Lezz's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Lezz's Profile › Lezz's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 (of 224 pages)
plaetton:The ignorance of feminist is mind blowing. I have never seen a group so intelligent in ignorance and lacking in wisdom. Virtually all carrier driven and power hungry women have paid away their children and husbands as a price for their folly. Which unaltered man with a healthy, uncompromised testosterone will find sexy and eternally seductive a woman who goes to work by 8am looking her soft best for her colleagues and returning home tired,exhausted to the husband. They both arrive at home by ,say, 5pm , both looking tired and worn out. This isn't the way it is meant to be. possible out comes, the man gets a secret young mistress who is always soft, clean, strong and waiting. Someone whose the very natural disposition is unalterably opposite of his testosterone driven nature. He will lose his power and money to that woman. The carrier freak wife is going to toil hard and get older,maybe one or two flings with a colleague and she's going to return home old and alien to her husband and children. Then her wiser counterparts whose mothers told them the way around a man's heart will be happier with their children and husband. |
Stillfire:that's a narrow interpretation of the subject matter. The bottom line is that carrier success, promotion, power and social status has not increased the happiness of women as have been shown in research statistics. Because what makes a man happy isn't what necessarily makes a woman happy. The bottom line is applying carrier and motherhood in a good balance as Danielle wrote in her record smashing book: What Our mothers Didn't Tell Us:"[b]Why Happiness Eludes The Modern Woman"[/b] My daughters are going to get that striking balance. |
bukatyne:I choose to believe you misunderstood me. By women trying to be men, I was implying the prioritizing of thier goal to achieving happiness which is as a result of modern feminism. The rate of divorces were lower in 1979 as compared to today , and yes women were happier then as research shows. Divorce is hard on humans, both male and female. But I think women are worse hit not because of any social conditioning or cultural inclinations, but because they are inherently different by psychological and biological dispositions. Evolution has balanced the gap between man and woman for millions of years. Modern feminists get confused and wicked and spun lies from a selfish political ideological point of view. Men pursue power, glory, money and social status to satisfy their abundant testosterone and also to impress the ladies. Evolution balanced this gap by giving women the skills and ability to control men. All she needed to do was invoke her inbuilt feminine meekness and wiles. That's what our mothers did with wisdom without the corruption of modern feminist education. Men control the money, power and politics plus resources,and women control men. That's the balance of power by God in his wisdom of mystery of evolution. Today's feminist have become pretenders who venture out side their natural comfort zones and area of strength to compete and think what a man can do they can do better. they can't be further from the truth, the difference between men and women means they both have areas of natural expertise. The Swedish and Americans have begun ripping the folly of their intelligence. All the nations of feminist movement have come to report the increasing unhappiness of women even as their financial and economic status rise. |
MduZA:south Africa is the most status conscious African country and your Zulu, Bantu brothers are the most misguided, ignorant self-deluding usurpers in Africa. Read the ISS report about your ignrant backward government . |
bukatyne:By 1979, women could still balance the moderate demands of career and children. 35 to 40 years ago women were not pretending to be men. The earning power of women in 1979 is not the same today. The figures of single motherhood aren't the same as is the number of divorce. |
bukatyne:The research group says women where happier 35 years ago than they are today. Did you skip the lines. |
patches689:Ah! You're back from pap-break. Patches, I'm going to slap you hard across your meaty face!! Who's talking about objectives,eh, internet lawyer? Your SANDF was beaten black and blue into a retreat after severe losses they had to seek safe passage to flee. Your troops were defeated spectacularly. |
MduZA:political emotions, Zulu. Many yorubas have decried that Oba's statement. Funny thing is that South Africa isn't going to be even No.2 on the continent eventually. |
Vickybee:Your heated, animated reaction says otherwise. |
jl115:he did not. |
patches689:Your shameless denials in the face of overwhelming evidence is out of this world. You really are mixed, clerk. ******modified ******hey! Come back clerk, where are you going? |
patches689:lol, I think you're missing your Sunday pap. |
swaggzo:surprisingly, I think it's an overdose/abuse of the feminism pill. |
patches689:I know what you're up to, patches. Just know that it won't fly here. Our differences I just stated is our strength like no other in Africa. |
MduZA:they needn't deny it, my boy. They are stating their heritage which stand in sharp contrast to yours. I have caught you in other threads where you descended to the brainless savage you are and hate on Nigerians. So you're always having emotional diarrhoea wherever Nigeria is mentioned. I can't be a tribalist, my Zulu stooge. The reason the citizens of Nigeria stgand head above any African country is because of her tribal diversity. The yorubas alone with their literary and educational prowess , organisational skills are a threat, not to mention the entrepreneurial igbos who combine hardwork, education, mobility and risk-taking to colonise you in your very streets. Then the southern Nigerians who have the swagger and cosmopolitan heritage to morph into any society with great adaptability and sophistication. The Middle-belterns are a cultural and intelectual spread between the north and the South. |
Everyone wants the secret key to happiness, both men and women alike. Thus positive psychology seems to be the rage these days as everyone is searching for this elusive psychological land of Oz. So what can evolutionary psychology say about being happy? Humans are designed by God and evolution in a particular way for millions of years. No amount of debate, argument or denial can change our evolutionary legacy and heritage. One thing God has done through evolution is to make man and woman inherently different in many ways. One of the ways which men and women are different is what makes them HAPPY. Modern feminist movement has advocated that a better paying job, money and promotion and "equality" would promote women and consequently make them happy. These are lies fuelled by political and ideological leaning, and never on science or the bible. Promotions, money, political power and social status are unlikely to make a woman truly happy. Similarly, quitting their jobs, dropping out of the rat race and spending all their time with their children to become stay-at-home-dads is unlikely to make men happy. Money, power, respect, promotion, political power, social status and/plus/or a strong metaphysical belief is make makes a man happy. Can a woman be truly happy without children? It is very unlikely. Spending time with their Children and/or a strong metaphysical belief is what makes women truly happy. Women with wisdom look out for a clever way to combine career with motherhood and it is not the way the feminists tell us. Men and women are very different, because they are designed by millions of years of evolution to be very different. Women cannot become happy by pretending to be men, and men cannot become happy by pretending to be women. Swedes have already tried that, and they have failed massively and spectacularly. As Danielle Crittenden argues in her book,what our mothers didn't tell us: Why happiness eludes the modern woman women's TRUE happiness is in her reproductive and caring nature, both to her husband and children. Finally, modern feminism is evil because it ultimately makes women (and men) unhappy. In a forthcoming article in the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers of the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania show that American women over the last 35 years have steadily become less and less happy, as they have made more and more money relative to men. Women used to be a lot happier than men despite the fact that they made much less money than men. The sex gap in happiness (in women’s favor) has declined in the past 35 years as the sex gap in pay (in men’s favor) narrowed. Now women make as much as, sometimes even more than, men do. As a result, today women are just as unhappy, or even more unhappy than, men are. As I explained earlier, money does not make women happy. The feminist insistence that women behave like men and make as much money as men do may not be the sole reason for women’s rising levels of dissatisfaction with life; a greater incidence of divorce and single motherhood may also contribute to it. At any event, the culpability of modern feminism in making women steadily unhappy, because it is based on false assumptions about male and female human nature.. Surprising, Men’s happiness has not declined in the last 35 years, because there has not been masculinism. |
biafransoul:they're hiding in shame. |
MduZA:nope, you're going off to loot shops your fellow hungry savages just finished invading led by your commander in chief, the Zulu King. Those shops are owned by foreigners not South Africans. By the way, Nigeria has got more rich people than South Africa. Happy looting spree to the Zulu king and co. Laziness, docility, savagery have forever marked your legacy. Hope you noticed how your compatriots here a denying being blacks South Africans....when will you? ![]() |
EVarn:Hey,Chief, that was a nice slaughter for that Soweto czar. |
MikeCZAR:32 battalion of lies. Read up their website and see for yourself. You will realise that the average South African is military glory-thief. |
patches689:of course I wasn't keeping up I joined in yesterday. The debate was about overall for tank crews. And he successfully proved not all of your tank crew members are equipped with overalls from your own pictures as well as his. You denied they were mechanics . But the truth is your military are picture-loving and Press-hyping pretty boys who doesn'thave any clean military history. They get their "highs" in front of cameramen and cooked up propaganda from SANDF magazines, not in front of battle. |
patches689:the BBC still sites us as the most important country in Africa. Besides most of the tanks you fought with in that war were imported from the US and UK. All the powerful western countries helped you in the border war because of the worry Russia was promoting communism there, just as the Russians and Cuban were helping tiny Angola. Your history in nairaland is marked with denial and argument. You're not capable of honest debate. American were supplying your overhyped army with logistical supplies from its bases in Zaire. I'm not even taking of thousands of mercenaries. Go to sleep, patches. |
patches689:in otherwords, these menial jobs is what South Africans are competing with them over. The menial job is what got Edwards so disturbed and the Zulu king so concerned. Why can't you admit that foreign companies in South Africa finds majority of South African grossly incompetent just like the Anglo Dutch finds them not only as violent but also inefficient. As blacks move into Johannesburg, the whites scamper in fear into sandton suburbs. Tick tock says the BBC. |
MduZA:listen, I read 4 lines from your nonsensical post and left with the conclusion that your brain power is just as low as your Zulu king. Black South African should get better education and training and naturally they will get better employment . The Anglo Dutch prefers hiring foreign black national who has got better training and education than you laidback, drug-sniffing möröñ. Send your lamentations to BBC over the "ticking time bomb", i was only reporting what they published which is accurate anyway. |
MduZA:I don't expect you to agree to facts; it isn't in your nature. Whites do not complain because they are secure in their learning and education. Nigeria and Congolese, Ghanaians, Somalia a and Zimbabweans came into SA to take the jobs created by the fall of apartheid which you Zulu morons couldn't handle and unqualified to take. That's is globalisation, boy. Why is the ANC making it mandatory for 75% black representatives to be employed? That's insecurity. In South Africa the best pilots in your schools are traditionally meant to go into the air force while the average ones go into commercial flight. Well, since blacks do not come up tops despite their population, the ANC government are placing Zulu monkeys on the air force and directing whites to fly commercial. We pity your incompetent, blond government. Ticking time bomb BBC says. |
patches689:for once in your pathetic life admit being fvckec all over by agaugust. Stop killing this thread by your circle of stupid denials and lame repeatability. |
agaugust:hmm, simple few words and a pic that killed patches689 |
patches689:you lost the border war. Stop making reference to that. Besides CIA, America , British and west Germany ready made sure you never lacked logistical supplies but you lost still. |
jl115:you're correct, but your definition is also very narrow and strict. @mikeczar Anglo always stand for English either in relation to person or culture or institution. Dutch is always Dutch. Anglo-Dutch simply refers loosely to people of brtish and Dutch backgrounds. And the two major Europeans that built and run southafrica are the Dutch who chased the natives into caves and trees,lol, then came the English who conquered the Dutch and ruled as colonists. Yes we know other pockets of whites later came from Europe to settle in but their numbers are darn insignificant to change the term. All whites immigrating to SA either fell into the Dutch or English angle. And isn't Afrikaans are corrupt form of Dutch language, a pidgin variant. |
jl115:I like the 0 in front |
MduZA:that's yesterday's BBC news, keep deluding your dishonest self. |
MduZA:you are trolling in circles now and doing vian repeatisions. After reading the xenophobic attacks I posted now, you're still taking about Nigerians flocking into SA. Your Zulu king and president's son is asking foreigners to leave. Why is it that whites do not complain? It is because they are equipped and qualified hence they do not see foreigners as threat. But the feeding bottle-sucking overgrown black babies who can't look after themselves are murdering Congolese, Kenyans, Somalians for the fear of being left out of work. Which Europeans own Atlantic City in Nigeria. You're as desperate now as your besieged troops were in Angola in 1988. Stop talking nonsense. We have built the best economy and biggest in Africa and have the richest black people on earth. Our entrepreneurial skills is second to none on the continent. You're saving grace is that you're 50 million, Angola would have knocked you out of the ring a long time ago. The Anglo -Dutch remains your shield, Angola and Nigerians are your TRUE masters. Each xenophobic attacks is a depiction of your insecurity and incompetency. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 (of 224 pages)

