₦airaland Forum

tola9ja:
SO WHAT YOU CANT EAT YOU SHOULD GIVE IT TO A STRANGER SO HE/SHE WILL BE INFECTED WITH DISEASE ABII KONTINU

What are u even saying.. do u thing all the animals u eat in restaurants all died by sliting the throat.
I wouldn't cook a dead animal specially for strangers but if someone wants to eat my dead chicken by all means eat..and that is the meaning of that verse

Maamin:
I have been studying the quran for years now and I had never came across the word love in it or was love never mentioned in the quran? Is there any muslim on NL that can help out..will be glad to receive your comments

To be fair on the muslims the word'LOVE' appears about
45 times in the whole of theQuran mostly in expressions such as( in love; love of wealth; love of life; love of Allah; love of woman; love of self; love of other believers or love in the abstract; 2:177; 3:31, 103, 119;5:54; 9:23; 19:96; 38:32 etc).
[size=18pt]
TheQuran, unlike the Bibledoes not encourage love of strangers or any others who are not'believers in Allah and his prophet'.[/size]

In theBibleon the other hand, this word is mentioned at least[b]155[/b] times in all its forms and manifestations. In the form ofloving the STRANGER(Lev.19:34; Deut10:19) & NEIGHBOUR (Lev.19:18), the Quran is silent.

The ordinances on how well to treat the stranger and neighbourare over[b]150[/b] times in theBiblewhile none are mentioned in theQuran.

http://www.inthenameofallah.org/Love%20in%20the%20Quran.html

Cc tola9ja

"Mohammed is God's apostle. Those who follow him are harsh to the unbelievers but merciful to one another" Quran 48:29

tola9ja:
those the bible teaches love ?

Deuteronomy 14:21New International Version (NIV)

21 Do not eat anything you find already dead. You may give it to the foreigner residing in any of your towns, and they may eat it, or you may sell it to any other foreigner. But you are a people holy to the Lord your God.

There is nothing wrong with this verse.. infact it shows tolerance....this is a clear example of not forcing ur own traditions on others. Imagine if the west says there shouldn't be halal meat because they think it nonsense. .

I once saw a muslim hausa man begging a southerner for a dead goat to eat, the goat was attacked by dogs...it's disgusting but the man ate it..it's later that I learnt that Muslims are not allowed to eat dead animals but the dude ate it still.

tola9ja:
Can't. You see the verse

Matthew 23:17 You blind fools

U gave the chapter ..I want the verses..

tola9ja:
Chapter (3) sūrat āl ʿim'rān (The Family of Imrān)
l Say, [O Muhammad], "If you should love Allah , then follow me, [so] Allah will[size=17pt] love[/size] you and forgive you your sins. And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful

Chapter (2) sūrat l-baqarah (The Cow)

And they ask you about menstruation. Say, "It is harm, so keep away from wives during menstruation. And do not approach them until they are pure. And when they have purified themselves, then come to them from where Allah has ordained for you. Indeed, Allah[size=17pt] loves[/size] those who are constantly repentant and loves those who purify themselves."



Chapter (9) sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance)

: Do not stand [for prayer] within it - ever. A mosque founded on righteousness from the first day is more worthy for you to stand in. Within it are men who love to purify themselves; and Allah [size=17pt]loves[/size] those who purify themselves.

Chapter (3) sūrat āl ʿim'rān (The Family of Imrān)

: And as to those who believe and do good deeds, He will pay them fully their rewards; and Allah does not [size=17pt]love[/size] the unjust







SHOULD I CONTINUE

Pls tola9ja I want the exact passage numbers.. I would like to investigate the Arabic words and English translations. . Muslim al taqiyyah is very common with u..

johnydon22:
You know one big problem with engaging you is that you leave the subject of the matter and dabble into individual talks thats why you and these muslims always have each others throat..

That i turned atheistic few months ago is clearly nothing in this matter, i have been agnostic for more than 5years (clinging to catholicsm due to emotional attachment) ...we have concluded..

[size=20] The gospels were not written by the people they bear their names [/size] nothing more to add..

I have no more time for such unwarranted baseless talk anymore..

Nope that's not what we concluded.. it was most likely written by scribes on behalf of the apostles, literacy is something we take for granted now.. ..even ur commentary snapshots noted that..

I brought up the issue of ur recent conversion to atheism so as to emphasize ur naiveté on this issue.. u could not have been agnostic for a whole 5 years and be willing to defend ur Catholic faith just Oct last year..

Spend some time reading to make ur arguement stronger if the folly of atheism appeals to u...

johnydon22:
let me agree..

And you fail to mention this theory didn't mention John the apostle was the writer huh?...
Both hypothesis were proposed by new testament scholars...
Yet this particular hypothesis didn't mention John as the writer still..

I wonder why you still cling to this your traditional belief that John wrote it when clearly New testament scholars says the contrary..

The four synoptic gospels copied heavily from mark, with additional additions from the authors yet they succeeded in creating contradictions in my places.. 300 gospels (now referred as the Gnostic gospels) dismissed at the council of Nicene surely would have told a different story.

Am starting to search for the holes you pointed out
And then assuming i read commentary and became an atheist is another fallacy and a big flaw in your arguments.(BIG LIE) stop using assumptions when dealing with people..ok dude?

At the end you just sieve out the information you think is ok for your belief and dismiss others ...lol..

Dude apparently u haven't been reading my posts.. I have written already that it is unlikely the apostles wrote those..one because they were likely unable to write..Peter for instance was a fisherman. .getting parchment paper was difficult...and they were being hunted and persecuted. .

This is not the arguement.. they mostly likely had scribes do the writing when it was convienent to do so.. Paul on the other hand was a learned Jew ..this explains his many letters.

I don't care if u doubt the authenticity of these gospels. I will only advice u look at christain theologians view on these issues. U will be surprised at what u will learn. I don't sieve information.. I take in everything but like every other human I am biased.. I have studied these thinks long before u..remember in Oct 2014 u were still professing ur Catholic faith..

johnydon22:
lmao.. after covering my marked texts...anyway... so quick to dismiss a snapshot even from a christian bible..

Do you now agree that the gospels were not written by the people they bear their names?

You keep arguing that John died a very old man even when its clear he wasn't the author of the gospel according to John..

about the gospel of john i marked to proposed hypothesis of how it was written, not surprised you overlooked the second marked space..

let me poste the pic again now take the two marked places into consideration...

I didn't intentionally cover ur texts I ruled over ur red with white to differentiate it from my own red maker..
Ur highlights are still in ur earlier post for all to see.


Apparently u don't understand what u read about John. ..one theory is that he was a withness who documented the events, wrote it and died very old

The 2nd theory is that it was written by another converted scribe who belonged to Apostle John's community.. that said ..this is the opinion of a bible commentary on the gospels... different scholars have different opinions and NT scholars often have little consensus between them. U need to read more John.

However if the gospels where fakes I would expect tonnes of differences between them.. however they are so similar in their narrative that the 4 are termed synoptic gospels.

This conversation is getting boring.
My intention is to point out holes in ur argument so that u don't decieve others just because u read a commentary on the gospels origin and became an atheist.

Pr0ton:
Hope you aint getting things twisted. I only support the existence of the Paul of the Epistles (some epistles actually). The Paul of the Acts of Apostles is pure fiction and contradicts the other Paul. For example, in Gal. 1 Paul affirmed that he never received approval from man, not even Peter.

Oh goodness..there is a fake Paul? Pls elaborate?

Pr0ton:
Ok then. And about Paul?

I honestly think Paul was a fierce theologian and right in all of his letters..

U said he preached a different Christ. .this is fallacy.. a statement without evidence... he and the apostles got along very well and he got Peters approval. As a christian I believe God is perfect in his plans.. Paul was called to spread christainity and he did it remarkably well..u need to understand that Christ came to fulfil the law and even Paul said all scripture is profitable. He was not anti OT.. he just understood the theology of it better than most.

Is there any issues u think we should discuss on Paul. .

johnydon22:
How quaint you chose to forgo the jewish talmud messiac prophecy i told you and dabble into misinterpreted prophecies... can you list one of those prophecies for me and all to see?

too bad you can never argue without employing unnecessary ad hominem.. **sighs** anyways..

If you are referring to the various attacks and destructions as seen in the likes of nehemiah and meccabeus, its all part of the everyday events of ancient world.. every civilization face wars and attacks so the jewish attacks is nothing special..
lmao.

i love the excusses..

For this their is nothing i can say to make you drop your belief about the authorship of the supposedly synoptic gospels..leme drop some snapshots for you taken from the New community Bible on introductions to the gospels.

Now dude i bid you to go dabble more and check how these tales were concorted then come back

Dude u have to understand that depending on one literature source is poor scholarship..ur captured screenshot mean little..

let me start by saying they agree with me as well see shots below.. look at what I said about mark and John. .the dates agree with me... including when I said the theory is that John died a very old man. Like is told proton above john is unconservatively estimated to be 90 years after Jesus. . It means at most 90+33 = 123 AD.. Even tho some people say it's as early as 90AD that is 57 years after Christ. Do u get the picture ..


2. I said mark is estimated to be 30 years after the fact...30+33 is 63 ad. .

Peter was was a fisherman and not a scribe,same as some other disciplines hence they may have had others write their stories it's possible or they may have written it themselves I don't know, I wasn't there but the truth remains the assumption that a second generation christain wrote it is pure conjecture and even if true does not make a difference. I think u mistake second generation to mean second century. .I can have someone write my own biography , I don't need to write it myself.

a generation is 30-40 years, hence if it is assumed that mark was written in 65 ad that is 32 years after christ then u can see why someone can also assume it was written by a second generation christian. But there is no evidence for that argument.

U may ask ..why wasn't the gospels written earlier..well they were being persecuted by the jews and Romans and their was probably no time to sit down with scribes and write but Paul was very literate and wrote letters himself. This explains his many letters . Peter the ex fisherman was more into the ground work winning new converts to christiandom and was murdered. . Most of the apostles went to their bl.oody deaths believing in Christ. .

Pr0ton:
@Ifeann

Your dating of the Gospel of John shouldn't be 90AD, but at least 90AD as the Gospel is arbitrary believed to be written within 90-120AD.

Mark was written between 60-75AD and should be at least 30 years after the fact. 1Peter was written 110AD, so falls in the second century.

Proton listen I said john is unconservatively estimated to be 90 years after Jesus. . It means at most 90+33 = 123 AD.. I didn't say 90 ad but 123 ad. Even tho some people say it's as early as 90AD that is 57 years after Christ. What's ur confusion.
2. I said mark is estimated to be 30 years after the fact...30+33 is 63 ad. .you say it's between 60 and 75 ad. .are we in conflict??

I like to give the date based on the period between the fact (death and resurrection ) to the estimated gospel date for a clearer picture

Pr0ton:
Yh. They did.

Okay..at least u are not one of those people who don't believe the existence of historical figures...
But I am puzzled .. if u believe Apostle Paul existed why then do u doubt the existence of Christ. He lived for only 33 years and changed the world yet u doubt he existed. . I just don't get it.. I am Goin to make a post about bible prophesies over the weekend, I will mention u.

Pr0ton:
If your Messiah is the Jesus of the Gospels, I can relate. What prophecy did He fulfil? (let's assume He existed)

I don't like answering a question with a question but before I continue , u said " let's assume he existed".. I would like to ask do u believe these 2 people existed
Apostle Paul
The Islamic Mohammed. .

johnydon22:
Abraham the jewish patriarch is from the land of Ur in ancient mesopotamia.
Bearing this is in mind the mesopotamians clearly were in existence before the very founding fore-father of the jewish race Abraham..
The issue of jews being an oppressed nation is not a historical fact, cus their is no record or external historical source that suggests jews were ever in egypt..



The same way the christians believe this, is the same way the mesopotamians believe it was the supreme god Ea and indian mythology attributes it to vishnu, they are all implausible fables but as you said all points down to BELIEF...



The messiah prophecy as listed in the talmud quite contradicts the Jesus messiah tale thats why adherents of judaism rejects the jesus messiah claim till today and which is why the jewish scripture of talmud is missing from the christian bible..... the Christian bible being a work of emperor constantine and early christian fathers in Nicene..

The gospel being second century christian write ups (this you must have known) is still a debatable source since it contradicts each other and proves not to be first hand accounts but second century work based on oral traditions.

check out the debates in a thread created by frosbe.l a christian

https://www.nairaland.com/2072612/wrote-new-testament

https://www.nairaland.com/2042507/why-deny-virgin-birth-jesus

I see how u cleverly skip my other question on prophesies. ..anyway that's besides the point..

Again Johnny there are things u say that shows ur naiveté.
For example

The issue of jews being an oppressed nation is not a historical fact, cus their is no record or external historical source that suggests jews were ever in egypt..

The jewish communities and lands have been attacked and destroyed hundreds of times throughout history..Google is ur friend....use it... I agree that one may say that there is little evidence to suggest jewish presence in egypt same as their is NO evidence to conclude that jews were never there.

But that said this one event doesn't mean that jews were or were not oppressed in egypt or elsewhere..besides you don't expect ancient records of Egyptians to contain significant information on a little slave tribe.. also bear in mind the Great Library of Alexandria which may have contained any such records was destroyed along with so many ancient secrets. Not to mention the destructions the muslims did to civilizations by annihilating records kept by scribes , monasteries etc after they took over...so much information has been lost.

U see ...the evidence to make absolute statements from an atheist perspective is lacking. The theists have concrete records informs of manuscripts no matter the perceived conflicts. Whereas the atheist has only conjecture.and assumptions. .


Hoold on.. I just saw u said that the gospels are second century write ups... tisk tisk tisk... who told u this Bart ehrman, Richard Dawkins,..for.bel? ?? Lol.. the latest gospel is John which is unconservatively estimated to be 90 years after Jesus.. the consensus and evidence point to the theory that apostle John died a very oldman.
.
The gospel according to mark is said to be 30 years after the fact..

Johnny boy u have a lot of reading to do.

johnydon22:
The mesopotamian civilization thrive thousands of years before that of the jews.. stories like the mesopotamian creation story, gilgemesh fable have been there thousands of years before the emergence of jewish civilization...
It is possible they copied from the jewish fable just like it is possible that the bible copied from koran..



It is wolrd wide knowledge that the mesopotamian flood story is myth, their are no archeological evidence to support a world wide flood, neither is it possible for millions of species to fit into one ark and live for a year (carnivores eating herbs ..lol) . . .The story itself clearly shows it's implausibility.


The prophecy of the end of the world is a very wide spread prophecy that we all have heard about, which is causing so much scare in christiandom as it stands today...

Thrive is very different word from beginning. timeline of Ancient Mesopotamian civilization is 5000-3500 BC: The first city-states gradually develop in southern Mesopotamia. This is the achievement of the Sumerian people. The jewish records go as far back as this..bear in mind the jews were an oppressed people who didn't THRIVE in anyone place for long.. so u are right to say the mesopotamians thrived before the jews but did they exist or begin much before the jews.. so u saying this and I quote , "It is possible they copied from the jewish fable just like it is possible that the bible copied from koran.. " is without credibility.


You also said

their are no archeological evidence to support a world wide flood, neither is it possible for millions of species to fit into one ark and live for a year (carnivores eating herbs ..lol) . . .The story itself clearly shows it's implausibility.

Even tho there is evidence for sea shells on top of mountains whixh scientists have tried to explain..I won't try to convince u a great flooding may have caused this. ...Again ..Christains believe in a God that is all powerful ...if he could send all animals to a great big ark .. it is possible to make all of 2 species fit and not consume each other should he please. .this is far more believe literally than the garden and fruit and creation tale which I often view as allegorical. This is why your former church's Catholic universities teach evolution in their university..evolution is outrightly rejected by Muslims.


Now to the last point ... apparently u misunderstood me... I am not talking about end time prophesies. Not revelations but more of Isaiah, genesis etc from the OT. .I am talking about prophesies that have already been fulfilled about the the Messiah. .christains, Arabs, Mohammed, turkey, syria, Babylon.. etc haven't u read anything on these..

Abuamam:
It's ok. We muslims know that evangelical christian beliefs derive from emotion and gullibility rather than proper sources and proof. We also understand that Paul/Saul taught the principle of lying to "increase the glory of your god". Let her leave it, as it is all over the internet with numerous other stories like it; seeking to 'convert' gullible muslims. You can't remove all fake xtian stories, and you can't change the gullibility of all fundamental christians.

Abuamam I see u are still as ignorant as the last time we discussed. .

This story was published by a fake news site a secular satire news site and we all know satire sites are often run by atheists because they are amoral. Not christians.
The OP made a mistake and I a christain pointed it out to him.


Muslims are the gullible ones.. u people believe a 7th century mass murdering pedophile sex addict who died by the posion of a jewish woman on top of Aisha's bosoms with an ere.ction is a prophet.. who gets more gullible than that.

Again christians are not allowed to lie unlike Muslims who use lies deciet Kitman and al taqiyyah to mislead non muslims. An example is the pic below by a muslim xballm.

johnydon22:
a simple google search would have helped you but no you prefer blind belief of jewish mythology..

Wikipedia encyclopedia [b] Origins
See also: Panbabylonism
The Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh, composed about 2500 BC, contains
a flood story almost exactly the same as the Noah story in the Pentateuch,
with a few variations such as the number of days of the deluge, the order
of the birds, and the name of the mountain on which the ark rests. The
flood story in Genesis 6–8 matches the Gilgamesh flood myth so closely
that "few doubt that [it] derives from a Mesopotamian account." [10] What
is particularly noticeable is the way the Genesis flood story follows the
Gilgamesh flood tale "point by point and in the same order", even when the
story permits other alternatives. [11]
The earliest written flood myth is found in the Mesopotamian Epic of
Atrahasis and Epic of Gilgamesh texts. "These mythologies are the source
of such features of the biblical Flood story as the building and provisioning
of the ark, its flotation, and the subsidence of the waters, as well as the
part played by the human protagonist." [12] The Encyclopedia Judaica
adds that there is a strong suggestion that[/b]

try and research more...

and below is a picture of the explanation as given by the New Community Bible ..

Johnny , 3 questions

is it impossible that these other folks copied the jewish tales on this matter.. knowing fully well that several times in history jews tribes are often driven out from their hosts communities and their historical records, torah, tamuld and other manuscripts etc stolen, confiscated or destroyed..?

Is it also impossible that such an event or something similar occurred and tales of it got passed from generation to generation and hence variations occur in different records by different civilizations. ..be it jewish or otherwise?

I would like to know how a young atheist such as urself reconcile the possibility of these 2 scenarios.

I have thought about some of these things..
The biggest argument for the christain scripture is the accuracy of its prophesies. ..

This bring me to my 3rd question... have u read anything on biblical prophesies ?

Peace.

Alisha4U:
Aleppo (Syria): jihadi fighters from the Islamic organization Daash (ISIS) converted to Christianity after being left for dead after battle near the Syrian eastern border, where he was rescued by Christian monks in the region.

The man miraculously survived after being injured as a result of the exchange of fire between ISIS and the Syrian army. The man was rescued by members of the Monastery of St. Dominican hours after the fighting ended. Members of the monastery wanted to give the man a decent Christian burial. He was carried more than 17 miles before the miracle of him coming back to life, as he had lost a lot of blood due to his injuries.

When the injured man came back to consciousness, he told the priest Herman Grohleyn of after-life visions he saw. This led him to Christianity in several days after the rescue. The man told of his vision experiences. He climbed toward the light in the sky. But then Satanic demons or Jinns appeared to him took him to the gates of hell, where he had to live again all the pains he brought to others. He had to live the experiences through the eyes of his victims for every death he caused in his lifetime. He had to live through cutting heads of his victims in his victim’s eyes. The priest said that these images will haunt him for the rest of his life. Then God spoke to him and told him that he had failed in his life as a human being and that he will be deprived from the gates of heaven if he chose to die. But, but if chose to come back to life, he will have the opportunity to repent for his sins and walk with God, in God’s way.

The man returned to life after that, as he chose life. He converted to Christianity days later, He realized that he was deceived in his religious life. The man’s injuries healed very quickly. He chose to live in the monastery of the Catholic priests who saved him from death in the desert, and hopes that his story will help ISIS fighters, and others to change their ways and turn to the true living God.

Hi Alisha4U it's important we always show our sources for news such as this.. I want to use this opportunity to let u know that this event is a fabrication by a satirical news website run by atheists. . it's only proper u delete it..

Alisha4U this is a very insightful post. . it makes more sense when the commands in the quran is read

“And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their
testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God.”-Revelation
20:4
https://www.nairaland.com/2142658/graphic-pictures-christians-
slaughtered-islamic
the usual standard muslim response that
those muslims who kill non muslims are:
1) Tiny minority
2) Misunderstaders of Islam
3) Not true muslims
4) Are zionist agents sponsored by the CIA to tarnish the image of Islam
5) They do not understand quran in 'original' arabic
6) The dont go to mosque regularly.
7) They have been radicalized
They dont represent the 1.5billion muslims.
9) They are marginalized by the govt.
10) It is the fault of the victims who offend the fragile sensibilty of
muslims
11) alllah know the best.
And other standardized excuses that islamic apologist give anytime their
foot-soldiers go on a killing spree.


People often wonder why a lot of Muslim riots and protests occur after
Friday prayers and why people like jihad john, Osama and other
terrorists are devout mosque attending Muslims.
Most moderate Muslims will use AL TAQIYYA or ignorance and quote this
non-compulsion of religion verse: Qu'ran2: 256
Sahih International
"There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right
course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in
Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold
with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing."
But they refuse to mention the other verses which compels their terrible
religion on others. Remember the quran is a book that is filled with
contractions and abrogations and even commands for Muslims to lie and
deceive infidels eg Kitman and al Taqiyya..
Here is a little sample of the over 100 quran verses Islamic terrorists
use to justify their acts of terror as commanded by Mohammed with
total disregard for the non-complusion of religion earlier stated ;
Qur’an 9:29—Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor
hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His
Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the
People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and
feel themselves subdued.
Qur’an 9:28—O ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean; so let
them not, after this year of theirs, approach the Sacred Mosque. And if
ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty,
for Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.
Qur’an 9:30—The Jews call Uzair a son of God, and the Christians call
Christ the son of God. That is a saying from their mouth; (In this) they
but imitate what the Unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s curse be on
them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!
Qur’an 9:31—They take their priests and their anchorites to be their
lords in derogation of Allah, and (they take as their Lord) Christ, the
son of Mary; yet they were commanded to worship but One God: there is
no god but He. Praise and glory to Him: (Far is He) from having the
partners they associate (with Him).
Qur’an 9:32—Fain would they extinguish Allah’s Light with their mouths,
but Allah will not allow but that His Light should be perfected, even
though the Unbelievers may detest (it).
Qur’an 9:33—It is He Who hath sent His Messenger with Guidance and
the Religion of Truth, to prevail it over all religion, even though the
Pagans may detest (it).
Qur’an 5:51—O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians
for friends; they are friends of each other.
Qur’an 9:73—O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the
hypocrites and be unyielding to them.
Qur’an 9:111—Surely Allah has bought of the believers their persons and
their property for this, that they shall have the garden; they fight in
Allah's way, so they slay and are slain.
Qur’an 9:123—O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are
near to you and let them find in you hardness.
Qur’an 47:35—Be not weary and fainthearted, crying for peace, when
ye should be uppermost.
Qur’an 48:29—Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are
with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among
themselves.
"The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be
worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except
in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits
illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate)
and leaves the Muslims." (Bukhari, Book 83 Number 17)
Sahih Muslim 30—Muhammad said: “I have been commanded to fight
against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but
Allah.”
Sahih Muslim 4366—Muhammad said: “I will expel the Jews and
Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but
Muslims.”
Sunan An-Nasa’i 3099—The Prophet said: “Whoever dies without having
fought or having thought of fighting, he dies on one of the branches of
hypocrisy.”
Sunan Ibn Majah 2763—The Messenger of Allah said: “Whoever meets
Allah with no mark on him (as a result of fighting) in His cause, he will
meet Him with a deficiency.”
Sahih al-Bukhari 6922—Allah’s Messenger said, “If anyone changed his
Islamic religion, then kill him.”
Qur'an (4:74)-"Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of
this world for the other. Whoso FIGHTETH IN THE WAY OF Allah, BE HE
SLAIN or be he victorious, on him WE SHALL BESTOW A VAST REWARD"
Qur'an (9:111)-"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and
their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they
fight in His cause, AND SLAY AND ARE SLAIN: a promise binding on Him
in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the
Qur'an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then
rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement
supreme."
Qur'an (2:207)-"And there is the type of man who GIVES HIS LIFE to
earn the pleasure of Allah..."
Qur'an (61:10-12)"O ye who believe! Shall I lead you to a bargain that
will save you from a grievous Penalty? That ye believe in Allah and His
Messenger, and that ye strive (your utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with
your property and your persons: That will be best for you, if ye but
knew! He will forgive you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath
which Rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of Eternity:
that is indeed the Supreme Achievement."
This verse was given at the battle Uhud and uses the Arabic word, Jihad.
The dark-eyed virgins are mentioned in several places as well, including
verses 44:54 and 52:20.
For those who swing the other way, there are"perpetual
youth"verse6:17, otherwise known as"boys"verses52:24and76:19.
Qur'an (17:33)"And do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden,
EXCEPT BY RIGHT"
Qur'an 3:151
Soon shall we cast TERROR into the hearts of the unbelievers, for that
they joined companion with Allah...
Bukhari (52:54)- The words of Muhammad:"I would love to be martyred
in Allah's Cause and then get resurrected and then get martyred, and
then get resurrected again and then get martyred and then get
resurrected again and then get martyred." This is why modern-day
Jihadists often say that they love death.
Qur'an (5:51)-"O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the
Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever
amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them;
surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."
Qur'an (5:80)-"You will see many of them befriending those who
disbelieve; certainly evil is that which their souls have sent before for
them, that Allah became displeased with them and in chastisement shall
they abide." Those Muslims who befriend unbelievers will abide in hell.
Qur'an (3:28)-"Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers
Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there
be help from Allah:except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard
yourselves from them..." This last part means that the Muslim is allowed
to feign friendship if it is of benefit. Renowned scholar Ibn Kathir
states that"believers are allowed to show friendship outwardly, but
never inwardly."
Qur'an (3:118)-"O you who believe! do not take for intimate friends
from among others than your own people, they do not fall short of
inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you; vehement hatred
has already appeared from out of their mouths, and what their bosoms
conceal is greater still; indeed, We have made the communications clear
to you, if you will understand." This verse not only warns Muslims not to
take non-Muslims as friends.
Qur'an (9:23)-"O ye who believe! Choose not your fathers nor your
brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than
faith. Whoso of you taketh them for friends, such are wrong-doers"
Even family members are not to be taken as friends if they do not
accept Islam. (This is the mildest interpretation of this verse from the
9th Sura, which also advocates"slaying the unbeliever wherever ye find
them" .
Qur'an (53:29)-"Therefore shun those who turn away from Our Message
and desire nothing but the life of this world."
Qur'an (3:85)-"And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall
not be accepted from him, and in the hereafter he shall be one of the
losers."
Qur'an (3:10)-"(As for) those who disbelieve, surely neither their
wealth nor their children shall avail them in the least against Allah, and
these it is who are the fuel of the fire." Those who do not believe in
Muhammad are but fuel for the fire of Hell (also 66:6, 2:24. 21:98).
Qur'an (7:44)-"The Companions of the Garden will call out to the
Companions of the Fire:"We have indeed found the promises of our Lord
to us true: Have you also found Your Lord's promises true?"They shall
say,"Yes"; but a crier shall proclaim between them:"The curse of Allah is
on the wrong-doers" Muslims in heaven will amuse themselves by looking
down on non-Muslims in Hell and mocking them while they are being
tortured (see22:19-22.
Qur'an (1:5-7)-"Show us the straight path, The path of those whom
Thou hast favoured; Not the (path) of those who earn Thine anger nor
of those who go astray" This is a prayer that Muslims are supposed to
repeat each day. "Those who earn Thine anger"specifically refers to
Jews and"those who go astray"refers to Christians (seeBukhari
(12:749).
Remember the ultimate aim of Mohammed and devout Muslims is for
Islam to dominate the world. They aim to murder all the pagans and
atheists hence condemning their souls to hell, of courses they spare the
Christians because a murdered christain in defense of his/her faith
becomes heaven bound hence the devout Muslims are commanded to
humiliate Christians and have them pay the jizyah or convert or die.
Once a muslim renounces Islam they are commanded to behead the
apostate.
this is the religion of "peace".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmGRshS0PAw