Justlove91's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Justlove91's Profile › Justlove91's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (of 25 pages)
it's obvious you don't understand how the law of attraction works, this law is not a magician or a miracle worker. If you believe you can attract that kind of money you definitely will but will it be this Friday? probably not, it all depends on the amount of conditions the universe has to orchestrate before you get the money. |
InsanePsycho:Have answered your question already, it's just not what you expected. Do you think I gain anything by you reading the book or not?? Am not here to convert anyone to anything. Like I said earlier am only here to bring to attention of people the compilation of evidence supporting afterlife, it's up to anyone interested to look it up. If you decide not to read it, then it simply means this thread is not for you . |
InsanePsycho:I know where this is coming from? You think I use the book to support my religion version of afterlife. No my brother, am actually an ex Muslim in case you don't know and not subscribed to any religion. So the book and the evidence is not confirming any afterlife version, it's just giving evidence for the afterlife. I would really like to know what you think about the evidence if you look into it. |
obinna58:You're not a credibility authority on this so your conclusion is completely irrelevant I cant even begin to engage you on this topic because know absolutely nothing about it, so wise up and enlighten yourself bro |
InsanePsycho:Why ask me? The book itself is a summary of the enormous evidence and you still want the summary of the summary abi? Why don't you stop being an intellectual coward and man up to check it out yourself . |
obinna58:What do you mean by that And who says am hear to urge?? Cm only doing this to bring to notice of people who still believe the myth that there is no evidence for afterlife. |
obinna58:Can you just go ahead and read the book before concluding, that's what educated people do, they don't conclude without knowing absolutely nothing about what they're talking about |
InsanePsycho:What do you mean by I should post one proof?? You wouldn't understand until you do your own research about this. For example if I say physical mediumship is one of the proofs of afterlife, do you understand anything by that?? If you want a gist on what the book talks about read the table of content I posted but you wouldn't be anymore wiser until you take the time to study each evidence yourself. As an atheist always demanding for evidence, I thought you will be eager to know what the so called evidence are all about. |
InsanePsycho:Yes o The evidence is much you can't exhaust it this year if you decide to investigate, and these are objective evidence at that. I will only urge you to just begin with the book I posted, and in the book we will find others |
There is a great body of evidence supporting life after death but it is obvious that most people are quiet oblivious of it. When one begins to study these evidence one is surprised of being unaware of them in the first place. The book above is just a tip of the iceberg, there are a lot of materials and work to keep one busy through this year and the next. The question now is are we ready yet ? Are we really seriously looking for evidence of afterlife? Are we ready to go into this field of investigation as an open-minded skeptic?? |
skeendyke:And they're the set of people that will quickly cry for evidence when afterlife is being talked about as if they're really interested in the evidence if given. Am sure most of them are still under the myth that their is no evidence that support afterlife when in reality there are tons of evidence, but will they even be able to put their preconceived ideas aside and look at it ? |
Peacefullove:So that is your research on afterlife. Just try and read the book and enlighten yourself. Are you not even curious to know what those evidence are. |
Peacefullove:And what investigations have you done to arrive at this your conclusion? Have you ever bothered to do any afterlife investigation? Any at all? Sincerely ask yourself those questions. |
Table of Content 1. Opening Statement 2. Respected scientists who investigated 3. My materialization experiences 4. Voices on Tape 5. Instrumental Trans-communication (ITC) 6. Near Death Experiences (NDEs) 7. Out of Body Experiences 8. The Scole Experiment proves the Afterlife 9. Einstein's Equation and materialization 10. Materialization mediumship 11. Helen Duncan 12. Psychic Laboratory Experiments 13. Observation of mediums 14. The most investigated medium ever 15. Direct voice mediums 16. Proxy sitting refute the allegation of mind reading 17. Remote viewing 18. Apparitions & after death contact 19. Deathbed visions 20. The Ouija Board 21. Xenoglossy 22. Poltergeists 23. Reincarnation 24. Quantum physics and the Afterlife 25. Lawyers who were convinced by the evidence 26. Answering the closed minded skeptics 27. Closing statement: Summing up the objective evidence 28. What happens when we die? |
Do you know that A LOT of evidences are on ground that support the reality of the afterlife? Do you know that A LOT of researchers have explored the possibility of an afterlife and have documented their research in the affirmative? Do you know that it's now ignorant of anyone to say their is no evidence supporting the belief in afterlife? And do you know A LOT of people are not even aware of these evidences? It's for this reasons that Victor Zammit took the time to compile all these evidences in one book for easy accessibility to everyone. The book is "A lawyer presents the case for the afterlife" If you're really serious about finding out whether the afterlife exist or not, I urge you to read the book. The book can be easily downloaded by typing "a lawyer present the case for the afterlife pdf" on google. Again, the book is not about what the author thinks about afterlife but the compilation of evidences that are on ground that support the existence of the afterlife. |
I would appreciate it if you could read through this post before commenting with the assumption that you somehow already know what I intend to say. Empathy is the ability to feel what another person is feeling and if this feeling is negative often leads to help for the original owner of the feeling with the aim of alleviating the person's emotional pain. I must say this ability has been of help to our society and motivates us to respond to the emotional pain of others, and no doubt the society will be a better place if more people are empathic. But as a person with the motto "Question everything" I found myself thinking of empathy and asking myself "Is this the best method to motivate us to help a person in need?" then I realized that this empathy though helpful is dysfunctional. Let's assume a friend of mine is eating and said I should pass him a glass of water because of too much pepper in the food, will it be wise of me or is it necessary for me to firstly taste the food before I can help him?? Someone cut himself with a knife by mistake and asked me to help dress the wound, is it necessary to also cut myself first to know how it feels before I can help?? I know virtually everyone will agree with me that experiencing their physical pain is not necessary before I can help them and don't think they will praise anyone that does that. Then why is it necessary for me to feel the emotional pain of another before I can help? Why do I have to punish myself emotionally before I can help? Why don't I just take the fact that they're in emotional pain as is it and help if I can without necessarily partaking in their emotionally pain? After seeing that taking up another person's emotional pain is not necessary why do I think it is even selfish ( Perhaps this is not the right word) Let's assume someone is frustrated and needs my help, if am empathic, then I have to firstly internalize his pain before I can be motivated to help him. This only means am not actually responding to that person's pain but indirectly responding to my own pain. This is clearly seen in people that are not empathic, you can beg and cry and beg again but they wouldn't help because even though you're in pain they wouldn't help because they don't feel what you feel. This means that an empathic person don't help the person in pain really but only help the person in other to indirectly ease the pain he feels because of the person. Of course must of them don't do this intentionally and must are not even conscious of it. And I must quickly add I don't have anything against them only pointing out that their is a better and selfless way to help. Do you still doubt empathy is "selfish" ?? Then why is it that some people are incapable of helping anyone in emotional pain if they're unable to feel that pain themselves? Yes... simply because their is no pain to indirectly heal in themselves by helping the person, so they unconsciously think if I cant gain by helping him, why help? Why do I say empathy is delusional? When I look deeply into this idea of taking up another person's feeling, it got me asking "Are we actually feeling another person's feeling or are we only feeling our own version of what we assume they're feeling?" Based on the information received, we then create what we assume they're feeling using our past experiences, conditioning, beliefs etc. Let's assume I say my Dad is died, must people will console me by saying they know how I feel because [b]they've also lost someone dear to them (experience) [/b]while what I feel is that his death is a relief because he always tries to control my life. Let's assume I approach you and say my daughter is very sick in the hospital that I need your help, you may feel "my pain" and try to help while what am actually feeling is happy because I have been able to convince another maga. Do you still belief we actually feel what the other feel when we empathize? Have you ever said anything that happens to you to another person and they took it too far that you're now the one saying to the person "Take it easy, I don't take it this serious" This shows that the person is not feeling how you feel but only feeling his version of how he thinks you feel. That is, he is not dealing with reality (what is), it is all in his head. I believe we shouldn't stop at empathy because we can actually help other without creating our own version of what we suppose they're feeling. |
agabaI23:Yea, this can happen but only to those who already have no strongly held belief and I think the percentage is low because I have some Muslim friends that though they don't pray, fast and do all sort of things, they still strongly hold on to their Islamic faith and are not ready to look into anything else . |
agabaI23:And does this "spirit" in the word choose people at random because I make sure I read all the ones given to me even those I pick up elsewhere, but still here am I. |
agabaI23:But you cant compare listening to someone preach with just reading one small note. Have never seen anyone get converted through this method, have you? |
When I was in school, it occurs frequently that people would be given leaflet by Christians with the aim of spreading the Gospel to the sinners for their salvation. These leaflets often end with something like "To give your life to Christ now, say this prayer.......... congratulations, you're now a child of God." This often get me thinking are these people serious or just kidding? Did they actually expect anybody to just accept Christ by reading a leaflet not more than 300 words? Did they think it is that simple/easy to change ones belief? I can remember vividly it took me not less than one year of serious thinking and reading different points of view of people before I was able to be convinced that Islam is a cooked up religion by Mohammed and thus leave it. I know these Christians believe what they're saying totally and because of that think they can just write some epistle with some Bible verses and expect people to just abandon their long held belief just like that. Even the indoctrination of a child is not that fast considering the fact that this child or baby is a clean slate with no belief, yet it still takes continuous exposure of the baby to the belief before it sticks. But they expect a grown up man already holding on to some beliefs to just discard his belief for theirs. So this got me asking: Did they actually expect to convert anybody by this method or they're just doing it for doing sake? Maybe am wrong, does this method work? |
KingEbukasBlog:Oh! is it? that's why its always good to read terms and conditions, my bad. |
If the abrahamic God was clinically diagnosed, his case file will read : Chronic paranoid delusions, extreme anger outburst, a pathological propensity to commit murder and acts of extreme violence and cruelty against his perceived “enemies” . Criminally insane, with a few brief lucid intervals. What is your own diagnosis? |
naijadeyhia:I think you're mixing belief and truth together and not only you, I see must people doing that. Belief is just an opinion which could be true or not, when one is cognizant of this fact one will be more open minded with his believes knowing fully well that the belief may be wrong. This is actually what brings about the position of agnostic atheism. It means that Even though I belief there is no God, am aware of the fact that it is only a belief and not necessarily the truth and I may be wrong. |
oaroloye:Lucid dreaming and astral projection are the same thing, they're just different ways to enter the mental world. |
Anas09:Exactly, what matters in the end is this believe works perfectly for me, it may not make sense to you but it doesn't have to, this is about me and what works for me. |
Lennycool:Yes, but it has to do with eliminating psychological suffering not necessarily the physical one, in fact nobody can eliminate all physical sufferings. Enlightenment is not about not suffering outside but about not suffering inside. |
Lennycool:The concept of Buddhism accommodates changing your life situation if you don't like it. It just advice that you totally and completely accept where you're right now instead of resisting It, this will create inner peace. It teaches that where you're right now is the reality that what is real at the moment and not what you desire to be which is in the future. So you can walk from here to where you want but to always remember that your life is happening not in the past or future but here and now. |
Anas09:Atheism is the believe that there is on God. Materialism is the believe that only the physical reality exist. Even though all materialists are atheists not all atheists are materialist. If the physical can exist without God why can't the "spiritual" also exist without God? I believe the universe is maintained by laws and not by God. |
Seun:Buddhism teaches that human suffering also arises from desire and tell people to strive to reach a state of "desirelessness" But this state isn't about having no desire because it is not really the desire that causes suffering but the attachment to the desire. Desire becomes a source of suffering when your inner peace depends on it fulfilment. It is possible to have a desire, work towards it's fulfilment and yet be detached from it, which means you don't wait for it to manifest before you can be at peace and happy. The poor man can still work to better his life situation and yet be happy along the way. What all this really means is that you don't have to feel sad and miserable before you can change your life. |
Seun:The primary aim of Buddhism is to end human psychological suffering not necessarily the physical one. Buddha realised that the cause of human psychological suffering is resistance to what is ie life, and said if one can just bring unconditional acceptance to life then there will be peace of mind irrespective of what is happening outside. |
Immorttal:You're on point |
4kings: |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (of 25 pages)

I wish so too haha