₦airaland Forum

Later someone will shout no conviction, only media trial

Pidgin2:
This is why He is sometimes called "Ancient of days", He never changes, He is not affected by time, so yes, He still uses those words, if He didn't I would be skeptical

As for His choice of words, it an assurance He gave to the brethren to build His faith, how does this affect your existence?

So if we are to believe apocalypse scenarios, in this nuclear age, God will fight his wars with chariots and bows and arrows?

In 2015, God still uses words like "behold" and after singling you out to speak to (something that a lot of people have been praying for), he chose to speak a single sentence, not telling you how to achieve world peace or anything useful but to announce himself as Lord of all flesh, something you already ought to have known?


Pray tell me, what was your diet beforehand?

Wahala. And this is a country that was used as an example for Nigeria when times were good.

I'm not hating but even the blurb is meh!

Reminds me of Torres and Diego Simeon

I'm interested in this. What happens when you flag a fraudulent payment?

Why do they have notepads when there are computers there?

. . . and then the writer did his own gbagaun by saying "get's to see it". Who will now correct him?

ScepticalPyrrho:
why don't you check it up yourself?

I don't need to my brother. I've dealt with it in the past before.

Ill give you a clue though. An atheist is someone who doesn't believe . . .
You seem to be equating that with "an atheist is someone who believes that there is no. . ."

And that's where your error comes from. An atheist disbelieves, not that he believes in a negative.

Now your definition of an agnostic is one who neither believes nor disbelieves. This is where the issue is. If he doesn't believe, he necessarily disbelieves. Disbelief doesn't mean he believes in the opposite proposition. Basically what you probably meant to say is that an agnostic is someone who neither believes in the existence of X nor believes in the non-existence of X.

They are two different things and I hope you see the contrast.

If a person doesn't believe, he disbelieves and that makes an agnostic an atheist.

As JackBizzle used to say, an agnostic is an atheist without balls. I wouldn't go that far though but you get the point.

Op agnostics are atheists. That distinction you made is a false one.

There's a Chessbot on telegram. Pretty amusing. You can actually play chess with it.

"How many times have we all heard people say ‘if that person is a Catholic, it is better to be an atheist’.”

Those were the words of the pope (according to the link) and not the words in the headline

CplusJason:
It was not so during GEJ administration.





Some untammed beast parading themselves as NA.

In whose administration did those naval ratings batter and strip that young lady in Lagos?

If men don't show chivalry they are accused of being chauvinistic.

Which way?

greatgod2012:
I can still remember the way PMB was so loved and praised in 2015 and in just two years after, see the level of insults and hatred people who were hailing him then now have towards him!

That's actually not true. The 2015 elections where arguably the most divisive ever. PMB was hated by a great majority even before being sworn in.

On the other hand, GEJ was the most loved leader but quickly squandered his goodwill with his rudderless and clueless style of leadership.

PMB has also lost a large portion of his fan base but the point of this rejoinder is to refute the fact that PMB was widely loved. He wasnt.

JideAmuGiaka:
He tweeted about Andrew Yakubu check very well. The corruption in Nigeria is alarming.

His tweet was misleading. He wanted us to believe that Yakubu was sacked for corruption and ABC protested whereas the truth is that Yakubu was sacked for insubordination to Allison.

Is it not to shout?

I go do am. Nothing will happen. They will even shout back with me in sarcasm. Reno where are you? 1M nor be child's play for this recession.

Janeyinspires:
Someone is missing someone

Hey love

Proof you don't need to paint a bride in all the colors of the rainbow for her to shine.

No broken bottles or nails to pierce the feet?

LoJ:
I was told she died... I don't know how to ascertain the information but I do hope it is not true.

I certainly hope it isn't true but I fear the worst. I had heard stories of cancer before.

I cant imagine her staying away.

Perhaps manmustwac might be able to shed light.

sonofluc1fer:
weigraf JackBizzle jayriginal Plaetton and the oldies...

remembered when we had JeSoul as mod.. and Purist and mnwankwo were more regular. The mad days of buzugee vs frosbel, goshen360 vs anony, Davidylan and everyone.... lol. Wasn't in vain guys...

LOL. Good ol days. Wonder what happened to JeSoul though. Lovely person she was.

Shout out to manmustwac

Statsocial:
Well am a testimony, the way I matriculated wasn't the way I graduated. In a Church uni there is so much opportunity for youths to be spiritually fed. That's why a very sizeabe population of CU grad are into full/part time ministry. The problem is not that these unis are too expensive but that our economy is so bad that we can't afford it.

Bro, I'm not sure of what you're saying but if after all the fees you're still saying am instead of I'm, wahala dey oh

Op, you could probably make some good money selling this to conspiracy nuts.

Think of the 5%.

Your last point is the worst of all.

Creating a spiritual revolution ke? What are the churches for then?

Had to abandon the car to take a sh1t in the bush.

KardinalZik:
So na English you want your employee to sabi, no be work?

I pity you and your organization (that's if you have one)

If the foundation is poor, you can't build on it. Pity yourself first.

eleojo23:
You did not answer my question.

In fact, proof reading exists because there is the tendency to make mistakes while writing.

Let's just say that the guy did not proof read what he wrote.

So we can assume that the error came from failure to proof read and not necessarily from a poor grasp of the English language/grammar.

Its actually poor grammar. I can never make that kind of mistake but if I do, simple proof reading should correct that.


It's a freaking banner for the sake of Zeus

eleojo23:
Can you write English grammar 100% without errors once in a while?

Ever heard of proof reading?

I'd never employ him just for the "am" alone.