raumdeuter: What are the implications on the first amendments?
except you offer essential services, or you are a monopoly, you should reserve the right to deny services to anyone. There will be others willing to pick up the service
As an attorney, I am sure you don't accept everyone. As a cab driver you also don't pick everyone. Surely some people might use it as a tool for discrimination but that should not override the right of the service provider to pick who they want to serve
It's a tough case. I think in this case the plaintiff went out their way to say they were going to discriminate against LGBTQ. In most cases people find other ways. In fact as I was reading it seems the plaintiff didn't even have a LGBTQ client at that time. Seems like one of those cases that was designed to reach the Supreme Court to make new law/policy/precedent.
SmartPolician: America is a country where laws work! If Biden wants a cheap way to win his re-election bid, he should use his money to pay the student loans. That's if he has anything close to that.
But then, if Americans, who can easily get jobs after college, are unable to repay their student loans, is it in Nigeria where a student cannot get a decent job after 5 years that people can pay their student loans?
Laws work? That's a naive statement. Which laws? This Supreme Court Majority (6 unelected people) have been aggregating power. They have been rewriting laws that Congress has passed and Presidents have signed based on what they think. Until Congress(Dems) gets serious and takes some of the power back, the Supreme Court justices are the true Power in the US. Republicans are happy with it because they really don't like democracy.
PDPGuy: A ruling with major First Amendment implications
Have to think this one through, can see both sides of it. But, the conservative majority on the Supreme Court is all over the place. If this was a Christian who was refused service what do you think the ruling would be?
bemeruca: But you post them. You can't help yourself. Posting random stuff claiming it. Notice me
This is such a satisfying post. Half heartedly trying to dismiss something you know is true. Just as you do in mostly every post you write here. Laughable.
bemeruca: Lmao. This is not an escort. What's the difference? The photo is embarrassing.
You removed the photo again 😂😂
You are now picking stuff online to brag. You are a little kid, an envious one. Keep exposing yourself
Lol. Your poverty driven live doesn't even understand how a convoy works. There are about 20 officers who lived in the compound 24/7 with 2 police trucks. They disperse between a lead and then a follow car and depending on how many cars we have they may disperse in the cars as well or just jump into one of the regular SUV's. That time, they drove 7 cars up for us. The car you saw, a couple of Benz Suvs, a BMW Suv, a couple of regular Suv's and a Range. (that last list was me just showing off so you can cry to sleep).
And FYI, those pics sux. Who would even post them so I could steal them? It's ok to use your brain once in a while. It may hurt you, but try.
bemeruca: What an escort. 😂😂 empty police truck is what you are bragging about. Way too ahead as well. What kind of escort is this? The phone camera is poor. I am sure it's not from your phone. You are a clown.
What kind of escort is this? Empty police truck? ahahahah As if you've ever had an escort.
bemeruca: it's embarrassing how you saw a nice car parked outside, you took a photo of it and decided to brag with it like you always do. a house with 100 boys' quarters does not have a parking space that the car will be packed outside. hahaha
Well normally you are right. Normally the cars come in, drive around the water fountain about 200 yards to the house, lets people out, then they head to the back to get washed and cleaned and put away. If a car is needed relatively soon, it sits out in that corner so that the police detail can roll their truck out first, then the car rolls around the fountain up to the house and picks people up and so it is then behind the police truck (whatever they call it) and then another police truck falls in behind it. And off we go. Something like the pic below. I promise you, you want to let this go.
benalvino3: This mumu posted someone's car again claiming it's their car. You live in what looks like an abandoned building?😂
An abandoned building with a pool, pool house, 10 room boys quarter, 12 room guest house and a meeting/function house not including the main house. And this is just the village house.
Did you google envy yet? This post surely sounds like you are envious. Yes, this isn't my car, never said it was. You were talking about my family, so I wanted to show you how my family was struggling in blinding poverty.
Some major decisions from the Supreme Court. They ended race based affirmative action. And also allowed religious accommodations for workers. I'm not in the mood to talk about the affirmative action case. But I'm trying to figure out which religion I can join so I can get Mondays off. Maybe I can become Rastafarian and say I need two days off to smoke weed and force my employer to accommodate me. It's silly season at the court.
BraniacX: the super idi0t is many things like the republican party he supports, christian isin't one of them, christ's love was unconditional, he gave the parable of the shepherd who leaves the flock to rescue the one lamb that strayed, gave the parable of the good samaritan, associated with gentiles (close to abominable for jews), gave the parable of the prodigal son, condemed the misplaced pride of the overtlý religious pharisees and saducees, gave stringent conditions for a rich man to make salvation, gave a definition of true value using of poor widow with two silver coins and the story of the tax collector and the pharisee praying at the temple, the new testament is replete with Jesus giving practical examples of what it means to be his follower but these idi0ts of the repugnantcan party believe like basilico believed the Nazi party were socialists that all it takes is a name tag and that words and not deeds define a man or an ideology! They believe that if they shout "i am a christian!" Long enough the rest of the world will take them any more seriously than Jesus took pharisees and saduccees of his time.😏
Exactly. I think this is the most frustrating part of this new "Republican" party. People think that who Christians really are. It's deeply frustrating.
benalvino3: Yel I did. I am not your folks who can't afford flights.
When you stop being envious you will stop hearing it.
Envious assumes you have something I want. Which is? Someone's else pic of a shitty looking bbq while a dirty fat dude with a forearm tat cooks it? Clearly envious.
Yeah, flights can be expensive. So sometimes when you're home you just ask someone to pull a car around so you can take a drive. You ever been in one of these? Lol. As I said, let me show you a little bit of my poverty soaked Naija life that makes me so envious of you.
benalvino3: Yeah, it's 1am in nigeria. But it's also 5pm here in the US.
We are making barbecue for Eid...
Envious midget.
You should really go look up the definition of the word "envious". It clearly doesn't mean what you think it does. And this picture. So you want me to believe you came to the US, went back to Nigeria and came back to the US again in the course of 1 month. Yup. Take your meds. And this hot mess of a ghetto picture.. lol
benalvino3: Addiction to this nigerian Website is something else. take a break instead of coping for a senile corrupt idiot that is in the white house.
Take Todays Date Subtract the Time Registered and divide it by the Time Spent Online. Easy Math. Then compare it to mine. And then do that with your other 2 usernames that were BANNED. If you want I'll update the last spreadsheet for you.
As I said so much mental illness in this thread and people living in delusional worlds. Worlds where they don't live and breath on this thread. And Worlds where they've actually visited the US.
FYI, it's almost 1am in Nigeria. Lol. Talk about taking a break. Lol. Delusional Mental Illness. Do you also think ur in a US time zone? Lol
ono: Bas, recall when I posted this. Trump recently told anyone who cared to listen that Jack “the loser” smith posted a voice recording that’s not his. Bravado he said. Y’all can see what these evil demonrat can do to bring Trump down.
So much mental illness in this thread. There were multiple people in that room when this discussion took place Not only was Trump's people recording the conversation. The person who was there interviewing Trump for the autobiography he was writing on Mark Meadows also recorded it or took notes. Not one of those people is going to fux around, lie to the Feds and go to jail for lying. There is no world where Jack Smith put a fake recording that is not Trump in evidence in a Federal courthouse. Jack Smith would go to jail for that. Take your meds.
Silly take. His portfolio is the world. From meeting to meeting he's discussing diverse topics from Finance, to Healthcare, to infrastructure to Foreign Policy and has to be sufficiently knowledgeable in them to answer the randomly shouted question. Wow he slipped up. How well do you think you'd do? Shit, I'm half his age and called my g/f my ex's name last week. lol.
And I'm one who thinks someone younger in the job would be beneficial.
It's clear the Trump leaked the audio of him discussing the classified documents. It's the same tactic he used during his impeachment with the call with Ukraine. Release the audio, claim that it exonerates him. Talk about it so much to normalize it so when people here it they say.. meh. And he's not going to testify in court, this way he gets his narrative out without taking the stand. Also, he undercut Jack Smith who I'm sure would have liked the Jury to hear it for the first time while on trial for the shock and awe value. Gotta admit Trump is a masterful marketer and propogandist. He manipulates the media so easily.
EnlightenedUFO: I'm truly certain that you are NOT ok. You are having a mental fit and it's now getting worrisome. If you objectively read your trash again, you'd know what I'm saying. If they make 3% of the population, why is your hate giving you erections?
I'm sure all those LGBTQ sex videos he watches are only "research".
This was my post from the American politics thread: Trump on tape discussing/showing classified documents he admits are classified and that he didn't declassify.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He3KZrmJETU Unless he becomes President or gets a very favorable juror willing to disregard the law, Trump is going to jail. He should have settled this case.
Compare that tape with this charge he was indicted on.
18 U.S.C. §§ 793(e) (e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates , delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
EnlightenedUFO: While dumb idiotic maga cultists and haters of American diversity and freedom be wet dreaming about a 71 counts indicted criminal getting back into the white house (tufiakwa!), SCOTUS be saving democracy one opinion at a time.
Ijebos, budaatum, braniac are you guys surprised with these SCOTUS opinions in these three decisive cases, the gerrymandering in Alabama, Louisiana and then this?
A conservative* majority SCOTUS just saved American democracy but flat brain haters like basilico loco still be holding on to straws like mad men.
Thanks to Marc Elias. That man is a god!
Big Deal rulings. This last opinion I think was the biggest deal of them all. I want to give them credit but I think the rulings show how bat-shit crazy the Right has become. The argument that somehow the US constitution would allow a state legislature to decide how elections are run without Constitutional review by the State Court is asinine. The point of the State Court is to review whether State laws are Constitutional. Important ruling in as far as some crazy people(judges) allowed a nutty fringe theory to reach the Supreme Court.
basilico: Harvard multiple degrees holders of foolishness. I admit I had not read the post about OIG DoJ report. The OIG DOJ ooked at how FBI mishandled the Clinton email treason. The OIG did not check the emails Hillary submitted. He looked at how FBI treated the case
The OIG intelligence looked at the actual emails and determined some were classified, top secret and SAP.
You full of shit
The addendum you added is a copy and paste from some leftwing fact checker. Not factual at all. Remember I said that any stuff from the following websites is fake news pushing a narrative to room temperature IQ zombies.If you rely on these as the gospel truth ,you are almost irredeemable
Cnn, Msnbc, Abc, Cbs, Nbc, HuffPost, NYT, WashPost, The AP, BuzzFeed, politico, NewsWeek, The Hill, Rolling Stone, Twitter , Sky News, Mediate, The Atlantic, USA Today, Time magazine, LA Times, Politifact, Reuters, Facebook , BBC, Wikipedia, Boston Globe, Vox, The Miami Herald, Mother Jones, Instagram, Factcheck .or, HLN , Yahoo, MSN, NY Daily News, Vice, Univision, People magazine, PBS, NPR, New Yorker, Wall Street Journal, Daily Beast, Bloomberg, Aurn, National Journal,
You and Benvalino3 have got to be two of the dumbest posters on this thread. Your posts are a waste of the bytes they encompass. I always wonder how a mind can be that limited it believes and continues posting bullshit from the same people who are continuously wrong. Has anything you've posted in the last 2 years been right? From Trump to Hunter Biden? At some point a rational person would be mad at the people feeding him that BS. Not you. Your sick mind just makes up a new conspiracy.
You didn't read the DOJ OIG report and still haven't read it. Because what I posted was from Horowitz's office who was quoting the DOJ OIG report. Also, if you read the letter from the Intelligence IG's letter, you would have known they referred the matter to the Justice Department/FBI (most likely the counter intelligence unit). And the first investigative step the Justice Department/FBI would do would be to verify if the emails had actual classified material in them to determine if anything/anyone was compromised. Because that's their job. So Comey's team would have a better say as to what was or wasn't actually classified in the emails. And the OIG went through everything Comey did.
LOL at your list. Basically, you're saying you won't read anything with actual knowledge. No wonder you are the cesspool of ignorance you are.
FYI, don't bother responding to me. If I choose, If I see a post of yours that's really egregious, I'll post a fact check. That'll be the limit of my communication with you.
Trump on tape discussing/showing classified documents he admits are classified and that he didn't declassify.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He3KZrmJETU Unless he becomes President or gets a very favorable juror willing to disregard the law, Trump is going to jail. He should have settled this case.
Compare that tape with this charge he was indicted on.
18 U.S.C. §§ 793(e) (e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates , delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
basilico: During a 2011 e-mail exchange, Hillary Clinton urged top aide Jake Sullivan to strip classified talking points of all markings and send them through “nonsecure” means after a secure fax line failed to function. On the night of June 16, 2011, Sullivan told Clinton that important talking points on an undetermined issue would be faxed to her the following morning. When Clinton informed Sullivan that the talking points had not yet materialized, he began a frantic search for the problem. “They say they’ve had issues sending secure fax,” he wrote to Clinton 15 minutes later. “They’re working on it.” “If they can’t, turn into nonpaper with no identifying heading and send nonsecure,” Clinton
She clearly knew it was classified. I'll post more of her emails. Yet Comey says intent not determined hence no sane prosecutor can press charges
The server Clinton used as secretary of state contained "several dozen emails containing classified information determined by the [intelligence community] element to be at the CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, and TOP SECRET/SAP levels," the inspector general, Charles McCullough, wrote in the letter, which was first reported by Fox News. "SAP" stands for special access programs, which carry a classification level higher than top secret.
Idiot.Get this through your skin head. IG DoJ looked at how the FBi handled the email case IG intelligence looked at the emails and determined that some were SAP , above top secret levels
The 500-plus page report was the product of 17 months of investigative work by a dedicated OIG team that reviewed well over 1.2 million documents, including over 100,000 text and instant messages, and interviewed more than 100 witnesses, many on multiple occasions. Our report provides a thorough, comprehensive, and objective recitation of the facts related to the Department’s handling of the Midyear investigation. The review team followed the evidence wherever it led, and it was through their efforts that we identified the inappropriate text and instant messages discussed in the report. Additionally, as a result of the OIG’s painstaking forensic examinations, we recovered thousands of text messages that otherwise would have been lost or undisclosed. We completed our report when we were satisfied that we had pursued all reasonable investigative leads and finished our detailed forensic examinations. As a result of this approach, our report includes, for example, text messages that we recovered just last month, which were significant to our findings. It also includes an analysis of the FBI’s decision not to request access in May 2016 to certain classified information, a decision that we did not learn of until the later stages of our review.
basilico: Ijebos ,they demanded all records from the day he was sworn in to the day he left office Note Trump waved newspaper clippings about Iran attack, it's a herculian task to prove he showed docs that were classified to people without security clearance. Secondly by presumption whatever he carted away was in his mind already declassified, tell me a bureaucrat has powers to decide that the President needs his permission to declass. Which actually happened because they slow walked his declass orders. Insubordination screaming loud. Thirdly, by precedent Bill was allowed to chose to keep what he thought was Personal records.Trump decided what he carried away was personal. They carted away his passport and letters to various people. NARA demanded every doc since Jan 2017. Fourthly From Hilary precedent, she sent what she thought was official and deleted 30k what she thought was personal... Yoga and her daughter's wedding ( attended by Ghislaine Maxwell remember). They never confiscated her server or searched her home for all docs. Fifth. NARA has always assisted the transition president by going through what they deem they should preserve.With Trump they never did. Smells setup. Joe Biden had no declass powers yet had documents that could only be viewed in a SCIF.
Jack Smith laid out charges under Espionage Act, yet they are not charging him for anything espionage. Pure political hackjob, intended to stop Trump from running, possibly acquire a life sentence for him.
You too full of shit to comprehend what's going on. All your head knows is Trump is a criminal.Yet the real criminals were let off for worse
Dave Putreas (sp). Commander of Afghan ISAF hired his girlfriend to do his biography ,leaked classified info to her. Obama fired him and had him on probation. Reason. He said at a House hearing that Obama was arming jihadists while claiming they were moderates in Syria.
Jack Smith was shown the man and ordered to look for his crimes. Ditto that NYC Alvin Bragg . Next indictment landing on Trump will be a rape accuser, Georgia disputing of election results, Jack Smith on holding Trump responsible for Jan 6 protests upgraded to insurrection.
Hell Jack Smith wants Miami trial to start in Dec not Aug 14 as judge wanted
I don't engage with you because 99% of what you write is Bullshit or Racist. Or a combination of both. Like this post above is mostly Bullshit. I quoted the law with the elements that will go to the jury. You posted BS Trump said at some rally. Post the law that says any documents he takes is personal. Post the letter from NARA saying they wouldn't help him. Again, read the law I posted and show me anywhere it says classified.
The laws you talk about are Bullshit. The Precedents (if that even mattered) you talk about are Bullshit. You peddle in Bullshit.
And FYI, the trial was never going to start in Aug. I wrote that it would most likely start at the end of the year (due to pre-trial motions) a week ago and I don't even work for the Special Counsels office.
basilico: Established facts. Clinton had transmitted classified emails. Some higher levels than top secret. As secretary of state, there is an annual training provided on security clearances, claiming she didn't know while there are emails on record - asking Her aide to send classified emails from secure system to nonsecure. - asking her maid at home to print out work emails -using a private server instead of .gov address - using her personal phones in China etc knowing the phone was not encrypted... Not using gov issued encrypted phones -Deleting her server and using shredding software bleachbit to wipe the hard disk clean -Destroyed 13 phones she used on accessing her emails while in China , Russia etc. She used hammers for this.
Comey had long decided to exonerate her, circulated an email months before to close aides where they changed from "grossly negligent" { A Felony) to "Extremely careless".
You quote OIG Horowitz ( justice dept who investigated FBI conduct . The OIG intelligence concluded there were emails above top secret.
Fact. She hald classified emails. Her intent of using the private server was to hide her comms with her foundation donors who were people/countries with dealings to the state dept Most of people whom she met with at state Dept were donors to Clinton foundation. Take that to the bank.This is the reason why she needed an email outside of .gov..... At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.
The 500-plus page report was the product of 17 months of investigative work by a dedicated OIG team that reviewed well over 1.2 million documents, including over 100,000 text and instant messages, and interviewed more than 100 witnesses, many on multiple occasions. Our report provides a thorough, comprehensive, and objective recitation of the facts related to the Department’s handling of the Midyear investigation. The review team followed the evidence wherever it led, and it was through their efforts that we identified the inappropriate text and instant messages discussed in the report. Additionally, as a result of the OIG’s painstaking forensic examinations, we recovered thousands of text messages that otherwise would have been lost or undisclosed. We completed our report when we were satisfied that we had pursued all reasonable investigative leads and finished our detailed forensic examinations. As a result of this approach, our report includes, for example, text messages that we recovered just last month, which were significant to our findings. It also includes an analysis of the FBI’s decision not to request access in May 2016 to certain classified information, a decision that we did not learn of until the later stages of our review.
BraniacX: because the law was coďed (worded) by people with brains and given your self confessed hatred for dictionaries and words it surprises no one that you can't understand that the letter of the law must be satisfied to establish that she committed a criminal offense i.e no intent no crime a claim you can nòt make for trump hence the false equivalence of your comparisons super idi0t bèn the vino head the 3rdturd
Exactly. Laws are specifically written by lawyers where every ("Or", "And" and "comma" is important). The elements are like puzzle pieces, if they match, it means your guilty. This is one of the charges Trump has been charged with for counts 1-31 (I Believe). He basically admitted all of the elements already on his recent Fox News interview. No need to be nebulous on the charges when you can just look to the language. The key here has been his willfulness/intent. Which sets Trump apart from Biden and Pence. What's stupid is he should have just listened to his lawyers and given them back a long time ago. Wouldn't have been in this situation.
18 U.S.C. §§ 793(e) (e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information[b] relating to the national defense[/b] which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
BraniacX: hope you're finally arriving at the conclusion i already made some time ago? These idi0ts are never to be taken serious! Do you see me trying to re-educate anyone? When i point out a fact once i follow next with ridicule, try to have some laughs at their expense here, you've made the point i would have been too lazy to research to make anyway, obviously the chief idi0t benalvino3 is going to play ostrich and pretend there isin't a timeline to events and the soundbyte he sourced out is all there is to everything so simply ask for hillary's indictment on the strength of such compelling evidence he just sourced out so we can start drawing comparisons between hillary and trump, the rest of the dimwitted pack will follow his lead as he tries to introduce a tangential argument and divert from the fact that once again, based on facts you have irrefutably highlighted his stupidity! There's fun to be had here, if only you stop expecting seriousness and sincerity from a bunch of base mofos with nary a braincell spread amongst them
Lol @ the dimwitted pack. You nailed it. But, I have made the same conclusion. The posts were mostly trying to give anyone else starting down this path some actual facts.
benalvino3: I follow those tenets, You are stabbing me in the back while preaching to me to follow the tenets of turn the other cheek. The reason why Christians are being messed with is because they are nice. "Shows" like you know this and you want to ask us to be nice while you show wickedness and hatred towards us. Not gonna work. I told you about your father pride of lincoln... he was the one throwing insults at any nice person he sees. he engages them with insult, insult nigeria and everyone in it. When you say okay, no more Mr. Nice guy and start to attack him... he will stop engaging you directly just as you were doing. he will complain asking for people to be nice.
Now you have turned PASTOR, Asking me to be nice. are you nice? Even your own side recently called you out for your harvard reasoning of you are not in the US so you cannot know.
You have used everything you can. Try to intimidate me thinking i am like your cousins in Naija. come to a forum you don't understand to try and use wealth you don't have to oppress people.
Remember how you were showing me stuff i never asked for claiming you are the richest man in Boston? People with sense Ibime, brags about property, not coke and Pepsi he is drinking in a hotel bar.
Don't preach about tenets... if you want to beg for forgiveness, go ahead and beg, I may give you mercy.
This post. You should have left the forum years back, instead you seem to have lost your way. Your argument seems to be "this road I'm supposed to walk is hard so I'm going to create my own easier road." Again that's the antithesis of the faith you supposedly subscribe and wield to beat others down with.
And the only reason I bring up faith, well besides the fact you seem to talk about it a lot, is that it's what animates my views on social justice, views on loving my neighbors.. my politics. I grew up in the Church. And people like you denigrate it.
I don't really bring up your family, I don't care. I don't need to because my arguments are sufficient. I think people who attack people's families are weak stupid losers who can't engage with their mind so they attempt to bully. And it's peculiar that you continue talking about my family being poor. Does it make you feel better about yourself? If my cousins were poor what would it matter? Honestly, if you really want me to give you a glimpse of how my family lives in Nigeria, let me know, I will. But then don't complain that you think I'm showing off.