₦airaland Forum

jericco1:
Poor list

Well the pool of songs released in 2024 is very poor too

Lol....what a list

Unsubstantiated news for now but it wouldn't surprise me if true, northerners are pretty weird like that.

Wasted life

EreluRoz:
He should mind his business afterall he's just a friend and not his brother or relative

So it's okay for the siblings to tell the man? Then how about op tells a sibling who in turn tells the man, would that then be okay by you?

LoverOfPussy:
Please it's very urgent
Anyone please


08022190.242
Airtel


Please

Done.

Happy easter my people

Not my concern

Jogs1900:
Smh

You're smh say wetin happen? He has a valid point

immortalcrown:
He checked and confirmed? How? On your phone or on his own phone?

The transaction will not automatically reverse if he confirmed it on his own phone. If the confirmation was on your own phone, the money could automatically bounce back based on atomicity principles.

If you ever get an automatic reversal (credit alert) for your successful payment (that is if the recipient's account has been credited with the money you sent), the automatic reversal you get will not debit the recipient's account. The bank is the one losing the money you got in the reversal. And in this case, the bank may later debit you to recover the money.

This cannot happen automatically. Someone initiated the reversal. Your claim is like saying a delivered mail automatically reversed. It is even a crime against the recipient. You can sue the bank.

It happens more often than you know. I have witnessed it several times

qtguru:
It's you womens problem not men, for us it's entertainment that a man out dresses a woman.

Don't lump all men together, not every man is as silly as you

nlparrot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVY0YrkIWFg?si=irPe5XRM-w4gHwBW

Afrobeats superstar, Davido has disclosed that he met his wife, Chioma Rowland before he became rich and famous.

The singer stated that if he had not met Chioma before he became successful he would have found it difficult to find love.

He disclosed this while featuring as a gues on the latest episode of The Bridge Show.



Source: Yabaleftonline @IG

It's obvious all these interviews are conducted with questions that the interviewee has already agreed to otherwise i don't understand why the interviewer's response to this watery answer was not "when were you ever not rich"?

oloriooko:
@ poster.
I have a word for you.
e be like say you get yawa with the man of God and you be fake reporter.
if you tink say the man own na fake, go start ya own make we see.
If wetin the man dey do na fake, then I like am cos everybody dey talk about the man!
O boy wake up ,try something else, stop attacking what you do not know about.
I have never met the man one on one but the guy is hot men! I think I like him just like other men of God.
Sir john or wetin you call yaself, I beg find something else talk.
If ya person no heal, no blame am for the man head i beg, him be God? Only God sabi wetin ya person do for life wey heal he no fit heal! Tell ya person make him confess him sins oooo.

Senseless post as usual

AL1ENWARE:
I played over2.5 @ NO they nullified it because they played 2-2 which is a draw as Preator stated.

I played Under2.5 @ NO they still nullified it after they played 3-1

So based on the purpose of this thread, I won that match.

Guys look at all the screenshots posted below and tell me there is no discrepancy in their markings.


Notice the 3rd screenshot.
The OR is functioning on the alternate outcome of Over2.5 @ NO hence it WON.

But...

On the last screenshot.
The same OR refuses to function on the alternate outcome of Under2.5 @ NO.

In fact, careful analysis of the NO operation on the second alternative of all my game denotes that it's functioning except for the last one. Where I picked NO @ Under 2.5 which means I'm saying they must do over 2.5 which they did and it counted me lost.

What kanfa!

From what i can deduce from these screenshots, seems the two games have to enter for the ticket to go green. I think someone already said something similar in the earlier pages, means he's correct...no wonder the odds are so high, no sensible betting company will give such high odds for such an outcome, guess this is where they'll hook you with TnC if you try to escalate

AL1ENWARE:
I played over2.5 @ NO they nullified it because they played 2-2 which is a draw as Preator stated.

I played Under2.5 @ NO they still nullified it after they played 3-1

So based on the purpose of this thread, I won that match.

Guys look at all the screenshots posted below and tell me there is no discrepancy in their markings.


Notice the 3rd screenshot.
The OR is functioning on the alternate outcome of Over2.5 @ NO hence it WON.

But...

On the last screenshot.
The same OR refuses to function on the alternate outcome of Under2.5 @ NO.

In fact, careful analysis of the NO operation on the second alternative of all my game denotes that it's functioning except for the last one. Where I picked NO @ Under 2.5 which means I'm saying they must do over 2.5 which they did and it counted me lost.

What kanfa!

Ok, means my opinion is wrong then cause if what i said before was true then the first game would've been green. I'm out o, make i focus on my virtual

Fattprince23:
So you do see Yes/No on 1X2 market too?

Like i said i don't really play soccer bets, i focus mostly on virtual but i believe when you play home win either halves, it does show yes

AL1ENWARE:
The under 2.5 is operating at NO not YES why are some people like franugo continue to insist that the NO can only affect the Home to win or lose but not the alternative outcome by which OR functions on? , yet same franugo cannot agree that if Burnley to Win or Over2.5 is set to YES, and let say that play 0-5 then it should be a LOSS because according to him and those who reason like him on this market pick, since Burnley didn't WIN, the YES should only apply for whichever team was predicted to win or lose?

What are you talking about? Burnley to win or over 2.5 set to yes seems straightforward, if Burnley wins, green. If Burnley lose but game plays over 2.5, green. Nothing special there....moreover when did we talk about Burnley or over 2.5 that you said i can't agree to it?

Na all these kind fights my sister n me dey love to watch that year....she dey sabi give commentary

AL1ENWARE:
What does the below means?
Under 2.5 = NO

You did not play under 2.5 NO, you played home NO or under 2.5, learn to distinguish the distinction.

AL1ENWARE:
What does Under 2.5 set at NO means. Does it mean outcome should be over 2.5 or under2.5

You're still not understanding me it seems. You played NO home or under 2.5 goals right?
I'm saying that the way sportybet obviously reads this is either home does not win or the game will end with less than 3 goals. Both options lost so your ticket lost. You are guessing that the NO acts on the two options but it does not. It only acts on the home option because the goals are already specified and it's clear whatis needed goalwise for the ticket to go green.

AL1ENWARE:
Yes it does with SportyBet.
Those of you arguing this has a lost are not calming down to apply your logic.

For as long as OR is there, it means either of two outcomes must be met. And one of either conditions was met.

ManU vs PSG played at Home or Over2.5 = YES
means it's either Man U wins or the match ends with more than 2 goals to have a win.
If it is NO, it means ManU must not win or they both don't play up to 2 goals.

In the same stance
if it was ManU v PSG played at Home or Under2.5 = NO, so how come you guys are saying it is a lost when the selection is NO to the other alternate outcome predicting Under2. 5 is a NO

The way you're reading it differs from how i do. From my POV, the yes/no is strictly for the home win, it has no bearing on goals cause they've already specified it as over or under 2.5. That's the way bet companies structure their games, you are the one reading it differently.

Samade7:
The game entered, sporty na thief.......
Home team win (NO) = LOSE

or

Under 2.5 (NO) = WIN

I'm sure you play bets, does it show YES or NO when you play over or under a certain goal range?

AL1ENWARE:
Thank you
God bless you.
This thing is a no brainer.
Should I post the chat between me and their agent. They are arguing I lost what is obviously clear cut. I now ask to know if they are saying if I had played Home win or Under 2.5 @ YES would it be a win, they said yes, because one of the two outcomes was met. Now that it was Home Win or Under 2.5 @ NO, how come it is a loss. They just kept repeating that I lost the match. What can I do in a situation like this.

I don't really play match bets but this seems like a clear loss. Firstly over and under 2.5 goals do not really need yes or no operators as they're clear cut so your NO operatior is acting on the home win only NOT under 2.5 goals. Since you chose NO, means home is not supposed to win or the game will end with less than 3 goals. Neither outcome materialized so you lost. You are thinking the NO acts on the goals part but it obviously does not.

NuCypher:
The Nigerian women showed the Nigerian men how it's done!

The men also won

UDOKABESTLUV:
Source: CatiaKyen

Oh my, what a beautiful baby....the person wey leave baby for ground dey snap picture need serious slap

That last botswana girl no go fit last long for bed i swear, her perseverance level na 10%.

Awesome run Omolara

RecentHistory:
This is the woman who Emefiele introduced a rule to kick out.

What rule was that?