Emmanuel30a: ➜If MY RELIGION can't speak of THE BIBLE and can't speak of GOD of Isreal, what is you and your religion and how and why can you and your religion speak of THE BIBLE and THE GOD of Israel? ➜ By the way, you haven't answer the previous questions!
Your religion is a fraudulent arrangement by non-Israelites aka dogs — Later made official by the Romans —that attempted to usurp the movement that began by the Israelites back in Jerusalem and the nation of Judah before their eventual destruction. I am simply an individual reading through the books and looking to honor the actual messages intended by the Israelite authors of the many books your religion pretends it abides by.
2. I did answer your question. None of the authors placed any requirements on me, the reader, to that end. And since I don't subscribe to your religious delusion, I can only wonder why you would think to ask me such a silly question.
Emmanuel30a: ✓ If you are not a christian, why are you talking about GOD and THE LORD JESUS CHRIST? What is your gain or what would be your gain? What did you stand to gain or achieve by talking about how JESUS CHRIST came only for isrealite? Are you preaching the gospel...? I think people can read that in The Bible themselves... Are you telling them tell that they should believe in you? What would happen to those who believe in Jesus Christ of Israel...?
1. Who told you that your religion of Christianity alone, a religion that was created by Non-Israelites for their political and material purposes has reason to discuss the contents of the book that is instead of Israelite origin and speaks of the God of Israel?
Emmanuel30a: ✓ One of the questions he asked you : Who is GOD AND JESUS TO YOU? ANSWER!
According to the books, YHWH, who gave Himself the title "God of Israel" over the people He named after Himself is God over the bloodline of Jacob, and Jesus Christ of Israel is the promised forever King of the land of Israel that was given by YHWH to the bloodline of Jacob.
Christboy01: ➜What surprised me was how the feeling I had for this girl suddenly vanished. I visibly saw how foolish I had been in the relationship. This became pronounced after my dad's friend who is a vibrant Reverend prayed for me one day and led me to christ. I called off the relationship citing the seduction spree this girl took me through. It was the grace of God that prevented me from sleeping with her. She to my surprise did not resist my point and accepted the breakup easily. I later got into a relationship with my now wife whom I met at the Reverend s house and we married two years after. My problem is that close to our wedding, I felt strong feelings for my ex. I nearly went back to her. After the wedding, I would dream of her and next thing is we'd have serious misunderstanding with my wife the next day. I have constantly find myself regret breaking up with the lady, yet I love my wife and kids and would NEVER go back to my ex. I just need this feeling off my mind. I don't know why I am still attached to her after I was the one that cut off from her and was very okay with my decision then. Please help me with any useful piece of advice. The story is long though and much of it I cut off. Thanks and I am happy to be a part of this wonderful family.
There was no spell or curse on you. You were obsessed with the gal, probably due to personal trauma or insecurity of yours. And she, knowing this, took advantage of your vulnerability to her benefit. She wasn't into but into what she could get from your clingy behavior.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYnBECqI__w?si=OHZfqncJ3-l8Ypd7 The gal is not to blame for your insecurities, trauma, or lack of emotional and social intelligence. She isn't a witch, nor is her family of witchcraft, and not to blame for those who think they can obsessively gain their attention or love.
Solofresh2: ➜Hello fellow nairalanders, remember this thread I posted few days ago https://www.nairaland.com/8428017/just-broke-up-girlfriend This lady has been reporting me to my friends and particularly my elder sister who liked her so well.My sister challenged me on why I would do that claiming she is a good girl. She is always checking my status on Whatsapp and I had to block her. How can I keep her shut permanently
Nothing of what you posted indicates she is, in fact, stalking you, though. She has a right to air her grievances to whomever she wishes. Why are you looking to impede on her freedom?
vybzkartel: ➜You live alone in your 3 bedroom apartment. You woke up at 5 am to see a beautiful naked lady by you in bed. You locked your doors before sleeping and you were alone only to find a very beautiful lady in your bed. How will you react? And why
So, a home invader is not a home invader if he/she is beautiful and naked in your bed? 🙄🙄
I am trying to understand why anyone would feel the need to ask this question of any other individual, as though common sense is no longer to be considered common for all. 🙄🙄🙄
AngelahFlo: ➜Despite the fact that your arguments are out of sync, I'm enjoying our discourse. You mentioned a particular bible reference where Jesus is quoted as saying that he was sent to the lost sheep of Israel but did you read that part of the bible in its entirety? You simply took it out of context. The reference occured as the result of a woman who came to Jesus over the issue of a sick child requesting that Jesus come to heal the child to which Jesus replied that He wasn't sent to other people but to the list sheep of Israel. The woman persisted to which Jesus replied and said Healing is the children's bread and He can't give that to the dogs. The woman's response to this statement was that the dogs do eat from the crumbs that fall from the master's table. That response got to Jesus for He ended up healing the woman's child. ➜ The point I'm trying to make is your Jesus of Israel cos my own Jesus is Jesus Christ the son of the living God who came to save that which is lost whether they be of the lost sheep of Israel or not. That Bible version you used. Which is is it? And where is it stated that the sheep who earn their eternal reward are Angelic beings? ➜Read Genesis 1:26 where God created the first man. In what image was He created. ➜ If man is made in the image of God, how is he an Angelic Being? Did he become that after he got his eternal reward or before that? Which version of bible are you using. I wanna know
1. Stop posting what amounts to incoherent nonsense! 🙄
Jesus Christ of Israel, in the passage that is Matthew 15 vs 20 - 28, makes the statement not to the Woman but to His disciples who wondered why Jesus Christ of Israel did not respond to the calls from the woman urging Him in the name of David to answer her. The Davidic Covenant was only for the Israelites is why Jesus Christ did not directly respond to her. It wasn't until after she clarified that what she sort was the crumbs that fell from the Master's table from the food meant for the Master's children, that Jesus Christ then turned to address her directly. 🙄🙄
2. This is a very silly response at best. 🙄
3. The absurdities of Religion are unbelievable! The verse tells you that the image which is referred to is the one that establishes humans are rulers over the other creatures on the earth. What is its relevance to this discussion, for crying out loud?🙄🙄
4. Man was created a mortal being in the beginning —humans were created without eternal life. Jesus Christ of Israel came to transform the Israelites who would become His followers —humans, formerly mortals—into immortal beings by installing in them the very same Eternal Life that is YHWH's. And He, Jesus Christ of Israel, referred to these hybrid humans as His angels— eternal beings.
Mear23: ➜Let me cite a case I know for you. Two so called believers were in courtship. During courtship, the sister said se only had sex once, it's on the wedding night that the bro discovered the woman lied. Till today, the home has nit settled. To avoid had I known, when it comes to marriage, don't give anyone an impression of what you are not.
Wait a second.... How did he make this discovery of his? So the believer brother was some sort of sex expert before marriage, or what?
Mear23: ➜I am not justifying the man. But i pray you don't fall into a wrong hand. ➜ One of the solid pillar of marriage is trust, once this is broken in marriage, the ship can capsize irrespective of who is involved.
1. You don't need to pray such useless prayers because everyone is bound to, at some point to fall into the wrong hands/path/ditch, etc. It is all a part of the human experience; no one can, by way of prayers or anxieties, avoid that. Rather, it is by gaining knowledge and understanding of human behavior, etc., that one is best able to maneuver past many of those pitfalls in this life.
2. Here's the revelation for you. Even if the man and woman were born and raised in the same house/compound as neighbors, attended the same schools from the beginning, sat in the same classes, hung out with the same group of friends, came home at the same time each day, and then eventually dated and married to each other, what you call trust would continue to evade them. Knowing your partner's past has nothing to do with trusting your partner. Even if you could read your partner's mind, you would still not be able to trust your partner. Why? Because humans cannot trust each other. We are born that way, and we die that way. Trust is erroneously believed to be a pillar when in fact it is not.
Think about it. If the divorce rate(and marriage abandonment rates) for those in your churches mirrors the divorce(abandonment rate) that is found among those outside of your churches including those who don't even believe in any deity, doesn't this here serve as definitive proof that whatever is wrong with marriages between churchians is also what is wrong in the marriages of those who don't have your church ideas, meaning it is more a human problem than a pillars problem?
Yet the vast majority of Nigerians raised with that in mind turn out more corrupt & undisciplined individuals when compared to their counterparts in countries where using the rod is notoriously frowned upon, why?
Berankis: ➜The Ezekiel is foolish like most young men. Any young man that wants to get married should do some background checks on your wife-to-be and same goes for the ladies too, so that you know what you are getting into. It is mostly a serious issue where you marry first and later start to discover a lot horrible things about your partner.
What you are having us believe here is that the pastor man, against his church doctrines, refused to do background checks on his wife-to-be, and that is the reason why he, with all of his faults, ended up crashing heads with his wife? Una no dey ever talk real things! It is always inane after inane exercises with you, religious folks.🙄🙄🙄
Mear23: ➜I think I need to say something at this point. I am saying this to all genuinely born again Christians. ➜Don't hide your past from your intending spouse. Yes, we know God had forgiven you, that should not stop you from sharing your pastor. Hiding your past is like keeping a bump that is about to explode in your pocket. Forget the shame that comes with sharing your past.
1. Oh, so the pastor husband, whose faults are equally plenty, is not genuinely born-again? 😄
2. What gives you the impression that a past was hidden in this case, though? Are you insinuating that the pastor husband who claims he sniffs his wife's panties whenever she comes home does so because of some hidden past of his sniffing women's panties? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Guestmale: ➜This is a sad story. Marriage is a great thing ordained by God, but devil the greatest enemy of human beings out of its wickedness and knowing it has lost it already and always makes some marriages looks like hell.
Stop ranting bullsheet... why is the devil to blame for the problems created by humans in their own marriages?
oridavid: ➜I can understand you. Take your time and study the bible carefully, and especially the verse in 2 peter. You'll see that both verses are talking about the judgment to come. They're both pointing to the day of Judgment which will happen when Christ returns. That is the day reserved for all judgments, even the judgment on Adam. It's ok if you disagree though, I'm not here to make you understand what I say, I just posted what I know. Whoever find it reasonable will learn from me, you don't have to. Thank you for your time though. Chao chao .
Religion and lies are indeed 5 & 6— inseparable! 🙄🙄🙄
So, even though none of the two passages — Psalm 90 vs 1 - 4 & 2 Peter 3 vs 8=9 — makes any mention of the person of Jesus Christ of Israel or Adam, you instead instead that the passages are about Jesus Christ, some judgment and Adam? 🙄🙄
dapadawee: ➜ Well that is the answer to a successful marriage. If no marriage in your family succeed that doesn't mean it is not successful in others. ➜ Woman is to submit and man is to love. However, if one party fulfil this condition even if the other does otherwise the marriage will stand. The girl mother also left her father, if she had wisdom she ought to know that she must do everything to break that circle. Well I pray the twin breaks it. ➜ It is spirit thing your canal mind will never understand. All the same good luck
. It is the answer to a successful marriage, yet this answer clearly failed in this instance. Doesn't that there invalidate your claim of it being the answer to a successful marriage? If 1+1 IS NOT 5, why continue to assert 5 as the answer to 1+1? 🤣
2. Without evidence, your particular conclusion seems to be that the woman never submitted at all in the relationship. Why do you do this to yourself? 🤣
3. Get the f-ck away with this religious gobbledegook of yours! Nonsense! 😂
oridavid: ➜ I really understand your point and I see it. I'm sorry I just need to make slight adjustment to your thought. The bible never said that a day years in God's presence is a thousand years on earth. ➜ For context, you need to understand that simile was in that place to tell you that it's just figure of speech and not a fact. ➜ It was a figure of speech to say that a day before God is a very long time and when that time is passed, it's remembered vividly. It's not a yardstick for time measurement. It's just figure of speech. Try to look at it again, pls.
Stop rambling!
That book claims that by the account of two or three witnesses shall a truth, not spoken directly from the mouth of YHWH, be established - Deuteronomy 17 vs 6. So, we have two witnesses describing a day in God's presence as a thousand human years.
1 My Lord, you have been our home forever and ever. 2 You were God before the mountains were born, before the earth and the world were made. You have always been and will always be God! 3 You bring people into this world, and you change them into dust again. 4[color=#990099]To you[/color], a thousand years is like yesterday, like a few hours in the night. 5 Our life is like a dream that ends when morning comes. We are like grass - Psalm 90 vs 1 - 5
...
8But don’t forget this one thing, dear friends: To the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years is like a day. 9 The Lord is not being slow in doing what he promised—the way some people understand slowness. But God is being patient with you. He doesn’t want anyone to be lost. He wants everyone to change their ways and stop sinning. - 2 Peter 3 vs 8-9
2. Wrong! A simile is a comparison made between two things as a way to reveal a likeness that exists between them. It shows a relationship that exists between one thing and another thing. It is about how two things are alike and the comparison is usually subjective, but since we are given the rule in Deuteronomy 17 vs 6, it becomes a truth—exactly that, a yardstick—as there are two witnesses to this in the book.
DeepSight: ➜Nope, being single has always been in reference to your marital or relationship status. Since when did it indicate your handling of your kids if any? Anyway most of the things you say have always been silly.
Shut up already if you don't know what you are talking about!
The story told is that the man has several side chicks... living a single life. Side chick na for free? No be attention and resources dem dey use keep those? Nonsense!
If you don't even understand the meaning behind the references used, then don't even bother commenting next time.
dapadawee: ➜Very wrong. You are wrong. Being a Christian doesn't excuse you from getting the required knowledge on marriage. She is deficient of marital law and ways. ➜ A man who once you claimed loved you all of a sudden hated you. Something must have happened. Maybe she had lied all this years that she was a virgin.
Nonsense! Christianity, the cult of Deeper Life included, focuses on ensuring that gullible followers lack this required knowledge on marriage you speak of. For instance, rather than openly explain that marriage is an agreement requiring the man and woman to negotiate their wills as partners in business are meant to, your churches teach that the woman is to basically close herself off — submit her will — to the man, an arrangement that can only exist between a master and a slave and not a marriage.
2. Humans are notoriously fickle... this is common knowledge. And no human can read the mind of another human. If the woman had, according to you, lied that she was a virgin, does that then give him the impetus to cause her harm or make her life miserable? Come on naw! You people have brains... use them!
GindoX: ➜My brother has been westernized. marriage na spiritual thing and it requires spiritual eyes. Indians know this. ➜ Forget inner maturity and decision making abilities, all those are plus.
There is nothing spiritual about marriage which instead, like every other relationship, is a battlefield for both the man and woman to express their individual whims.
2. Nothing like pluses... as they are the basis of all that an individual is able to express either in or outside of marriage.
DarkJeddi: ➜Where did he say that the father abandoned the kids? So because he's living a single life mean say he abandoned the kids? Is he married to them?
You folks are notoriously incapable of walking a mile in the shoes of others.🙄🙄🙄🙄
A father/mother living a single life is a man/woman whose attention is not focused on his children; that is abandonment.
tiswell: ➜I'm not surprised at your perspective. There are wrong choices in marriage which were earlier masqueraded by either of the party(s) to be right.
Your wrong choices are a reflection on and of you, not the other person!
GindoX: ➜If no be wetin people go talk all because say I refuse to marry ennI would have preferred not getting married. No be all of us get strength for marriage, some people would have live longer and more productive with positive effects on people around it they have remain single
Nonsense! Don't blame others for your lack of a spine! 🙄🙄🙄🙄