₦airaland Forum

Melvyn11:
Aired by what? A useless and shameless whataboutism post by afrodoc2 without context or relation to Greenwood goal record against big teams.

Melvyn11:
Epl fans are ridiculous. The way they are praising his finishing one would think he was banging in goals against the big teams on a regular but check his goal records it's all against relegation fodders.

You mean he is doing a lukaku

Melvyn11:
The man "who can't be marked out"How many big teams has he scored against?

Zero

BlueRayDick:
Don't mind the Ediot......I'm sure the dragging they gave him on Twitter already got to him hence the apology. Imagine someone as enlightened as him not being able to discern peaceful protesters from the same hoodlums himself, the speaker and their other cronies used in winning elections for themselves.

I just hate the fact that they are lumping everyone together when they know the truth within themselves. Instead of calling out those who did everything possible to truncate the peaceful protests, they are busy chatting shiiit.
Desmond is one big disppaointment to the youth.

Himself and Yahya Bello of Kogi are very dangerous examples of "the youths are not ready to take political leadership "

You are only typing this because you lost absolutely nothing due to looting.

Kimbeast:
I just saw Ronaldo champions league record for Madrid and I was dumbfounded.


How can you score 105goals in 101matches in the Freaking Champions league. United need to demand extra 100million from Madrid because that 80million was a scam price

Funny thing is Madrid even sold him for more than they paid for him.

I hope this isn't you

TrebleChamp:
Totally agree on the point of making money, just see how Rashford is regressing after signing his 200k per week deal. I look forward to seeing Sancho play for us

The man without tactics claims another victim. If I be spillo1 I for dey drag patrickmuf,nezzjnr and treblechamp anyhow.

DissTroy:
Rakitic has never really played like a Barça player. Never. He was part of the treble-winning team and scored an important goal in the UCL finals but the only reason he was even playing that match in the first place was because we had a Luis Enrique who took a piss on the tika taka philosophy.
That 2015 UCL Final (and the journey to winning it) pales in comparison to the 2009 and 2011 editions we won. Ask yourself why.

Is Rakitic a good football player? Yes. Is he a fitting Barça player who understands tiki taka which is Barça's DNA? No. Always obvious he never would even in a sextillion years.
And if you don't know understand what defines a Barça-esque player even after my explanation then it calls into question your claim of being a Cule in the first place.

2015 treble winners does not pale in any comparism to Barca of 2009/2011.
You guys still live in the bubble of Barca domination of 2009 to 2011 it's becoming a disease . That's when this rubbish talk of Barca dna became a curse that every young player from the academy is termed the next Xavi, Iniesta and Messi. Those players are once in a lifetime and Barca is not going to produce those kind of players for the next twenty years if not more . So expecting anything like Barca of 2009 is senseless. When Barca won the champions league in 2006 go and look at our starting midfielders. Through out Barca history we have always bought the best players from around the world and dominated. Trying to rewrite Barca history like it started from 2009.

DissTroy:
Complete hogwash! Bartomeu is responsible for bringing shitty, un-Barca-like players like Rakitic and spent farm horses like Arda Turan, Paulinho and the likes to Barça as replacement for the likes of Xavi, Iniesta, Alves and more.

Bartomeu is responsible for appointing coaches who do not adhere to the tiki taka philosophy like Enrique, Valverde and Setien, while almost completely leaving out Barça academy players with no option to phase them into the first team.

Bartomeu is responsible for shelling out hundreds of millions to buy just about any player he fancied while selling out key squad players for peanuts.

Messi would still command humongous wages in any team as evidenced by PSG, Man. City and Man. United being willing to foot the bills when there was a seeming opening for Messi to leave Barcelona.

Messi has throughout Bartomeu's infamous dictatorial mishap you call "presidency" been responsible for singlehandedly winning Barcelona more points and games and trophies than all of the spent mules he spent millions buying.
Messi has had to churn out mesmerizing displays just to score more goals because the defense was getting more penetrations than the wenches at Allen Avenue.
Messi has, in spite of Bartomeu Jong Un, won more individual awards in that period than any other footballer in Europe's top leagues because he has been outstanding.
Messi has continually razed the scoring charts in that period than any other footballer you can think of, including assists and ranks high on take-on charts.

Stick to adulating the footballing Michael Phelps your moniker pays homage. Football is not water sports.

This is disrespectful and rude towards Rakitic who was a key member of our treble winning team and their is nothing like un-Barca-players.

Segedinho:
But it ended in tears.

U don't rush a very shrewed man u team any how u like.


Ask Liverpool n Man city... .

Look at how Chelsea fans are showing respect to a United team coached by the man without tactics. Patrickmuf, nezzjnr , treblechamp and nitrogen won't like this

Elnino4ladies:
Exactly my point. An slowpoke can win with Barcelona playing with the best in almost every position. Why you think say FIFA, UEFA never nominate am for any award before

K

Elnino4ladies:
Won it playing with the best in the world.
He won't survive outside Barça.

Where was he supposed to win it before? At Norwich, West brom or levante?

Moura7:
Nailed it man.....no disrespect to those two but are they creative enough. Can they spot runs and make those cutting edge through balls? God I miss Iniesta. I think Pedri can tho, when playing in the middle , puig too

Where does Liverpool and Bayern Munich creativity come from? Can you enlighten the players let's compare to those at Barca. So you are telling me a midfield three of Countinho,De Jong and Pjanic/Busi can't pass through balls or spot runs or the two fullbacks In alba and dest as well are not creative.

swiz123:
Honestly, Busquet has to be the biggest liability in football.

The so called "liability" has won it all in world football.

Melvyn11:
I can see "The man with no tactics won another big team", Some people here are dying inside.

You mean Enemies of United progress on this thread like patrick, Nezz and others. You won't see them this night till United loss again.

engrelvis:
l taught it was only me.Dis guy is good.AWB also

But according to this guy

olabode89:
Wan Bissaka is extremely poor with a very low football IQ, poor touch, etc. Crystal Palace scammed us big time.

SonOfAfonja:
Yes, he’s not the best player in the team...umtiti has done better than him.

K

Ikennablue:
Very true. Sometimes i wonder which position he is really playing. It seems he is untouchable and can play anyhow he likes.
But fact is, he is still better than any other player. And he contributes the most for the team. So some of these decline can be excused. Messi can only be compared to his former self. Nothing else

Players nowadays don't have free roles. Coaches are creating systems where each and everyone must have a specific role and work together. It seems the constant disgrace we have encountered in the champions for the past 3 to 4 seasons have not shown you guys anything. Messi is 33 and declining rapidly. I don't know which Messi you have watched since the start of the year and especially after la liga restated post Covid that's still better than any other player.

seankafor:
if na that boy, make him find me come.. I dey urata o town..

I know OG's and elders when I see them and I give them accolades accordingly..

That boy has been getting on my nerves lately.. just imagine this boy start early morning to dey reason my matter

Na thunder go fire him and his hoes

Nigga he did not attack you yesterday or even quote you. You where the one who attacked him when his post didn't even concern you one bit. Don't just act like the victim here.

swiz123:
Put your argument against the 1999 constitution, not me. The law decides what constitutes cruelty against animal.

K

gensteejay:
Just like sexual relations of straight people also expose them to different diseases.

Everything in life has some risks associated with it. The ones termed bad are those whose demerits outweigh the merits like incest (father-child sexual relations), bestiality.

So far, you've not shown how homosexuality has more demerits than merits.

K

swiz123:
That would amount to cruelty against the animal.

Note, cruelty against animals is an offence in Nigeria.

What do you mean by cruelty? Butchering of animals is not cruelty but having intercourse with one is cruelty. Does that make sense to you in anyway? You eat meat and chop chicken everyday,use animal products but now you suddenly care about the well being of animals. You must be joking

gensteejay:
I already stated one up there. Microbial transmission from animals to human during mating.

The same risk that eating live animals and insects poses to humans.

Is there any sexual relation of any kind that's not health risk or do I have to list all the diseases humans can get from same sex intercourse.

* So now we have established both bestiality and Homosexuality relationship both have same problems.


Is there anything else in your Arsenal?

gensteejay:
You keep mentioning "incest, bestiality and zoophilia" when the adverse effects of those practices are clear. Are those the same thing as homosexuality?

Obviously, you don't have any tangible reason, except "the Bible says so".

Bring out the adverse effects of those practices and I will show you Homosexuality is not any different. I know you will chicken out now.

gensteejay:
I never said homosexuality should be decriminalized based on infringements of human rights alone.

I said homos are good people that don't constitute harm or danger to anyone with their same-sex acts, and you disagree without any particular reason.


What hypocrisy? You still don't get the point.

Mention how homos harm others or the environment. That's how to argue your points rationally, not merely giving irrelevant examples.

State your reasons clearly.

You actually never said anything at all why Homosexuality should be legalize in Nigeria apart from "live and let's live" which was no offense premium bullshit. State your reasons clearly why you support legalizing Homosexuality and not incest, bestiality and zoophilia.

raumdeuter:
So you dont want definition of terms but want to draw an equivalent
The definition allows you to know what parralels and differences exist between the 2 to ensure we are comparing apples to apples

You can as well say if homosexuality is acceptable, Offside should be accepted. And my response will be that "I am not asking you for the definition of offside or how it applies to homosexuality"

I will tell you exactly what I told your friend. If you want the legalization of Homosexuality in Nigeria because it's an infringement of human rights then you should have no problem saying the same thing for incest, Zoophilia and bestiality. If not then you are an hypocrite.

gensteejay:
And your mentioning the highlighted is not whataboutism? Homosexuality has to do with human-human relationships. FYI, some cultures permit people to marry their cousin. Islam even allows people to marry their cousin. The other issues you mentioned occur between different species.

Irrelevant.

Another post of premium whataboutism. If you want the legalization of Homosexuality in Nigeria because it's an infringement of human rights then you should have no problem saying the same thing for incest, zoophilia and bestiality. Your hypocrisy and ignorance jumped out today.

raumdeuter:
homosexuality involves 2 consenting adults human who want to be with each other

Bestiality involves a human and an animal

Nobody asked for the definition of terms.

gensteejay:
Is it not a similar criminal law that stipulates 2 years of imprisonment for persons accused of witchcraft?

I'm sure you see nothing wrong in killing or even burning an innocent kid accused of witchcraft by ignorant, superstitious folks like you.

It's shameful when so-called adults refuse to take responsibility for their actions and would rather put the blame on innocent people, mostly women and girls who they call witches, or blame one imaginary devil that doesn't exist.

Typical case of whataboutism and deviation tactics. Defender of human rights why are you stopping at Homosexuality, why not include those of who wants to practice incest, zoophilia and bestiality. I repeat whatever argument you want to bring to support legalizing Homosexuality in Nigeria,I will use it to support those other three.

raumdeuter:
Relevant because we are discussing relationship between 2 human not a human and an animal

This is a very bold claim. Can you show me where you came to that conclusion ? We are talking about infringing on People rights,if you are standing up for Homosexuals then why not include those who wants to practice incest, zoophilia and bestiality.

Melvyn11:
Since everybody wants to be mad let's legalize all the rubbish together

Yes o. Let's legalize all of them so as not to infringe on people right to Bleep anyone and anything.