Jedisco's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Jedisco's Profile › Jedisco's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 (of 211 pages)
missjekyll:With over 5000 houses in in side hustle, should the King be taxed 'until he shivers'? Hehe Finally, he's had a tough patch of late- from being heckled by an Australian senator to commonwealth nations speaking loudly about the dark past to this. I now quickly see why the news of how the King was rumoured to have reduced his brothers allowance was quickly 'leaked' to the press to water the ground and show them as being financially prudent before this became public. |
justwise:From the link: However, in July, education secretary Bridget Phillipson stated that the party would not be raising tuition fees, with universities to be supported by international student recruitment. I agree. This is the price to pay for lower migration numbers. The country needs the money international students bring and still goes ahead to chastise them for 'ruining the economy'. The money they brought in was not miniscule afterall as some opined. And as we can see, those in government circles made good plans on how to spend that money. |
Coincidentally stumbled on this. Discussions between the commonwealth is merited and hopefully thet turn out fruitful. It's not just about money - it could be an avenue for positive corporation. In his first comments since 56 Commonwealth leaders signed a statement saying the time had come for a conversation about reparations, Lammy told the BBC that was not "the debate people are wanting to have". The UK government previously ruled out paying reparations for slavery and Downing Street said its position included "other forms of non-financial reparatory justice too". Lammy said the UK would instead look to develop relations with African nations through sharing skills and science. During his first visit to Africa as foreign secretary, Lammy said reparations were not about money, "particularly at a time of a cost of living crisis". Reparations are measures to make amends for past actions deemed wrong or unfair. Cash payments - where a state gives money to a country whose communities it enslaved - are the most commonly understood type of reparations. But they can take many forms, including an official apology or investing in health and education.
|
Cboss:The number of agent issues I see here is disturbing. You might have to mandate it out of him. But even at that, accessing the account would likely need 2FA authentication which would be linked to him. Also hope the details he submitted are not widely varried. For the umpteenth time, the PR process is straightforward with lots of resource out there. Most people dont need an agent and if you find yourself unable to do it yourself, then it's worth asking if this pathway is really for you. |
Ifeayo7:Also look at your work history and be sure the number of hours worked or duration of recent role(s) meets the criteria. This is the most common reason I have seen for that. |
Cyberknight:Keeps me wondering especially when you see self-entitled folks bring up the differential attainment of migrant groups as an excuse to chorus racist views of how they are 'low quality' Despite all being said, the modern migration criteria for many western nations is so highly self-selective that the vast majority of their citizens would not meet the criteria if they were not already citizens. The result is that many of these migrants are driven and against all odds even after being settled keep grinding for themselves and kids. If not, what stops majority of them after 5yrs of paying all these from defaulting to join the millions on benefits? |
missjekyll:I remember discussing this here when it came out. Another good example where what is not said is as important as what is said. I mean the fact that the cost of a low/no wage UK resident is not represented to enable a like for like comparison leaves me thinking. Since the average UK resident already costs the government circa 450k by the time they are 25, I wonder how that would progress or the representation for lower wage earners moreso considering the fact that 1 in 3 UK adults of working age do not pay income tax and that a growing cohort of this group are under-35 who are on longterm sick i.e more difficult to subsequently return to work, rise in their carrer or contribute significantly. Add this to the female fertility rate which is well below replacement level and still dropping, then you see why certain immigration pathways e.g care have been purposely left open despite every politician and citizen chorusing how they want high earning migrants. For a society that cannot naturally meet its workforce demands, each young migrant coming to fill a role is like handing the government a huge check i.e the cost of not having them/replacing them locally far exceeds the cost of having them. This is basically the reason why many developed nations find themselves turning to migration to boost the economy when faced with low growth |
justwise:She was always the favourite. Alot of recent events including Rishi's premiership helped pave the way. Takes nothing from her brilliance, eloquence and carriage but she sure did pander to her core demography. Now, she has arrived, I hope her premiership is not characterised by talking down on Nigerians cos her own party wouldn't waste time to devour her if the opportunity presents. As said earlier, the dilema with trailblazers like her is that she could very well be a mouth piece for the most vile cohort of the thier party. She could say things that even Farage would struggle with voicing and people would find it hard to criticise her as she's 'black and immigrant'. I saw her dress down an MP from NI speaking against the narrative around migrants and theblady was in shock. She was not expecting it. |
Cyberknight:The bill is layered - na step by step. Reminds me of a post I made a while back comparing the UK visa system with Canada. It's interesting how cheap things were in 2003. The UK has now succeeded in commoditising the process. Upside is that its relatively quick and more predictable. With an annual income of £2.2 billion and counting from visa fees alone, I would not be surprised if other developed countries soon follow suit. Annoyingly, these are fees that have moore differential impact on migrants coming from developing nations.
|
ReesheesuKnack:Dude/mrs, why not relax and let the new government execute its policies. Money for investment has to come from somewhere. They have the benefit of seeing what the Conservatives tried unsuccessfully. Of the last few conservative governments, one tried blaming the EU for all the problems of Britain which resulted in Brexit. The next tried borrowing huge sums with no plan on how to pay back which almost tanked the economy, the last (following actions of the previous 2) brought in huge number of migrants to grow the economy which resulted in a historic defeat for them. |
Goodenoch:Congrats... welcome to the club |
Zahra29:Yeah, need goes both ways. Change is constant and there are ebbs and flows most things. At least most of those other western nations did not set up their immigration system as a business enterprise, go on to comit an act of national self-harm in the name of cutting migration, turn around and start visiting countries asking their citizens to come over and take advantage of new pathways they creates, go on to let in record numbers, plan significant expenditure based on the profit they expect from such record numbers and then turn around and blame new entrants for every national issue including traffic. All said, I'm comparing notes and as this is your specialty, in what sector and how long from now do you thing there would likely be another migration boom to the UK. The last one was personally well received. I love the UK, it's given me and my family plenty. |
Treadway:Baba, you carry this matter for head like gala. Regarding the bolded, hope you do realise you're doing the same thing you accuse Obama of? Truth be said, I'm less bothered about what Americans are doing I've not watched most of the interviews you think she killed her career on. Maybe because its not lit up on my algorithmic feed. At this stage in such a divisive contest, there are many hills both parties could die on. Except a candidate makes a major gaffe, most voters are locked in. Don't forget one of those running is a recent convict and his supporters dont care. |
Baronthecelebri:If she's dressed skimpy, you'd say na slay mama. Free mumuness make e free you. |
Zahra29:Hehe. There is a long history of you clutching at any anti-immigrant policy from any nation to justify the 'graciousness' (as you put it) of the UK migration policy all in a bid to fervently 'remind' us the grass is not greener elsewhere. Having been through both pathways, I am able to weigh the pros and cons of each. e.g despite the reduction, they are still looking to take in abt 1% of their population per year via the PR (settled) route alone aside others. The underlying fact here is that when faced with prospects of low growth, western nations repeatedly turn to migration, not out of want but need. |
Treadway:You do realise that they are both formidable candidates right? None of them come close to being airheads. Issue with such elections is people who sit on one extreme end or the other. They'd hardly be able to critically analyse issues weighing the pros and cons of each candidate. All they can see is a two switch button i.e, their candidate is the saviour while the other candidate is the devil. Ultimately, like I've asked before, it seems it all boils down to the second bolded for you. |
PMKeirStarmerer:Thats how negotiations are made First, the UK has to come to the point of offering a formal apology just like many of its institutions have done. Then agree to look into reparations and then discuss how to proceed with that. Also, there is a symbolic part to most of these. It costs nothing to give an apology which the nation has officially given for loads of much smaller historical demeanours. As per the bolded, I would not consider that as a benefit home citizens of member states get by being part of the commonwealth. |
PMKeirStarmerer:This is not exhaustive. Reparations cannot only be done though cash. It can be via bilateral agreements/technological transfer that are mutually beneficial. The fact those most commonwealth nations are English speaking with growing populations could be a good first step in greater collaboration. Irrespective of what the west would say, China for e.g is supporting much needed capital investment in alot of African nations- many of these have been to the benefit of both the host nations and the Chinese. Of late, aside shouting down what laws to expunge or deciding what self-serving aid to give, what have been the footprintof the UK in these nations? Take the commonwealth for example, given the number of member nations, what corresponding concrete advantage does it give it offer home citizens of its member states? Someone described it as a committee of GB and her side chicks. There are a few scholarships but these hardly scratch the surface. |
Treadway:Hehe.. you don dey clutch this one. Free these people make dem free you. Just like the upcoming budget, can't wait for this election to be done with. |
hammed71:Wetin dem do you na? |
Zahra29:Our anti-immigration minister. You no dey miss this kind news. When Canada dey increase targets, u no com tell us, now it's dropping, u don dey sing am like hit. |
Jamesclooney:My apologies. I can see how it can be frustrating if you have a set event. Both pathways have their pros and cons. I appreciate the access, predictability, relative speed/level-playing field (which was hard fought) of the UK system. I dont like the fact it seems all profit oriented. The Canadian system OTOH has all the hassle (prolonged wait) front-loaded after which thats it. Its relatively very cheap truth be said. However,I dont like the tiered processing time. For a specific event, I'd choose UK. For tourism/leisure or for parents, I'd choose Canada. The best would be not having to apply for a visa the second best would be a hybrid between the two. Personally, I had put off travelling to the EU as I considered the whole visa process too much hassle for its length. I applied for the Canadian one cos I felt for the price and duration (abt 100 cad i.e £55 for upto 10yrs by default), I could forgo the annoying wait. |
Jamesclooney: Santa2:Most immigration stuff esp visit visa in Canada takes a while- na just to apply comot mind they do other things. The wait is offset by the fact the visa lasts the duration of your passport validity. So if na 10yr passport you get, na 10 yr visit visa. |
Baronthecelebri:Lunatic |
cashmyles:Lemfi? |
PrettyPacy:I don't see an issue with solar panels. Some bew builds come with them. If well set up, it can reduce your energy bills by a lot and you can even export excess electricity and be paid. I am also considering installing them on my house. |
PrettyPacy:Hehe... 20 yrs is almost 'new build'. This is the UK where houses of 100 yrs are sought after. The best building depends on your pocket and needs. |
Great Britain! Love this country. To be British is to migrate
|
chival10:First of all, it's not my area of expertise but I can share personal thoughts. Not heard of $mubi before this. Seems like a new coin. I'm hardly into them as crypt0 is quite volatile as it is. Might do well,might flop. Can't say. Your travel history could be better. It depends on the reason for refusal but with top western nations sharing visa application data, getting into any initially after such refusals would require effort. I have heard of someone able to secure a UK study visa after similar refusals. I wonder why you use agents. Migration to western nations is straightforward, with clear explicit guidance and lots of online resource. If looking to study abroad, then going through the requirements and putting an application yourself should be expected. In most cases, agents generally cause more grief than good. On migration options, I'd quote a post I just made jedisco: |
uzoma213:It depends on a host of individual factors e.g age, work experience, area of expertise, cash reserves, personal capability, family situation e.t.c There's been a series of quick upheavals regarding immigration over the last few years and now there's some calm and a downward trend seems apparent, I doubt the current government would be in a hurry to make any change that'd reduce the barrier for entry except the economy demands it or numbers are firmly down. Generally speaking, emigrating via a work visa or PR gives you that peace of mind to pursue other things. If looking to move via a student visa route, there is good risk in the UK atm as its unclear what percentage would actually be able to switch to a work visa longterm. Of course, individual factors and exceptions exist. High risk, high reward but personally, if self funding, I'd be looking at the Canadian PR programme or only move to the UK via studies if I have individual advantages that make longterm stay easier. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 (of 211 pages)