Engineerboat's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Engineerboat's Profile › Engineerboat's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 (of 273 pages)
BERNIMOORE:They will soon come here to mark Register. You just hold your biro and be at alert |
BERNIMOORE:B-uhari M-edia C-entre Hmmmm there functions is to.......... Agents are everywhere...................... Fill in the gap............. abeg |
The 3rd witness (2RW68) Mr. Hillary Ozogo, from m Owan East LGA. He is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 4(57), .PO 98(1-17). Can over voting be determined by comparing the voters register with the entries in form ECBA, F Orbih (SAN) asked. The witness said yes he agrees. Did you see the endorsements on the voters register before your deposition was written. The witness answered that in paragraph 18 of his deposition, the information that formed his statement was gotten from his polling unit agents |
The 2nd witness (2RW67) after the replacement mounted he witness box. He is Mr. kheafe lghodaro Dennis, from Otuo in Owan East LGA. He is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 97(1-17). Counsel to the petitioner asked the witness if before his deposition he had seen the Voters register from his ward, he replied No my Lord. FOrbih (SAN), again asked do you agree with me that before you can determine over Voting you must have seen the voters register, i repeat do you need the voters register to determine over voting, he said No. He was also given exhibit PO 299 (6,5 & 10) to identify if they were the voters register used in your ward which he supervised, he confirmed, yes my Lord |
Confusion sets in for the 2nd respondent (Obaseki) as they just withdrew their 2nd Witness for today, we need to present our most important witnesses, O. Oyeyepo (SAN) pleaded, apologises my Lordship he added |
spartan117:The 3rd Respondent will still call its witnesses |
After the usual introduction by counsel to all parties, the 2nd respondent (Obaseki) who 8W be closing their defence today, commenced the defence of their case with The calling of their first deponent into the witness box Mr. Igbinijesu Cookey Nosa (2RW66), a businessman from Ward 9 in Egor LGA were he functioned as the ward collation agent. He is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 23(1-19). During cross examination, after he was showed Exhibit PO 21 (1,9,10,11& 16) by F Orbih (SAN) to confirm the documents, counsel to the 2nd respondent objected this move on the grounds that the said witness didn't handle Form EC8A but EC8B which he signed as a ward collation officer. Responding, Chief F. Orbih (SAN) told the court that this I issue shouldn't dragged by A. Oyeyepo counsel to the 2nd respondent but that on the 7th of February 2017, your lordship earlier ruled in favour of the petitioner concerning this issue, he referred the judge to paragraph 15 were the witness deposited that there was over voting in his Ward so going by his statement, he needs to test the veracity the deponent's claims. He also added that in his paragraph 10 he also stated in his deposition that he received all Polling unit results from his PU agent, so my lordship I in order not to shutout justice, may I be allowed to continue with my cross examination F, Orbih asserted. Counsel to INEC Mr. Anumwonye Onyinye objected to the cross examination by the petitioner on the grounds that he wasn't the maker of the said document. Chief F. Orbih (SAN) cited section 215(2) of the evidence act, which he said doesn't support the submission and contentions fie the 1st and 3rd respondents having regards to the evidence the witness has earlier sworn to. He also argued that if the 1st respondent is saying that because the witness isn't the maker of the document he shouldn't be cross examined then that particular section of his statement should be expunged from his deposition since he isn't the maker. O. Oyeyepo (SAN) prayed the court not to allow counsel to the petitioner go on with asking his witness questions concerning the above subject matter because it lacks competence. This argument has lingered for over 2 hour and 15 minutes, but in a short ruling, Justice Ahmed Badamosi upheld the objections of the 2nd respondent. |
Good Morning. We are back at the Edo state governorship election tribunal. Obaseki the 2nd Respodent is expected to close his case today after seeking for adjournment last week wednesday. Stay tune for more updates. engineerboat |
PenisCaP:The recent released girls.where are they now. Has any media been given opportunity to interview them. Is the government giving updates on their reharbilitation. Your answer will be as good as mine |
omenka:What are you saying man. How does this affect Baba Iyabo the author of rascality Democracy |
TonyeBarcanista:I dont know what Baba is looking again. PDP dont need him again. The rot he created in PDP is been cleansed. So He should waka comot jare |
Myd44 Kare hooo. Are you sure your comments come from your heart or a rhetorical statement |
Obasonjo the man that left PDP just because he want to have his 3rd term agenda. Do we even neef to remind Baba Iyabo that his relevance is if no use again |
HardMirror:And your point is. Must you mention peoples name to drive home ur point |
Tribunal Adjourned till Monday for the 2nd Respondent (Obaseki) to close their defense. |
Owonikoko (SAN) counsel to the 2nd respondent told the judge that they are opting for an adjournment, we have called 65 witnesses so far and we need to reappraise the level of our defence till Monday. We don't want to be working and calling witnesses without focus. We need to put our house in order, My lord it's important for us to appraise ourselves and in order to know where we are going. In the light of the above, we want to move for an adjournment to Monday, the 6th of March 2017. We are willing to forfeit two and half days of the 10 days given to us by the Tribunal. After no objection from the petitioners and 1st and 3rd respondents counsels, the Judge adjourned siting to Monday, the 6th of March and also admonished the 3rd respondent to endeavour to open its case on Tuesday. |
Here is a twist to the 2nd Respondent (Obaseki) Defense. |
The 3rd witness (2RW65) Hon. Ifedayo Esheshi, a businessman from Okpella , Etsako East, he is cross examined with exhibit PO 51-59, PO 4(46). Adelodu - In paragraph 6 of your desposition you said accreditation and voting took place at your polling unit. Witness - Yes. Adelodu- Which came 1st accreditation or Voting? Witness- Accreditation came first followed by voting. Adelodu - Show the witness exhibit PO 264(2,3,4,6,7) tell this honourable court if there are no tickings to the left of the document. Witness - There are tickings but I don't know whether its to the left or right , I need to be educated. The witness was then discharged by the judge. |
The 2nd witness (2RW64), Comrade Ogun John Oleghe , a public servant from Agenebode in Etsako East LGA, he is been cross examined with exhibit PO 4(40), PO 45(1-9), PO 259(1- .When asked if he knows the meaning of over voting ,he said No. On what document was the accreditation done in your polling unit, A. Adelodu [SAN] asked. Witness - The voters register was used. Adelodu - Please give the witness exhibit PO 259(1)and confirm that those are the voters register used in units 1& 6? Witness- I don't know, I didn't vote in unit 6, but you were the ward collation of your party the counsel asked. |
The 1st witness (2RW63) for today is Mr. Mike Awahigheme from Agenebode in Etsako East LGA, he is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 46(1), PO 46 (6), PO 4(42). During cross examination by counsel to INEC, the witness informed the tribunal that the election was very free and fair , he also added that he was never in possession of the voters register and results during the election. Senior counsel to the petitioner, Mallam Yesuf Ali (SAN) introduced A.Adelodu (SAN) to handle cross examination on behalf of the PDP. A. Adelodu (SAN) started by asking the witness to confirm using exhibit PO 260(1-7) was used in your ward? In his usual Interjection, Ken Mozia (SAN) objected the question saying that the question was immaterial to the Cross examination But responding Adelodu (SAN) refreshed the mind of the judge back to the 7th day of February 2017 were he ruled in favour of this issue being debated, that the evidence which is already in court can be identified by the witness. He was asked again and his reply was that he doesn't know, I haven't seen that document he added. Adelodu (SAN) told the witness to look at exhibit PO 206(6) and confirm if there are any tickings to either side of that document? This question was again objected by Ken Mozia (SAN) counsel to the 2nd respondent, upon the premise that the witness can be used to interpret the document in favour of the petitioner. However, counsel to the petitioner, A.Adelodu (SAN) told the court that since the witness had earlier said there was accreditation and no over voting, he should be allowed to cross examine him in order ascertain if there was anything contrary to his claims. This move was objected by counsel to the 2nd respondent Ken Mozia (SAN), but in short ruling, the judge instructed A.Adelodu to continue with the cross examination of the witness in view of paragraph 15 of his deposition. Adelodu - Is there any tickings to the left or right of that document? Witness- I don't know if its to the left or right but there are tickings on the photographs. Adelodu - Please confirm on same page 2 the same question on that document. Witness- There are tickings but I don't know if there are tickings to the left or right but on the voters register. |
We are back again for the 4th day of the edo governorship election petition tribunal. So far the 2 respondent (Obaseki) had called several witnesses to testimony but this has left much yo be desired going by the sceneroes observed from the crossed-examination of the witnesses so far. Be that as it may today is another day. Stayed tuned. |
ShaqFu:Using the mistakes of others as your yardstikes and excuse for your own ineffectiveness is a mark of irresponsibility |
SuperPanther:But you can waste your time to write comments on its thread. what other words can we give to not taking someone serious again. |
A government that always wanted to make the rich becomes more rich and poor becomes more poorer. they even said dollar crash. crash to where, when all they wanted to do is to allow their croonies get more dollars since their secrets CBN dollar sales and FOREX exposure had been exposed. This Government economic team of which Osinbanjo is the head is complete failure, no word can be used to described that. @ tonyebarcanista let them continue to say. |
sorry once again for the late updates, network issues, updates resumed back tommorrow |
The Judge adjourns sitting till tomorrow, Thursday 02/03/2017. |
The 12th witness (2RW62) Mr. Felix Orobosa John ,a teacher with a private school from Ebelle in Igueben LGA just mounted the box, he is been cross examined with exhibit PO 4(31), PO 216(5). During cross examination by Chief Ferdinand Orbih (SAN) it was again discovered that the witness doesn't know what the boxes on the voters register stands for. Orbih - Show him exhibit PO 216(5),now confirm that in the voters register ,there are no tickings to the left. Witness- Only to the left. |
The 11th witness (2RW61) Mr. Edughase Emmanuel from Ebelle in Igueben LGA, he is been cross examined with exhibit PO 222(4), PO 216. During his cross examination by the 3rd respondent, the witness was asked if he knew the PDP ward collation officer (PW46) he answered, No. But when Chief F.Orbih asked him that same question, he told the court he knows (PW46) PDP ward collation officer for his ward. Orbih - Now over voting is when the number of votes returned is higher than the accredited voters on the voters register, do you agree? Witness- Yes my Lord. Orbih- Are you aware that in exhibit PO 222(4) there are no tickings to the left and right on the voters register, am I correct? Witness - You are correct. Orbih - Are there tickings? Witness - Yes there are tickings. |
The 10th witness (2RW60) , Mr. Ugbehu Osarumwense is from Ebelle in Igueben LGA. He is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 40(5), PO 221(5). This particular witness kept on contradicting himself, at one time he said the tickings to the left in the voters register doesn't signify accreditation, later he said yes, it does. |
The 9th witness (2RW59) , Mr. Igbinedion Clifford is a businessman from Igueben LGA. He is to be cross examined with exhibit PO 4(27), PO 41(1), PO 222(2). Chief Ferdinand Orbih (SAN) just introduced the petitioner's lead counsel Mallam Yesuf Ali (SAN) and his colleague A. Adelodu (SAN) who walked into the tribunal. During cross examination by the counsel to the petitioner it was discovered that there wasn't accreditation in his polling unit, as confirmed in exhibit PO 222(2). It was also discovered that the witness doesn't know what the boxes on the left and right of the voters register stands for ,because he isn't an INEC staff. |
The 8th witness (2RW58) Mr. Paul .A. Alazi , a student from Ekperi ,Etsako Central LGA, he is to cross examined with exhibit PO 308( , PO 308(7).During cross examination, the witness agreed with counsel to INEC that he voted and there was accreditation in his polling unit through the voters register and also added that he isn't aware his name was ticked when asked by counsel to the 3rd respondent. Chief Ferdinand Orbih (SAN) told the witness to be given exhibit PO 254( , item 79, please confirm you are item 79?, are you the one there?Witness- No my Lord. Orbih- I put it to you that your name isn't on the voters register. Witness- After looking for his name on the voters register for over 10 minutes, he said my name is on item 38, page 4. Orbih- Please read out the name there. Witness - Adolphus Apeahiokhai Paul The name on the voters register is different from the name of the witness standing inside the witness box. Orbih- No voter was ticked the left of that voters. Witness - No tickings to the left my lord. That means there was no accreditation in his polling unit. |
Sorry for the late updates, networks issues caused the delay |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 (of 273 pages)

.