 of your deposition you said there was nothing like Over voting, do you still stand by that statement? Witness - Yes. Kemi - Did you observe the voters register? Witness - No sir, am not an INEC official. Kemi Penheiro - Did you witness the INEC polling unit officer ticking the voters register? Witness - Yes. Kemi - Show him exhibit PO 269(1), please confirm that on the left of your paragraph, item 736, page 47, if there are tickings to the Jeft? Witness - No ticking |
When the Srd witness (3RWW02) was asked what was his name he said Nigeria Edo state ,when asked again he said he was Sunday Eguasa , a clergyman from ward 10, Ikpoba Okha LGA. Kemi Penheiro (SAN) - Which polling unit did you vote? Witness - Ward 10. Unit 10 You know accreditation is very important? Witness- Yes sir. When asked when he signed his written deposition, he said he signed on the 6th of November 2016, which was a Sunday. Kemi - Did you visit units 16-307 Witness - No l didn't Kemi - So because you didnt visit those units, you don't know what transpired there? Witness - I don't know. |
The 2nd witness Mr Charles Otasowie Adenomo (3RWO2) , ward 6 collation agent, a farmer from Ikpoba Okha LGA. When Counsel to the petitioner Kemi Penheiro (SAN) asked whether he was trained by his Party with INEC manual 2016 he answered, ,No. So because you weren't trained with the INEC manual 2016, its clear that you don't know what Over voting means? The witness said I don't know. Asked if it will be correct to say that because you didn't visit other polling units in your ward, can you tell if you saw proper accreditation. his reply was that l don't know because l didn't visit other units other than my own unit, so l can't tell. |
Kemi - You agree accreditation is a must before voting? Witness- Yes sir. Kemi - Do you also agree that if accreditation isn't done, the election in that polling unit will be invalidated and deeclared void? Witness - Yes sir. When he was asked by P Penheiro .(SAN) to confirm that his name was ticked during accreditation by the INEC official, he answered yes he did tick. Penheiro (SAN) asked the witness to be showed exhibit PO 318(13). item 23, page 3, that is your name, please confirm how many tickings are besides it, his replied was, I don't know. |
The 3rd respondent (APC) commenced their defence today after the usual ritual of introducing counsel to all parties present in court. The 1st witness was ushered into the witness box by counsel to the 3rd respondent S.L Akintola, Mr Charles Otasowie Adenomo (3RWO01), ward 6 collation agent, a businessman who resides at 72 Uwa street_Benin City, ikpoba Okha LGA. During cross examination by counsel to both the 1st and 2nd respondents, the witness told the court that there was proper accreditation and the voting process went Wel But when it as the turn of the Counsel to the petitioner Kemi Penheiro (SAN) to cross examine the witness the story changed, When asked to confirm to the tribunal that all APC agents were not trained with the INEC manual 2016. he answered, we weren't trained at all, Asked if it will be correct to say that both you and all others trained by your party do not know anything about voting process and accreditation. His reply was that i dont know. |
Good Morning. We are back again at the Edo state governorship Election Tribunal seating in benin city. The 3rd Respondent (APC) begins her defense today. Stayed tuned for more updates Good morning |
ComrTonwa:Dead you mean. 1. Gombe just finished LGA election, what is the result 2. Rivers state concluded election (Ask for the score abeg). so APC led government need, SARS Commanders, Army, Police and ABUJA to slug it out with dead PDP. 3. Taraba State just held a LGA election (Ask for the score) Mr Man. Its better you don't comment at all than saying what you dont know |
ComrTonwa:Are you sure. Can the dead be giving the living a turf time at the tribunal. is it the dead party that is making Obaseki Witness and counsel to dey contradict each other ni |
BERNIMOORE:haahahahaha. No break my ribs abeg. Seems your visitors are on break. Just be at alert they are having meeting already. in addition just get ready for 1. Re: Who are the BMC on Nairaland 2. Who is BERNIMOORE 3. The Past lives of BERNIMOORE Just get ready |
Updates continue on Thursday March 9th, 2017. for those abusing me, please continue to say what you like. its a free world. |
Justice Ahmed Badamosi adjourns sitting till Thursday, 9th March 2017 for the commencement of the 3rd respondent's (APC) defence. |
The case of the 2nd respondent is thereby closed the ,judge ruled |
This was accepted by counsels to both the 1st and 3rd respondent but objected by the petitioner who added that it will be debated during their final addresses, Justice Ahmed Badamosi admitted the evidence as exhibits 2WR54 and 2WR55 respectively. Ken Mozia (SAN) ,"we thereby move that our defence be closed since our 10 days just elapsed" |
Counsel to the 2nd respondent Ken Mozia (SAN) just tendered from the bar ,certified true copy of INEC approved guidelines and regulations for the conduct of the 2015 general elections and a copy of it's official receipt issued by INEC to the court. . |
The 5th witness (2RW70) is Mr. Adams Ozimede Andrew, a teacher from Uzairue in Etsako West LGA, he functioned as the ward collation agent for ward 10, to be cross examined with exhibits PO 4(60) and PO 64(1-16). During the cross examination by F. Orbih (SAN) , the witness was asked I accreditation is done using the voters register, Do you agree he went further and the witness answer was "I don't know" Counsel to the petitioner to the witness, have you ever seen the witness deposition? No, the witness answered. Have you seen the endorsements of the voters register for your units in your ward at anytime before today? ,the witness answered "No". Do you agree that there can be cases of over voting from the voters register? The witness said he disagrees because he is not INEC. Orbih - Show him exhibits PO 235(1,2,3) of the voters register from his unit were he voted, are those the voters register? He said " I don't know" You voted in unit 3, so check if there are tickings to the left? The witness said "I can see tickings but I can't tell where it is". The witness is then discharged. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 (of 273 pages)