₦airaland Forum

Toju200:
alright here it is https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=850349902140299&id=563565107485448

Toju200:
alright here it is https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=850349902140299&id=563565107485448

Toju200:
thanks bro .. for the pics I've been waiting for...
I have the interior pics of the Ezugwu MRAP 2 but can't upload it.
Lemme send it to u

lebuhsi:
Someone suggested if he was shuwa Arab'...I think he's too light skinned, he's probably from the middle east or north africa

LagosWahala:
Do the police take delivery at TransCorp Hilton now?

komekn:
You are now giving a full circus performance in the theatre you are going to get a standing ovation.

You should look before you leap

komekn:
You are now giving a full circus performance in the theatre you are going to get a standing ovation.

You should look before you leap

komekn:
Double post sorry

komekn:
Double post sorry

komekn:
Consider the proposition you have presented in bold. I have to be brutally honest with you it's nonsensical without any substance whatsoever.

Every country sells it UAV hardware at different prices simply because they can.

But there are huge disparities in price and indeed difference in quality which is open to never ending debate.

Nonetheless, currently BOKO don't have high end technology in terms of anti aircraft mitigation then a Chinese UAV will be more than sufficient.

Actually the Wing Loong II is classed with the USA MQ that costs $30 million but costs a fraction of that price at $1million.

komekn:
[s]I want to presume that you went university at least. Having that thought in mind, you should transfer the basic methodology that underpins research.

Albeit this is not academic but even if you were presenting before a corporate board. You would approach matters with objectivity, substantive deduction and projection under pinned with rational.

First of all why all the insult and degradation. This is supposed to be a forum.

Why don't you do some basic open source investigation to prove me wrong.

You completely evade the topic, you do not address the issues directly, you dismiss substantive deduction but with nothing of substance. You are emotive and not objective

Your approach is to you use comparison by conjecture to make a conclusion. However, it has zero weighting in method or logic. The variables you use do not converge for inferences by comparison to be made.

Then you call me a clown with delusion based fantasy, that's derogatory.

I will use your own confused irrational unit of measurement to address your misguided response. [/s]

Turkey are doing a transfer of technology agreement with Tunisia as well as building 3 ground control stations. The 6 Drones are part of the package of the $240 million contract. How much does it cost to build one ground control station ❓ ow much does it cost per unit for each drone.❓❓

There are a number of variables you would have to consider in the Turkey to Tunisia UAV contract. For instance the existing communications infrastructure and if Indeed if they have any.

The next thing what value has Turkey put on, intellectual capital and how that relates to the contract sum. Before you can make any projections on unit cost of the actual UAV. However you do none of these things and yet you call me a clown.

I talked about unit price per Chinese UAV these costs are well documented on the global UAV market.

Ukraine bought 12 UAV'S from Turkey for a unit price of $4-5 million, the contract sum for the 12 UAV's was $69 million. I am using specialist global consultancies as my reference point. Although l do not have the full report that could cost upwards of $5000. I have the basic information which is suffice for our purposes here.

So using your unit of measurement in which it is implied by you that each UAV cost $40 million. That's about 10 time or more the actual cost of Turkish UAV. As you are quite obviously wrong.

What than does that make you ❓ Does that make something much more than a clown❓❓❓

So because Turkey sell thier UAV for $4 million and the USA sells thier for $30 million and China sells thier $1 million. It must be untrue and a fantasy.

It seems you are one of those people that take comfort in ignorance of the truth and rather support the lie to feed your emotive based prejudices and misguided sense of patriotism.

Expecting an apology from you would be too much, I guess.

mekussa:
But you that ALSO doesnt know the cost of the Saudi deal is sure the figures quoted are wrong because someone else paid higher for another drone of the same class?

kabe1:
Nigerian Air Force Tucano

mekussa:
The fact that Turkey sold her drones for 40 million dollars doesn't mean all drones have to be 40 million dollars. The WING LOONG II he mentioned were purchased by Saudi Arabia and the UAE for less than 5 million USD a unit.They are low altitude drones that are easily shout down but, giving how cheap they are and their good(not excelect) strike capabilities, countries that the US refused to sell the reaper to, love them. The Chinese have been flooding the market with low cost drones which middle east countries are buying.
I don't pray Nigeria goes for the WING LOONG II drone because its performance rating is poor but is it dirt cheap compared to others? Yes.
Its also not nice to call everyone with a contrary opinion names.