₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,490 members, 8,517,836 topics. Date: Friday, 13 November 2026 at 07:04 AM

Toggle theme

Johnydon22's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Johnydon22's Profile › Johnydon22's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 (of 489 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 5:08pm On Oct 15, 2015
Jeromejnr:
Good thing you were smart enough to say it was an hypothesis.
So let me try put something in you head. Big crunch as you call it still proves my point.
Of course it is a hypothesis or do you think i am you that hopes to establish immutable dogmas?

Hahahaha it doesn't actually you only went on further to continue show casing just how much scientific theories confuse you..


Collapse is the opposite of expansion isn't it. I said before Space was expanding before there was collapse in gravitational fields that birthed the big bang. You said Big bang is an expansion, science says big bang was as a result of a collapse. Expansion is opposite to collapse.


Now i see where your confusion stems from... you think collapse is the opposite of expand.. chai.. this is serious.

Nnam Collapse is not the opposite of Expand..

[color#990000]
Contraction is the opposite of Expansion rather [/color]

Collapse simply means to break down not to contract...... Stop confusing both..

I asserted with the big Bang theory that an infinite point of high density and temperature expanded which is exactly what the big bang theory says..

and you think Collapse means contract, how dafuq were you supposed to understand it then..


Look at the definition of the big crunch:
"In physical cosmology, the Big Crunch is one possible scenario for the ultimate fate of the universe, in which the metric expansion of space eventually reverses and the universe recollapses, ultimately ending as a black hole singularity or causing a reformation of the universe starting with another big bang."
So I don't know how you say Big Bang was an expansion.


Am so glad you googled it up.. smiley

Big crunch proposes that this universe was as a result of a singularity caused by the collapse of another universe just like a blackhole is caused by the collapse of a star core at an infinite point of gravitational force.

You are not even saying the big bang was an explosion anymore. . . lol..
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 4:50pm On Oct 15, 2015
Jeromejnr:
Lol! You know the funny thing about this Johnydon22 guy is that he accepts he doesn't know about the creation of universe [but still goes on to bring theories that are still speculations and calling them facts.
.


You see the problem i have with discussing science with blank theistic minds. . they will assume because you discuss a scientific theory then you must believe it..

First i took up this discussion was because it was a scientific discussion about Big bang which you represented as NOTHING EXPLODED..

Telling you exactly what a theory said is not same as subscribing to it..

Lastly about the bolded ..

- Big Bang theory is not a johnydon22 theory but a scientific one propounded by Georges Lamitre..

Please that i was telling you what the theory asserts is not the same that i subscribe to it..

making such assumptions will only sell you off to be daft, don't drag me into such assumption again..
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 4:45pm On Oct 15, 2015
Jeromejnr:
You see, If we are to go by your notion, then how do you know the universe is
not in it's perfect state? Is it possible that your definition of perfection is
different from that of the universe? You were taught in school perfection is
when nothing goes wrong but should all be in what we call a happy state. Well
if the mind of humans cannot grasp the whole concept of the universe how is it
we came up with our own theory of what perfection is? What if perfection
according to the "mind" of the universe includes all what you call imperfect
entity? You see you can't sit down with your puny brain in your room and say
what is and what is not for the universe. I am sure this concept will be deep for
you. So you see, at the end of the day you have no claim. Note: I am not even
taking God here. Because what you wrote up there does not even relate with
the biblical God.


You see? all this should be directed to you because you are the one that places the universe under the confines of a finite value..

You have not grasped what is there to grasp about the universe yet in your naive mind asserts it to be finite which is exactly as imperfect.

Still running around making assertions that keeps murdering your own postulations..


For there to be intelligent entities there has to be an intelligent creative force.
Intelligence cannot come out of unintelligence.

This is just like saying: For there to be water they must be another liquid source. .

Actually the formation of water is when hydrogen reacts with oxygen. . . So there musn't be a liquid source to get water.

Now going by this your argument only intelligence can come out intelligent.

- Then God (intelligent entity) must have come out of another intelligent entity which in turn must also require another intelligent entity.

You see assumption of this straight line of causality does not answer the question rather it postpones it..

There is no way you can pull this off for it to work for you. . .


Hmm, Primitive. That knew a lot in science before our age
Now this will bring me to a question I will throw to you if interested

Science simply means study of nature of which the ancient know as Natural philosophy..

So in your little mind you think science is restricted to our age?. . . hahahaha..

the ancient world knew much about science they made observations and postulated explanations but infused it with superstition like.

-Astrology

they had knowledge in
- Botany
-mathematics
- Biology
and many of them.....

You keep on showing you still know nothing of science thinking it is restricted to this age alone... Science is study
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 4:28pm On Oct 15, 2015
Jeromejnr:
Okay so now you are not a big bang theorists.


You never noticed. . . Let me remind you with one of my posts on this thread i said
"Color=#990000] Many atheist like myself do not subscribe to any theory of how anythingbegan but rather say they don't know which is the truth.[/color]"

That i took up this discussion is sorely because it is of scientific inclination.



So your claim is that the tightly packed dense point later expanded which brought the big bang. But science says the density collapsed even further by gravitational force which caused the Big Bang. Which is why Scientists still wonder why the the Universe has not recollapsed ever since.


#Sighs. . You are still not getting it. . .

Science asserts the expansion of an infinite point of high density and temperature . . . First of all density is in relation to gravitational action.

even your link keeps proving your wrong... The same theory predicts the universe in the process of expansion my reach a point where it's gravitational pull might be too weak and therefore will collapse under it's own weight.

It is a scientific hypothesis called the Big Crunch.. i wonder which scientific material you read exactly...


How is a star formed? Is it not by this same concept? Are they formed by expansion?

This buttresses my point even further.. a star forms when gravity brings matter (nebula) under severe pressure by bringing them together thereby making it denser and hotter until eventually nuclear fusion begins and a star is born.

It is also noted that a star expands past that dense point when nebula comes under the action of gravitational pull and even expands further as the case of red giants. .
Hiann.... this is getting tiresom..



Okay my apologies. I regard anyone who doesn't believe in God an atheist. But Yyet you guys love to put up Hawking's memes to spite theists.


This is about science not atheism or theism. . . what ever you feel about Hawkins or other atheists out there should not be infused into science.

I repeat : - Atheism has nothing to do with science..



Hmm! you were so quick to judge that it blinded you from message passed. Beside you took two unrelated points and meshed them together. Lets see that post in context shall we.

We agree the Big bang created the universe. But here it said when it was 10 exponent -34 seconds old, then it experienced an inflation. Which mean the universe had already in some billions of seconds been created before a force caused the speedy inflation or expansion as you say.


Further showing that the singularity started undergoing a reaction and led to an expansion..

Now will you do so well to agree that you were wrong asserting the Big Bang was an explosion which your own link just proved you wrong.. smiley



I never argued with you on this. huh
Yeah you only argued it was an explosion.. cheesy


Speculate? I never speculated anything. But instead used your science against you. What you call facts are in fact assumption is science.

You keep showing to know nothing of science here..

- A scientific fact is based on observed phenomenon which begets theories.

- e.g: The planet Neptune was first proposed in theory when the FACT of a distortion in Uranus orbit was observed.

- The universe is said to be expanding which is an observed fact by the hubble space telescope.

- Earth is going round the sun is am observed scientific fact. . . I wonder if the definition of facts changed lately...


The notion that nature was finite was not my notion but a scientists. Have you heard of "Fredkin"?


Hahahahaha you see? All your assertions are based on speculations of individuals...

You brought nature under the confines of a finite value because a scientist said so at the same time murdered that by asserting scientist says it has not been answered yet..

You just don't even grab the premise you are arguing over.... Thank you.!!!
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 3:55pm On Oct 15, 2015
FOLYKAZE:
Do those things God represent not existing?
You are seeing it gradually.


Seeing what, it doesn't take much to know these things.

Someone might personify air and anthropomorphically give it human attributes and make air a humanlike entity..

The idea is. . Simply agree that air is air and the human attributes they should shove up their asss...

by asserting air has a son and a prophet that it talks to, one have now distanced the anthropomorphic representation from what they in actuality represents... That is the problem
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 3:49pm On Oct 15, 2015
sonmvayina:
don't close your mind..you will not learn anything with that mentality......continue to search, you will get an answer that makes good sense..this is history, stop looking at it from a religious point of view..the early Christian stole it to control the masses..this is mans' history..either you accept it or you don't, no body is forcing it down your throat...these are beings that that the early people saw, most of those writings where not done by men but the Gods....like the cylinder seal of Marduk, or the Enuma Elish, or the 7 tablets of creation..open your mind, you still have a lot to learn...stop referring to them as myths, they are not....


Alright sir. . . Enuma Elis was written by the Gods. . . Noted smiley
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m):
Jeromejnr:
Ah! But I am one step ahead of you.

Refer back to my post.

Infinity can create Finity if it had a mind and will of it's own.

Lmao you see just how unfounded assertions can lead to weak run around.


Since infinity does not have a mind of it's own in the case of a singularity, isn't it then obvious that the result of an infinite point can span both ways ..

Either in a finite or an infinite value of which has been observed.. . . You still have nothing boy.. wink


God has a mind and will so as a result can decide to create finity.

Here comes the funny part of chronic assumptions.

God has a mind of it's own and therefore decides to create a finite value but God is infinite oo.

God is perfect but then decides to make an imperfect entity. . . Pheeew...!!!


But anyway I wasn't even using the scriptures for you but science against you in which some have said nature is finite.
But scriptures say otherwise. But we talking science now.
Because the matter here will be the concept of the will.

Lmao... which scriptures. . .who exactly was going to reply such primitive crap..

Anyway the issue now is before you bring up more links, read them first.. smiley
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 3:38pm On Oct 15, 2015

I am not even a big Bang theorists i still wonder why am even taking time to correct your naive impressions about the actual postulations of the theory..

Jeromejnr:
Wikpedia again huh
First of all, Big Bang was not an expansion of the bla, bla bla you wrote up there. .
Lmao. . and i was even waiting for a material that asserts an explosion


Secondly, The universe came as a result of a dense point which was hot. But what is the meaning of a dense point? A dense point cannot be as a result of an expansion but a contraction. Dense:Tightly Packed. So this alone refutes your thesis.

You don't even read your own posts because this post supports my assertion about a singularity which i asserted was a point of infinite value..

- And it was an infinitely dense point (Singularity) the big bang asserts to have expanded ..

You don't even have the slightest idea what you are arguing over..


Even Stephen Hawking a fellow atheists like you said it was as a result of gravitational force somehow collapsing on itself. So how was it a result of an expansion?

Oh jeez Hawkins is a scientist what ever made you bring up he is an atheist shows you only running around the insecurities of your belief..

Hawkins proposes a gravitational point and you have been shown here how infinite gravitational value (blackhole) is also an observed fact.

A star is born when gravity brings a nebula under intense density that it's temperature rises drastically to begin the process of nuclear fusion.

Now this is a discussion of the scientific theory of Big bang, don't make it atheistic because atheism has nothing to do with it...


You gave me wikipedia, I will give you space.com and also Hawking speech who didn't lay claim to your expansion theory.
http://www.space.com/52-the-expanding-universe-from-the-big-bang-to-today.html

Lmao i just love how your own links keep working against you... directy from the link itself..

" The universe was born with the Big Bang as an unimaginably hot, dense point.
When the universe was just 10-34 of a second or so old — that is, a hundredth
of a billionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second in age — it experienced an
incredible burst of expansion known as inflation, in which space itself expanded
faster than the speed of light. "

Chai...



http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-beginning-of-time.html
I can swear you didn't read this..

Here hawkin proposes time started with the universe which is exactly what the big bang asserts..





Haha. So now I can see you base your life on speculations.
You have already determined that nature isn't finite when science says the concept is still yet to be answered.

You see your life? So far here you are the one who asserted and brought the universe under the value of a finite entity and my reply was.

[color=#99000] For goodness sake nature is not restricted to one manifestation. A blackholeis an infinite gravitational well and is part of nature. . .
You are simply naive asserting nature is finite in your own little mind. [/color]

You never considered science says it is yet to be answered before asserting it was finite

am sure it is clear whose assertions are based on speculations here..


Am sure you don't even really understand the concept of singularity.
Read this up and stop basing your life on speculations and saying it is a fact.
https://plus.maths.org/content/do-infinities-exist-n

Can you please read your own links please...

anyone who clicks this link will slap their face. . . it is evident enough who doesn't understand the concept of singularity..
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 2:57pm On Oct 15, 2015


Now i think it is time for me to have fun with this... cool

So jeromejnr it is time i teach you the implications of your assertions by using them against you..

You said
why did it give birth to finite nature? We expect that Infinity will give birth to it's likeness since it does not have a mind of it's own.
Now using this your assertion of an infinite value must beget an infinite result let us boomerang it against your religion.

You assert an infinite and perfect God created the universe ... so going by your assertion above..

How can something infinite create something finite as you think?
so how in the world did an infinite God create a finite nature?

How can something perfect beget something imperfect... ?
How exactly did a perfect God create an imperfect nature
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 2:52pm On Oct 15, 2015
MzNelly:
Lol...
Just take care of yourself for us, bae kiss kiss

I always do sweety...kiss
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 2:39pm On Oct 15, 2015
Jeromejnr:
Firstly Big Bang is not an expansion but was an explosion. The Expansion of the universe came after the the Big Bang.
Which in turn created the known universe as we know. Now this known universe is in space. Universe=Galaxies, stars e.t.c
Now space on it's own is expanding and as a result of this expansion also stretches the known universe in which we live in. So we say the universe is also expanding. Big Bang is not even a cause of the expansion, it is space itself that is the cause. i.e ever before the big bang, space itself was expanding.


Not again please..

Big bang is an expansion of density and temperature singularity. . I think i will need to just refer this one to wikipedia ... wasting my time with this is becoming demeaning.

The model accounts for the fact that the universe [size=20]expanded[/size] from a very
high density and high temperature state, [4][5] and offers a comprehensive
explanation for a broad range of observed phenomena, including the
abundance of light elements, the cosmic microwave background, large scale
structure, and Hubble's Law . [6] If the known laws of physics are extrapolated
beyond where they are valid, there is a singularity

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

Big bang proposes the expansion from a singularity of high density and temperature. . . . That expansion according to theory caused both space and time into existence.. Both space and time are products of Big Bang according to the theory..




Secondly, as for singularity.. I am sure maybe you didn't study physics in school. Singularity represents an infinity. And nature is regarded as finite.


You see why i always say you appear dumb? You assert singularity represents an infinity.. while my post says

" Boy singularity is a state of [size=20]infinite[/size] point of value in spacetime… " Now people should check and see who really knows what singularity is ..

Energy is an infinite value and energy is nature . . Who ever gave you the impression of a finite nature ...SMH


So If the Big Bang started as a result of an Infinity (Singularity), why did it give birth to finite nature? We expect that Infinity will give birth to it's likeness since it does not have a mind of it's own.


For goodness sake nature is not restricted to one manifestation. A blackhole is an infinite gravitational well and is part of nature. . .

You are simply naive asserting nature is finite in your own little mind. . .

Secondly in a mathematical representation, a value at infinity comes under a finite point in one single value. . 0.9999999...till infinity is still equal to 1 which is a finite value..


Thirdly, Intelligently refute my post.[/b]

Your post is self refuting. . .
Romance › Re: How Bold Are You? Share A Pic Of You And Your Bae/Boo... by johnydon22(m): 2:02pm On Oct 15, 2015
Teempakguy:
shocked shocked shocked
grin grin grin
hahn:
All I can see is a girl climbing a tree tongue grin

Hahahahahaha e don finish me oo cheesy ...bad belle tongue
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 1:56pm On Oct 15, 2015
malvisguy212:
I know you cannot give me the reason, I disagree with you when you say energy is eternal.


You can read it again and again and then grab. . . Law of gravity states a body must be drawn towards the force of gravitational pull, you are not asking reasons for that..

why not jump out of your balcony and see reasons. . . What was i even thinking discussing science with this one that think science is satan's manipulation..

asking reasons why energy is eternal.. because it is freaking energy !!! .. habaa..
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 1:52pm On Oct 15, 2015
Jeromejnr:
Answer my singularity question first and don't dodge.
BTW didn't you just copy and paste the singularity issue from Hawkings claim?
You keep showing to be very dumb. . . Do you even know what copy and paste is?

I can bet that you dont even know what a singularity is...
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 1:51pm On Oct 15, 2015
Jeromejnr:
.

You said big bang was an expansion and it was an expansion of a singularity.
Oh Jeeez.. am i to start discussing science with this one now?...

Boy singularity is a state of infinite point of value in spacetime. . .E.g: A blackhole is caused by the gravitational singularity of a collapsed star core.

Big Bang theory is a freaking expansion. . Was proposed my Rev fr Georges when he observed the universe is expanding which was later confirmed by the hubble telescope..


First of all do you know what singularity is? Let me start with this.

Oh meeeehn.!!! refer above..


Theories that have not been fully accepted is what you are dishing huh


- first i have never asserted to be a big bang theorists... as a matter of fact i always maintain i don't know the origin of anything.

- Second i only corrected your dumb assertion of big bang being an explosion.

- Lastly Big Bang is the scientific accepted theory on the origin of the universe that is why it's called a theory dummy..
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 1:40pm On Oct 15, 2015
Jeromejnr:
Mr man no divert discussion.
I will put up the piece and you must refute to prove you "intelligence".


- First i have nothing to prove to you about my intellect
- Second i will not spend even a second of my time refuting a copy and paste (someone else's work)
- your assertion of me being intelligent is of your own making.
- Let me hope you won't copy and paste and bring up something from your own mind then i will see if it is worth me refuting.


BTW I reffered to this:
https://www.nairaland.com/2661330/scientist-declares-science-found-biblical


Enough proof that you know absolutely nothing of science. . . .i wonder how you could be ok playing this dumb..


I expect you now to come up as usual with a smart way of making yourself always feel smart.
Me?

Lmao. . . There this thing called peer review in science, why not let your so called scientist put up his research for peer review in the scientific field and not have you who know nothing of science begging me to refute some unfounded claims of unrelated representations..


I spoke with some of your brothers yesterday and I discovered mehn...why do some people say these atheists are smart because from my conversations with them they seem like sheep's without shephards. I mean I couldn't even go far with them in the debate because they kept beating round the bush.


Am sure people are reading this now, let them now say who the daft one is..


E.g Menesheh that keeps running away waiting for someone to help him out and Ifeness that said that humans created the air we breathe with our minds and the list goes on


So what has that got to do with atheism exactly?

why not let them come take it up with you..


So I said well, those guys are unintelligible and I now I have decided that [bltheir king[/b] help me with a piece that will be dedicated to you real soon.


Another daft statement ...


So you guys happily commented here when I never even made an argument. cool

Rather you should have been ashamed disgracing your self in public. . .

About you bringing up an argument, i doubt if you ever can... Copy and paste is never an argument..

Go learn
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 1:28pm On Oct 15, 2015
malvisguy212:
I want to ask you a question. Any reason why matter and its energy cannot be created nor destroyed?


Any reason why they can be? .

- First this question is a scientific one and so should be directed to the right section.
- It has nothing to do with what we are discussing here
- should be directed to a scientific community (Do not mistake an atheist for a scientist as usual)


- It is not matter and energy but energy rather.

- it is an observed phenomenon.

- energy changes from one form to another and never had it been annihilated in a reaction.

- energy is an eternal particle going by that law of energy conservation...

Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 1:09pm On Oct 15, 2015
Jeromejnr:
That wasn't even what I was talking about.

But I will be putting up a scientific piece as you say and I expect your comment. wink
Scientific thread is asserting that the core of a planet is a hell? You see what i mean you need to start reading, the bible and other religious materials has retarde_d you enough..

-Scientific topics are put up in the science section..

- I wonder what scientific topic someone who think science is a belief system would put up..

-Lastly endeavour to add the links of the christian apologetic websites that wrote the thing you call scientific piece...
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 1:02pm On Oct 15, 2015
MzNelly:
I thought you were sick... smiley


Hahhahaha people like me don't get dead easily grin

still sick though but the medicine i took last night made it subside a bit. . I hope it doesn't put me down again as the day gets old though..

But the type of nonsensical threads that goes up here even make sick people wonder how humans could get that dumb..

Just had to romance my phone a bit ... wink
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m):
Jeromejnr:
Why don't you go through the religious section for yourself.

Okay so I have taken note of the atheists that commented here. I am going to be opening another thread. Make sure you guys don't dodge it as usual.


The thing is nobody is obligated to even comment on a thread from someone who thinks the core of a terrestrial planet is a hell.

No atheist here is under any obligation to bother replying any of your posts because you come out quite daft and naive about simple things ..

why not first go learn basic argumentative ability then come back and we would see if you are worth discussing with..

Finally i suggest you start reading some scientific materials because you clearly need the bible has marred you totally
Romance › Re: How Bold Are You? Share A Pic Of You And Your Bae/Boo... by johnydon22(m): 12:53pm On Oct 15, 2015
Aminat508:
dis girl look like Adeh39 angry


Hahahahahaha i don't even know what Adeh39 looks like ... grin
Christianity Etc › Re: Can Muslims Deny Thes? Picture! by johnydon22(m): 12:51pm On Oct 15, 2015
krattoss:
go shout it to their ears, let me see whether u won't join the queue. tongue go shout it to their ears, let me see whether u won't join the queue.


Hahahahahaha you no like me ooo, you wan make them murder me join??..

**Takes my slippers and runs out of thread** if there is something muslims can be very mindlessly is violent.. They have such violence tendency more than any other religion in the world today..

Affirms the saying "Morality is doing what is right no matter what you are told, religion is doing what you are told no matter what is right (mindlessness)"

"Nothing makes people commit evil so happily and cheerfully than religion"
Christianity Etc › Re: Can Muslims Deny Thes? Picture! by johnydon22(m): 12:45pm On Oct 15, 2015
myproperty:
Guess what? I googled "The world's most notorious prophet" and whose name did I see?

Hahahahaha this is so so so ...... grin . . . I just googled it now and look what i got..

Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 12:24pm On Oct 15, 2015
hahn:
Some people are of the notion that atheists are evil, satan's messengers or even a cult that are set to lead "believers" astray.

Their ignorance is only baffling


Their belief in some evil entity satan/devil/ shaytan, hades, pluto is as delusional as their belief in the good ones, zeus, yahweh, odin, jupiter and so on..

All these deities Satan, yahweh, zeus, hades, jupiter, El, ba'al, Asherah . . are all primitive attempt of explaining what is.

I told you that these deities are just anthropomorphic personifications of the things they represent.

Devil/satan/hades/pluto an anthropomorphic personification of evil and death. . .these are primitive concepts and such entities are too childish for 21st century level of civilization.

Too bad most people tend to fear what only is in their mind... Bolting and deluding themselves in the ideas of ancient men that thought the sun was inside the dome of the earth.
Christianity Etc › Re: Can Muslims Deny Thes? Picture! by johnydon22(m):
krattoss:
Every religion at on point in time, persecuted, but some have stopped while some are still persecuting


I wouldn't call what Islam is doing now persecution rather it is just some moro_nic irrational and mindless effect of subscribing to the dictates of some illiterate medieval sun baked arab man..

An average muslim doesn't have a problem with a full grown man marrying a girl of 10 but will call for the head of a person that insults some dead rotten delusional arab man.

An average muslim will laugh at the greek myth of Perseus having a flying horse but will shout and praise God that muhammed rode a flying horse. . is that not just plain imbecilic..

They will say Islam is a religion of peace but will kill to prove it. . is that not some chronic psychosis?


Is this not the action of people lacking basic human brains . . . huh Islam has turned many people who would have been normal people into crazy, savages of medieval standard in a 21st century of intense civilization..

Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m): 11:51am On Oct 15, 2015
hahn:
I guess there theists also need to understand that atheism is also not a declaration of belonging to a belief system. I cannot say I'm an atheist but rather I am atheist which only describes my non belief in a god. We don't hold meetings, do evangelism, pray, pay offering, kill people or wish them death/hell for not sharing our beliefs.

We simply don't believe in a supreme entity.
[b]

I mostly blame it on the disturbing effects of religious indoctrination and our education system here in Nigeria.

Instead of the boy to simply say he doesn't understand any of the scientific theories around he naively in his confusion links science with atheism... lol.. its not funny though, it is a pity because the intellect of our youth is wasting here.

Atheist is just a name given to people who don't share beliefs in personal Gods.

it doesn't mean scientists

Big bang theorists

Evolutionists

people who don't believe in afterlife

people who don't believe in ghosts

people who have a set of doctrine or belief.

Nope atheist simply means "I don't believe in personal Gods and that is all"

-Someone can be an evolutionist and be either theistic or atheistic. .

-someone can believe in afterlife and still be atheistic (I have seen someone who doesn't believe in personal Gods but yet believes in reincarnation)
he isn't any less atheistic, he is sorely atheistic because he doesn't believe in personal Gods and that is all..)

- someone can believe in ghosts but not in personal gods.

One problem with the Op is lack of sound education which is his fault because we all studied here in Nigeria..

- He thinks science is a belief system
- He thinks Big Bang is an atheistic theory
- He think planetary cores found in every planetary body is hell.
- He thinks atheism has a belief
- He thinks atheism has a doctrine which is science

You can only pity him and hope he learns someday...
[/b]
Romance › Re: How Bold Are You? Share A Pic Of You And Your Bae/Boo... by johnydon22(m): 11:36am On Oct 15, 2015
ENIGMA24:
shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked........
This are the kind of girls that should be called "baby"
Lol


I am 6'9ft tall bro, so any girl would look that small with me. . . She is even barely a month younger tongue
Christianity Etc › Re: The True Definition Of Athiesm by johnydon22(m):
[b]**Face palm** why are people this dumb mostly in public... I think i just have to treat this once and for all..

- First linking atheism with Big bang theory (which you described as something exploded) shows off just how you need to go to school..

- First Big bang is a scientific theory and has absolutely nothing to do with atheism.

- Big bang is a branch of scientific study and not a belief

- Big bang was propounded by Msngr Georges Lamitre a catholic priest . . So big bang has nothing to do with atheism.

- Big bang is not an explosion dummy but an expansion.

- Big bang does not assert nothing but rather the expansion of a singularity. .

- Many theists as well as atheist agree to the big bang theory of which i just showed was propounded by a catholic priest.




There is no belief in atheism rather lack of it.

Many atheist like myself do not subscribe to any theory of how anything began but rather say they don't know which is the truth.

there is no shame in not knowing but when irrational assertions (like subsribing to primitive superstition as a deity did it) and attendant behaviour fills the gap left by ignorance is the problem.

Secondly talk about magic. . . Scientific theories assert interactions of natural entities which results to other entities. e.g.. it is a known fact that the interactions of gravity on matter (nebula) forms a star, gravity on the fabrics of space/time forms blackholes. . there is no magic here.

But first God came out of nothing, then spoke and everything poofed out from nothing ..

spoke and stars magically appeared from no where. . . Now check which is magic.

All these things you listed on that meme sums up the totality of your theistic beliefs . .

Please don't drag atheists down your own mess of having blind beliefs because we don't share your deluded idea of having a belief..

science means study and not a belief system and atheism has nothing to do with science. . . Its not a surprise you don't know this.

Atheist has no theory on the origin of anything, it simply means someone who doesn't believe in the childish concept of anthropomorphic personal God concepts.

So next time you want to list out your lack of understanding of scientific theories do not link it with atheism because atheism has nothing to do with science..

Now i advice you get your books and start reading cus you need it surely enough..

One huge problem with religions is that it makes people comfortable and happy with not knowing. . . . Wonder when you will stop disgracing yourself in public by sounding so dumb and simpleton-like..
[/b]
Romance › Re: How Bold Are You? Share A Pic Of You And Your Bae/Boo... by johnydon22(m): 10:30am On Oct 15, 2015
With boo of life . . .

Christianity Etc › Re: Can Muslims Deny Thes? Picture! by johnydon22(m): 9:49am On Oct 15, 2015
Islam is a religion of peace but if you say otherwise they will kill you just to prove Islam is a religion of peace...
TV/Movies › Re: Avatar: The Legend Of Korra | Seven Havens by johnydon22(m): 9:46am On Oct 15, 2015
Hey guys i want to start an avatar marathon again. . .

I have the legend of Korra in High definition complete season 1 to 4 on my tablet.

But i need the last airbender complete 1 to 3 in HD so i can start my marathon. cool

please someone know any website i can download complete last airbender 1 to 3 in HD?
Literature › Re: Nairaland Writers Collaboration 2015 (Discussion Thread) by johnydon22(m): 9:39am On Oct 15, 2015
LarrySun:
Wow! Frosti! shocked shocked shocked

Jeez! You're so welcome! You've been added sharperly cheesy
Visit the first page of this thread to see where i mentioned you or is the space filled up yet?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 (of 489 pages)