₦airaland Forum

Creeza:
oga rest. If you read the case against tinubu you would not be saying this...its very obvious you are being biased and blinded by sheeplike support for APC

Creeza:
Lol
What did i just read?

Felabrity:
It was for his own good

If you know you know

Edited: for context

Creeza:
I am not being biased on this but i've seen news flying on Nairaland where the current CJN described "forfeiture" in a case against ABACHA in 2014

Also this is good because some irredeemable persons are saying according to him Tinubu's case is simple because it was a forfeiture based on "civil neglect" which according to them isn't a crime...

The laws of the state of llinois specifically stipulated otherwise....


2. The tinubu camp says the forfeiture happened more than 30 years ago but fail to realise that a plea bargain and eventual forfeiture of property is simply an alternative after being found guilty and in events of huge amounts of grams the law of Illinois states that the imprisonment or jail term is as long as 15 to 60 years....

Correct me if i am wrong, but a drug case involving money laundering upto the tune of 1.2 million dollars as found in Tinubu's account ( allegedly) isnt proceeds ( allegedly) from little grams of drug or cocaine...



This is no child's joke
Believe me or not, Tinubu's drug case is really a pain in the ass

Verdict: Forfeiture is an alternative punishment for drug crimes involving proceeds or properties from such crimes according to the laws of Chicago.

Source: https://www.srhunterlaw.com/Drug-Crime-Penalties-in-Illinois

Creeza:
I am not being biased on this but i've seen news flying on Nairaland where the current CJN described "forfeiture" in a case against ABACHA in 2014

Also this is good because some irredeemable persons are saying according to him Tinubu's case is simple because it was a forfeiture based on "civil neglect" which according to them isn't a crime...

The laws of the state of llinois specifically stipulated otherwise....


2. The tinubu camp says the forfeiture happened more than 30 years ago but fail to realise that a plea bargain and eventual forfeiture of property is simply an alternative after being found guilty and in events of huge amounts of grams the law of Illinois states that the imprisonment or jail term is as long as 15 to 60 years....

Correct me if i am wrong, but a drug case involving money laundering upto the tune of 1.2 million dollars as found in Tinubu's account ( allegedly) isnt proceeds ( allegedly) from little grams of drug or cocaine...



This is no child's joke
Believe me or not, Tinubu's drug case is really a pain in the ass

Verdict: Forfeiture is an alternative punishment for drug crimes involving proceeds or properties from such crimes according to the laws of Chicago.

Source: https://www.srhunterlaw.com/Drug-Crime-Penalties-in-Illinois

MRSALT:
Subsection d. is where Peter Obi's lawyers are standing upon, not subsection e. Look at the later paragraph of subsection d. again
...or a sentence of imprisonment or fine for any offence involving dishonesty or fraud (by whatever name called) or for any other offence, imposed on him by any court or tribunal.

Pimine:
What do mohammedians know about demons and demonology?

Your false prophet Mohammed never performed a single miracle until he died miserably at the hands of a Jewish woman whose family he had wickedly exterminated.

So what, again I ask you, do you know about demons and demonology? What gave you the right to tell a child of God that he is possessed by the very powers that Christ said are under our feet?

You'd better forsake that false religion and come to Christ NOW!

David160:
The zombies that support the mandate thief Tinubu said that Lagos is paradise.. Why can't their pay Master rest Dere... He went all the way to France to rest.

He can't even eat the posion he made... Tinubu slaves are too stupid.

chokekachy:
https://twitter.com/officialKolaO/status/1639191763972943872?t=INMB83UYuZWhCUVAndq7Kg&s=19[/quote]What is justice? Does it mean you winning in court all the time?

Racoon:
This is the election APC said it won free, fair and credible that Festus Keyamo is stupidly asking President Joe Biden to forcefully congratulate drug baron criminal principal? I laugh!

Reactions:

Nwodosis:
And the big trouble will be the rebirth of Biafra, which the Igbos want.

Believeintruth:
Can you just shut up and stop being stupid.

AImiron:
https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/world-governing-body-tightens-restrictions-transgender-dsd-athletes-2023-03-23/

TossTos:
Interesting days ahead
And it seems a prophecy of One Bishop is coming to fulfilment
> Push for Interim
> Court Peter OBI
> Secret will be revealed how election was rigged.

Etc

Waiting for the rest

beerfraud:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/03/breaking-polls-anti-tinubu-protesters-ground-abuja-demand-interim-govt-fresh-polls/

Fahdiga:
If they arrest both of them then it is a part of the prophecy that Obi will be sworn in as the president. We remember that Christ was crucified to save mankind.

IgOga:
The Supreme Court already made the judgement in the case of Buhari vs Obasanjo in 2003. 20 years ago fa

Abuja is considered the 37th state for the 25% requirement

stevnwigw1:
Then criminals, robber will only get a tap at the back after rubbing us in Nigeria

Xxxxtentacion2:
you are using a letter from Us embassy in Lagos as evidence shai ....
No intelligent person would fall for this...
Try presenting this as evidence to defend Tinubu in court...
Dem go take original oraimo cord wipe you comot from the court....
I know you think everybody is stupid but this is not credible evidence....

Ofunaofu:
Candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Atiku Abubakar, has accused the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, of installing a third-party device he said was used to intercept and switch results of the presidential election that was held on February 25 in favour of ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, and its candidate, Bola Tinubu.

Atiku, in a 66-page petition lodged before the Presidential Election Petition Court, PEPC, sitting at the Court of Appeal in Abuja, further alleged that INEC had prior to the election, redeployed its in-house ICT expert, Mr Chidi Nwafor, and replaced him with an IT Consultant that helped it install the third-party mechanism.

According to Atiku, the said IT Consultant, Mr Suleiman Farouk, ensured that the device was intermediated between the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System, BVAS, and the IRev Portal, known as Device Management System, DMS.


He told the court that the DMS was the software that allowed INEC’s IT Security Consultant, Mr. Farouk, to remotely control, monitor and filter data transmitted from the BVAS devices to the electronic collation system and the IRev platform.


“The 1st Respondent (INEC) engaged an appointee of the 2nd Respondent (INEC) to man and oversee the sensitive ICT Department of the 1st Respondent for the purpose of the Election.

‘Third-party device installed’

“The petitioners contend and shall lead evidence to show that contrary to the original design of the BVAS machine to upload data directly to the electronic collation system and the IReV portal, the 1st Respondent contrived and installed an intervening third-party device (Device Management System) which, in its ordinary usage, is meant to secure and administer the 1st Respondent’s technological ecosystem for the elections but as it relates to the presidential election, was used to intercept the results, quarantine and warehouse same, and filter them before releasing same to the IReV portal.

“The 1st Respondent used the said Device Management System to manipulate the election results in favour of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents.

“The petitioners state and shall lead expert evidence to show the critical components of the 1st Respondent’s Information and Communications Technology, ICT, including but not limited to the BVAS which is an Android Device manufactured by Emperor Technologies China and supplied to the 1st Respondent by Activate Nigeria Limited.


The Voter Accreditation System, VAS, which is the software that is used on the BVAS was previously designed and configured in-house and installed on the BVAS by the ICT Team of the 1st Respondent headed by Mr. Chidi Nwafor.

“The VAS was subsequently handed over to Emperor Technology China prior to the Presidential Election and they then preconfigured and installed the software on the BVAS before supplying the devices to the 1st Respondent through Activate Nigeria Limited.

“As it relates to the IReV, the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV) is a web-based data entry and aggregation portal designed also by Chidi Nwafor’s team and is hosted on Amazon Web Service, AWS.

“The server system for the device and the portal are hosted on Amazon Web Service (AWS) URL:dashboard.ivasportal.com/dash,” he added

Besides, Atiku, who came second in the presidential election, in the petition he filed alongside his party, PDP, maintained that INEC, having set the parameters of the poll, “did not ensure compliance with the electronic transmission of accreditation data and results in the election to create opportunity for manipulation of figures to the advantage of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents”.

The petitioners said they would during the hearing of the petition, lead evidence to show that there were no technical glitches that prevented the upload and transmission of the polling units results and the accreditation data of the presidential election to the electronic collation system and the IReV portal.

They alleged that what happened was “the non-adherence to the system through a command and control element activated by a pre-programmed design to limit user-privileges of the front-end users of the BVAS machines at the polling units with respect to presidential election results while releasing user privileges in respect of the National Assembly election windows, by selectively withholding correct passwords and/or issuing wrong passwords through the use of the Device Management System equipment aforesaid.”

‘No server failures as claimed by INEC’

Arguing that there was no failure of the server as claimed by INEC, the petitioners said they would adduce evidence to show that the “server,” being cloud-based, in the event of any unlikely challenge, Amazon Web Service would have seamlessly switched to another server without hitch, being autoscaling groups with multiple network reception and offline upload options.

“The petitioners contend that the technology system deployed by the 1st Respondent underwent Quality Assurance Tests (“QAT”) before acquisition and deployment.


“The 1st Respondent is, hereby, given notice to produce the QAT Report that was prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers, PwC, as well as the Report of Vulnerability Assessment & Penetration Testing, VAPT, by Consultant Suleiman Farouk of Sulfman Consulting Limited and all other subsequent and related reports on the system.

“The petitioners contend that the so-called ‘glitch’ was a bypass to tilt and switch the results of the presidential election in favour of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents,” they added.

More so, they said among people they would subpoena to appear before the court to testify, would include PwC, expert witnesses in respect of the electronic collation system and the IReV portal, as well as Kaspersky Endpoint Security (of Thurhill Office Park, Bekker Road, Midrand, South Africa), which provided the system security for the BVAS and e-transmission system deployed by INEC, Globacom Nigeria Limited, the internet provider for the system deployed by INEC, “which internet was disconnected from the BVAS machines before transmission.

“The petitioners shall also call evidence of statisticians, forensic examiners, fingerprint and ICT experts at the hearing of the petition to establish that the figures/scores awarded the 2nd Respondent were not the product of valid votes actually cast but mere allocation by the 1st Respondent, and the summation of the result declared is inconsistent with and cannot be reconciled with the number of duly accredited voters.

“The petitioners plead and shall rely on BVAS reports, the results sheets of the polling units, wards, local governments, states and the national manually collated results and electronic video recordings of several acts of infractions of the electoral process by the Respondents.’’


‘Full results not uploaded before declaring winner’

Atiku and his party argued that as of March 1 when Tinubu was declared the winner of the election, the entire results and accreditation data from polling units had not been transmitted and uploaded by INEC.

“The petitioners contend that the 1st Respondent is in clear breach of the provisions of the law under Sections 60 and 64(4) and (5) of the Electoral Act 2022 by failing to use the BVAS to transmit the election results at the polling units and the accreditation data therefrom to the electronic collation system and the IRev Portal. ‘’Despite the failure to so transmit and several complaints for review, the 1st Respondent’s chairman refused all entreaties and applications for the suspension of the collation exercise and a review of the complaints before declaring a winner of the election and repeatedly off-handedly dared the petitioners to go to court.

“The petitioners contend that contrary to the provisions of the 1st Respondent’s Regulations and Manual which stipulate the transmission of both accreditation data and the polling units results from the BVAS directly and real-time to the electronic collation system and the IReV portal, the 1st Respondent introduced a device manager called Collation Support and Results Verification System, CSRVS, with which the results from the polling units were quarantined, prior to transmission to the IReV portal, leaving room for the 1st Respondent to upload wrong results.”

‘Tinubu didn’t get one-quarter of FCT votes’


On another leg of the petition, Atiku argued that Tinubu did not secure at least one-quarter of the votes cast in the presidential election in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. He stressed that out of the total votes of 478,652 cast in the FCT, Abuja, Tinubu, was ascribed only 90,902 (18.99%) of the votes.

“The petitioners shall contend that to be declared duly elected, a candidate, in addition to obtaining not less than a quarter (25%) of the votes cast in at least two-thirds of all the states, must also receive at least one quarter (25%) of the votes cast in the FCT, Abuja, this being an additional requirement introduced by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), the said Constitution having clearly distinguished the FCT, Abuja as a separate entity by specific and express mention.

“The petitioners further aver that all over Nigeria, there were manifest cases of over-voting. The total of the affected polling units in the various states are set out in the statistician’s report pleaded and relied upon by the petitioners”.

They are, among other things, praying the court to hold that Tinubu was not duly elected by a majority of lawful votes cast in the election and, therefore, the declaration and his return by INEC as the winner of the presidential election was unlawful, wrongful, unconstitutional, undue, null and void and of no effect whatsoever.

“That it may be determined that the 2nd Respondent was at the time of the election not qualified to contest the said election.”


In the alternative, the petitioners want the court to declare that Atiku, having scored the majority of lawful votes cast at the presidential election, be returned as the winner of the said election and be sworn in as the duly elected President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, or to issue an order directing INEC to conduct a second election (run-off) between the 1st petitioner (Atiku) and the 2nd Respondent (Tinubu). In their further alternative prayer, the petitioners urged the court to nullify the presidential election and order a re-run.

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/03/inec-used-3rd-party-device-to-switch-results-for-tinubu-atiku/

Chinjo2:
Omor, today I fell in love with Datti Baba Ahmed. The man really has balls. He said and I quote. 'i am saying this for the world to hear. Swearing in an illegitimate government will lead to the end of democracy in Nigeria'.

XY23:
The drug issue is the most important prayer made by PO. BAT cannot get out of it without a bloodied nose. He would need to officially attest to the plea bargain. The international community would be drawn to this issue. What a president-select, what a country. Expect BATists to make it tribal, whereas the Truth is never afraid, only those to tell it, are.

MajTee:
Complete
APC CRIMINAL SHOULD TELL HAUSA TO LEAVE LAGOS FOR SUPPORTING ATIKU
LETS CHECK SOMETHING


Tinubu becomes the president. He will legalize cocaine, forgery, assassination, tribal war, God fatherism etc.
He represents everything evil.

Felabrity:
INEC chairman should sew his cell uniform, he go tey for prison

Interim government should takeover till Peter Obi reclaim his mandate

I mean, a pastor even predicted this
Let me see if the prediction will come to pass

sosanova:
Military Government takeover is fully supported at this time.
Cos APC has bastardized Nigeria Democracy

owukpa:
https://dailypost.ng/2023/03/21/2023-elections-protesters-call-for-interim-government-arrest-of-inec-chairman/

owukpa:
https://dailypost.ng/2023/03/21/2023-elections-protesters-call-for-interim-government-arrest-of-inec-chairman/

Pidaa:
My gift was still powerful that I can fill the instinct of what will happen in the future. Example was Nigeria vs ivory Coast during that year Nigeria won the nation Cup. I was with my friend watch that match and I told my friend that ivory Coast will recallize the goal because Nigeria was winning with a goal and I told him this will be the goal and then Nigeria will score to make it 2-1 and win the match and I left. NIGERIA exactly won the match. That guy go dey look me as a witch like how did this guy know all this things.
Then in my 300l my result was very bad. It was from good to worst. Imagine having parallel D and E. That night when I saw my result then I cried out to God because I knew what I wrote.
Then I saw that old woman in the that attack me when I was in SS2 after collecting that gift from God boasting that she is the one that Mark my paper and decide what I get and not the lecturer. Then I woke up and I know I was in really in a big battle

Chibuzoc:
Non indigenes are threatening to boycott payments of tax to LIRS (Lagos inland revenue service) as a form of protest over the disenfranchisement of their votes as citizens. As seen on Twitter, I think only agberos in Lagos should pay, non indigenes should only pay indirect tax.