Enigma's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Enigma's Profile › Enigma's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 (of 198 pages)
@PA1982 Sorry, I don't mean to be rude but my suggestion was really for Inesqor; I am happy to leave you with your view - based on experience. ![]() ![]() |
shanda:@bolded: There is nowhere. ![]() ![]() |
@Jesoul I've just been told off by 'you know who'; he says I was looking for the "stuff" that Jesus "definitely sold" in the wrong places! That to make up: if we can find Jesus Himself "definitely selling" it at present, he would like to get you this: http://www.loveworldshop.com/product.php?id_product=38 The only problem is that Christ Embassy and Loveworld people will have to show us Jesus "definitely selling" it first. Not that either me or 'you know who' is stingy ---- truthfully and honestly! ![]() |
^ You wan contest me? ![]() Abi, you know how much ![]() |
Maybe this is the kind of "stuff" that Jesus "definitely sold"! http://secure.marilynandsarah.org/p-538-venti-living-fulfillment.aspx ![]() |
Galatians 3 (edited NKJV) 8 And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, "In you all the nations shall be blessed". 9 So then those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham. ![]() |
InesQor:Abi! Even many of the anti-Christian "scholars" including the 'Jesus Mythologists' now accept the (or at least the partial) authenticity of Josephus i.e. the so-called Testimonium Flavianum. Just google the Latin words. ![]() ![]() |
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9116182/Vicar-made-thief-kneel-until-police-arrived.html Vicar made thief kneel until police arrived ![]() |
Fair enough; there are alternative readings no doubt. ![]() ![]() |
@ Olaadegbu I don't know if you've seen it already but here is something you might find interesting. [flash=400,300]http://youtube.com/v/gqqr-Vl-CYM[/flash] |
"Them" because of what is considered the best reading from the context. ![]() Ergo, God knows how many Bible versions/translations, including even Jewish ones ------ with different groupings of scholars (some even theological opponents) ---- accept that reading. ![]() |
Ah, just as I expected about that article. ![]() OK, here is another similarly more recent piece which is more rigorous and which actually addreses the Hultgren article of which extracts are relied upon in post 35. http://files.wts.edu/uploads/images/files/71.2.Gladd.The%20Last%20Adam%20as%20the%20Life%20Giving%20Spirit.pdf ![]() |
Just so as the kabbalah Adam Kadmon stuff (from Wikipedia) is not left unchallenged, a short extract from a very recent piece: http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j23_3/j23_3_70-75.pdf There is some debate about whether Paul is using the Philo’s categories of “earthly” and “heavenly” man. Although some see Philo’s influence, the connection is tenuous, especially with no proof that Paul uses Philo’s categories anywhere else. Most of Paul’s other terminology differs sufficiently from Philo that there is no reason to conclude that he is being influenced by him in this passage. This is all the more true when one considers that evidence for the influence of Genesis on this passage is much stronger. There is no reason to posit another major background influence since the Genesis influence sufficiently explains the passage.Similarly, far too much is being made of the absence of the word "them" with unsubstantiated accusations and allegations. Everyone knows that many English conjunctive/disjunctive etc words have to be and are added to make sense of some sentences/passages. Ask anyone who speaks Arabic for example, especially of the Egyptian everyday variety and see if it can be translated sensibly into English without adding far far far more than words like "them" etc. ![]() |
debosky:The bit that I've highlighted interests me. I am pretty certain that I have not come across a single person who opposes the abuses of "tithing" or "firstfruit" etc who also says no giving should be made into "church". For all my ranting, I myself remain part of "organised church" for that matter. Apart from 'abuse' (or maybe it is even part of the abuse) is that the placing of too much emphasis on giving to "church" has the effect of making people fail to do that which Jesus and Christian doctrine demands of them. In fact, I often feel ashamed when I see non-Christians either with some knowledge of the Bible or simply with common sense tell our fellow professing Christians that it is better to give money to a more pressing cause e.g. someone in need of an operation, someone starving etc than to say noooo 'I cannot do that one because the money is meant for my "tithe" or my "firstfruit" oh'. The placing of too much emphasis on giving to 'church' means that many Christians then resort to token acts of charity or cannot even then afford to help precisely where Jesus told them to help ---------- feed the hungry, clothe the nak.ed etc. PS On the main thread topic, I also reason along same lines as debosky and nuclearboy; we do not have to be dogmatic about what constitutes "support"; it would depend on particular circumstances and particular circumstances may necessitate "support" in the form of (monthly etc) salary. ![]() |
Hin get "terrible day" too --- if you know where to look. Don't you just know days when I have some time on my hands! |
^ You sure say you no dey for eternal "order" of Cherubim & Seraphim so? ![]() ![]() |
^ Oju ti bẹrẹ si i ra bi aṣa igbira! ![]() ![]() |
Nuke I'm sure you would have heard these ones: Aitete m'ole, ole ya far away (ole n'sa lọ) --- {standard joke, no?} This next one makes me laugh all the time just because of the picture it makes in my mind. Afẹfẹ to fẹ, t'o mu ki ologi ma sa're ---- ki elelubọ ti far far far far away! ![]() |
I will find time to go through the other thread in due course. The little story and the Yoruba proverb was simply to demonstrate the simplicity that sometimes exists in application of an old saying/idea/wisdom etc developed in one context and applying it not as direct parallel but as a relational 'picture' to demonstrate another point. Sometimes we are looking for complexity where there really is none in the final analysis. True the Jews had some technical approaches to hermeneutics but is that what we really see everytime some old or even Old Testament idea is 'borrowed' or adapted for a different situation. The reality is that we do the relating/application thing constantly in everday life to explain, to paint a picture, to communicate effectively, to make the listener/hearer/reader better understand and see clearly ----- without thinking of issues of 'exegesis' or 'hermeneutics'. It is very common in Yoruba land in particular and the application is often very 'fluid' or quite 'free', i.e. the comparative situations are far from being 'on all fours'. It is the same with using analogies: the things being compared will rarely be on all fours and someone can all ways find things to nit-pick (indeed, something common on Nairaland). It must be accepted that there must be limits e.g. what I have seen called 'rigor'; questions to ask would be what are the limits or 'rigor' to be based upon? Possibles (1) honesty --- arguably the most important; (2) sufficient comparability as not to jeopardise 'integrity' of comparison ---- important and in some circumstances could be as important as honesty; (3) technicalities e.g. requiring near identity or at least more than sufficient comparability amounting to pettifogging and not seeing the wood for the trees ------ this is often the path taken by critics. An aside of interest/relevance: the use of ọfọ (incantations) in Yoruba could be interesting and even our more jocular usage of such things nowadays. Alọ ramirami l'aa ri, a kii r'abọ rẹ Bi dandanbiri ba lu'gi aa ma fẹ ku ni Firifiri l'oju n r'imu, bọọbọ l'agutan n'wo. Picture a single man surrounded by 12 people and he handles them easily with this one: t'ija t'ija lo n ṣe ti ọmọri odo ati iya rẹ, ẹ bẹrẹ si ma lu ara yin! ![]() |
Deleted Sorry, wrong thread! |
![]() And yesterday without irony or self awareness the "pastor" was mocking crossman for using another ID! By the way Joagbaje, please say hello to Azibalua for me. ![]() ![]() |
A relatively elderly man lived in a hut; one day this hut was destroyed by fire. A nephew of the elderly man who lived in town heard about this and rushed down to comfort the man. He said to the elderly man: "Ile ọba ti o jo, ẹwa l'o bu si" (when a king's house burns down, it only makes it more beautiful and grand). The nephew then quickly raised money and built the elderly man a beautiful new modern house. Interesting "interpretation" and application of an old proverb! Edit: I suppose it is a form of or the kind of thing as the "Rabbinical exegesis" mentioned. ![]() |
Zikkyy:Let me "assist"; below is taken from one of the Bible translations that the "pastor" contributing here turns to when he is snookered (as usual). ![]() GWT Hebrews 7:17 The Scriptures say the following about him: "You are a priest forever, in the way Melchizedek was a priest." ![]() |
@Fxking2012 I don't mean to criticise you as such because I actually like you and many things you post. However, because of the post on that "mastur.bation" thread, where you said: But for pastor Chris to say it's ok, I believe him becos he is a very learned man in the things of the spirit and would never say something is ok if it isn'tThis same Oyakhilome has said those who do not "tithe" are robbing God! Do you now see that it is not enough to believe something simply because Oyakhilome says it? ![]() |
Joagbaje:Ha, now we know! So all the people "falling under anointing" or being "slain in spirit" by Oyakhilome and other people like him with annoyingthing have an EVIL spirit in them. What is more, since the same people (e.g. members of Choir etc) always fall each time the "pastor" does his "take it" thing --- it means the evil spirit never leaves them or is always coming back into them. This their annoyingthing na wa oh! ![]() ![]() |
^^ The way you have kept going on about the Danes means you realise that my post did punch a hole in your argument about the Danes. I have kept quiet since because I didn't want that one to derail the thread. Since you are bothered so much about the Danes, I will just remind you of two things about the issue and leave the rest until perhaps a day when the issue is being discussed in its own right. 1. The official STATE religion of Denmark is Christianity. 2. The population of Denmark is only (even less than) 6 million ------ (apparently even less than half the population of Lagos). That is a far far far more significant factor in them having a good standard of living than whether people go to church or not. ![]() ![]() |
James |
With victorazy . . . throw spanner in the works . . . cat among the pigeons . . . promptly leg it! ![]() Revelation 1:4 John to the seven churches which are in Asia: Grace be unto you, and peace, from him which is, and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven Spirits which are before his throne3:1 And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things saith he that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead.4:5 And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and voices: and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God.5:6 And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth. ![]() |
nuclearboy:There really never was a "fight" as such --- so not really an issue of sheathing swords. More importantly: even though it may not be obvious, this is part of the fight against the real enemy: even when we Christians disgaree, we still need to have clear understandings of our different/respective positions --- that is how we can reduce vulnerabilities to the real enemy and his advocates. ![]() ![]() |
@ Nuke I ended my post #24 yesterday in the manner abbreviated below: . . . the question that I posed . . . remains: how can Jesus be God and The Father be God at the same time? To this of course we add, how can Jesus be God, The Father be God and the Holy Spirit be God at the same time. I suppose one honest answer would be to say: "we don't know - but that is what the Bible reveals". I can live with that. ![]() |
Two more sayings of Jesus: John 17:5 And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.John 17:25 “Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world. ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 (of 198 pages)



