₦airaland Forum

brain54:
Make you try dey translate small o...

This one too heavy.



Na only "devil take me..." Or something like that I understand there!

She's saying shame to devil and his angels/group etc

Mariangeles:
Can medical science cure HIV and different types of cancers?
Una go wail taya!

We're just getting started.
Y'all ain't seen nothing yet!

JESUS CHRIST REIGNS OVER THE EARTH!
WE'RE TAKING OVER!

Yeah, science can cure HIV and some cancers. But your god can do neither

chatinent:
Go on any Facebook ad displaying maybe a person who's about to be amputated and prolly needing donations for medical care, you'd see Nigerians all over the comment sections saying things like:

"Hurry, join the 7am NSSPD live stream and place your hand on the tv and you'll be healed."

"Take the child to Redeem Church Ojota behind flyover, and join any of their services. God will descend on you."


"Pray this prayer and you will be healed: god, recover my leg today.' Say it 72 times with faith "



I mean, what is all this!

The person needs financial assistance of probably ₦3m and you have nothing to offer but religious stereotypes, when you could have just sent a lil support in cash.

They know its only bullshit they can offer. They secretly know those advice don't work but are quick to offer it.
I met a man coming back from church(he was clutching a Bible). He begged me for money and said, "Sir, I'm very rich, I need some money, even if its tp to go home". I replied him"The lord whom you faithfully serve has already made you rich. Amen"! and started walking away. The dude held me and said "Sir its not like that nah, please help me". I shrugged him off and continued my way

StillDtruth:
Oh, so because you defined it, you are right and your definition is True and cannot be comtradicted? Because you are the god of atheism god of all abi?

You think too much of yourself!

I will tell you what i told your mad brother

"You think people are blind like you? Think people don't see that you people do not really attack muslims?

Did you not hear that actions speaks louder than words?




Can be applied is not the same as applied.

And by your.actions you have only applied it to one area.

So, clearly, you have impliedly admitted and confessed that you have only attacked christians and their God as your threads even prove.

As i can attack is not the same as i.attacked so also Can be applied is not the same as applied.

How many Muslims topics have you seen on Nairaland religion section? And how many Muslims have you seen attack atheists? Didnt you see my posts in was arguing with a Muslim who said Islam is scientifically correct? In fact you made a post on that thread

Wilgrea7:
I literally just defined what atheism is.. and your best rebuttal is "nuh uh" ..

Dude.. seriously..



Laughably false. And the idea that atheists hate a god that they don't believe to exist is simply not the case.

Go check my posts. Most of my rebuttals to religion and gods can be applied to multiple religions.. especially the Abrahamic ones (including islam).

Also, we live in societies that are controlled or directly influenced by certain specific beliefs. In Nigeria, those beliefs would be Christianity or Islam.. overall the Abrahamic religion. Hence the criticism of the respective faiths.

Again, this is Dtruthspeaker. You're better off debating with a brick wall

Wilgrea7:
Feel free to mention them so they can be aware of the thread

Its prolly Maxindhouse or his sidekick Aemmyjah he's expecting. His favorite nairalanders

StillDtruth:
Stop talking nonsense. You atheists are the king of unfair and dishonest debates Taking advantage of the fact that in the past most christians where not prepared that atheists had come to nairaland to attack them and neother did thry not know the rules of debate therefore you bullied and arm.twisted them.

But now, we are prepared and have engaged with you and you.have lost and are losing is why you are complaining and making unnecessary noises about the very same rules you yourselves violate like this your mad brother just did now now now!

Re: Atheists- Gather Here And Answer This Simple Question � by jaephoenix(m): 9:29am
StillDtruth:
Do i not know you? And do i not know how you ask questions perpetually? Is this how permanently mad and stupid you shall always be for the rest of your cursed life? Mtchew
Oh so you know me. But as you can see, I answered his questions and asked mine. So I guess you don't know me, idiot
(Quote) (Report) (Like) (Share)

Re: Atheists- Gather Here And Answer This Simple Question � by StillDtruth: 10:46am
jaephoenix:
Oh so you know me. But as you can see, I answered his questions and asked mine. So I guess you don't know me, idiot

See how you have changed topic thereby.proving that you are permamently mad and perpetually stupid. Fool!

See how he changed post because he could not counter, and this is one of the violations you people do yet you are making noise.

Whenever you people are ready to debate fairly, we are here for you.

I can even put up a N50,000 for us to have a public debate, judged on rules of debate to show that YOU ATHEISTS HAVE NO THING. ONLY LIES!

Aha! So where can we have this debate. I'll double the money to 100k. Lets see who blinks. Please get a venue, preferably online. And make it public so people can view.
Guys see how this one would run

WeirdAlien:
I've not mentioned that I believe in God. Why do you assume I do. You're also guilty of what you accused others of.

You mentioned god there.

WeirdAlien:
Okay

Now it is logical for everything to have a beginning.
So if you don't believe God is the beginning, and you don't believe it's the big bang. Tell us your views about how it all started.

People assume (probably erroneously) an atheist believe in big bang because that is the only (known) alternative explanation to the creation of the universe. If there is any other alternative you know, kindly educate others. Thanks.

Personally, I don't know the beginning. But I know evolution is facts because the evidence is real. I think Big Bang seems correct but it still doesn't tell us the beginning of the universe.
So if you say everything was created and it was your god, then who made your god? Surely everything should have a creator?
And why do you think irs your specific god?

LordTheus:
Intellectually, they're all impoverished. However, I honestly think TenQ is actually the best of these incompetent bunch in my observation of the arguments that occur here. Among the theists, he's like the one eyed man in the midst of the blind. He's terribly ignorant, and his logic is poor. Yes, he can be dishonest, but I've noticed that there can be a little tinge of sincerity in the way he argues sometimes. The rest of them are either just plain mentally retarded_, or unstable, or dishonest, or a combination of all three. And the worst part is that they wear their mental retardation in public like a badge of honor.

Yeah TenQ seems a lil bit savvier than the bunch here but all in all very dishonest. Just ask him if a god exists and watch all the verbal gymnastics unfold in front of you

StillDtruth:
See how you have changed topic thereby.proving that you are permamently mad and perpetually stupid. Fool!

Lol. How did I change topic? The topic was you think i would not answer his questions. But I proved I did. Do you see how stupid you are?

Righteousness2:
The way devil is subtlely dealing with people in these last of the last days is fearful.

What you think or how you think does not matter when it comes to GOD and HIS Word.

The thoughts and ways of GOD are not the ways and thoughtsof men
The Foolishness of GOD is Wiser than the Wisest of men.

Drop your Sense! Follow GOD and HIS Word so the devil does not mess you up and lead you to offend the HOLY GHOST.

In other words, don't ask questions. Do whatever you're told even when it sounds stupid or dangerous. Just do it! Like Nike

jflower06:
Moses never misinterpreted God.
Pharaoh kept/ obeyed one of the commandments of God religiously.So God hardened his heart so as to go against the commandment.
Honour thy father and thy mother..........

What r u talking about

Daejumong:
God did not harden the heart of Pharaoh, Moses wrongly interpreted God’s message!

Exodus 4:21
21 The Lord said to Moses, “When you return to Egypt, see that you perform before Pharaoh all the wonders I have given you the power to do. But I will harden his heart so that he will not let the people go

God is too righteous to treat a man He created in his own image like that- harden his heart unto destruction! Never! The God , Jesus , presented to us will never do such and He does not change!

Also, God is too powerful to need the approval or otherwise of Pharaoh to let the Israelites go! He can easily kill him in his sleep, He can teleport the Israelites if He wants . He is almighty!

Ezekiel 18: 23 “Do you think that I like to see wicked people die? says the Sovereign LORD . Of course not! I want them to turn from their wicked ways and live.

Many times God reveals things to us but the way we present it or put it in writing may be a little bit different because our human nature and thinking may sometimes get in the way! This is what I think happened to Moses!

Right.
1. So how do you know this? You weren't there, only good ol' Mo was there, yet to distrust and second guess his word.
2. So you mean Yahweh's trust was misguided? You mean Yahweh in his infinite wisdom cannot get someone more trustworthy than Mo?
3. I suppose you're a Christian. So an omniscient and omnipotent god can't correct Mo's misjudgment knowing he's gonna impact billions of lives?
4. So what other 'misunderstandings' occur in the Bible we should know about since you know what actually happened

StillDtruth:
Do i not know you? And do i not know how you ask questions perpetually? Is this how permanently mad and stupid you shall always be for the rest of your cursed life? Mtchew

Oh so you know me. But as you can see, I answered his questions and asked mine. So I guess you don't know me, idiot

LordReed:
LoLz. The thread is about a basic definition of atheism and the dolt still manages to mess it up in the same thread. Stupidity doesn't appear clearer than that.

Dtruthspeaker doesn't bother about definitions. He, like Maxindhouse, have their own definitions of concepts which are completely different from the norm. I don't bother with him. His delusions drive him. Not reality

LordTheus:
Bro trust me. Nairaland ain't what it used to be. At least, back then we had intelligent Christians willing to engage in honest debate. The theists on these threads nowadays aren't worth the effort. Irredeemably stupid and unashamedly dishonest. You really think they care about honest debate? They're more concerned about making themselves look good, even if they actually have no points to make.

Its just the way they are. There is this particular one TenQ that is unashamedly dishonest. He claims he can't see oxygen but we have shown him the picture of oxygen, but he ignores it. Then the JW crew consisting of Maxindhouse and Aemmyjah. They unashamedly say all the accusations against JW of child molest.ation are all lies. You can inagine

StillDtruth:
Secondly, it is seen that many many atheist stand and support evolution with one or 2 atheists surprising us that they don't.

And people operate more witb the general anf popularity because the general outweighs the particular, so you cannot expect any opponent to stop and ask each and every atheists he meets "do you believe in evolution"? Exactly you a Nigerian sends a message to a whitee, he/she cannot expect nor know whether you are a scammer.

That is why we have something called "presumption" and in law it is called "rebuttable presumption"

So, if you are an atheist and you do not velieve in evolution, then you are duty bound to plead it, if you want people to act on it and take it in in their dicussion with you.

And please tell those your 2 stupid brothers to stop being foolish for they know or ought to that if they saw several muslims running towards their direction with cutlasses they would run away presuming that the muslims are out to kill again and not wait to see whether they are heading somewhere else and do not care about them.

Just like assuming every black man is a Nigerian, or every Christian is a catholic. Shows how smart you are

StillDtruth:
Correction.

It is atheism is refusal, not lack, but a clear refusal to believe in God, specifically, God, Who took Isreal as His own and showed Himsellf aa revealed through the bible and history and things we see/have seen, which even after all these clear evidence, they still refuse to acknowledge the Authority of God.

And not "a god".

Atheists do not have much issues with allah, nor do they remember nor care about, ogun, sango, krishna etc.

Your hatred is directed to only One God; The.True God, Ruler of heaven and earth.

You're just a complete dolt!
1. Which evidence do you have about the existence of your god?
2. And why do you think atheists don't have any issues with Allah? Do you even know the definition of atheism?

TenQ:
His claim:
"I slept in a grave yard and I didn't see any ghosts"!
His conclusion:
"Ghosts do not exist!"


My claim:
"I have been breathing for so long now and I have never seen Oxygen gas"!
My conclusion:
"Oxygen does not exist!"



My intention is NEVER to talk about justification or not for ghosts or spirits, my intention was to show how dumb his argument was!
I have done that!

Sorry!

… yet we showed you pictures of oxygen.
Are you this dense?

jesusjnr2020:
"Nomads Of Yahweh": 3400-Year Old Egyptian Inscription Proves Bible True

Man discovers the oldest inscription yet of "Yahweh", the God of the Israelites, in Egypt.

Watch Video:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwNNiUIYpiA?si=0zbd4TiGy5Skfv6Y

So I did my little research on this subject and got this….

This video refers to a pair of Egyptian inscriptions, one from Soleb (during the reign of Amenhotep III) and the other from Amarah West (during the reign of Ramses II). Both inscriptions include the word yhwʒ in a list making reference to the land of the “shasu”-people. The “Shasu” (see R. Giveon, Les Bédouins Shosou des documents égyptiens, Leiden 1971) basically occupy the semantic niche of “nomads”.

David Caliban has quoted the relevant line (which appears in both lists), but here is a fuller list from one of the inscriptions to give some sort of idea of the context in which that line stands:

Amarah West, Ll. 93–98:

tʒ šʒśw ś‘rr , i.e. land of the Shasu: Seir
tʒ šʒśw rbn , i.e. land of the Shasu: l/r-b-n
tʒ šʒśw pyspʒys , i.e. land of the Shasu: P-y-s-p-y-s
tʒ šʒśw śmt , i.e. land of the Shasu: S-m-t
tʒ šʒśw yhwʒ , i.e. land of the Shasu: Y-h-w-ʒ
tʒ šʒśw (t)rbr , i.e. land of the Shasu: (T)-l/r-b-l/r

Assuming that ś‘rr is correctly identified as “Seir”, a mountain in Edom to the South of Palestine, then it would be a good working hypothesis that in every line the final word is a toponym. Toponym means a place name, especially one derived from a topographical feature. Some of the other words could be identified as toponyms (e.g. rbn could be the town “Laban” at Dt. I 1), but none of these identifications are truly certain. For that matter, one could challenge the identification of ś‘rr as “Seir”. All the same, it is impossible on current evidence to refute the proposition that yhwʒ is a toponym because there is no certain identification of any of these words as something other than a toponym; and there is absolutely zero evidence in these inscriptions that yhwʒ is a theonym (which is what we really do need to identify yhwʒ as the Tetragrammaton, i.e. YHWH — see below).

Next, while yhwʒ certainly does appear to stand orthographically close to the Tetragrammaton (i.e. YHWH), there can be no certaintly that it really is the same word. The chief problem has to do with the notation of vowels both in ancient Hebrew and in ancient Egyptian — the signs for some consonants could be used to represent vowels, in particular — you guessed it – “y”, “h”, “w” and “ʒ” (this last is the glottal stop, i.e. “aleph” in Hebrew). The use of these signs to indicate vowels both in Hebrew and in Egyptian is irregular and in particular in Egyptian highly inconsistent; and unless the name in question is certainly known, we have no way of telling if we should read any given one of these signs as a consonant (i.e. /y/, /h/, /w/, or /’/) or as a vowel — and given how ludicrously inconsistent the Egyptians are when writing vowels, if they write them at all, almost any vowel could be indicated by any of those signs). I.e. /yahwe/, /’ihu’/, /yewi/, or /yihawe’a/ as well as two dozen other things are equally good resolutions of those four letters. The orthographical resemblance to the Tetragrammaton could just be dumb coïncidence.

Third, there is no semantic link between the two forms: the Tetragrammaton is a theonym, whereas there is a good chance that yhwʒ is a toponym. If there were a semantic link — i.e. if it were clear that yhwʒ was a theonym – then the case for identifying it with the Tetragrammaton would immediately grow much stronger.

Next, the Shasu were nomads on the periphery of Egypt, and the name appears to be a generic one: i.e. the name is used to describe people to the South of Egypt in Nubia, people to the West of Egypt in Libya, people in Syria far to the Northeast of Egypt, and (possibly) people on the Sinai Peninsula to the East of Egypt. If we locate those particular Shasu which are connected with yhwʒ on the Sinai Peninsula (and the only way to do so would be to accept the identification of ś‘rr as “Seir” — and this seriously undercuts any interpretation of yhwʒ as a theonym) so as to get them somehow close to where we might expect the people of Israel to be in the time period in question, then I would suggest that the wish is becoming father to the thought.

For all of these reasons I personally would hold off on identifying yhwʒ with the Tetragrammaton for simple want of evidence beyond orthographical resemblance. First, orthographical resemblance (esp. in this case) need not imply phonological closeness; second, there is no ascertainable semantic connection; third, there is no way certainly to establish a geographical connection.

All that said, the biblical evidence which we have for the worship of YHWH does indicate that the worship of this deity was not limited to the people of Israel. Other tribes on the Sinai Peninsula (e.g. the Qenites) appear to have worshipped this deity, and the reference in the Song of Deborah to YHWH’s having gone forth from Mt. Seir does suggest that at least some people in Edom worshipped this deity as well. So, yes, if these particular Shasu who are connected with yhwʒ really are to be located on the Sinai Peninsula, then they might have worshipped this deity whose name could have been used toponymically or perhaps ethnically… But, once again, I would suggest that the wish is here becoming father to the thought.
So long story short, this discovery is not set in stone(pun intended)

Aemmyjah:
Unconscious creation right?
That's not creation
That's criminal and a violation of medical ethics
Why not try it on your own children


If I give someone a tablet that could harm him, I have created something right?

1. Yes one can create some stuff unconsciously or unknowingly. Many of the food, dress, scientific discoveries etc were unconscious or unintended
2. Your level of idiocy is phenomenal. I literally told you about drug reactions in that post as a type of iatrogenic disease. Can a doctor know if a patient reacts to drugs? No one knows if he or she reacts to a particular drug or class of drugs, unless when he/she takes it. Neither does the doc. That's why we take drug history or allergy history. We keep anti-allergic drugs around in crash carts just in case

Kingsempires:
Were stilltruth dey. He opened thread but his not talking

Hes a psychopath

MaxInDHouse:
It's OK you can now continue your PREACHING and TEACHING!

Thank you. And shut the door after you

TenQ:
Why ask me a question on what doesn't concern me?
Was that why you had to create and ascribe a strawman to me.

My interest in this post had been achieved: the OP's logic is flawed!
QED!
Otherwise, I have zero interest on this topic!

How is the logic flawed when he's perfectly right: you can't prove ghosts in any way

StillDtruth:
Who said "most hit" daffy?

Secondly, who did not know that China dortored carpentered its report of deaths?

Every country was hit by Covid, none exempt. So I don't understand your attempt at deflection.
Okay, so china doctored their mortality rates. So what makes you think other countries didn't doctor theirs?
Lets assume China doctored their mortality, its obvious they have recovered very well from it. So I don't still see your point. From all intents and purposes, China is well better than your country Nigeria, filled with Christians. You go cap in hand borrowing money, drugs, vaccines, personnel etc from China, an atheist country. Hope you know how much Nigeria is owing

StillDtruth:
Only in your mind especially as you atheists do not like to play defence/defendant because you already know you have a very bad case if and when put on trial and examination/cross examination, exactly how criminals do not want to go to court and stand in trial.

Truth Rules and wins whether defence or offence because "There is bo valid argument against the Truth"

So, you don't win because you play offence and aske all the questions you can imagine. There are rules of debate and it is your fallt if you do not know them.

Did you read anywhere where I said I'll ask all the questions? Are you this dense in real life?

MaxInDHouse:
Now it's clear that you're a LIAR who is just against anyone having faith in God from now i will no longer take your case seriously but for a joke.

Someone is begging people on Nairaland and i posted all the evidences not of his fellow wordhipers but of him as in himself but you're not interested in that yet you will be accusing me of pedophilia when you have no evidence.

Ọmọ farewell!

Listen. He begged for money. So? How is that related to me or this topic? Nairaland is littered with folks begging for money cos of the harsh economy. So I shouldn't talk about the crimes committed by your cult cos of that?

MaxInDHouse:
Why not catch one and get him or her arrested here in Africa?

That's the assignment you failed to do!

I'm not the police. That's their job. Do people report crimes to doctors? Are you this slow?

Kingsempires:
Did I dodge anything?

Please go through this thread and others where you literally dodged many questions posed at you

Aemmyjah:
Lol
Are diseases created?

AI can be created, yes
You saying something can be created makes you sound ridiculous
How much more creating a disease?

I expect someone that claims to be a biologist to at least know what iatrogenic diseases are. I can induce a disease by my intervention, eg giving a patient a particular drug can cause him to react to it. This is the most basic type of iatrogenic disease created by a doctor, you dolt.
So what do you mean I sound ridiculous?

Wilgrea7:
I've glanced through this thread a bit. I think it's quite sad how despite your best attempts to explain this stuff in a way that's easy to understand, it would still fly over the heads of the op like an asteroid from several light years away.

I'm just overwhelmed how such an adult, (never mind the fact he claims he is a biologist) cannot understand basic English, never mind the technical terms. I explained what intersex is right from my first post. He brought up wrong stuff from wikipedia. I told him to go to scientific sites and journals. Despite all these efforts, he's still asking me if XXY and XO are intersex. Aint that wonderful?