₦airaland Forum

See this complete nutter using multiple ids to defend the Bundesliga !!!

Multiple ids are for when you are banned and you have no other choice but to create another id

If everybody started creating multiple ids to defend their case,this forum will descend into a farce.What a complete idiot.You didn't even bother to change your style.I knew it was you from the very first post.Dummkopf

Economics 101! The Ministry of Education should have made Economics compulsory for WAEC.

hollandis:
@I-man which kain yan be that one? abi naija deport you?

We too boast for Naija.Its just like England. After all the bragging,we go win nothing. Na me dey enjoy Nations Cup pass amongst Nigerians-I no dey support team we go dissapoint me.

As long as Nigeria and Ghana no win.I dey happy

Long Live Ivory Coast! Long Live Mali-Any team wey dey play Naija,na dem I dey support.

Cougar:
@ mcomo,
stop having me mixed up with someone else. no sir, i have never chatted with u. the more u probe, the more confuzzled u will get. keep digging.

No mind them multiple IDs folks.I hear say you be Loyika! Dayokanu na Justkunmmi.McOmo na Razzorr-I dey unmask una one by one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

dayokanu:
Lets do some analysis.

The best country in football in my own opinion is Brazil

Why? IS it because of the number of Copa America( Local leagues) they have won? NO Argentina and Uruguay have won more Copa America titles

Is it because of the monetary worth of the CBF Brazilian football federation? No because some little Arab countries are richer

Is it by the number of world cups(UCL) they have won. YES

I see.So Uruguay are a better national team than Holland and on the same level as Argentina because they happened to win 2 Cups in particularly successful period-like Bayern in the mid-70s.This is what they call,"living in past glory".

Cougar:
@ i-man,
i have grown to learn something on this forum. arsenal fans have a grudging respect for ronaldo but they wont admit he is great because he plays for man united.

When McOmo wants to relax in the evening,he slots in a video tape of Man Utd playing champagne football.He even has a Ronaldo shirt.

Dayokanu dreams of Ronaldo playing for Bayern.He has a lifesize portrait of Ronnie in his bedroom.Don't mind these envious folks.They would love Ronaldo to be playing for their sides.

Mc Omo:
Iman

need I remind u of the goals Pires freely scored as a midfielder at Arsenal ? why are u quick to point out his contribution to the French team ?

So,make we simply just ignore his record for France? Was he playing netball with France? Arguing with Gooners na waste of time!My New Year Resolution is not to argue with Gooners on the Sports thread until they drop down to 3rd place.

Make I just keep quiet for now.Just know that Pires goals ratio for Arsenal is lower than that of Ronaldo for Utd.

Cougar:
@ i-man,
dayokanu is clueless. he was exhibiting the same characteristics yesterday telling us how bayern munich won 4 ucl titles. 3 of those were won in quick succession and since then they got one by playing in a penalty shoot-out in 2001. the game ended 1-1 after extra time. dayo in his fanatsy believes ucl should be the only yard-stick to measure greatness. i asked him if nottingham forest and aston villa are greater than chelsea and arsenal. trust me, dayo came out with an emphatic yes!!!!! now, how sane is this dayo?

The boy has been trying to convince people that Forest are on the same level as Juve and Barca.Indeed,by his theory,Barca only reached Forest's level in 2006,until then,they were as big a club as Villa,Red Star Belgrade or Celtic.

He once said that only a minority of Man Utd's starting players will make it into Bayern's starting 11.That is what happens to you when your club is languishing in the UEFA Cup and your best claim to glory came in a 3 year period when many Bayern players hadn't even been born.

dayokanu:
@ I-man, Do you know Portugal was busy with countries like Kazakhstan, Armenia and Azerbaijan Portugal came second behind Poland is that not shameful enough?

France no play the likes of Georgia,Lithuania and Faroe Islands? Is it Ronaldo's fault that Portugal finished 2nd?Why didn't Riberry rescue France with a goal in the 2 defeats against mighty Scotland?

dayokanu:
Klose and Toni both have 9 goals each making 18 how is 16 more than 18 Ronaldo has 5 games more than any of them Jackal are you suffering from Amnesia already?

Given that Klose and Toni have each played 15 league games,totalling 30 league games-its ridiculous to even compare their stats to Ronaldo's.Ok,you rolled up all their matches into and divided it by 2.What a nutter.

Mc Omo:
am utterly embarrased at your outburst u talk like a newbie high on shroomz he is a winger and so bloody what ? when Pires was scoring freely as a midfielder himself was the noise this much ?

See this pillock dey spit unadulterated applesauce!Pires wetin? What is Pires record at both national club levels compared to Ronaldo's? Pires never reached the heights Ronaldo reached.For instance,Pires scored 14 goals for France in 79 games-Ronaldo don already croass that level in 50 games and he is only 22!!

At club level,Ronaldo is only 18 goals away from Pires record with Arsenal-he has a far better goals ratio.Pires and Ronnie were never on the same level.

he has scored more than Adebayor, so ? has he won the golden boot ? did he not turn up last season against Drogba and at the end of the day get knocked out of the race ?

That Ronaldo is even mentioned in the same breadth as Drogba and Ade is a credit to him,for unlike those 2,he is a midfielder.Ronaldo should not even be near them in the first place.

Cougar:
@ justkunmi,
are u aware hleb has only scored 7 league goals since he joined arsenal in 2005? rosicky has only scored 8 league goals since he joined arsenal. theo walcott is yet to score a league goal for arsenal it means all arsenal's wingers put together hasn't scored more than ronaldo this season alone. what a shame!!!!!

Never mind Arsenal.Look at Dayokanu's Bayern this season. Ronaldo has scored more goals this season than the combined front 2 pairing of Toni and Klose!!!!

Schweinsteiger,a midfielder,has scored 1 goal in 22 games for Bayern.Riberry has scored 2 goals in 24 games for France(Ronaldo has 20 goals in 51 games for Portugal)not like France haven't been playing "Mickey mouse" nations like the Faroe Islands and the Banana Islands .

Yet,one guff merchant wants to convince us Ronaldo's stats are no big deal.

justkunmi:
wormedup
you still there? gone to check the facts? because u started all this. . .

but u keep forgetting one fact. . .RONALDO IS A WINGER THAT SCORES GOALS!!!
the dude has already scored 16 league this season. . .playing as a midfielder. . .
he has scored mo than Adebayor, Arsenal's out and out striker.
he has scored mo than Shevvy and Drogs put together
he has scored mo than Aiyegbeni or whoever comes close. . .
and the dude is only a WINGER. . .

Let their own boys go and score the same amount of goals.Did they insert a clause in their contracts that they will only shine against the "big 4"?

A midfielder scored 16 league goals already and they are mocking his record,yet they can't point to a single midfielder in the major European leagues that has equaled,never mind surpassing,Ronaldo's record.

I am wondering whether the likes of Lampard,Riberry and Schweinsteiger have a contract clause that limits the amount of goals and assists they provide.

dayokanu:
Messi scored a hat trick last season against Real, Eto'o score against Madrid most of the time, Ronaldinho scored a lot against Madrid in La Liga and in UCL

same with Kaka scores and creates a lot in UCL

Ronaldo is playing in the same position for Utd as Kaka,Eto'o and Messi play for their various clubs?

dayokanu:
does he turn to a striker against Newcastle? but why does he score against Newcastle, Fulham and Derby and not against the big clubs

If its so easy to score against the weak teams,why don't the rest just turn up and score 18 goals in 16 games?I expect Riberry to be destroying the net when next Bayern play a Bolton. I mean think of it,if its no big deal to score a hat trick against Newcastle,when Barca plays Newcastle,I expect Ronaldinho and Messi to notch up 6 goals each.If something is no big deal,others who are supposed to be better should be doing even more.

dayokanu:
@I-man,
Against Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool he is a winger does he turn to a striker against Newcastle? but why does he score against Newcastle, Fulham and Derby and not against the big clubs

You are an idiot.Against Newcastle,Derby and Fulham,Utd overwhelmingly dominates possession and can afford to attack in a cavalier manner.Against Chelsea,Arsenal and Liverpool,the games are more balanced and the attacking players operate with greater restrictions.

If you look at the stats,you will see that against the big teams-Ronaldo spends most of his time on the wings and almost 50% of the time in his own half,against a Newcastle or Derby,this isn't the case.

All the great attacking players in history have a better goals ratio against weaker teams than against the strongest sides.When Ronaldo of Brazil was at his peak in those 2 seasons at Inter and Barca,how many goals did he score against Real Madrid,Juve or AC Milan?

justkunmi:
you can't just wake up and say, Ronaldo vs The Big 4. .
thats too hypocritical. .
then when is Henry vs the Big 4 coming up?

Yes, Ronaldo has scored mo goals playing lesser teams, buts its just unfair and hypocritical to pick him out and judge him by those big matches. .

Isn't the vast majority of football matches played against the "lesser teams"? The great treble winning Utd side of 99 only won 1 of their 6 league games against the top 4.Who remembers that,what about the Arsenal side of last season against the top 4 sides.

Generally,attacking players struggle against the top sides.Have you watched Kaka against Inter or Roma this season,compare that to games against the lower sides.

Ronaldo was outstanding in Euro 2004 and in the last World Cup.The main purpose of a midfielder is to create goals and he does that in abundance. How many of Bayern's midfielders can boast the assists/goals record of Ronaldo?

dayokanu:
Exactly my point go and Check Messi's, Ronaldinho, Eto'o record against Real Madrid and you would see what I mean.

No show against Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal but scores well against Kazakhstan, Newcastle,Derby and Fulham.

100m in sub ten Then calling Justin Gatlin the world fastest man is an error It should be Cristiano Ronaldo.

You are a schmuck.Ronaldo is a winger in a traditional 4-4-2 formation! Compare his goal scoring records to wingers like Figo,Giggs,Overmars,Di Livio et al Compare like for like.

How many midfielders are prolific against the top clubs? How many goals did even Kaka,playing just behind the front man score against Lazio,Inter or Roma(Italy's top 4 last season)?

Here is a quote from a pro-nuclear lobby group:

Nuclear power is cost competitive with other forms of electricity generation, except where there is direct access to low-cost fossil fuels.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf02.html

Nuclear power is not even cost-competitive in countries like Nigeria,going by the estimations of a pro-nuclear lobby.

Now,we live in a country whose entire national budget is far less than that of the City of New York-our budget over the past 3 years is equivalent to that of New York City in one year.You would think that such a country would not be determined to embark on projects which even biased lobbyists deem as not even cost competitive.

We are actually talking of a country where millions go to bed hungry and salaries are unpaid for months.Yet we want embark on something that is not even cost competitive.

Never mind that the project in question-nuclear power plants-hasn't been embarked on for decades in some of the wealthiest nations in the history of humanity for safety and financial reasons.Never mind that for those grotesquely wealthy nations,nuclear power is actually cost competitive in their cases.

The best way to develop Nigeria is through common sense economic decision making.You don't do something because the West,South Africa or Russia did it.You do things according to the resources you have.A country with rich hydro-carbon resources and mind numbing poverty has no business embarking on costly white elephant projects.

Lets put it this way,if nuclear power was economically attractive in Nigeria,private investors will be lining up to build one in Nigeria.That they are not shows us that,from an economic perspective,it isn't logical.That is why Nigerian politicians,following a long tradition of investing in wasteful projects,want to use our scarce resources to build what makes no economic sense.We will never learn.

davidylan:
Wind energy and solar energy are not viable alternatives in the long run . . . if we intend to transform our nation to being one of the top 20 economies by 2020 then we need to do something about energy supply fast. Nuclear power seems to be the most logical alternative.

This is where you are wrong.The people who build nuclear power plants today do so as a necessary evil(apart from the Irans of this world)-they barely have other viable alternatives in the short term.That is the whole point of resorting to nuclear.However,Nigeria doesn't have that problem in the short to medium term.

In the long term,solar and wind energy would be much cheaper than they are today.Then and only then can we start investing in them.

The idea that it somehow in national interest to invest in a costlier energy source is bewildering. Who in is his private life buys more expensive alternatives simply because he wants to "diversify" what he has?

davidylan:
despite poor power transmission Kainji dam is yet to collapse decades after it was built. The major problem with electricity in Nigeria is not only transmission but the fact that Kainji dam just can no longer cope with the increased energy demands.

Are we supposed to be congratulated because Kainji hasn't yet collapsed? We have had innumerable major accidents at industrial plants.This is a country that has had more air plane casualties than the whole of Western Europe over the past few years .

Everyear,hundreds are killed over pipeline explosions,una want add nuclear to the mix.

davidylan:
Gas . . . is non-renewable. We don't have enough to use it as the long term alternative to energy generation.
Coal . . . see the response for gas. It is more expensive to harness coal into an energy source.

We don't need enough to last us forever.Don't think of 2050 in the way we think of 2010.We simply need enough until renewable energy sources like solar and wind are commercially viable enough for us to invest in.

davidylan:
maybe we should ask South Africa were she has been disposing her own waste over the years.

You don't do something because South Africa did it.S.A expanded their nuclear facilitties at the time of apartheid when they had little alternatives.You don't see them embarking on the same course post-apartheid.The costs are still there for South-Africa for thousands of years to come.

In the US where you live,when was the last Nuclear power plant built?I believe in the late 70s.If the US is wary of building nuclear power stations why is Nigeria,which can't even maintain basic facilities contemplating going down that route?Delusions of grandeur.

In Britain,the costs-financial and safetywise-has been holding back the building of nuclear power stations for decades but some how people advocate that an energy rich nation like Nigeria with a wretched maintenance culture should embark on projects were even the likes of Britain and the US are reluctant to embark on.

bawomol:
hydro is unpredictable and depends on water levels. gas depletes fast and isn't a renewable resource. u can't live on coal alone. u have to diversify your energy production or else u would end like up like nigeria which depended on dams.

There are innumerable energy sources Nigeria can rely on without resorting to nuclear power.Gas depletes fast?We have enough to last us a century. . . . . . . . . . .we are as likely to run out of coal as we are of uranium.By the time our gas and coal start to run out,possibly 60-70 decades from now,alternative energy sources like solar,geo-thermal and wind will be far more commercially viable.

You are talking like as if its an all or nothing situation. . . . .we either build nuclear power plants or we will run out of gas and coal and thus,out of any energy source.This is far from the case.

davidylan:
my questions are:
1. WHY can we not maintain a nuclear power plant?

We have a poor maintenance culture.Name one major project that has been well maintained in Nigeria over the long term.

2. What are the alternatives to nuclear power? Gas a non-renewable resource? Wind power? The unpredictable hydro-electricity?

Gas,coal and hydro-electricity are better and safer alternatives.Where do we dispose of the waste?You know the waste lasts for thousands of years.

This country cannot maintain a nuclear power plant.Look at all the other power plants we have.If you can't maintain other plants,why build a nuclear one?

Nuclear is even more expensive to build and run over the long term,so,from a cost-benefit perspective,there would be no point in building one.

If you are looking at the short term,Nigeria and other emerging markets offer higher returns.The only way you can get the kind of returns you get in the NSE,if you invest in the UK/US,is to try the UK's AIM-not the main bourse- or small cap companies which have higher volatility with the attendant risks.

There are a lot of foreign companies listed on the AIM here in the UK that offer emerging market's like returns.

Of course,the market has been bullish in Nigeria over the past few years but for how long? I think the best thing is to have exposure in both the UK/US and Nigerian markets.With the prospects of recession,the US/UK doesn't look attractive in the immediate future(though,markets historically actually perform well even during recessions).However,over the long term,its a safer bet than Nigeria.

In a worst case scenario-where the US enters into a sustained period of sluggish growth-the impact will be eventually felt in Africa,indeed globally.

So running back to Nigeria because of a possible recession would be foolhardy.There was a recession between the last 2 quarters of 2000 and the first 3 quarters of 2001 in the US,one between 1990 and 1991-so its no big deal.

Recessions are an inevitable part of the business cycle.They are actually necessary to get rid of waste accumulated in buoyant years.

The fundamentals in the US are still sound and the US continues to look a better long term prospect than the EU region.

If you adjust for the different population growth rates of the US and Nigeria,you will find that real GDP per capita growth in Nigeria over the past few years has been about the same as that of the US.At that rate,it would probably take us 150-200 years to get to the level the US are in today

dayokanu:
When OBJ promised us light by December 2001 how did he hope to do it Guess it was by prayer and fasting and not investing millions of dollars.

Maybe senility don set in with McKren.

Probably,he left Nigeria a long while ago. I remember the extra funding to revamp the power sector dates back to 1999,never mind 2000,under Bola Ige.

He is probably simply dating the investment to the start of the NIPP but the FG had already invested billions of dollars in the preceding years.

Was not Yar'Adua's supposed comments about the FG's total investment in the power sector and not just the NIPP?

Never mind that it sounds ridiculous trying to defend OBJ by effectively saying he did nothing about power between 1999 and 2004-what a defence!

davidylan:
what a dishonest fellow. The muslims conquered Jerusalem illegally in 1076, the first wave of the crusades was not until 1096 . . . more than 20yrs after the slaves of allah first put jews to the sword in their motherland.

You are actually being too kind! I find it bizarre for any Muslim to raise the issue of the Crusades as a defense to charges of Muslim aggression. You have to be hopelessly historically illiterate to use that as a defence.

The First Crusade was launched one thousand years after the founding of Christianity-1095AD.The first Muslim military attack on a Christian nation dates back to the middle of the 7th century!!-a whopping 400 years before the Christians responded with the Crusades!A jihad was launched against the Christian Byzantine Empire as far back as 634AD-This doesn't include the famous Battle of Badr or the Battle of Medina fought in the early part of the 7th century in Mo's lifetime.

The First Crusade was launched in response to Muslim military conquest.Christianity had existed for a 1 thousand years without crusades.Jihads started as soon as Islam got going with Mo as Commander-in-Chief.

Muslims are effectively telling us that after launching jihads against Christians for 4 bloody centuries,it was unconscionable for Christians to launch a crusade.Christians should be congratulated for showing restraint for 4 centuries.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Crusade

Mariory:
[b]nigeria1 has a point in that the money was not invested from 2000-date. [/b]The NIPP project kicked off in OBJs second term. Having said that, I don't think it is possible to say the investment has achieved it's intended purpose. Even OBJ admitted to this before he left office.

Ah. . . . . there was no investment in the power sector by the Federal Govt between 1999 and 2004?

Not even OBJ will make the above claim

If $10bn was invested on power generation alone,it should be yielding about 10-15,000MW by conservative estimates in the case of gas powered stations.

Obviously,all the investment wasn't exclusively in power generation but I used the above scenario to place matters in perspective.I don't know the exact breakdown of all the expenditure but we sure haven's much in results.

Granted,such investment doesn't entail quick outcomes but we are talking about investments dating back to 2000.In the meantime,the power situation has barely improved.

Mc Omo:
May aint too far jare, imagine these mancs getting all so forgetful that the league is a marathon

imagine Cougar saying Anelka left because he felt Arsenal wasnt ambitious enough ? after helping it win the double ?

abeg wetin be the meaning of ambition again ? some people need dico jare!

Anelka left and won the Champions League with Real Madrid,something no Arsenal team have ever achieved. Useless Gooners,imagine them implying that a transfer from Arsenal to Real does not demonstrate ambition.Anelka moved to a higher level.

Does Arsenal have ambition? A club that refuses to make the investments necessary to challenge for the biggest trophies on offer lacks ambition.Gooners keep boasting about making transfer profits over the past few years,is that not a symptom of lack of ambition?

Name one top club in Europe that keeps boasting about transfer profits.Arsenal is a selling club.

tkb417:
wait a minute, did you say dayokanu will dust all Mancunians?
Ask him what Akin Alabi did to him. He has been humbled. he can only do shakara for me with his 1881 soccer info.

The bastard once claimed that Rooney was signed by Utd in 2003.If you are arguing with a lunatic,nobody will know the difference.

According to him,Juventus and Barca are on the same level as Nottingham Forest.The guy na pathetic Kraut wannabe.Una dey waste time discussing footie with am._{I don exceed my sports thread limit of 1 post a week because of that fool.}