IjeBos: And, yes George Bush did ignore us "bleeding hearts" who were right about Iraq. And America paid dearly in dead young people and trillions of dollars. You are literally defending one of the worst policy decisions and one of the worst presidents in US history.
Bush ignored you crying about Saudis, Kuwaitis found in Afghanistan with known links to Al.Quaeda but no proof and saved a lot of lives from keeping these Wolves in Guantanamo. All sensible people need to know is what is a Saudi or Omani mullah doing in Afghanistan at this time of war unless he is fraternising with Al Quaeda. Lock him up and keep society safe, while you cry about his human rights.
swiz123: Why are you quoting me with subjective opinion? We both watched the same match and we both saw what how professionals interpreted the situation. You are just pained because I am right as usual and you just can’t stand it.
The law you posted suggest a shove. Did Guehi use excessive force to push Caicedo aside? Of course no. He was simply stronger and was able to move Caicedo aside with little to no resistance. If Caicedo had tried to apply reasonable force to resist, Guehi would be forced to apply “excessive force” to move him aside.
Caicedo knows he wasn’t fouled, Guehi knows he didn’t foul him, the referee knows too. The referee had to explain personally to Guehi why the goal was disallowed despite seeing clearly from few meters away that he didn’t foul Caicedo.
What does a weekleeeng like you know about resisting force
You can only give faulty interpretation of what you have never experienced nor ever had the strength to be in such a situation or know what is appropriate in such a situation
The ball is not in play, they are not running side by side or chasing any ball, they are not jostling for an inswinging corner, neither is Guehi standing his ground.
So what justifies the rugby scrum push by Guehi for over a metre except interfering with play.
People who have played football extensively with tens of thousands of these physical interactions have cast judgement that that action is unseen on a pitch, you are just here embarrassing yourself and showing your lack of experience.
This is me bundling a guy shoulder to shoulder in a football game. Na my type of game be this, I love physical game and know all its acceptable parameters inside out, you just showing you have never played any serious footie before and embarrassing yourself
ijebosb: If they called them prisoners, would you then be ok with them holding them?
Again, this is the problem with your choice of words and how they are used as propaganda. Strip away the branding, Hamas are holding people against their will who were taken on Oct. 7th. Israel is holding thousands more against their will who were taken from Gaza.
You have ascribed righteousness to one side based on your view of their rightness in the conflict or their goodness as people. I don't. I see inhumanity in what Hamas has done and inhumanity in what Israel is doing. And because Israel's actions are backed by the US, it falls on me.
Don't have time for your terrorist sympathiser world view.
You must be one of those bleeding hearts who protested holding terrorists without charge in Guantanamo bay. George Bush ignored bleeding hearts like you because we the people with common sense had no issues with it.
A wolf does not need to be caught killing a sheep before you charge the wolf or kill it. its mere being a wolf is enough to take action to protect your sheep.
Terrorism is a difficult charge to bring with a steep burden of proof which is why in most of our societies, terrorists are allowed to be held for longer without charge under special laws (like Guantanamo bay, or suspicion of terrorism law in UK). A terrorist is not usually caught until he completes his act which no society can afford. You don't wait till the wolf kills the sheep to find out if he is a terrorist or not. You could be held for associating with terrorists, membership of organisations, having violent views and intent without having acted upon it or even plotted any attack. They are not prisoners, they are terrorists, so save me your snowflake sympathies for them. They are not in anyway equivalent to festival goers murdered, raped and kidnapped, nor have they been arrested by any authority.
iamoyindamola: Forget semenyo, what of the guy in same line with konate Why did vvd run away from him, if he had taken care of him konate will do the same to semenyo Make i catch you for field you will lose weight
VVD has taken care of his man with 5 yards gap between him and his man, abi you expect him to be running in the same line with his man?
I always tell newbies in our 5 a side to stop running to my man or your teammates man. Just stay with your man, simple and everything will be taken care of. Some of these 18 year olds will leave their man and come and start pressing everywhere the ball is moving, like they are some poor mans Kante because they feel they have too much energy. Most times we would concede from a pass to the man they just left to start pressing other people's men.
iamoyindamola: Ibime where this guy they run to Baba think say na sisoko because all blacks are the same
Na only winger position you fit play with your short height, so you will never understand. Him get him own man, if he engage Konate man, one pass to his man will lead to goal. It's every man for himself when the numbers are balanced between attack and defence
ObaIgwe1: I have no time for the search? But I am interested to know; who did you make the calls to on Nairaland and how many hostages have been released because of your calls? Or what impact has your calls on Nairaland for the release of hostages made?
Do the search and answer the question
Have no time for those who support the kidnap of hostages or those who support and like posts justifying such things. They are terrorist sympathisers, simple.
You should save your energy for calling on Hamas to release hostages, stop using Palestinians as human shields, stealing their food and putting their people in danger. Israel has and continues to provide all information and food to keep Palestinians safe and satiated. Hamas are the ones who deliberately put them in harms way, shoot from hospitals, booby trap homes etc and steal their food.
The below is sacrosanct. We can't put the cart before the horse
Ibime: Releasing the hostages is a first step toward peace
You can't be holding kidnapped people and begging for peace without releasing them first
ObaIgwe1: Your best jab is to call us terrorist sympathisers to make you sound right. Who among those you are referring to as terrorist sympathisers here has been in support of Hamas and her activities? We simply saying enough of killing of thousands of innocent just to arrest or kill 10 bad guys, we are simply saying you don't need to wipe out a nation of millions because you are trying to get to thousands of terrorists. Come out with better strategy or keep using your intel to get to the bad guys as being done in Syria and Iran?
You should be one of the 6 people who liked this terrorist post, including the terrorist sympathiser I quoted. Una no plenty for here. Over 2 years now. none of you terrorist sympathisers have made a call for release of the hostages. Felicia was even justifying the terrorist journalist praising their heroes of October 7 and taking multiple selfies with the terror leader Sinwar the other day
nateevs: Palestinians were celebrating on 8th of October because for them, and unlike for you, history did not start on 7th October. Over 900 Palestinians had been killed by the IDF in the same year pre Oct 7th. Over 3000 people have in perpetual captivity with no charge pre 7th Oct. Over 400 of these captives are children under 15. If some took your child away for months, years, and prevented you from seeing them, or having access to them because they have more power than you, you will celebrate if oct 7th happened to that person. It's simple!
You guys want to talk about the consequence of waging war, but only seem to be convenient talking about it in one direction. History did not start on Oct 7th mate.
airmark: You are right but I just stayed quiet to let you face what I usually face here and most of you that know the truth stay away from joining to educate the ignorant ones.
Just state Ifab rule 12 to support your claim and shut down this unnecessary back and forth.
Swiz123 with his usual gba takes, claiming he played football
swiz123: You are just yarning okpata. The professional referee who was standing right in front of the wall didn’t view it as a foul, the VAR called his attention to a totally unrelated offence and he agreed with their decision and respectfully communicated that with Guehi who accepted it peacefully.
Anything you are saying is just what you feel and not fact. If you have any honesty left in you, you will admit that the first thing VAR will check is if is was a foul or not before considering the second incident.
swiz123: So you know better than the Commentator, pundits, Referee, VAR and even Caicedo himself (Judging by his reaction) ?? Everyone with reasonable knowledge of football knows that wasn’t a foul, but somehow, I should believe you that all your poor takes are all over nairaland. You overrate yourself.
Did the commentators tell you Guehi push was not a foul? They spoke on what was clear cut in the rules and left the subjective part since it's already a fait accompli
cococandy: I saw the Tel Aviv one. Like 400 thousand people. Chilling.
Yea I guess Ibime is more Jewish than they are. Lol
The protesters share nothing in common with you terrorist sympathisers, nor do they share your love for terrorists
They are simply arguing the strategy of how to get their hostages back
Like when Kaduna train was hijacked and it's travellers kidnapped, some Nigerians argued going after the kidnappers with force and some argued negotiating for the hostage release
These ones just want the Israeli hostages released whatever the cost of negotiation, not because they are don't absolutely detest terrorists like every person with common sense should
swiz123: Your arrogance is petty. Instead of accepting your goof of calling that thing a foul, you chose to type something so incoherent.
I will keep exposing your poor football knowledge.
See this one. You said it's not a foul
It was called a foul then you argued "it's not for the reason Ibime said"
If you kill a man during the process of robbery and get convicted for murder, it doesn't mean you are innocent of robbery.
Which football did you play?
When your favourite fragile players like Jogginghoe and Felix are chasing a ball and getting legitimate shoulder barge and lose their duels, you will see nothing wrong in them losing their duels, it's Guehi using two hands and excessive force to physically push Caicedo away for a whole metre on a dead ball to clear space for Ezes shot that you consider legitimate
You never played any football, yarning like someone who can't even raise 10
Just thank God for Spåmbot for not receiving firmer response to your misyarnings
swiz123: Have you seen the reason why the goal was disallowed is totally different from your usual low takes?? You are no where near my level in watching football no matter how you force it.
There are 2 reasons to disallow that goal, they just gave you the indisputable one not the subjective one so Palace won't argue. You no Sabi anything football