₦airaland Forum

kmariko:
CBN must remove that symbol. It smacks of a middle Eastern religious symbol. Use a Nigerian symbol if you must.

lack of comprehension, Plz go back to pry one or better still return the money your parents used in training you to school back to them that is if you attended school in the first instance. mtcheeew

omoiseselagba:
SEE DUDE. THE HAUSAS WERE ALREADY EDUCATED B4 XTIANITY CAME TO THE SOUTH THRU YORUBA LAND.ISLAM WAS EVEN ALREADY IN YORUBA LAND B4 THE CRIMINAL WHITE DUDUES CAME.SO ARABIC WAS NEW TO THE HAUSAS AS IT WAS A MEANS OF COMUNICATION IN THERE REGION.I SEE NOTHING WRONG IN ARABIC INSCRIPTION ON OUR NOTE.LETS GET IT STRAIGHT.TO THE HAUSAS,ENGLISH IS CHRISTIANITY AND CHRISTIANITY IS ENGLISH.U CANT SEPARATE A LANGUAGE FROM A RELIGION.RELIGION LANGUAGE CULTURE TRADITION ALL GO TOGETHER.

Go back and Re Read the History properly then come back and post you will notice Christianity came 100s of years to the south south B4 it went to lagos. Because of their geographical location the Itsekiri came into contact with Portuguese priest who accompanied Portuguese explorers in their bid to find a sea route to India in the fifteenth century. By about 1477 the first European contacts were made with Benin, and by 1555 Augustinian monks visited Warri. They were sent by Gasper, who was the bishop of the diocese of Sao Tome. One of the monks, Father Franscisco a Mater Dei, baptized the son of the Olu of Warri under the name of Sebastian.[1]
If this is the case English is not Christianity as the first Europeans to bring the Roman catholic into Nigeria where Portugal. They don't speak English till date, try and Educate yourself more when debating in matters like this get your facts right Mr.

PStacks:
I'm a Christian by birth but seriously speaking, I'm with the muslims on this.

U see your life.go school U nor gree.U say na 2 leed nama

MadCow1:
living things are not produced in Factories..

Yes they are.ie dolly the sheep n test tube babies

oluamid:
Incitement.

Thank U.however Im using my mobile so im txt typing if U gt a biff wiv dat den U r on a long tin

omenka:
Stop sounding ignorant. If Jonathan didn't sanction this, it wouldn't have seen the light of day.

If jonathan hadn't brought in ethnoreligious politicking, we wouldn't have been having this conversation.

Jonathan is a total disaster.

You see your life.pry 6 kid knows the diff n U r here trading Ignorance.shame on u n your likes

iseyi:
Hypocrite, I believed you will not call it frivolity if it is symbol of great Mosque that is there. Search your mind.

Use ya education wisely.I say again .thats on the note is 2 rectangle .isrealy one is 2 triangles!

Yahzeelv:
Having another sign of a religion on our currency is a bias,after d remover or Islam's inscription ,but president has right to employ security dat are and trusted of his choice .

I repeat again ise ir education wisely thats 2 rectangles not 2 triangles hence it has 8 points hexangon.Now tell the rest of ur brothers to chill

Strongbest:
My brother, a bird at hand they say is worth more than a thousand in the air (bush). This doesn't necessarily stop anyone from looking beyond but while waiting for that white collar job it's good to have something doing in the interim, sometimes this even grows beyond your imagination or expectation, I'm a living witness to that.

And of course, there are general lectures on how to apply for a job and how to write a good CV, that goes to show that it's not just limited to being self employed alone.

Good insight.ni idy goes to school to learn hiw to be their own boss.they all mostly axpire to look 4 employment

Obinoscopy:
This is the star of david symbol:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Star_of_David.svg/887px-Star_of_David.svg.png

Its an artistic design of a star that is formed by merging two equilateral triangles together.

So I still wonder where the MURIC spokesman saw that sign on our N100 note

U will be suprised how silly people can be.this is the kind of instigation that leads to killings.Insightment of the hieghest order if U ask me.

idealsico:
Hypocrites! You see why I hate double standard. When the arabic inscriptions were criminally inserted into our currency they saw nothing wrong, even though Nigeria is multi-religious. Only one note and they are complaining. My humble suggestion: DELETE BOTH ARABIC AND JEWISH INSCRIPTIONS ON OUR CURRENCIES. He who comes to equity must come with clean hands.

Use your Education wisely.dont subscribe to stupidity.many things on the notes mean loads of diff things to diff people.Thats a watermark and its a security mark on the noteThat is a hexagon watermark.

indigene:
That has been the fastest way of obtaining a license, still with same fake license, you can drive from Lagos to Kano.
You wil be suprised to learn, that my truck driver, have not renewed his licenses and the truck papers since 2009.
Reason whether your license and truck papers are issued from the presidency, or even owned by presido, every police, army and federal road safety cashier road block has its specific kelebe.
Why bother of fake license, when some Nigerians are fake in personality.

you are wrong, I never give anybody any money while Im on the highway in Nigeria, why should I?

larez:
I charge $225.00/Hr consultation with a minimum of 2 hours including traveling time, if I need to come out to meet the client. Ignorant guys like Ajileko (sufferhead) are the types who low-ball to trap the client and then steal them blind. My average design af approximately a 4000 sqft (heated) home costs my clients $8000.00 to $12,000.00. But then, my name stands behind the home. This is the most important cost to the client. Talent is priceless and market rates determine it's price, not drudging hourly labour. Ajileko is merely a foreman that you put at your site to make sure the workers there follow instructions. He can't understand the concept of the dignity behind Architecture.

He wouldn't know the difference between a Claude Monet, Van Gogh etc, from a painting being sold along Ikeja road by a street hawker.

Did you say Heated home?

GlorifiedTunde:
Or end up with a man who dies early because of their wahala

That one join too chei chesus.I sorry for such man

GlorifiedTunde:
Guy u no dey give up o. Why u dey try convince this girls na? U wan marry them.

There's a chic out there who will be willing to kneel for you no mata what. You better stop wasting your time to recycle terrible mentalities here.

Imagine if a husband has to be the head and priest in the home, he's supposed to bless his wife and kids. They kneel while he prays for them. Its a sign of headship as the scripture demands.

Se woman wey no fit kneel beg her husband go fit kneel down for blessings?

This ladies are not looking for your type. Na "anything goes" kind of man they want.

Thats why they find themselbes on the wrong side of forty something no husband

mifavour:
my friend shut up biko.

More reason husband go hard U.mannerless gyal

leorayvon2k2:
pls how much can I use to scan a car

Try and buy a scanner, they cost as low as 2K these days, get one.

ifuckpussy:
Liar. Most people downloaded the song or bought a pirated copy.

I like flavour and I love the song. But 5 million CD copies... Iro nla ni yen

where E say 5 million copies?

MissMeiya:
I was and am discussing the actions of the POLICE. Perhaps you've lost track of which poster you're talking to.

Nop I know whom I talking to and you say it was right for them to Ignore the COURT ORDER correct?

MissMeiya:
Read my post. I discussed both restraining orders and injunctions.

I did and my assumption is you are saying they should disobey the court's ruling ?Im talking about the ruling stating the house should not reconvene till 3rd December?Is this what you are saying?

MissMeiya:
No, sorry I didn't understand any of that. Please read my response. From what I can gather from this post, it's obvious you did not read it.

I'm actually trying to educate YOU.

Did you check what a restraining order is? and why I used it in this context?Are you in anyway suggesting that they where right in disobeying court Orders? or are you deliberately omitting that part?

MissMeiya:
Sigh. A restraining order is a very particular kind of court order, one that involves a person's or persons' safety. That is why violating a restraining orders can have criminal as well as civil consequences. But even then, someone who thinks another person is violating a restraining order can only call the police (and defend themselves, if they feel their lives are in danger). And what do the police do? They arrive and MAKE AN ARREST. They don't fire tear gas and put up barricades around the protected person. They just make the arrest.

The case is then turned over to the COURTS. To determine if the accused was in violation of the restraining order. Yes, even after all that, the matter must still be decided in court. That's how democracy works.

Your exaggerated comparison aside, the court order in this case was NOT A RESTRAINING ORDER. No one's life was in danger. This is a civil matter, not a criminal one. It is called an injunction. Whether or not an injunction can be actively enforced by police varies by region. It usually isn't, especially in a case like this. Even if it is, once again, the police must be called, and then they arrest whoever is in violation of the order. In this case, it would be every House member who attempted to meet.

THEN, the COURTS--NOT THE POLICE--would decide if they were in violation of the injunction, and make a judgment as to what sanctions to impose, whether it be a fine or jail time.

Response to your P.S.:
No. A court judgment is not a law. You need to look up the definition of a law.

ahah ok whenb I said court Judgement is not lawy,its not law that a states enshrines into thier constitution,however, the are backed by the law of teh land to pass judgement and everyone is bound by these same law to Obey,Im trying my very best to Educate you on this issue I hope you see beyond this,
Another example is The police dont make law but are empowered by laws to make arrest if they have sufficient reasons and evidence.
The court of lawy is Empowered by the laws of the land which is also Enshrined in teh constitution to pass judgement.The court has just done that they have restrained not just Tamblewal but anybody from going to the house until the 3rd.A restraining order those not just apply to someone in Danger, I used that example to bring it close to home cos you will hear this more in the news in the US.so in this context, the restraining order is for the house not to sit till 3rd December.Going against this is and avenue for the court to hold you in contempt if we are living in a free society like those of the USA and UK and other western country.I hope I have made this clear enough.

thunder74:
noun (plural assaults)
A violent onset or attack with physical means, as blows, weapons, etc.; an onslaught; the rush or charge of an attacking force; onset; as, to make assault upon a man, a house, or a town.
A violent onset or attack with moral weapons, as words, arguments, appeals, and the like; as, to make an assault on the prerogatives of a prince, or on the constitution of a government.
(criminal) An attempt to commit battery: a violent attempt, or willful effort with force or violence, to do hurt to another, but without necessarily touching his person, as by lifting a fist in a threatening manner, or by striking at him and missing him.
singulare tantum legal The crime whose action is such an attempt.
(tort) An act that causes someone to apprehend imminent bodily harm.
singulare tantum legal The tort whose action is such an act.
(fencing) A non-competitive combat between two fencers.

The actions of the lawmakers are unnecessary, since police have condoned off the place, the honorable thing is for them to obey and live by example. Just imagine I refuse to stop for police stop and search because I know my papers are correct.

You don't need to touch a police man physically before you assault him, mere abuse, pushing, holding his uniform, removing his beret, invading a red line are disrespectful to the force and must be condemned by all.

Thanks you very much, thoughtful of you.

Deapexboy:
How was d police assulted?

How did d speaker break d law?

Where nd who are d thugs?

Who said there is no fiction in PDP?

After d saga GEJ jets out of d country?


On which constitution is the IGP acting upon?


Why have the POLICE come so low to use unlawfully?


I need answers


or i wil b force to believe that d IG,GEJ and PDP's are going against law,they don't knw constitution

they brainless

Tambuwal has gone to court to challenge the removal of his security details by the IGP over his defection to the APC and to stop the House removing him as a speaker and member of the House of Reps which was adjourned until Nov. 27. Though, he had withdrawn the first suit to restore his security details by the IGP recently. The second suit is still pending and the court had earlier ruled that the status quo as at the time Tambuwal approached the court should remain. One of such is that the House shall not reconvene until the 3rd of December. Why would Tambuwal not obey the court order? Have the Police done wrong to defend the court order preventing the House for reconvening until 3rd December?

MissMeiya:
Like I said earlier, police enforce the LAW. No law was broken. A court order is not a law. If someone felt the entire House of Representatives was in violation of the court order, the matter should have been reported to the court, and allowed the court to summon the parties in question.

Tear gas and barricades are NOT meant to be used in a civil matter such as this. The police were grossly out of bounds, and behaved like paid thugs.

I would take this as a tongue in cheek statement, for God sake your location says USA, you should know better, what happens when the court gives you a restraining order no to go 20 yards to your ex? is that no law? if you do you get arrested right?its this same restraining order that the court gave until the 3rd of December, so the noble thing for the police to do is to arrest all of them and charge them but this is Nigeria, the politicians think they are above the law so they dealt with the situation the best way deem fit.
PS: Courts Judgement is Law,if the court says you are going to prison you are going to prison.Fact.

obinoral1179:
status quo means he is still the speaker and he can call for meeting any day any time and he is trying to work as the speakers of the federation. So bro tell me something else and why did the so called police refused to mention this in their report. This police breach the law or unless you will inform me that status quo means tambuwal is not the speakers and cannot reconvene the house?

yes he and no one is meant to return to the house, status quo means he retains all his powers, he knows and realized early enough he wont win the part of returning his security back as usual so he was duly advised.However the court already made a declaration and no one can change that, doing so would undermine the same Agency he seeks refuge from the Judiciary.
come on guys no lawyers in the house?

yetunsbay:
enlighten pls

Tambuwal has gone to court to challenge the removal of his security details by the IGP over his defection to the APC and to stop the House removing him as a speaker and member of the House of Reps which was adjourned until Nov. 27. Though, he had withdrawn the first suit to restore his security details by the IGP recently. The second suit is still pending and the court had earlier ruled that the status quo as at the time Tambuwal approached the court should remain. One of such is that the House shall not reconvene until the 3rd of December. Why would Tambuwal not obey the court order? Have the Police done wrong to defend the court order preventing the House for reconvening until 3rd December?

obinoral1179:
are they to send a letter to the IGP that they want to reconvene? Am not getting your argument?

Hope you do now,sometimes it pays to follow up closely with what's happening around us cos it concerns us o ne way or the other.

obinoral1179:
the reason the police gave was lame may be you where there to give me a firsthand info.

Tambuwal has gone to court to challenge the removal of his security details by the IGP over his defection to the APC and to stop the House removing him as a speaker and member of the House of Reps which was adjourned until Nov. 27. Though, he had withdrawn the first suit to restore his security details by the IGP recently. The second suit is still pending and the court had earlier ruled that the status quo as at the time Tambuwal approached the court should remain. One of such is that the House shall not reconvene until the 3rd of December. Why would Tambuwal not obey the court order? Have the Police done wrong to defend the court order preventing the House for reconvening until 3rd December?
there.

MissMeiya:
Courts do not make laws. They judge cases of alleged law-breaking. Again: COURTS DO NOT MAKE THE LAW.

Ok since you seem reasonable I will make this clear,****
Tambuwal has gone to court to challenge the removal of his security details by the IGP over his defection to the APC and to stop the House removing him as a speaker and member of the House of Reps which was adjourned until Nov. 27. Though, he had withdrawn the first suit to restore his security details by the IGP recently. The second suit is still pending and the court had earlier ruled that the status quo as at the time Tambuwal approached the court should remain. One of such is that the House shall not reconvene until the 3rd of December. Why would Tambuwal not obey the court order? Have the Police done wrong to defend the court order preventing the House for reconvening until 3rd December?
So my question to everybody is today the 3rd?
the Judge passed judgement and the police protected it, what has it got to do with PDP or GEJ? no has anybody got an answer to this?

obinoral1179:
on what ground? and the president sent them a letter to extend the emergency rule and they came there o fulfill their constitutional right but the so called police said they came with thugs after the court of law said everybody must remain status quo.

Exactly you only stated status quo how about the resumption date?did you miss that?