₦airaland Forum

fabolouz1:
wealthy people are not wealthy as it seems.
A man can't be wealthy while in debt.

Walai:
African nations borrow to consume while the China you mentioned borrow to invest.

emmaodet:
We fear debt like kilode and try to avoid it.
I guess because we are mostly bad managers and very poor in paying back debts to even family and friends we do owe

Gerrard59:
Most billionaires are in debt, including Dangote and Elon Musk. No billionaire is without debt. The goal is to service the debts consistently in the best-managed form. No business grows without leverage which is known as debt.

Nigerians don't know entrepreneurship walai!

NaijaNaWaa:
My heart goes out to my brother, Obijackson at this difficult moment in his life and business.

This underscores my assertion that most of the people the media and the Otimkpus promote as a billionaires are too neck deep in debt. This applies to most of your favorite top richest men and women in Africa. If you see their liabilities, you would thank God for the little you have. There is one of them who has been hiding from creditors for over 20 years, yet the media keep singing his praises all the time. May God help them.

franchasofficia:
If you are born into a poor family background, as in, your parents are not rich, please don't marry just because of love.

Love is a fallacy that led so many men into marrying ladies that ended up hampering their lives and keeping them poor or dragging them backward on daily basis.



If your parents are not rich as a guy, marry with purpose and future in mind.


Go for financial, career, business focused lady.


Marry a lady with the potential of helping you become better financially not one that will drain you and take you back to square one.


In summary, if your parents are not rich, when you want to marry as a young man, consider:


1.) The girls family background

2.) The girls career or job

3.) Her source of income

4.) Her academic background

5.) If she have a western country passport to help you Japa if push comes to shove

6.) Is she financially wise and smart


7.) Is she a money maker or a layback, lazy, unambitious girl that just want to eat, sleep, have sex, get pregnant and give birth and be monitoring you her husband to know how many girls you are chasing outside. If she is one run for your life

8.) Until you have secured a good job, career or established a thriving business, don't ever keep a girl in your house. Don't have a live in girlfriend. Let her come and go. She must not spend more than 2 days in your house until you re ready to settle down.


9.) Make use of condom a habit as a single guy until you marry to avoid marrying the wrong girl out of pressure of "I am pregnant"

CaveAdullam:
DAY 74, REDPILL 2021

Harry is the father, son and spirit of simphood, who was thoroughly taught efficiently in the gynocentric college, passing all his feminization courses in flying colours and undefeated. He is the king and god of betaness. All hail the beta king!

Many thinks "Nigerian women" are the only types of women that act with wiles and caprices, and yearns to engage with foreign women, not knowing that AWALT all over the planet. A man can only manage women responsibly only if he knows their true nature, therefore, TRP!

Meghan, is a typical example of what women are capable of eliciting if the men around her or her husband allows her to wield her internal chaos by granting her explicit independence and impunity. She's efficiently manifesting her hypergamous nature and she's not stopping soon. The straw that will breaks the camels, sorry, Harry's back is the forthcoming divorce papers. Meghan is really doing the Lord's work, as per she's taking no chances in leaving any card behind.

Harry choose a single mother, an alpha widow over royalty and royal privileges. He muffed his ears to one the most wonderful and powerful family in the world because of a woman. He forsaked his allies. He decided to lose quality people and opportunities in order to prove a useless point. Like Candace concluded: Harry is the victim not Meghan. By the way Meghan was never a victim but a storm that was earlier forecasted.

Lessons learnt:

1. Never think twice, it's family before any external woman.

2. Never commit to an alpha widow or single mother.

3. Never jettison any quality opportunity for a woman.

4. Never engage with an unhappy or unlucky woman. Watch out for the traits she exhibits and endeavor to see if there's any simulacrum in her history.

5. Always be the decision maker. For this to be possible, you must be a man of wisdom, courage and intellect. And if you are not smart, you will be oscillated by every winds.

6. Women only come for themselves, you must make sure you don't lose your time, energy, resources over them. Women are consumers, you must treat them like Pavlov did with his dog.

7. You've come a long way, never let a woman make you become jaded. If you notice any sign or symptom of belligerent behaviour, victim signalling, dump her.

8. See beyond a woman's body. Women are in motley, if you lose one today, you will get another better package tomorrow. But if you lose your dreams and time, you can never recover. Let your focus be above women.

9. Women are for fun and relaxation. If you quid pro quo quality and productive time for leisure, at the end you will lose both women and your objective.

10. Don't expose your dirty linens. As a man you must resolve internal problems internally. Rather than showcasing in to the world who will not help you but use it as an advantage to exploit you and identify your weaknesses. Only women does that, never go along with her.

11. Have options in every areas of your life. Option is the predecessor of confidence. Your ability to ignore or exit any termite work, relationship or people is a superpower. You must used your quality time in creating or seeking options. Don't live life by chances or luck but by the opportunities you've laid on ground.

12. Flowers are beautiful and precious, women much better. A gardener don't spend his whole day manuring and trimming flowers; act like him. Give a little tender here and there and face important task mano a mano. Remember: flower fades.

13. Take the REDPILL to eviscerate all traits of simping and betaness in you.

Authority: You first.

Kipaji:
That's one of the reasons why I stopped being so judging of desperate simps. Like thirsty slaves in the Sahara, they are excited for every drop of women's attention/sex/energy/interaction they can get. Even if it comes with disrespect, excessive demands, and a lot of compromise, he can't really afford to be choosy, can he?
As I said, one of the three categories of men that can avoid this downgrading situation is men who hold their self-esteem, respect, dignity, principles, masculinity, and authenticity higher than sexual access.

Parizz:
Is this redpill really working on men? I opened my tiktok and discovered a gal I knew as a hookup gal is married. Her husband was beside her and the two were having fun like nothing happened

Skepticus:
At the bolded, a girl/woman can be truly "in love" with you, though it is extremely rare to find such but when you do, count yourself extremely lucky. Here, my definition of finding a girl who is truly "in love" is not the nigerian man's "definition" of a woman that is truly in love with him. Most of them (Nigerian guys/boys/men) know NOTHING about females' truest attraction nor leadership in relationship. I'll get to that later.



At the bolded, I saw the whole discussions and drama that happened in relation to the paternity fraud trend on Social Media. What i found very worrying, that escaped the attention of most people on the issue of paternity fraud is that NIGERIA as country was mentioned (the only country in Africa) in ALMOST every documented research done on the issue of paternity fraud worldwide. The ones done in Nigeria put it between 50 - 75 percent of women giving birth to babies who are fathered by men who have no genetic connection to these babies. I saw one TEDx talk research putting it at a conservative 30 percent.

The disturbing point of these researches proves that a high number of Nigerian men (poor, middle-class, rich, old, middle-aged, and young) are mostly SIMPs who are also highly ignorant of the nature of women, and that Nigerian women (from the south to the so-called "prudish" north) are highly promiscuous or a terrible combination of both.

If you are a Nigerian man in the "business of promiscuity" whether as a gigolo, pim.p. player, religious leader (some religious leaders like pastors, imams, and those in secular leadership positions like CEOs use it to great advantages in getting women attracted to them) or just an average "fuûck boy", you'll slay a lot of pûssies (single, about-to-be-married, married, pregnant, divorced etc) easily because of the ignorance of the average Nigerian guy on what women do or are capable of doing.

I remember sharing the link of a Nigerian guy who revealed his escapades with so-called "decent" married women earlier on this thread. There have been many threads on front page of Pastors, Imams, Native doctors sleeping with women of all status and background without the knowledge of their boyfriends, fiances and husbands. I have had some personal experiences in this "promiscuity" too, and like most men who have been in my shoes, they stay off marriage because they see the nonsense that modern women are made of. I don't trust a woman telling me "Good morning ". I'll go outside to confirm of it is truly morning time. Like someone said earlier on this thread, most of those Saturday Marriages are just men saving hoes.

Ubunja in his miseducations and miseducashins, has revealed some of these, but the "moral" posturing (which includes some red-pillers) and blue-pill conditioning of nigerian men is so strong that the underlying message of these miseducations and miseducashins fly over their heads.

Martinez39s:
I sent you a message today by 12:35pm. You haven't responded.

Skepticus:
Personally, it's a reason I'm wary and cautious of addressing rich men as "alpha" (I hate to use that word but for the sake of clearing some things up, I'll use it here). Though, they are alpha by the standard of men just like the guy who could lift or squat the heaviest in the room, the guy(s) at the top ladder of a corporate organization, the guy who could get the most girls in the neighbourhood or on campus (whether he attracts them naturally or "rents" them as prostitutes).

Where men get it wrong is that what men consider as "alpha" is different on a deeper level than what "alpha" means to women (when dealing with women). With money, status or some other above-average talent/skill, men can pass off as alpha to other men even if they are natural betas and expectedly, attract women easily than the average joe. Men are impressionable at the surface. Since men get intimate with women than men, and with women having the natural conditioning to spot qualities that escape the attention of men, women expose men better. That's the reason why a guy who has achieved so much in wealth and status (what men consider "alpha" on a basic level) having control over millions of men who admire him and look up to him, is such a weak beta vagina being disrespected by his wife, girlfriends or women around him (though his wealth and status makes it easier to attract women who see him as a rich beta provider) much to the shock of the men who admire and look up to him.

The reasons for artisans being red pill at base level in relationship to women is that they learn skills/trades that are predominantly male, environment is traditionally conservative and date/marry women early, who, though hypergamous, have their hypergamy within their social class where they are looked up to as dominant patriarchs. They may not be rich but most have the basics necessary for a man which is shelter, food and a work that brings in money. I know more red pill aware artisans at base level than rich, highly educated men.

I have shared your sentiment earlier. I'll look for it and drop it once again. For those you who are seeking marriage or relationship with a woman where you are contributing partners but you, take the leadership role, you don't have to abandon education or not seek to make more money, but learn from these artisans and tweak the knowledge from their love life to suit your style.

FitCorper:
When I hear guys saying they love their girlfriends and can’t do without them, immediately I know they have the scarcity mindset. Make urself ur priority and work hard on urself (hit the gym, learn a high income skill, elevate ur status, work on ur confidence and tidy ur hygiene+grooming) get these right and u will know there are still babes who approach guys even in Nigeria.

Benee1000:
I understand your points, and I agree with most of them.
However, the idea of men avoiding marriage as a panacea against the annexation or incorporation of gynocentric laws in African states, I believe will only make matters worse.

Suggesting men avoid women altogether for sex and children, strips him of an instinctive desire for sex, and a group (family) where even the least of men in the commercial world would have the opportunity to exercise his instinct for leadership, a major trait of masculinity.
See bros, this thing is about instinct, and not really about "E dey sweet them to born pikin and be the powerful and respected red-pill patriarch in a traditional setting".
It is a man's biological imperative, and only few men have the will power to go against it.

Also, the children of most unmarried or irresponsible parents, especially single mothers, make up a very large source of feminized males and beta simps, as well as masculine ladies and whores, and it is this group of people who are the problem of intergender relationships and society.
It is this group who instigate, formulate, and propagate these gynocentric laws, when in position of power and influence.

Marriage itself is not the problem, the problem is the transfer of the regulatory authority of the institution of marriage from the individuals, families of couples and their cultural traditions, to the state, which started from the church.

If Marriage is strictly between couples and their families, Why should the state be involved in it? why does the state recognize marriages, and have to issue certificates for it? should the state have the powers to annul marriages and issue divorce certificates?
why should the state regulate my choice on the number of persons I choose to have a personal relationship with? (think bigamy).
If on the basis of protecting human or children rights the state has to interfere in a couples private matter, why is the interference from the lens of "gender" and not from "human" perspective?

Marriage should be regulated by the individual's, family and cultural preferences, and not state laws because it is a personal and cultural matter, and not state matter.

Gynocentric laws exist and will apply to marriages or relationship when people choose to give the state, authority over their personal decisions, through court marriage, because these laws are made by bitter masculine ladies for vengeful purposes, as well with feminized males, and beta simps influenced by cheap pus.sy and validation.
I understand, these gynocentric state laws have now been so modified by these guys that it now even applies to live-in couples who avoid official state recognized marriage in western countries.
However, gynocentric state laws don't apply to traditional marriages or personal relationships, at least not in African states or states with strong cultural marriage traditions like south american and asian states.

The problem is not marriage in itself, because the solution is not avoiding marriage, this will only make the problem worse.
The problem is designating marriage as a state function rather than an individual, family and cultural function, and we know the solution to this.