₦airaland Forum

Dybala11:
Of course, United could never stand a chance against Southampton, like they never stood a chance in the first leg. You're a joker.

They could not beat a Sheffield side on their own turf, it's a complete Southampton side they would win? Shioor!

holuwajobar:
what did we play first leg with their complete team

Sense no too dey expensive na

You nor fit beat common Sheffield for old "trashford" , na complete Southampton team you wan beat. Forget first leg, that was months ago and you even struggled to win.

holuwajobar:
what mins was the second red card given And what was the scores before the second red


Dey use your brain na

Be like your brain sef dey pain you. Didn't united score after the second red card? You think united would have stood a chance against a complete Southampton team? That early red card disorganized them. If not, una for hear am.

DownChelsea:
1. Lingard is still a red devil (Manchester United player)


2. Martial scored 2 goals in 45mins just yesterday against a Southampton side who beat Liverpool a few weeks back.


Happy New year

Against a 9-man Southampton side.*

Chii59:
Deep. Explain further.

While it's not wrong to have your preferential qualities in the person you intend to espouse, it's also important to not be carried away with them. It may blind you to what God wants for you, if what He wants for you does not match your desires/plans.

The point is, you can meet a man with all of those qualities you listed, yet it's possible you may not find the happiness you seek in the union. So above all, you need to seek God's will for you marriage-wise and be willing ro submit to it, so you don't shut out the one He brings your way because you have a spec. Clear enough?

Chii59:
You must meet these criteria
- Genuinely born again (No sex before marriage)
- AA genotype
- 30 years and above
- 5'10 and above
- Have a steady source of income
- Smart, family oriented and have a sense of humour
- Live within the middle belt (FCT inclusive) & be willing to travel.

What you need to know about me
- Believer in Jesus Christ
- Tall, light skinned, 6'1
- Mid twenties
- Self employed
- Well educated, ambivert
- Ardent lover of books, pets and nature
- Full of witty humour. Never a dull moment
- Lives in the middle belt.

If you're interested, send me a DM.

Good qualities you got there and good qualities you also seek, but what if the things you desire are not the things you need? What if God has a different plan for you? One which can afford you a peaceful and long lasting marriage?

Akinbahm:
For your type who just rush to say things without having prior knowledge about the stuff...

That wasn't accidental, it was deliberate but not so obvious.

Akinbahm:
For your type who just rush to say things without having prior knowledge about the stuff...

You must be an Arsenal fan, the pain is glaring.

Bankyproperties:
How can that be a red card penalty yes, Red Card No..Have watched the replay about 10 times and even paused it etc...that red card was really harsh in my opinion..That actually lost arsenal the game...

If it was a penalty, then it was definitely a red card. He hindered a clear scoring opportunity and was the last Arsenal man. That's the rule.

Mikael0407:
We will also remember man u 3-2 Liverpool

Without a major trophy? Hahaha. What shall it profit a team to celebrate a massive match win without a trophy to back it up?

Harmlesspill:
. Bittered soul.

At the end of the season, this is the only match y'all will remember.

Aricoswet:
I will Neva regret falling in love with Manchester United

Because they won a handicapped team 9-0? And at the end, they won't win the title. Maybe this is the only thing united will be celebrating this season Hahaha.

Angelfrost:
Very disappointing, I tell you! He lost that game even before it started.

His players now let him down by failing to completely fall back!!!

Don't mind them, they thought they were going to cause an upset after being a man down.

Angelfrost:
Well, they "fought" till the very bitter end (for wont of better words)!

Maybe Mourinho needs to actually write a book on "Bus Parking"! Seems it's only Diego Simeone that gets it.

Cos I don't see how Southampton failed to learn a damn thing from their last disgraceful "Leicester treatment"

That their coach wan dey form Klopp. Using two newbies against a team like Man united.

Cantonese:
Chelsea were brave enough to remove Lampard. They examined themselves and found that an inexperienced school boy coach would cause them tears at the end of the season.

Arsenal should take that bold step and remove Arteta. Dem take stinginess do Stan Kronke and im family? Which kind wickedness be this sef?

Arteta everyday na to speak English. Please bring Wenger back!

One bad game after seven impressive games and they should let Arteta go? That's not too fair. They were playing really well before the first red card and that could happen to any teak. Lampard had a spell of bad games and looked tactically inept, hence his dismissal.

Gaint50:
Too bad asernal with one man out, wolves will score more goals this second half..

Arsenal are not playing like they're a man down. These Wolves players don't look confident even with a man up. I suspect Arsenal will get something out of this game.

chelsea04:
chelsea sack acadamy graduate una won manage una own

Me na Chelsea fan o, but bros Lampard nor be Arteta mate tactically.

crazygod:
Still not a red card.

Lol he was the last man. That's the rule.

Ekpekus:
E be like say na another game you dey watch o... stick out his leg ? Where? How?

I would be tempted to do the same if I was in Luiz's shoes.

Ekpekus:
Oga it was not intentional neither was it professional foul nada... the Wolves player's clipped Luiz's knee while making that run

Oga go and watch that highlight again, it was deliberate.

Angelfrost:
That was not a penalty nor a red card...

I watched it from so many angles.

How was that any worse than what Boly did to Saka earlier in the game?!!

That's why I said it was not so obvious. Luiz tried to be smart there, he stuck his right foot out in a way that made it seem like Willian was over-speeding and lost his footing. Watch it again.

dazzlingd:
Please can someone explain why that was a red card and penalty.

He was the last Arsenal man at the back. That was a professional foul, it was deliberate and not so obvious, but the referee and VAR team are too smart.

crazygod:
But that's not a red card na

He was the last Arsenal man. That was a professional foul, it was deliberate and not so obvious, but the referee and VAR team are too smart.

ashawoKGB:
3 mins was added
but 97 mins has been played.
Manure buying referee since 1900

You obviously didn't see the game. Lacazette and Maguire sustained injuries from an accidental clash and they were treated from the 90th minute to the 93rd.

sanpipita:
Is this your counter argument? weren't Adam and Eve walking around the said garden of eden nude before they apparently sinned against God? I could go on and on

Bros since you said nudity is not wrong, then stop wearing clothes na. I'm not arguing with you.

TheWalkingMind:
Wrong and right don't exist, I used those words because that's what you can relate to.

What works perfectly for situation is appropriate, and what doesn't is inappropriate.

Still I will say the true meaning of any word is how you understand them.

How do you differentiate something appropriate from something inappropriate? Why don't wrong and right exist? What is the basis of that submission?

TheWalkingMind:
I'm giving you a scope on how I see things.

So you have murder in self defense, which unanswered by you is justified and right. But otherwise is unjustified and wrong. But how can something be wrong and right at the same time? That almost makes zero sense right, unless if circumstantial.

So in the sense of things right and wrongs don't exist, only appropriateness and inappropriateness.

PS: I couldn't answer your question because wrong questions don't have right answers. Hence the need to broaden the scope for you.

If something can be right OR wrong depending on the circumstance, then how come right and wrong don't exist? Besides, it is not all things that are considered wrong that can also be right in a different circumstance.

In the light of my comeback question, and with respect to your answer, how do you determine the difference between something appropriate and inappropriate?

privaldo:
Again, it goes to my talk of people making choices for themselves. If you viewed the first one and it doesn't sit well with you, why go ahead to view others.

That's because they can't help themselves. Now you see why talking about it is important?

privaldo:
It's not about caring, its about sticking to my beliefs of letting people take the wheel.

So if you could drive and you saw someone else who doesn't know how to drive taking the wheel without proper training, you'd let them go ahead with that?

TheWalkingMind:
Depends on the circumstances.

To help you understand:

A thief broke into your house with a gun. You shot him in the head. That's murder, is that wrong or right?

You as a thief broke into someone's house, and you shot him in the head. That's murder. Is your action wrong or right?

So you see you're asking the wrong questions.

I didn't need to expatiate on my question for you to know I wasn't referring to self defence.

doxijaw:
They don't want love to lead and totally intolerant of a difference of opinion.

It's like seeing someone trying to commit suicide and be saying it's their choice , let them die

Being a freethinker certainly has its downsides. It's almost like they don't even know what they believe.

privaldo:
No, I won't interfere. It's their life to live and their choice to make and also their consequences to face.

Then that simply means you don't care. You are contradicting yourself.