ExLaidback's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ExLaidback's Profile › ExLaidback's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (of 13 pages)
, |
rebekah2011:Haba! Ol boy these guys mean business o. This is why I restructured my portfolio to more of long term holds than short term. |
November looks set to be a predominantly bearish month with maybe a bit of respite here and there. NSEASI also looks set to break the 27000 support, and who knows how low it will tank? Maybe much further below. I dey sidelines dey look sha but for the money I already have trapped, unfortunately. $$$ |
123ABCXYZ:Thanks bro! There goes all my lofty dreams for UBA. I hereby downgrade UBA from a buy to outperform. LoL |
123ABCXYZ:Thanks and God bless for your input! I actually studied a breakdown of IAS 21 a bit before putting up my post but as you can tell Finance is not my forte. ![]() I did already state that it isn't a loop hole in my response to @Kentoto, that it's within their right to do so. Though I wasn't so clear to what extent and I didn't know that it's non-negotiable. The notes to this financial item on their report (note 10) just said 'FX revaluation gains'. Which just seemed unclear. But thanks again for the clarification. Please can you help expatiate on that of UBA? There were no notes attached to theirs so I'm assuming it's the input from investments in Foreign Operations/Subsidiaries rather than than other monetary items at play (just like you said above). My question is: what are the chances of it's reclassification within this same financial year? |
kentoto:Thanks Sir, Yeah, I guess it's just to watch and see how things go. I do have faith in both of them sha...especially as a lot can still happen in 4th qtr. Also I may not refer to it as a loop hole, IASB rules actually favor their (GTB's) presentation especially if those FX gains are already realized -I think. It's just that it helped masked a problem (i.e. much higher impairment charges) and yet it may not offer a consistent means of income. Cheers. . |
This is not to over flog the issue but just to educate some of us here, especially the investors with a mid to long term view. (Personally at the end of this year, my portfolio is getting divided into two parts strictly i.e. JIJO and long term. This is by choice and not by bull trap or force )Well we discussed UBA and GTB's result earlier so here are a few things to note about the Statements of Profit and Loss and Other Comprehensive Income based on IFRS 1. Entities currently have a choice and can present profit or loss and other comprehensive income in either: • A single statement of comprehensive income; or • Two statements: a statement displaying components of profit or loss (an income statement), and a second statement beginning with profit or loss and displaying the components of OCI (a statement of other comprehensive income). 2. IAS1 proposed: • To present a statement showing as two separate sections: i. profit or loss; and ii. all items of ‘other comprehensive income’ (OCI); and • To present separately: i. those items of OCI that might be reclassified subsequently; and ii. those items of OCI that will not be reclassified subsequently. 3. Profit or loss is a key performance measurement tool and Earnings Per Share (EPS) calculations are based on this alone and not on Other Comprehensive Income 4. The commonly suggested attributes for differentiation between profit or loss and OCI (realised/unrealised, frequency of occurrence, operating/non-operating, measurement certainty/uncertainty, realisation in the short/long-term or outside management control) are difficult to distil into a set of principles. However there are general guidelines set out by the IASB. 5. So with respect to UBA’s result, those items presented in OCI may - as already stated on the report - be reclassified into profit and loss on the FY2016 reports which would then result in a much higher EPS than usual. This remains to be seen anyway. 6. I think GTB was counting on this freedom of presentation of it's reports as explained in point 1 above and the tendency for people to focus primarily on the bottom line, to present all it's income for the period under profit and loss knowing the effect the high EPS will have. It is still ok as it's within their right. This of course is not a buy or sell recommendation, just something to bear in mind for those interested when perusing reports of BaOFI |
pluto09:Ok, but what is it about their history? not consistent in dividend payment or in revenue growth? kindly enlighten, cos I've not really followed these stocks for that long... |
It's pertinent to note that UBA's total earnings has perhaps for the first time in a long time exceeded that of GTB. While NSE sentiments may favour GTB for now, I do think that UBA is a much better buy considering present SP and value (i.e. if they get to add the FX gains to their dividend pay for FYE 2015). If they add the FX gains, their EPS would be very close to that of GTB (it ought to be higher but for the fact that they have a 23% higher OS than GTB). We are watching, unfortunately my money is tied down in UCAP. So I no fit enter UBA. This no be buy or sell recommend o |
feelamong:UBA obviously has a materially better report, but I think they are doing that for one of two reasons:- Either to show how well they've done through regular banking activities rather than just the (bad)luck of devalued naira/FX gains, of which they may combine both at the FYE and declare the full sum as Profit OR They don't plan on declaring FX gains as part of their profit for the year at FYE. (I.e. they don't intend to pay dividend of it, may be transfer it to some reserve or something - I don't know how that works ) But then again in compliance with IFRS standard, at FYE the audited report for banks probably has to differentiate between profit and other comprehensive income. I'm just postulating... |
Considering that UBA is the most performing bank stock right now, and that it must touch and exceed N5 within the next 4 - 5 months, for those mid to long termers, I'd say this is a good buy now. $$$ |
Na wa o. I just dey laugh... $$$ |
DeRuggedProf:I hope so o. I guess their loan loss for Q3 will tell us everything. |
On a scale of 1 to 10 how possible is it for FBNH to seek Tier 1 capital? $$$ |
fxuser:Yeah, I guess that would be a determinant if at all they're going to do it |
Sometime between now and end of the year, CBN is going to have to release it's grip on the Naira, allow it depreciate a little in order to allow some of these banks breath i.e. considering the rising NPLs. We know that's why they devalued close to the end of June. Policies to favour the elite |
bigass:I've heard good things about Mansard, never had reason to make a claim personally though |
ExLaidback:Who wrote this with my name! My account was hacked. They hacked Kemi Adeosun now it's mine. SMH UCAP is obviously finding support much higher at 2.5x just like I said last week. ![]() |
Willie2015:Sure a number of people understand these things. But I only started taking stocks seriously this year and so only recently started seeing the intricacies of the NSE. So there are still lots of peeps who don't quite grasp it |
People on this thread don't really go through results. They just check the PAT and that's it. I'm not of a Finance and Accounts background but some of the basics are there to read for whoever is interested. Like has been posted before, which is not news, FX will be this biggest player on most bank results this year. FX gains/losses and loan losses GTB (the almighty bank) in it's Q2 had to add FX translation/transaction gains to it's PAT (instead of under OCI as ZIB and UBA did or else it would have declared a loss for the 3 months ended June) due to very high Loan impairment charges. That's one of the most stable banks. FCMB did the same thing. So these are banks wit good NET FX Assets. Now imagine banks with Net FX liabilities (rather than Assets), also having high loan loss to deal with this year. My take is this: for any bank whose Q3 you are expecting, just check the Q2. If there was a considerable increase in it's loan loss therein don't expect anything too fantastic in Q3. If even worse, it has a net FX liabilities rather than Assets, you might even want to sell because there'd be nothing to cushion the rise in loan losses (except cutting down drastically on operating expenses, I guess). Or what do you think? |
On Thursday/Friday when UCAP may trade at it's lowest price for the next 2 months (at a likely price of N2.3x), you may want to buy. This is taking into consideration, the improving energy price situation worldwide and assuming Niger Delta Avengers will calm down at least for now. Also most stocks that would produce good Q3 would not trade as low as they are trading now till late December or early next year i.e. you may be seeing their lowest prices for a full quarter. This is a buy recommendation for UCAP. Yes. Please buy it let it swell. Thank you. ![]() Short to mid-term traders kindly take note. #ForecastofLife |
Oga @FXUSER perhaps you're envisaging high net gain through FX transactions? But if that's the case why you go put UBA at less than N40B, they have good net FX Asset like the rest. $$$ |
locodemy:Nice, na jeje dey win this race pass sha. With the shocking reversal of UCAP today, you may see it to enter at 2.30/2.35 (nut nothing less I promise) next week (I said 2.42 before so i don change mouth ). Enjoy. |
locodemy:Any better news for FBNH? Let us know o biko. |
fxuser:Ol boy, frankly I'm quite surprised it came way down to 2.51 today o, not what i envisaged at all. NSE na bros. Be that as it may, I'm expecting a continuous battle between those trying to take position for dividend and profit takers, with the former keeping it above a certain price and the later keeping below a certain price too. |
bigjay01:You're a chairman na, you no get problem |
I mentioned on this forum earlier that UCAP would not close at less than N2.2 again before it trades at N3.00 (it only closed twice below N2.2 though it traded below on about three occasions due to way too much bears at that time and some people were waiting to buy it at N2.00 or even N1.80 ), some 'gurus' laughed at moi. Who's laughing now? Let me just add that if you're the type that holds stocks for 6 months or more you better buy UCAP now, cos the least price it will ever trade between now and March/April next year is N2.42 (actually more like N2.5 if at all it reaches there). Mark it.I missed the bus this time around because I was riding FCMB and UCAP was trading sideways for too long, but I've jumped in nonetheless, even though i know it might still trade lower than today's close price soon. |
fxuser:Your projection is very reasonable. The average payout ratio over the last 3 years is 67.5% with a minimum of 56% if I'm to go by what some one posted earlier (it's why I like people posting accurate figures). So 60% is very reasonable, as I also noticed from their cash flow report that they've done a lot investments this year hence a reduction in their cash and cash equivalents. Some say though that it's still early to jump in and take position. But what do you think? |
angelo82:You mean 78k. |
agisky1975:Good advice. For long termers. I'm not speaking as one. I think I should have added that I was speaking as a very short term trader, specifically for those who are buying with hopes of a wonderful Q3 result (JIJO guys). If you're looking at holding any of the stocks I mentioned for a long while, you're not likely to get significantly better prices than what obtains presently. Then again if you read the link that Intendy shared you'd find that the mentioned banks had weakened fundamentals with possibility of further deterioration. |
).
)