₦airaland Forum

YTmami:
Her husband is not innocent here, he cheated on her in their matrimonial home. So you should criticize them both instead of solely focusing on the woman

MrBrownJay1:
i dont know whats more fukced up here.....
A) a married person going on these BS shows disgracing themselves for clout OR B) such person saying that they would have done more if they werent married (aka her mind is ready to do all type of nonsense, but marriage license is stopping her lol).

i do feel sorry for this person's partner.... he must really feel like shiit right now, but then again, he let his wife join this BS show. many men out there are married to undercover low life sluts who will do anything for a buzz or some change.

if i was that woman's husbnad, her bags would be already packed and ready to be shipped wherever she decides to live when she leaves that garbage show. olosho wifey ***spit on floor***

MITCHELL96:
Do anything that makes you happy, that's what I mean

MITCHELL96:
OBO, Catch cruise abeg we only have one life to live

Davash222:
Same girl that said she will choose Alex over the richest man on earth



Only a fool will believe the words of a Nigerian girl.

Nonexisting1:
So na ordinary bad attitude make this mumu girl cancel her wedding? This one never ready to marry. True true, women and common sense are big enemies.

arantess:
and when we call him penaldo una go dey vex

MilitaryLady:
will you shut up?
Just because your broke club no fit get money sign am you're this pained

deeptechcool:
She died a wasteful death.

fergie001:
Painful to know that Chelsea is in pole position to win the PL 2021/22.

ceeceeco:
How dare you require Fernandes & Shaw for Kante? What an insult. We will give you Van De Beek plus £50m for Kante or f*ck off!

Emola12:
see thunder wey go fire u dey knock ur door now if dem born u well come outside (kante injury prone tueh... i will go for ruben neves instead of kante or kunte

Angelfrost:
Deep down... You know Bruno and Shaw are worth half of your first team in today's market... No jokes here!!!

hatakekakashi:
We still need ndidi or any decent DM for that matter.

Fred is not it

MrColdsweat:
When Frank lampard played a high defense line with these same players, how many goals did you concede?

Una no chop goals tire?

There is nothing special about sitting deep.

I could pick 11boys and set them up to sit 90mins and we'd not concede.

What you guys brag about is like praising yourself for killing someone with a gun. The gun is actually the deadly weapon, not you.

MrColdsweat:
A fluke is an accidental act. You can't tell me havertz accurately scored that goal without looking at the goalpost.

You are not being honest. Chelsea is known for sitting deep. Against Liverpool last season, you scored and sat deep all through the match. Against man city, you sat deep. It has become a trademark. On Saturday, after scoring, you sat deep and invited pressure which caused the penalty. Saying you came out and caused Liverpool pressure is you being dishonest. Infact, we how pressure made rudiger give the ball away to salah in the box 18. Chelsea couldn't build the ball from the back like they usually did.


Let us stick with the argument.

Between a team who commits more players to defend, to stand and block the post and a team who keeps a very high line all through the match, runs tirelessly to block headers, counter attacks and still keeps clean sheets, which team does more difficult defending?

Defending with a high line is one of the most difficult things in football as it requires a lot of communication, attention, concentration, intelligence and several hours of training on keeping the offside trap.


Defenders who are intelligent enough to play a high line and still cover a full space are very scare and expensive.

Barcelona is an extremely good team but they always suffer because they don't have defenders who can defend with a high line.


Defending with a high line is very risky because once an attacker breaks through the line, he is left with the goalkeeper.

Liverpool play the high line every time and they barely concede goals. Infact, with a high line, we were unbeaten at anfield for more than 3years.

That's very superb defending.

Sitting deep is very easy. All you have to do is raise the fitness and stamina level of the players so as to sustain pressure from the opposition.

You typically defend with 7 players, I typically defend with 3 players, who does more difficult defending?

Chelsea's defense is no where as good as Liverpool's defense.

MrColdsweat:
Let me say it again.

It is far more difficult to defend with a very high line than defending deep.

When defending with a very high line, you have much space behind you to cover and you have little protection because you are in the attacking phase most of the time.

Despite being very high on the pitch, Liverpool had just van dijk, matip and fabinho to quell your attacking threats. And they did so very well.

Tell me, which is more difficult, to sit on front of your post to defend or to constantly defend against counter attacks?

Also, havertz goal was not scored from an open play. Any team can luckily score from a deadball situation. Not something you should be proud of.



As champions of Europe, I don't expect you to sit deep against your mates. Sitting deep is for the underdogs.

Come outside and play good football.

MrColdsweat:
Let me educate you.

Any body can deep and throw several players in the box 18 to protect the goal. It is a very easy but tiring way to defend. Chelsea play with a back 3, with 2 wing backs and 2 holding midfielders. That's 7 players defending. A very typical way to defend.

70% of the time, Chelsea's defenders were in the box 18. Liverpool couldn't score not because Chelsea were super good, but because there was no space. A low block is used to close space.


Now do you know what is actually very difficult defending?

Defending with a very high defensive line.

80% of the time, van dijk and matip were outside the box 18. Infact, they spent most of the first half close to the midfield area. Arnold spent most of the time in the opposition half.

Liverpool played with a back 2, who pushed up high, with support from only fabinho and concerned just one goal

Chelsea defended with 7 players and conceded a goal and scored a fluke goal.

Sitting deep to block the goalpost is simple. Defending counter attacks is very difficult.

Tell me again, who defended well?

flexyrule:
Very true.

There was a time a pass would have produced better result, but he decided to take the shot which ended in Alison's gloves.

I think they're begining to feel threatened by Lukaku's presence in the team.. Plus his high price tag.

Lukaku too should be dropping down once in a while and work with midfielders.

You can't just sit up there and expect others to the work for you when you're not C.Ronaldo.

DannyJ19:
Good!, next time Chelsea should be decisive and utilize opportunities on time.. They should have buried the game long ago if not for the selfishness of their frontline.



May not be luck next time.

MrColdsweat:
They are just plain dumb.

Meaning they expected liverpool to win comfortable, indirectly labelling Liverpool a superior team.

The same chelsea wey arsenal score them 2goals with 10 men at the bridge

crazygod:
Van Dyke didn't fall twice. I watched the gam from beginning to the end. Van dyke always gives Lukaku a yard before he tackles him. He won't allow Lukaku to wrestle him like Mari. That's an experienced defender right there. He pocketed Lukaku all through until Lukaku decided to move over to Matip.

crazygod:
With over 7 defense in the second half? Even Psg no fit break into that wall. Tuchel is a good strategist. He would rather take a point than risk getting three points.

Ray07:
See them rejoicing over a draw . . . If na united draw, them no go let us hear word.

crazygod:
You were watching back of your TV bro