₦airaland Forum

Just30:
now you are desperate

Just30:
Every rifle has accuracy if you've perfected shooting with it, so it is all about skills

Just30:
look at the fragmentation in the wound
The 5.56 has 36% and a 105 degree angle from impact while the 7.62 has 33% and a clean cut straight wound from impact to penetration at 40cm

That is what the lethality of a bullet is.

Just30:
you just can't see it

This is from a Navy seal retired

Just30:
just go back and read your quotes

Mzal3ndo:
Read the full article.
https://tass.com/defense/1043299

Lurker4Long:
Those stories, like the white genocide rubbish, were the febrile imaginings of idiots and racists who have no understanding of the political realities of SA. Millions of previously excluded Saffas now have a real stake in the economy and will not easily give up their middle class status.
And when the remnants of the crazies in the ANC try their BS, they lose the cities and are further relegated to the shrinking rural votes as elections since Zuma came in in 2009 have shown.

Just30:
Read

The SCAR is not a bad rifle, but when they actually tested it in troop trials, the guys who tried the SCARs (including the very units that had pushed for the SCAR to be designed and adopted) found out that by the time the SCARs arrived, the incremental improvements to the M4 had eliminated the problems that pushed them to look at the SCAR, the M4 weighed less, and the M4 cost less. Thus, the SCAR didn't actually improve anything important, and had issues of it's own where the M4 was better.

The SCAR heavy (in 7.62x51mm) fared better, because, realistically, it wasn't competing with the M4 - it was competing with obsolete (and they were obsolete the day they were adopted) M14s.

Just30:
No they don't like it because it didn't out performed the M16 during testing for it price tag.

It also didn't pass the endurance test they were expecting. So they will rather stick with the trustworthy M16A4 than to splurge large on something new that will put their soldiers at a disadvantage on the battlefield.

Just30:
yes according to the images posted it does



say you dont know how to read the image so that I can help you.

Just30:
I never said that

But in a range competition, anything can be king depending on skills

Just30:
Just before you pulled out that comment

jl115:
my bru go do some actual research instead of watching some propaganda YouTube videos.... The bru literally claimed the m4 is the best AR my bru the m4 is a piece of sh1t that overheats and jams...

What I will say is that the 5.56 is the best infantry calibre!!!

mtisQ:
have you ever seen a vid about chatting btw google assistance alexa , siri an contana....Feels so weird bro...some conversations here are like that..Like i google then you google ..then we deny each other googling results an the loop continues

Just30:
No they don't like it because it didn't out performed the M16 during testing for it price tag.

It also didn't pass the endurance test they were expecting. So they will rather stick with the trustworthy M16A4 than to splurge large on something new that will put their soldiers at a disadvantage on the battlefield.

Just30:
yes it will make a big hole but the 5.56 makes a bigger cavity and lunges in the body.

Bigger cavity means bigger internal damage.

Just30:
and you went for a competition while we were talking about rifle effectiveness

Just30:
You referred to AR meaning Assault Riffle when we were talking about AR-15.

But what ever you say bro

mtisQ:
There are two categories of people who have camped on this forum, I've discovered. The plagiarizers and the googlers. You engage a person here, and he just keeps googling things without even realizing what the conversation is about. Then there are those that plagiarize and claim it as their own. It's a disgrace.
They're all waffas (as kyk1 calls them )

Just30:
It has it own problems and won't won't even survive what the M16 has survived.... And that is why scar is not trusted.

Just30:
you see how it is just a straight wound?

You see how it's fragmentation is lesser than the 5.56 hence lesser secondary wound?

Just30:
just stop comparing apples and oranges

Just30:
clown, you referred to the AR

NTSA:
Not unless you can prove it.

NTSA:
Preference due to reliability is not superiority.
There are way more superior ammo but that doesn't mean 5.56 is superior since it is used by US military.
The mere fact that 7.62 x 51 has more energy than 5.56 makes it superior end of story.

NTSA:
Not true.

Mzal3ndo:
ArmaLite Rifle, the name of the company not Assault Rifle

Just30:
Youare mistaking the M14 for the M16....the M14 was prone to jamming hence why it was dumped

FN SCAR has been dropped from the selection process of US military new weapon platform to replace the M16 and M4.

They dropped it because it didn't come with as much advantage as the M16... That makes it not good.


The weapon that they will most likely select for their entire military will be the 6.8mm NGSW from General Dynamics

That weapon is superb

Just30:
waiting for you to post it so I can educate you

Just30:
at a shooting range, yes

Just30:
AR does not stand for Assault Rifle

Its an abbreviation of the name of the original producer of the rifle

Shma:
That is what we're talking about? We lag in numbers but we triumph in Quality. By quality, I mean the level of excellence by those weapons.

kikuyu1:
SIGHHHH....I envy you Saffas your shooting culture! I rmbr a decade ago there were stories of how the ANC would disarm lawful gun owners and I was like," Ohh, BS, NEVER HAPPEN!?"