Janeedema's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Janeedema's Profile › Janeedema's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 22 pages)
He is even compassionate because he owns Rivers state Mentality like this is why Africa will continually be a slave zone.A sitting governor being terrorized by an ex-governor is that your definition of democracy? Cajal: |
Dear Nairaland, You are not reflecting my posts because it isn’t applauding Wike? Interesting! Do platforms still do stuff like these? Please, feel free to not just delete my post, but my handle as well. I truly don’t care. The truth must be said. Now, when people attend burials, they should consider that the dead were once the living. No man is immortal. Yeah! That was to Mr Wike. P.S: Feel free to delete again. quote author=CapitalLens post=134361148][/quote] |
When people attend burials how come they don’t think the dead was once living like they were? Dear Wike, let me remind you in case you forget sometimes: Men are but mortals. [quote author=CapitalLens post=134361148][/quote] |
Because he is authoritarian? Indeed, the black man and his slavery mentality cannot be redeemed. Ikonse: |
I used to like this man as SP. Highly emotionally intelligent. [quote author=fergie001 post=134350662][/quote] |
You didn’t hear how much she has tried to push the Ajaokuta stuff but Akpabio didn’t allow it to be read. Then she had to meet him privately and he said she should make him happy and it would get audience? These are the reasons she claims she is being intimidated. Komu1048: |
She doesn’t have a new husband. She has a husband. She didn’t have an old husband. She was never married. She was a single mum of 3. UncleJJ: |
A 45 year old woman isn’t a Gen-Z, sir. spiSeyi: |
Not true she has been married 4 times. What’s your source? Post it here. It has to be reliable, though. She has 3 kids outside of wedlock. She hasn’t been married prior to her marriage to her present hubby in 2022. EXOUSIAng: |
Please, this is not scripture you quoted here. When Jesus talked to the Samaritan woman, what did He tell her? John 4:18 New International Version The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband…” Why did Jesus recognize all the marriages she ventured into and called the men the Samaritan woman’s husbands except one? Regina is married to Ned. They are not sin partners. Their marriage is recognized under the law and traditionally so you can’t say they are committing adultery. Every woman that marries him knows that he is going to marry more wives so technically, they already gave their consent. So it isn’t adultery. Adultery is a sin against your partner. So even when you seem forgiveness from God, you must seek forgiveness from your partner. You commit adultery when you indulge in extra marital affairs and when you don’t get your wife’s blessing on taking another woman wife. This isn’t the case here. We saw in the Old Testament how Sarah gave the go-ahead to Abraham to indulge in sexual relations with her maid. That isn’t adultery. His wife gave consent. The first 5 commandments in the Ten Commandments are sin against God. The other 5 are sins against your fellow man. In the case of the Samaritan woman, “the man that you are now with is not your husband” signifies a sin partner. Because nothing contractual was done. I know you genuinely love the Lord but please, learn to do an exegesis of the word so you don’t keep quoting scriptures out of context. Shalom. Righteousness2: |
With all this your grammar the question is: does Ukraine have what it takes to retaliate? The US have been bankrolling their war against Russia not even Europe. Isn’t it wisdom to calculate the costs before you keep pressing against your enemies?. It is your lot that set them on this journey in the first place. Now they have started building with no cement to complete it. The Europe you are gingering with all your grammar, you think they don’t know what it takes to support their own or speak against America? They do but they can’t. Because they are either broke or selfish—minding their business. That’s the same position America wants to take—-putting America first and not spending money recklessly in a war that they aren’t profiting from at the expense of the American people. Russia is the bigger party here. So it is common sense to liaise with them or rally around them to see how the war will end. People are dying in droves in Ukraine, why not compromise for a ceasefire and then go back to yeh drawing board and recook something? It is wisdom to lose a battle to win a war. The Ukrainian president just needs to know that. Everything in life is not gragra. Namaster: |
The Bible clearly states that the borrower is servant to the lender. This is a pure case of it. Don't sell your birthright over porriage. Nothing is actually ever free. America has sponsored Ukraine war against Russia and now, thry are at their mercy. A real lesson for everyone. LegacyB: |
The question is why is Wike giving the updates of the happenings in Rivers State? You think it is ideal? He shouldn't be insulted hastily because he loves his people so much and is determined to use Federal might to show he deserves to be worshipped. That you are supporting this gross wckedness is pathetic. Fubara may not have shown capacity like you mentioned, but how many other states do you see an ex-governor making the state ungovernable? People like you is why Nigeria will never rise against oppression. It is a real shame. quote author=chipet67 post=134345172] Your emotions have taken over. The fact that none of his LG chairmen could have the courage to speak after the court ruling should tell you they are been held by the jugular. Even the information commissioner didn't sound impressive and he ended his speech with "let us think and come up with the next step." Don't clap fubara out of office. Don't be hasty to insult Wike. Sim himself has not shown capacity.[/quote] |
There is a reason why sexual advances is frowned against in a workplace. Particularly, between a superior and their subordinate. It could be used as a tool of manipulation to get favors and blinden reasoning. So it is big issue to make sexual advances at your colleagues in most organizations. It could lead to sack or demotion when found to be true. yemmit90: |
It may not be a lie. Remember that these people according to Akpabio’s wife have been close even before she got married. And I perceive Akpabio is the playful type so there may be no cause of alarm. My concern though is this: If they have been family friends even before Natasha got married, and he didn't make advances at her until December 18th when she is already married, then something is fishy. He had access to her as a single mum and didn't make any move. Why wait for when she is now married? In her interview, she said, Akpabio mentioned that now that she is a senator he would make time out for them to have quality moments together. Now that she is a senator… what was happening before she became a senator? Some things aren't adding up. Almost seem like relationship gone sour. Why would a decent woman wonder if her husband heard Akpabio flirting with her? Who was she protecting? Herself or her hubby? Even when he asked her several times why didn't she mention it to he hubby? What was the plan behind hiding the flirtatious SP? Even when she claiming the man told her to make her happy in his office, she didn't tell her husband the details? Why? Why was Akpabio so bold to flirt with Natasha even when he relates well with her husband? Why wasn't he scared that she would tell her husband? Seems like he got something on her. gassbee: |
Whats the point of the point in a Nigerian forum? To make gullible and unpatriotic Nigerians compare SA prisons to that of Nigeria? You are a hypocrite. You post on a Nigeria forum that gives you viewership and your intent is xenophobic. When you do this, it only goes to show discerning Nigerians how desperately you are trying to make SA look appealing. Why try so hard if there’s nothing to hide? We are Nigerians and are proud of our heritage. We built and are building our country. We own Nigeria. It isn't a white man’s investment. So, Rest, sir. Stop trying so hard. Take a leaf from your compatriot @samantha. RandDigital: |
And if what she says is true It should be swept under carpet because it is a non-issue, right? Ladies who have turned down flirtatious men can easily understand her plight. Often, it comes with hostility from them. Maybe bruised ego. I am not saying she is saying the truth but I am not dismissing her stance either. The drama that has ensuring e between them clearly shows there is no smoke without fire. Are they the only ones in the Senate? Wallade: |
She shouldn't wear sunglasses because she wants to serve in tn senate?? Seriously She should stopped being stylish because it affects how she sees things and contributes to proceedings![]() How we are carried away by the minor. 11doubledee: |
Who cares what men wants? Save the epistle for your wife. I’m sure Natasha knows what her hubby wants. That's all that counts. Thankfully, she is married; else your lot would have claimed her “drama” is why she isn't. Natasha represents her people at the senate. Hence, your mysogynist epistle about what men wants is irrelevant. Like the senate president with an obvious mouth diarrhea, Natasha deserves to be heard inspite of her “drama” Gender is irrelevant. Like Akpabio, she was duly elected to serve. Men don't need to like her “drama”. Her people do. And in my opinion, that's all that counts. casualobserver: |
What is your definition of waste her youthful years? That she didn't live worldly? The same you will come here and call all ladies oloshos. You find someone who didn't live an “olosho-ish” life even till 65, and you still balme her for being virtuous. She didn't tell you sbe is regretting not having kids of her own. What’s the guarantee she would have had kids even if she got married? Our worth is not in marriage or even kids. She found that. Her marriage came when the Lord thought it was a need. She had everything she wanted. Our completeness is in Christ.. oluwaseyi0: |
Since you are trying to explain terms, let me state here that homosexuals CANNOT be part of the Church. They shouldn't even be a part of a church assembly. The Church are those who have been washed by yhe blood of the lamb and whose names are written in the Lamb’s book of life. Homosexuals who don't see anything wrong in there sexuality, have no place at redemption. It isn’t about judging them. It is what God’s word states. You must think the Church assembly is a hospital for sinners but you wrong. It is meant to be a dressing room for saints. The ideology of allowing all and sundry into the Church assembly is why Christianity seem to have lost its potence. I have heard of a scenario of a homosexual who was part of the worker body in a church and made advances at a friend of mine—-this is how some person’s get lured into sinful acts right in the Church. Notice the in the time of the apostles, the Church was only made up of those who had accepted Christ. When Annanias and Sapphira tried to infiltrate it, the Spirit of God immediately addressed their hypocrisy and rid the Church assembly of them. Why do we have so much worldliness inside the Church? It isn't because the Church is in the world because the Church welcomed the Church into her midst. We were supposed to come out of worldliness and be separate. Today, someone will boldly say: I am a Christian and I’m gay. What a contradiction. The sin of immorality is very contagious and that's why we are asked to flee from it. Don't engage it. Don’t keep the spirit close. It would corrupt your thoughts subtly and you will fall into the acts before you know it. So please, homosexuals and homosexuality have no place in the Church or church assembly—- but it they come into a church assembly, it isn't written on their faces that they are gay. But if they have to introduce themselves as one, it isn't love they need, it is deliverance. If they aren't ready to submit to deliverance, it is only a matter of time before the spirit takes over the congregation. Like the OP right said, it is a spirit. We don't love on demonic spirits, we can't them out. This lacadaisaical approach to sinful acts is why Christianity seem to be losing impact in the name of love. Love has judgment and justice entangled in it. Gays go to Islamic nations and have sense. Then, they come to church and feel at ease and give demands. No! This isn't correct. quote author=SeraphicWind post=134235567] Hello Sir, I don't think I am spreading a false narrative. I have seen churches in Nigeria send homosexuals away especially the protestant churches. You can even search online. You may see pastor doing this. As recent as last year, there was a great hullabaloo when the Catholic Pope mandated catholic priests to bless homosexuals. What can you say about this?[/quote] |
The Church may not be the problem, but has she succeeded in her role in being the solution? We exist to be the light in the midst of darkness, which is why Jesus said, let your light not only shine but so shine that men may see your good works—-your solution to the world’s problem and glorify your Father who is in heaven. In your opinion, @OP, do you think the Church is fulfilling the reason for which she exists? Most of the criticisms the Church gets would you say it is unjustified? We were called to live in a way that is free of blame, but is that how we live? When a things deviates from its purpose, abuse is the result. Instead of justifying the bashings we receive from the world, we should see it as a call to “so shine”. When we become light indeed even the world won’t have a basis to continual bash us santaclaws: |
Why do we turn pathetic situations that can occur in any state a tribal issue? What joy or satisfaction do we derive from it? This isn't helping us as a nation. Just so you know: I’m neither Igbo nor Yoruba. But turning every thread into a tribal war is uncalled for. Youths should engage intellectually not sentimentality. TheChameleon: |
You don't know the father of her child. She didn't tell you she doesn't know who impregnated her. So calling her child a bastard is uncalled for. She doesn't owe you the details of her life. It is her prerogative. Not all men wants to be in the media space. And she may have employed the services of a sperm donor. In the end, it is her life and her decision. You on the other hand, should stop being a busy body in other people’s affairs. Regina Daniels is fine with polygamy. She on tbe other hand isn't. S Fuckyoumod: |
Well, it would make no diference to her. The same fate awaited her if she had married a Nigerian. Nigerian men are only generous to foreigners because of what they want from them. Afolue: |
Most Nigerian men are hypocrites. They spend on foreigners and treat native ladies with less attention. Charity should begin from home. Shattuck: |
@boldened ——Deep. quote author=wickedclown post=134166065]Na Nigerians I blame Sha... When them never ask you for update about the ngo money.... U no see the government make u criticize... Now they are asking u for update.... U Wan use government criticism mask am... It's now a norm for this boy and alot of gullible Nigerians feed this monster they may not be able to control one day.... I dey here dey look everybody Sha... Time Shall tell[/quote] |
You call a man that you aren't half as accomplished as a "mumu"?, A man way older than you are a "mumu"? In what way did he offend you directly? The message you are quoting was from his sermon to his congregants. You don't need to believe in his message or like him as a person, but to call him derogatory names is uncalled for in all regard. This goes to show how poorly brought up you are. Bishop Oyedepo isn't the problem of Nigeria. Go deal with your frustration NOETHNICITY: |
If Nigerians can recollect the people you are talking about and their atrocities, it means they didn't forget like you mentioned. They simply moved on. Yeah! Call to forgive if you like, but not forget. franchasofficia: |
Please, go and rest. Please. Nigerians aren't the ones driving low self esteem, in this case, our leaders are. It wasn't like the embassy didn't give visas to some of them. The issue is because they didn't see a need to give all of them visas for the event they were headed for. It is news because the chief of Defense staff was one of those denied. The country you are headed for know that the event being used by the entourage to jettison into Canada wasn't solid enough. Instead of hiding our heads in shame for the reckless way we spend taxpayers money, they are writing epistle. Nigerians will defend Nigeria when it is a good cause— we saw that play out during Chidimma Adetshina saga. These guys are the ones with low self esteem where a whole Minister of Defense would leave his duty post for an irrelevant event. The Canadian Embassy deserves our thanks. They simply told our defense chief to go cater to more pressing needs in our security as a nation and let other less high ranking officers attend the Canadian event. That was what the denial aimed to achieve. Since we don't know how to set priorities as a nation, why make news when those who do redirect our focus? quote author=allthingsgood post=134149586] I don't know what is wrong with Nigerians brain. How did we develop this devastatingly low sense of self worth. Always excited that your country is dragged in the mud. I just don't get it [/quote] |
That’s how low we have become. When you see those liking his comments, it tells every one why we aren't safe in this world. How can a young man conceive thoughts of sleeping with another man’s wife and not think anything is wrong with it? @OP, where’s your conscience? Not sure, though, why a married woman would approach her ex for financial assistance. Sounds like she wants something more than financial assistance by consistently asking for over 6-months. Common sense should tell her it is a wrong move. Indeed, both the OP and the lady need redemption.. In my opinion, no virtuous woman would approach a man for money without her husband’s consent—let alone her ex sin partner. DelilahMakinde: |
Mentality like this is why Africa will continually be a slave zone.
. She even went ahead to add the Senate to the law suit, just imagine such missap from a so-called lawyer.