Enigma's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Enigma's Profile › Enigma's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 (of 198 pages)
KunleOshob: nuclearboy:Now here is a thing. It seems that people tend to confuse the c[/i]atholic Church with the [i]C[/i]atholic Church or Roman Catholic Church (RCC). The [i]c[/i]atholic Church simply means the universal church. It is the universal Church (granted with dissentients) that formulated the Trinity doctrine and not the [i]C[/i]atholic or Roman Catholic Church. (EDITED See further this thread: https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-497445.0.html#msg6576034 ) Second, it seems to me that people making allegations against the early Church Fathers who formulated the Trinity doctrine are not fully aware of the circumstances in which the Trinity doctrine emerged. It seems there is a sort of ignorance/insufficient awareness of or insufficient credit for the fact that the formulation of the Trinity doctrine was an enforced necessity in view of the fact that the Church Fathers faced various teachings that were considered wrong, heterodox or heretical. There seems to be this unfair suggestion of out and out caprice on the part of the Church Fathers who formulated the Trinity doctrine. Third, it is wrong to suggest that the Trinity doctrine is purely one of intuition or that it is extra-biblical especially if on the rather flimsy basis that the word Trinity is not mentioned in the Bible or even on the relatively more solid claim that the doctrine of the Trinity is not [i]explicit in the Bible. If one believes that there is One God and the Bible teaches that the Father is God, Jesus is God and the Holy Spirit is God, I would like to see what better doctrine than the Trinity one can come up with. Fourth, I'm not aware that the Trinitarians here have been claiming that the Trinity doctrine fully encapsulates God; even I will be willing to countenance a suggestion that the Trinity doctrine is not perfect. But again, has there ever been any doctrine on the relationship of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit that is better than the Trinity? In my view, all of Arianism, Modalism, Sabellianism, Docetism etc are inferior to the doctrine of the Trinity. Let alone talking of things like Tri-theism or Oneness of infinity. ![]() Finally, it is such a pity that the Church has become fragmented and divided on many issues. God gave the Church and ordinarily we should believe that the Holy Spirit is guiding the Church. For this reason we can sing this verse from a personally much beloved Trinitarian hymn: And I hold in venerationTaken from Firmly I Believe and Truly |
KunleOshob:If you make an allegation that someone is self contradictory without providing proof of the alleged contradiction, then I think it is reasonable if the person calls your allegation foolish. If you can dish it then you should expect to receive it. I put it to you that in the few discussions I've had with you on this Trinity issue, you always start to get abusive even when I had been deliberately cautious to be polite to you. You can go and check the thread For Trinity Sunday for example. EDITED KunleOshob:Well, the Bible teaches that (a) the Father is God, (b) Jesus is God, and (c) the Holy Spirit is God. If you disagree and think that the Bible doesn't teach any of these, that is perfectly fine by me (edited). It is nothing new; you won't be the first and you won't be the last. Go and read up on things like Arianism, Modalism, Sabellianism etc etc. |
@kunleoshob Instead of making foolish allegations that you have not thought through why not outline the contradiction that you allege? Here are three questions for you: Does the Bible say the Father is God or not? Does the Bible say Jesus is God or not? Does the Bible say the Holy Spirit is God or not? |
^^^^ Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Human "descriptions", "representations" or "depictions" rarely if ever work! We all (at least we Christians) recognise that we cannot fully encapsulate God --- thus in a way the less said the better. We can only confine ourselves to that much that is revealed in Scripture and confirmed to our own individual spirit (the experiential element) by the Holy Spirit. This much is revealed in Scripture: a. the Father is God b. Jesus Christ is God c. the Holy Spirit is God We will be on strong and surer ground if we confine ourselves within the boundaries of revelation. Whenever we go beyond that we are always likely to fall short or to stray. In fact, that is what is at the heart of the debates from the very beginning (i.e. pre Nicene/Athanasian creeds) (a) understanding what is revealed and (b) going beyond or even falling short of what is revealed because of trying to fit revelation within the very finite limits of human conceptions and perceptions. |
aletheia:I also found it quite interesting. I certainly would like to see a western Christian (new) version of the Old Testament using the Septuagint and/or the textual tradition on which it is based (if only the manuscipts can be found). One thing though, that the Septuagint (compiled 100-300 years even before the advent of Christ) is the way it is testifies quite powerfully to the Christian message; that it was compiled by Jewish rabbis, who were not "Christians", is powerful attestation that the gospel and testimony of Christ is not just a fable. I am inclined to support/accept the view expressed that the Holy Spirit guided the compilers of the Septuagint. I also find of great significance the fact that Jesus Christ Himself and the writers of the gospels and epistles tended to quote predominantly from the Septuagint. Having said all of that, I do not think that having our current Old Testament based on the Masoretic tradition is in itself a necessarily bad thing; despite the "marked" differences, we can see that the esential message and overall doctrine of the Old Testament is the same ---- whether as expressed in the Masoretic textual tradition or the Septuagint tradition. A very positive spin that has been put on this is that the "differences" in ancient manuscripts show that really the writers were not trying to create falsehoods otherwise you might have had everything tailor-made to "agree". I do realise that some will say that - 'but the Jews and the Christians each had reasons to put their spin on things'. Then we will ask again if the Septuagint was produced by Christians. |
@italo I think with some people if you seem to 'agree' with them on their falsehood, they will start beating their chest that oh yes you have agreed that they are right and they will be telling others that even you agree with them. Thus, what I will do when I tire of arguing with them is to say "No, it is not red, it is green; however, I am happy to leave you to continue thinking it is red; I will simply continue to see you as wrong!" That way, there will be less room for doubt or misrepresentation of where you stand. |
Here is an interesting piece albeit from an Orthodox perspective http://www.orthodoxengland.org.uk/septuag.htm |
MyJoe: ![]() Sure (as in we are looking at things from the biblical perspective essentially )While we can easily point to personal references to God the Father, we can also point to personal references to the Holy Ghost as your penultimate post acknowledged. Now: is it more (or less for that matter) difficult to show from the Bible that the Holy Ghost is sentient than it is to show that the Father is sentient? That is the issue I was trying to point out. We are generally talking about human conceptions and perceptions. As has been pointed out many times on this forum, often we are trying to box "God" within finite human perceptions/conceptions whereas God is transcendental and above and beyond human conceptions/perceptions. Let us consider it: leaving Jesus out of it, can we paint a picture of what "God" (i.e. the Father) looks like? Can we paint a picture of how He can feel or exactly how he is sentient? Even as a force, how exactly does the Holy Spirit emanate from the Father? What part of the Father does the Holy Spirit emanate from? Or perhaps the Father Himself is spirit ---- in which case we come back to the need to explain how the Father is sentient? |
We may also ask: is "God" the Father a personal sentient being? If we can show that "God" the Father is either not personal or sentient, then not only the idea of the Trinity is dead then the "Father" too cannot be "God"; we might as well say with Nietszche that God is dead. |
By the way, what single word can be used for "virgin" in: 1. Yoruba 2. Igbo 3. Hausa |
0@ italo Don't let him mislead you; it is more complicated than that and even 'alma' does/can mean virgin. Do some more study on the subject. An example: the Septuagint which was compiled way way before the Christian era translates it to a Greek word that is widely reckoned to mean virgin ---- even though some will argue that even that word can be used e.g. to mean maiden. EDITED I have found a link with a useful simplified discussion (though the discussion can be 'heavier or more 'scholarly') http://www.secondexodus.com/html/jewishcatholicdialogue/virginbirth.htm |
@nuclearboy Email sent. ![]() |
@ jossybless Big congrats oooo; God bless you and yours. ![]() |
Deep Sight:^^^ No problems; really, no hard feelings. I should be in Naija soon and I move in legal circles, so we might even meet without realising it. Anyway, what I have expressed is my genuine assessment/judgment of the thread. I am not averse to discussing the Holy Spirit or the Trinity; indeed I was pursuing such a discussion with Kunleoshob recently, except that he pulled out. If my perception is that the discussion is a genuine attempt at either grappling towards the truth or a genuine attempt to understand my/the Trinitarian perspective, I may be happy to engage. ![]() |
Deep Sight:Whatever. I decide who I consider worth discussing what topic with and when. Actually, looking back over the thread someone made a good response very early on. enitan2002: |
Oh, I agree with that; and funny enough there might be some good discussion out of it. I will keep out of it for the most part after this though. ![]() |
It is connecting that post that I quoted with the opening post of the thread that confirmed my own personal initial assessment that the thread is contemptible. |
@Nuclearboy Did you see this: Deep Sight: |
@ Deep Sight No big deal; I will address issues as I see fit or comment as I deem apposite. I deem my comments in my two initial posts on this thread quite apposite and of course I will not hesitate to make such comments in future if I consider them apposite to the situation. ![]() |
@ Deepsight Please point to where I have referred to you in derisive terms --- a link will do. What I know is that indeed I have deliberately ignored your posts even on occasions when you insulted me directly. I can find the links if you want. Finally, what I wrote in my two earlier posts is what I genuinely believe about the discussions of certain topics on this forum ---- particularly in recent times. |
Ah, I've actually been popping in and out of here. I will send the email a little later. ![]() And you are right that the nonsenses need to be countered by truth sometimes --- particularly to help and strengthen others who believe in the Trinity. Nevertheless, I still generally do not take these kind of posts/topics too seriously --- at least on this forum taking account what I know of/have read from some of the personnel. |
As a Trinitarian, I never see the point of expending too much energy on this type of threads. My people say: ọmọde ko mọ ogun, o npe l'ẹfọ! On this type of issue, I usually leave the ignorant to be ignorant and the mocker to be mocker. |
@Viaguru You'd better avoid that "church" like the plague; keep away from it! The "prophetess" is deluded and possibly a charlatan; her followers are ignorant or misguided. |
http://www.hymnsite.com/fws/hymn.cgi?2062 1. I have found a friend in Jesus, |
http://www.cyberhymnal.org/htm/t/h/y/thykicog.htm Thy Kingdom come, O God, |
They are both idiots. |
[flash=500,400] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEvFVECuv1Q&hl=en_GB&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed>[/flash] Link to Story ETA Miami Herald Report A would-be armed robber who held up a mobile phone shop repented during the raid and left as a rescued soul after a sermon from a Christian shop assistant. |
Meanwhile apart from donating for his $2 million donor appeal, you can also buy your "prosperity prayer shawl" from Hinn's website for $50! They stop at nothing when it comes to fleecing the flock. |
@ italo Well done for holding firm even though it seems hardly worth it with your 'opponents'! ![]() |
Even after the news broke, the knobhead had the gall to ask his From http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/global-filipino/world/07/29/10/televangelist-benny-hinn-asks-2-m-donation Televangelist Benny Hinn is asking his prayer partners to donate $2 million to his ministry because of financial difficulties. |
I know this is gossip and I am breaking one of my own rules on trying to avoid focusing on personal relationships or morality per se of these televangelists/prosperity"gospel" people unless context requires it. However, I think the story/gossip is interesting enough! The American rag National Enquirer reported on a romantic trip to Rome with pictures. See pictures here: http://twitpic.com/288cb8/full However, both have "denied" 'immorality' or 'impurity' in their relationship. See story and denials here: http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2010/July/Evangelists-Hinn-White-Deny-Affair-Allegations/ If you read each "denial" carefully, you will see that they don't clearly deny that they are dating ---- just that there is no 'impurity' or 'immorality' in their relationship ----- yet (if you read Benny Hinn's carefully); and that is even if either of them can be believed. While both Hinn, 57, and White, 44, have admitted to being friends for over two decades, both issued statements denying that there is anything inappropriate about their relationship. In a statement issued on her Web site, White said she and Hinn have become closer since both have endured painful public divorces, but "our friendship has , Remained morally and spiritually pure." Still, Hinn and White said in the future they would seek to avoid any appearance of impropriety. |
@ aletheia You'd better leave him to his ways and hope and pray that he repents; also that he soon learns the difference between hope and false hope. ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 (of 198 pages)


)
Cos i'm very sure any explanation different from your own definition wont be acceptable by you.