Justlove91's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Justlove91's Profile › Justlove91's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 25 pages)
Anas09:If you like that label, but am sure you know an atheist is not necessarily a materialist. |
4kings:To me the message of Buddha is very simple which is simply how to end humans psychological suffering. To be able to maintain an inner peace or stillness irrespective of what is happening outside is what enlightenment is. And I don't understand all this connecting with a higher self of a thing. I don't believe Buddha is a kind of supernatural being because he is enlightened. |
4kings:How?? |
CeoMYN:#Buddhafan |
Seun:Am not a Buddhist |
Anas09:I 100% agree with the article though am not a Buddhist. |
Atheist: Someone that doesn't believe in God/Gods. This is from Buddhist's site Do Buddhist believe in god? No, we do not. There are several reasons for this. The Buddha, like modern sociologists and psychologists, believed that religious ideas and especially the god idea have their origin in fear. The Buddha says: "Gripped by fear men go to the sacred mountains, sacred groves, sacred trees and shrines". Dp 188 Primitive man found himself in a dangerous and hostile world, the fear of wild animals, of not being able to find enough food, of injury or disease, and of natural phenomena like thunder, lightning and volcanoes was constantly with him. Finding no security, he created the idea of gods in order to give him comfort in good times, courage in times of danger and consolation when things went wrong. To this day, you will notice that people become more religious at times of crises, you will hear them say that the belief in a god or gods gives them the strength they need to deal with life. You will hear them explain that they believe in a particular god because they prayed in time of need and their prayer was answered. All this seems to support the Buddha’s teaching that the god-idea is a response to fear and frustration. The Buddha taught us to try to understand our fears, to lessen our desires and to calmly and courageously accept the things we cannot change. He replaced fear, not with irrational belief but with rational understanding. The second reason the Buddha did not believe in a god is because there does not seem to be any evidence to support this idea. There are numerous religions, all claiming that they alone have god’s words preserved in their holy book, that they alone understand god’s nature, that their god exists and that the gods of other religions do not. Some claim that god is masculine, some that she is feminine and others that it is neuter. They are all satisfied that there is ample evidence to prove the existence of their god but they laugh in disbelief at the evidence other religions use to prove the existence of another god. It is not surprising that with so many different religions spending so many centuries trying to prove the existence of their gods that still no real, concrete, substantial or irrefutable evidence has been found. Buddhists suspend judgement until such evidence is forthcoming. The third reason the Buddha did not believe in a god is that the belief is not necessary. Some claim that the belief in a god is necessary in order to explain the origin on the universe. But this is not so. Science has very convincingly explained how the universe came into being without having to introduce the god-idea. Some claim that belief in god is necessary to have a happy, meaningful life. Again we can see that this is not so. There are millions of atheists and free- thinkers, not to mention many Buddhists, who live useful, happy and meaningful lives without belief in a god. Some claim that belief in god’s power is necessary because humans, being weak, do not have the strength to help themselves. Once again, the evidence indicates the opposite. One often hears of people who have overcome great disabilities and handicaps, enormous odds and difficulties, through their own inner resources, through their own efforts and without belief in a god. Some claim that god is necessary in order to give man salvation. But this argument only holds good if you accept the theological concept of salvation and Buddhists do not accept such a concept. Based on his own experience, the Buddha saw that each human being had the capacity to purify the mind, develop infinite love and compassion and perfect understanding. He shifted attention from the heavens to the heart and encouraged us to find solutions to our problems through self- understanding. source: www.buddhanet.net/ans73.htm |
Weah96:I don't understand you o, is it that: 1. You don't believe a thing like that can happen? 2. You just don't believe the OP version? I guess I will have to read your conversation with the OP |
Weah96:During seance when the medium is entranced he or she can speak ANY language. Sometimes even the tone of voice will be different from the medium's normal voice. I know this sound ridiculous and am must tell you I was skeptical when I first heard of mediumship but I was open minded enough not to discard but examine it. You probably believe in evolution, and I can fairly guess that you didn't believe in it the first time you heard of it because it's quiet ridiculous to imagine that human evolve from animals. But you're open minded enough to examine it, why don't you do just that know also?? |
HardMirror:I observed the op question can be answered using the phenomenon of mediumship that's why I gave it and if anyone has read about this phenomenon he will know it's relevant to the question. I think you misunderstand me up there, I only say he should listen next time not accept as true what he says, he still has to use his brain to judge his actions. Have heard of people making good decisions according to instruction given them by mediums and have heard people making bad decision. When one realizes that the so called controlling spirit is not some supernatural being but just someone giving is own opinion, one will be careful the take there advice has absolute truth. Hope you understand my position now |
Princewilla:It's simple, and this is what I think happened. Have you heard of mediums before? Mediums are psychics able to contact the "dead" and receive message from them. According to your story, the friend you told said it is a common thing that happen with that PARTICULAR mad man, and according to you the mad man called you by a name only your grandpa calls you who is now dead. My guess is the madman is a medium and it is the spirit of your grandpa that is controlling him at that time. And from your friend's statement, other spirits have also communicated through him, next time wait and hear what he has to say. |
This is the number one post that resonates with me totally, deeply and completely and my number one post of the religion section. I got to know about the concept of non resistance last year and have been reading and practicing it since in my own little way. I advice anyone who wants to know more about this to read these books by Echart Tolle - Power of now - The new earth - Stillness speaks |
Lennycool:I understand you, but if they are eventually able to produce favorable gene how did they do that since it doesn't exist before? mutation? luck? |
Lennycool:OK let assume the dinosaur doesn't have favorable gene to pass on but have enough time, will they've eventually been later able to produce the needed gene or they would still go extinct even when having enough time? |
GRIMMJOE:I don't quiet understand you. |
Lennycool:Yes I know about natural selection, I don't think anybody will read about evolution without knowing anything about natural selection. But natural selection is simply the selection of those with the desirable ability, it tells us nothing about how the ability comes to be. In the example you gave with the dogs, the long neck is already present in some of them so it just needs the natural selection of this kind of dog but what happened in cases where the desired ability was never present before? how does the ability comes about before natural selection can favor those with it. For example, there is a mixed culture of microbes living "happily" then there happens to be shorted of space, nutrient or water, then one group in other to survive producer antibiotics to inhibit the growth of the other microbes, naturally this group will be favored by natural selection and may later be the only one left in the environment, my question is how are they able to know which specific compound to produce that will specifically inhibit the other but not them? mutation? I don't think mutation is that precise, and if it is mutation how is it that it happened at the precise time the organism needed it? |
Lennycool:Mind you I also believe in evolution but the only thing we know that drives evolution is the survival instinct, how is this converted to creation of specific tissue, organ, system that will make it possible. For example if an animal specie requires a long neck for survival, how is it that millions or so years later it actually has the long neck? How was the need for long neck created the long neck? Like I said, I believe that every complexity we see in living organisms today is a product of millions of evolution but is the instinct to survival or adapt to an environment alone able to create this complexity? |
OK, am a microbiology student and in my lecture last week in MCB 406 (Pharmaceutical microbiology), we were dealing with bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. Some bacteria resist attack by drug inactivation through chemical modification of the drug, I will just give two examples. 1. Some bacteria do this by hydrolysis of the beta lactam ring of beta lactam antibiotics like penicillin. 2. Some add chemical groups to the drug eg some bacteria render chloramphenicol inactive by adding Acety COA to it two hydroxyl groups. After the lecture this got me thinking, how the hell do these tiny unicellular organisms know what to do to inactive an antibiotic. Notice that the chemical modification of these drugs is targeted to a specific part of the structure of the drugs. The inactivation of beta lactam antibiotics is targeted precisely to the core beta lactam ring, that of chloramphenicol is to the hydroxyl group and is not just the addition of any chemical but Acetyl COA to be precise. So the question is where do these unicellular microbes get the intelligence and knowledge to do all these PRECISE modifications, how do they know which molecule to add to which part of the structure of the drug? In addition to the above phenomenon, there is what is called antibiosis which is a microbial interaction, this occurs when there is limited space, nutrient etc, one microbe then produce a compound(antibiotic) that will inhibit the growth of other microbe in that environment in other for it to have a higher probability of surviving. Penicillin was actually discovered in this type of interaction. I can understand the need to survival but how do these microbes know which substance to produce that wouldn't be harmful to them but to other microbes? How did they know what will inhibit others? When did they study the physiology of the other microbes? Also, if bacteria that get a certain nutrient eg folic acid from their environment are subjected to an environment with low folic acid content, even though many generations of these bacteria will die but at a time there will arise strains able to grow in this environment because they've simply developed the ability to synthesis folic acid themselves. We ought to note that this is an ability alien to them before, they're not programmed to do this, they've never done it before, so how did they know how to Bio synthesize this compound. Anyone with knowledge of biochemistry will know the complex chemical reactions, pathways, enzymes required for Bio synthesis. I can imagine a human saying I need this product and if I can't get it from the market I can make it domestically but can't imagine the microbe saying, OK I need folic acid and if I can't get it again from the environment I will use this substrate, these enzymes etc to synthesize one, if they can't do this where do they get the ability to Bio synthesize. Even in evolution we only here that this organism developed this ability or organ because it is required for survival, we were never told how they were able to manufacture the organ. When the first set of organisms reached the land, they only have the "desire" or need to survive on land they didn't know how it is going to happen but millions of years later it happened but HOW? In antimicrobial resistance to drugs, evolution, adaptation etc the driving force is the desire or need of this organism to survive in the environment, they all have the survival instinct but who or what is making this possible? Creating organs, tissues, abilities needed for there survival? Even though I have my way of making sense of all these and doesn't claim it's the truth just what makes sense to me as at now and will probably share it later, what do you especially the atheists and materialists personally think of this? |
ChemicalReaction:When I find out I can actually walk better on my two legs, so I threw away the crutches. |
sonmvayina:Are you serious about that? Guess your parents are not religious. |
AnonyNymous:Do you dispose other books like that also? |
Omudia:Good, so it's how one follow the teachings in these books that matters not how one treat the books. |
SuperSupremo:So has for you you will bury the Koran when it's old. I don't believe the Christians dispose there's the way you said. |
Tiny23:But you have one now, what would you do with it when it gets old? |
Even though we call these books Holy books, we all know that these books also get old and torn just like any other books. So what do you do with them then? do you burn, throw away, bury or what? |
Kolababe:Happy married life |
Anas09:Amin ma. Thanks |
Anas09: |
Anas09:Yes. definitely, nah one semester remain. As you can imagine, am still pretty much trapped (at home) just got back from mosque (Jumat) now, imagine being forced to do what you know is absolutely futile, so am still waiting to be free. |
Anas09:Yes. definitely, nah one semester remain. As you can imagine, am still trapped (at home) just got back from mosque (Jumat) now, so am still waiting to be free. |
Anas09:Well am cool as usual. No, nah strike o, FYB though |
justlove91:Practicing |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 25 pages)
, See? Thats why i registered another one, but still use Anas though.