₦airaland Forum

Affiliated: Before life on earth started there should have been life elsewhere for many billions of years. There's life all over the universe. There would be those that are more advanced than us

Adaeze003: Don't mind him jor.. Dude nor get case.

tny60: see your life. you have exposed yourself as the one with inferiority complex here.

tny60: if it annoys you so much, why not go and give the girls money to do their weaves properly? why are you so concerned with their hair? are they your girlfriends?

tny60: african women wear wigs because they want
to attract men. and 90% of african men mostly
prefer long, silky hair which african women
don't have naturally.

Adaeze003: So now we are also insecure? Wtf? Like seriously, what are you going on and on about? Its not bad to look trendy but girls use weaves coz they're insecure? how is it possible that you have never thought of it as part of the trends and fashion? Why are you being myopic over a trivial issue?
You also said that girls in your family use weaves,does it also mean that they(and 90% of girls in nigeria) are all insecure?
What about white gurls that use extensions? Is it also due to inferiority complex?
"Opinions are like arse holes, every one has one"

tny60: african women wear wigs because they want
to attract men. and 90% of african men mostly
prefer long, silky hair which african women
don't have naturally. maybe you are in the 1% that prefer plaits and natural hair. but most men don't. they always pick the weave-on lady over the natural lady.
ps: if a woman has enough money to get it
done correctly, it will look good. but if you do it cheaply, it looks bad. just the same way natural hair or plaits can look bad if
you don't take care of it.
so to answer your question, we wear wigs for
you your choices in women have told us
that is what you prefer. and tha is why we do
it. so men, it is up to you to give you wife or
girlfriend enough MONEY for her hair so she
can look good with her weave.

kandiikane: Mtcheew! Men and their stup!d!ty!

Didn't you know our ancestors use to add extensions to their hair way before the whites came?

Look in the mirror before chastising women. Don't you wear the white man's suit? Don't you wear the white man's attire more than you w [quote author=kandiikane]Mtcheew! Men and their stup!d!ty!

Didn't you know our ancestors use to add extensions to their hair way before the whites came?

Look in the mirror before chastising women. Don't you wear the white man's suit? Don't you wear the white man's attire more than you wear the african attire? Does it mean you want to be white?

Adaeze003: I'm a proud Nigerian so I'm gonna answer your question with a question.
What about the mohawk hair style I now see on you guys' head?
What about all the fashion trends that started from the west?
Is inferiority complex also the cause?
Call it fake or anything just don't use the inferiority complex line..

Adaeze003: Everything is now caused by inferiority complex. Mtcheew!

Sijo01: Sorry to disappoint you, dude! I an't wearing no wig.

Lovetinz: Hmm..
I remember when I told my girl the only hairstyle I like is 'plaited secondary school style'.
She said 'abi you mean say you no wan pay!' so I bribed her with a ladies chronograph to get the darn thing of her head.

Running my hand through natural hair and sniffing it is pure bliss to me.
I hate wigs!

tpacalipse: So are you trying to make us understand that our babes in Africa are fake people?

Sijo01: How about channeling the 'why' to the women in your family?

Goshen360: @ Logicboy and Frostyzone,

There is what is called "chronological" arrangement - based on how books were written. The context of Matthew to John wasn't NT, but OT. Christ is the MEDIATOR of the NT and without the death of a testator, a testament is NOT in force. Under the chronological writings, Matthew to John was written AFTER the death but the context is DURING the earthly life of the testator. Do people write you biography when you are alive or does your will take effect when you are still alive?

Goshen360: New International Version (©1984)

For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance--now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant. In the case of a will, it is necessary to prove the death of the one who made it, because a will is in force only when somebody has died; it never takes effect while the one who made it is living. This is why even the first covenant was not put into effect without blood. When Moses had proclaimed every commandment of the law to all the people, he took the blood of calves, together with water, scarlet wool and branches of hyssop, and sprinkled the scroll and all the people. He said, "This is the blood of the covenant, which God has commanded you to keep."

Hebrews 9:15-20

See how you bear this one first....

Goshen360: Matthew to John is not NT by covenant, it
was only NT by arrangement for purpose
of simplicity. NT start in Acts. You want
prove?

Goshen360: Matthew to John is not NT by covenant, it was only NT by arrangement for purpose of simplicity. NT start in Acts. You want prove?

Goshen360: Permnit me to help you out.......@ OP and everyone,

The bible is a compilation of God's thought in God's university. You don't expect one ONE student or ONE faculty in a university, do you The bible was written to two major groups but then, three namely,

The Jews
The Gentiles
The church of God.

Now, back to the topic, all scriptures quoted are under the old covenant wherein God found fault with the ONLY people He was dealing with at that time. Christianity wasn't in effect until the death of the testator.

cold: Theists of course.With their narcissistic obsession with their own mythologies.Vociferously and ferociously trying to foist their beliefs down everybody else's throat.Telling anyone who cares to listen that their God created everything bright and beautiful (but leaving out tsunamis,earthquakes,AIDS/HIV etc).Attacking and cursing everyone and anyone who dare question the numerous inconsistencies inherent in these religious strains.

donroxy: Frostyzone......ehm one more thing!!!

Mayb u shd alert the MOD that u ve adjusted the topic cuz it is still ehm ,
RELIGION VS ATHEISM @ the frontpage.

donroxy: But before i do, i want u to know this........''God is not a Subjective being,HE has proven his Existence objectively and HIS signs abound everywhere , u don't have to be Subjective in proven the Reality of God's Existence!!!!

Let the Atheists realise the above while u dudes are @ it!!!


Christianity Vs Atheism......... Goodluck to u guys!!!!

donroxy: The Op said he Delibrately left out muslims......!!!!! Quashed,Quashed!!!!





Always defending the un-defendable........ Where is the Logic in Logicboy!!!!!


The last seconds I checked ''Islam for Muslims'' is still sub-forum within ''Religion'' on Nairaland.......




This Thread should be lowered from Front page!!!!

MOD!!!!!

tbaba1234: I guarantee I haven't called you that either. You have said far worse things.

Now the op made a huge mistake by presenting what seemed a balanced opening and then going ahead to alienate an entire group.

If a Muslim did this, this post would probably reach 10 pages of Islam bashing. Yet you would come out and say the Muslims are generally abusive.

It is unfair and unbalanced.

Frostyzone: I deliberately left out Muslims from the
topic.
From what I garnered from research,
they are mostly unreasonable abusive
bunch.

Logicboy03:

Pass that good weed abeg

donroxy: See dude,
Op put up ''Religion vs Atheist''......
The topic should be ''christianity vs Atheist''....


We need to be logical and constructive in our dealings..... Op wants objectivity but he himself was never objective!!!


What is reasonable in this thread whose body negates the Topic!!!!!......., ahhhhhhh(yawn too)!!!!


The Thread even made it to the front page......where is the MOD self!!!!

tbaba1234: Next time, you make such an allegation, at least have the facts to back it up... Making careless broad based allegations does not give you any credibility. Needed to clear that up.

Back to topic.