₦airaland Forum

TLona1:
What Fergie did in 1999, Guardiola did better exactly 10 years later.

He did not do anything better. Ovebro did it better.

TLona1:
Mou did not do it in style like Pep. Pep didn't nust win it back to back, he also garnered 100 and 98 points while doing the back to back making it the highest and 2nd highest points ever in EPL's history.

There's nothing as good as victory in style.

Same way Pep did not win LaLiga in style like Mourinho who has points and goal record there.

Mourinho broke points record while winning EPL 14 years ago, same as Pep. Records are there to be broken over time. The fact Yohan Blake has better time than Carl Lewis does not make him greater. Mourinho also did it while reaching UCL semis which Pep has been struggling to do despite Pellegrini handing over to him in UCL semi.

TLona1:
If no one cares about the domestic treble, it won't be a record. You're trying to undermine it because Pep just won it.

What Fergie did in 1999, Guardiola did better exactly 10 years later.

What Fergie did with Jesper Blomqvist, Andy Cole and Dwight Yorke, Pep needed Messi and Xavi to do

popizaino:
The same Messi that can't score 91 goals a season without pep? Let Messi have the same number of ballon d'or pep left him with first.


Bayern cheifs and fans still want guardiola back at the club.

Messi has won 2 UCL with Pep and 2 UCL without Pep.

When will Pep win UCL without Messi?

TLona1:
There's one thing Ferguson and Mourinho never did in the EPL - winning the domestic treble.

Who cares about domestic treble? So Fergie should swap his UCL in 1999 for Carabao Cup just to make his treble "domestic"? Local champion talks.

TLona1:
Mourinho inherited Ronaldo, Kaka and Benzema and bought many other players but still won one La Liga in 4 years. Pep has won 2 EPLs in 3 years

Pep points record is nothing special. Mourinho matched that in Spain.

His back-to-back is nothing special. Many managers did that. Fergie did that several.times,.including 3 times in a row.

So why should we suck dick just because Sheikh broke FFP rules to save Pep from.his first season humiliation when his players and squad depth was not over superior to opposition.

popizaino:
LOL.
Till you and every other mourinho's advocate confesses that pep isn't a fraud I will keep signing his praises here on this thread.

Pep remains a fraud till he wins UCL without Messi.

Bayern fans will never forget how he destroyed their club, turning them from UCL heavyweights to laughing stock.

TLona1:
Mourinho won the La Liga once in 4 years while Pep has won the EPL twice in 3 years (winning it back to back) and still counting. Mourinho couldn't even win the La Liga back to back.

This is why more attention is given to Pep's prowess in the EPL than Mourinho's when he was in La Liga.

Capisce?

Is Pep the first to win back to back?

Pep was getting trashed in EPL till Sheikh saved him.

Make we hear word for.

TLona1:
It's not just about winning the league but winning it in style.

Records set by Pep in his time in England :

Most points in EPL: 100 points

Most Goals in EPL: 106

Most wins in EPL: 32

Local achievements. Mourinho holds all the above records in LaLiga and no one cared since he didn't win UCL. Same for Pep at Abu Dhabi United.

popizaino:
The truth is bitter gba fun oga e.


Pep is the Goat among coaches.

OK, we have heard.

Must we listen to you sücking Barca dïck every day on Chelsea thread?

Go and join them.

raumdeuter:
E pain am!!!

Pep sodomizing your league can pain

How can local achievements meant for Conte and Ranieri pain when some of us are looking forward to European finals.

Mr Adepoju, please carry your fellow dïcksuckers to Man City thread. We have Chelsea matters to discuss this summer.

When will this dicksücker popizaino go and open Man City thread and get the fück out of Chelsea thread?

Ever since he joined Nairaland, he must tell us our legends are worthless and constantly suck Catalan dïck.

They came out from us, but they did not belong to us. 1 John 2:19

lordfalcao:
well deserved. His introduction changed the game

Long may his injury woes continue. This guy is the 3rd best player in the world. I wouldn't like him to be fit for next season.

DeBruyne MOTM for only 45 minutes work.

This guy is an animal.

patrickmuf:
Sky Sports reported that he made over 34 appearances this season, how will a second choice LB play that much games?

He shared minutes with Jay and he covers CB as well, but City fans acknowledge he is 2nd choice LB.

nihilistjnr:
Players going from EPL to champo will always go cheaper than the other way.

David Brooks that I was shouting about a couple of years ago came from man city to Sheffield United for free...and was sold to Bournemouth last year for 12m.

E no mean. My question is why put that clause in the boys loan deal when his development is not complete. Bristol City go now use money from their 2nd choice left back buy Dasilva and Kalas with change to spare.

Bristol City just sold their 2nd choice left back to Bournemouth for £17m

BTW, their 1st choice left back is Jay Dasilva, on loan from Chelsea and they have £7m option to make his loan permanent.

Foolish Chelsea

airmark:
Longstaff ?

English footballers and their punchline ready names ehn


Like Sean. . . I got a Long staff

Like Jack. . . I use my rod well

You girl is like Jack. . . everybody knows she will share


And so on and so forth. . . .

Chei, this trolling between Manure and Loserpool fans too much abeg

I no want yarn for RLC injury

Roman is a staunch anti-semitism campaigner and a massive philanthropist to Jewish causes. The game was a charity game as part of Chelsea CSR.

Whether the club didn't think we would be in Europa final, who knows. All I know is it's a direct order from Roman to play this game.

Chelsea fans did a lot of anti-Semitic chanting that may have led the club to try to wash it's image in this way also.

[ author=sod09 post=78443982]bros why nah, see the dane gun more like the old skool hunter type
i say try with pump action then i can start believing[/quote]Dane gun will kill that guy from that range

Check well, the dibia raised the gun at the last second and fired over his shoulder.

Some militants done go do odeshi post am on Instagram

If you ask me, the native doctor shot over the guys shoulder. Chic2pimp and Raumdeuter, help me check am well before Airmark and Griffon present this as evidence.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bxg_8Gahwo5/

Lampard flogging Peps mentor Marcelo Bielsa at Elland Road.

Derby in the playoff final vs Aston Villa.

Never saw Derby winning this after Leeds beat them convincingly at Pride Park.

Derby are the first team in playoff history to overturn a first leg home defeat.

Abraham and Terry vs Mason Mount, Tomori, Ashley Cole, Lampard and Jody Morris in the final

Eruditor:
Walker is better than Trippier at certain things and he was first choice no denying that. But I am telling you it was not a 90-10 thing. More like 55-45.

And Walker was not the best RB in the league anything. Tottenham have never cried that Walker left the way they will should Harry Kane or Eriksen leave.

I am not guessing about Sané. You know Bayern refused to pay for him when Pep was in Bayern right?

Trippier has 10 times better delivery than Walker but Trippier gets physically dominated by any winger he comes up against. Trippier is low key becoming a massive liability like Alonso. The likes of Neres, Tadic and Sterling nearly wrote the epitaph on his top level career in the last few UCL fixtures. That guy cannot win any duel with a winger at the moment, whether it's pace, strength or positioning required of him. Walker is head and shoulders above.

Eruditor:
Conspiracy theorist at his finest.

City went for Walker because it was easier to buy him than Trippier. You are right that Walker wanted to leave though. Remember Pep was going for Dani Alves, when he took PSG's offer for more money, City then went all in for Walker. So Walker was not City's first choice. Let me just put it out there.

Sané tapped up by Bayern lol. Sané already told (I forget the press) that he will be in City for years after the United game. Players taking their time to sign contracts is not new. Every agent wants to eke out as much money as possible for their clients.

Walker had been acrimonious with Spurs in the press and in his attitude, and adamant he was leaving. . . which is the only reason they started planning for their future. Trippier is not his mate.

Sane go do you like film. Watch this space.

Eruditor:
Hahaha Walker was getting benched to Trippier before he left. His last few games Poch was playing Trippier.

Best RB in the league indeed.

As if English homegrown talents are not overpriced. You are telling us 50M. If a team is to sign even Trippier today how much will he go for?

Nonsense. Walker cannot be benched by any Trippier. That's like saying Rabiot is being benched by another PSG player. Spurs knew Walker was leaving and in an acrimonious manner too having been tapped up by City, and decided to start their succession planning by giving Trippier increased minutes. If Walker is being benched by Trippier, why did City not bring £50m for Trippier instead? Trippier is even trained in City academy and would fit HG criteria better.

Same way Spurs sat down Aldeweireld for a year for insisting he get paid the same money as VVD, not because any other Spurs defender is better. They did the same to Danny Rose to discipline him too.

Even till today, I don't believe Leroy Sane is not a guaranteed starter for City. Sane has been tapped up by Bayern and refusing to sign new contract, so Pep will prioritise the players who will continue with the team after summer over Sane.

Greatihex:
each time i see walker in this your list i get annoyed.

The same walker conte was looking for as replacement for Moses?
Arguably the best rb in the league prior?
The one signed for 50m?

No mind that efulefu

Eruditor:
But he was used as a winger for the most part this season and scored at least 9 goals in all competitions. He did not reduce their total goals and in fact, according to his manager, was the best player this season.

If his fraud manager could use him in that role you said he won't be good at to win 98points, should that manager not get any credit?

Don't bring me discussing needs of Chelsea into wider context. This is just an excerpt of us discussing what would be the best fit for Chelsea.

We are already overstocked with ball-to-feet wingers who like to come inside. Bernardo is basically another no10 who plays on wings. We already have that in Hazard and Willian.

What Chelsea need more of is a flying winger like Son, Sterling, Mane, Sane, Salah type.

City already have 2 of those, so Bernardo is a better fit for them as a ball-to-feet winger, but not necessarily a priority for Chelsea. I don't actually think City will even be worse if Bernardo is sat down for Sane.

raumdeuter:
Below is the context and your opinion of a "top 20 winger" in the world when Pep got him

He's a top 20 midfielder, not top 20 winger.

Never in those quote did I doubt his quality, just told you I'm not a fan of no10s.

Eruditor:
Ibime, you said Bernardo was not good after the Bournemouth game that City won 2-1 at the 95th minute (I recall that post vividly). I saw some of you say CR7 was in a one-man team in Portugal. Today, Bernado is top 20 -because he plays for Pep.

You insulted Sterling, Stones, Otamendi, City have barely had a natural LB for 2 seasons. Yet you are telling us Djibouti budget. If Marcus Alonso played for City, Pep would have used him over Delph and Zinchenko. Guess what you would have said today? That he is top 20.

Rubbish and oversimplification.

Go and ask Nihilist about our famous Sterling vs Oscar debate that ran for years. I was on record here saying Sterling is in the top 3 AMs under 23 in 2014 which prompted people to say Oscar is better and led to a 4 year debate on Sterling vs Oscar.

What is the context of Bernardo quote?

Otamendi is a rubbish defender in almost everything

Stones is a poor defender who is good on the ball. When you play in a possession team who hardly get attacked, that does not matter so much so he is good to go for what Pep uses him for, just like other defenders I fundamentally dislike like Ramos and Pique.

raumdeuter:
When Nolito flops, its a Pep signing, when Drinkwater flops, its not a Conte signing. When Bakayoko flops its not a Conte signing, Morata is not a Conte signing not even Zappacosta

Typical press conference platitudes. Nowhere in the stuff you quoted did Conte say he signed him. There are many other articles that make clear that Drinkwater is not a Conte signing.

popizaino:
Except for Mikel, fabregas made the conte's team that gathered 90+ point and with notable performance despite his limited time on the pitch.John Terry who would be plying his trade in the championship later on was also among the 90+ pointer.

Will you sharrap dia

Mikel did not make any Conte's team that made 90+ points, and was sent to China in January

Fabregas also rode bench all season, only being allowed on after Chelsea had sealed victory and switch to 3-5-2 to accommodate the passenger.

If Conte, had trusted those 2 escorts with his midfield, he will not even make top 4.

Oh I forgot, the next season when Matic left and Bakayoko flopped, Fabregas played almost every game and led us outside top4