Martinez39s's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Martinez39s's Profile › Martinez39s's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 (of 238 pages)
DEMZEE:It's best to ignore the odious and histrionic clown; we don't quote its kind. Just like others before it, it will fade into oblivion and obscurity with time. For now, let it bask in its retardation as we starve it of attention. We can't stop it from having epileptic fits all over this thread, but when it is tired, it will take a rest. |
djon78:Good for him if he truly wants to understand female nature. |
Why can't someone just teach this Liverpool a lesson?
|
. |
ProphetJeroboam:Na their way. |
emmaodet:The lady was trying to play and bill the duck because konji got the duck, but the duck no send. He would rather stroke his meat watching xvideo and sleep in peace than entertain her shenanigans. ![]() The meme is derived from an older meme. Those who don't know the older meme won't understand. |
ProphetJeroboam:You needn't clarify for the sake of any troll. The true Gs got your message. Keep on bro. Life is a marathon for men, it is a sprint for women. |
heartofcity12:Loud it! Loud it!! Loud it!!!
|
ubunja:It is a shame seeing people plagiarising your work and printing them as books which they put up for sale on Amazon. |
You are being played by a bitch. Use your head. |
odinson1:One mistake that men make is thinking that certain simpish behaviours and pedestalization are harmless and can be excused just because the women they are dealing with are their wives and mothers of their kids. They see these positions as golden and sacred and they think the women in these positions are golden and sacred and hence are worthy of being simped for and pedestalized. They think doing these is understandable and can't be detrimental. If you point out what they are doing, you will likely hear "but it's my wife". They don't realise that the start of simping and pedestalization of a woman will always yield the same result no matter her position in your life eg. babymama, wife, girlfriend, side chick, or fùck buddy. Being your wife and mother of your kids won't impact her views and feelings when you start simping and pedestalizing her because female nature doesn't leave a woman when you marry her. No matter what, don't be a simp. |
chaloskyx: |
DominusPrime:You go wait gan. ![]() |
Dizzyyish:It is not uncommon for women to name their children after the alphas they got entangled with in the past... the guys they CHOSE. It sucks to be the beta whose child bears the name of your wife's ex; many men are in this situation, but they are unaware. It happens more than we think. God bless the red pill. |
Akinbahm: Correct guy. Na their way. Picking the parts of holy books that suits them and discarding the parts they don't like... all for their games and the female imperative. Also, you will see them twisting verses and making all sorts of rationalisation to align with their views and cunning. Don't mind them. |
ubunja:Exactly! I find this quality of theirs remarkable. Their persistence and stubbornness in playing their games and getting their egoistic and emotional fill are unrivalled. Do you know how childish, emotional, jobless OR retardèd one must be to engage in such behaviours? ![]() Anyway, it is what it is. Some people are just wired differently. ![]() |
Red pill 101.
|
![]()
|
ubunja:You should have asked the troll from the ashewo thread to answer if anyone forced him/her to click on this thread and what is preventing him/her from going to other threads with "matured" individuals or start such a thread himself/herself. People are weird. Just ignore the troll. As NeroStealth01 once said, "you can know who is not worth any attention from one or two posts." ![]() |
ShadowCracker:I will never understand why certain people from the ashewo thread who are not redpillers feel the compulsive urge to come to a red pill thread and constitute nuisance when they can simply go to other threads or create their preferred thread. They are here doing any of the following: (1) Trolling, (2) Trying to attack and bring down the red pill and/or redpillers, (3) Engaging in attention/relevance seeking behaviour by trying to show they are sharp and logical guys who understand what's up and ain't simps or bluepilled even though they don't identify as redpillers (talk about being enslaved to your ego). They even come with an antagonistic attitude towards redpillers' here and actively look for perceived loopholes in redpillers arguments and exploit them by writing rebuttals (even adding personal takedowns) to increase and improve their relevance, sense of accomplishment here and self-image; if they are ignorant enough, they even achieve this by looking for opportunities to play the moral and decency card (sometimes at certain redpillers' expenses) to uplift themselves, not knowing this is pointless and facetious in an amoral terrain. They even achieve their quest for attention/relevance by trying to be important and relevant contributors, play games, and compete with they perceive to be the hierarchy. Funny enough, they will never take out time to painstakingly do their due diligence on what the redpill is and recognise that this is a red pill thread, but they will jump in and start putting mouth in our discussions, rubbing shoulders with redpillers, trying to partake in the privileges of redpillers on their thread (even when they don't identify as redpillers) and speaking on the red pill as though they have a say & know what it's all about even though it is very obvious that they don't know much of what the red pill is and they are new to red pill spaces. Lest I forget, such fellows seem to get a kick from the "likes" and "shares" they get. When they unknowingly post things antithetical to what the red pill stands for or its principles and we blast them, they will insinuate we are not open-minded. SMH. (4) Mobilising others from the ashewo thread to help them in any of the above. (5) add yours Why is it that you will never see redpillers doing this nonsense in the ashewo thread or any other thread? Why can't these set of individuals visit other threads that align with how they think? Why choose to come here and play silly games? No matter how smart you think you are or what reasonable thing you write here and there, if you indulge in any of these nonsense, you are not worth being taken seriously here. This is why StillmàticOG will be the only person I respect in the ashewo thread even though he doesn't think highly of redpillers; he knows he doesn't roll with the red pill (I respect people's choices and opinions) and he decides to stay on his lane and stick to the thread that suits him and gives him what he wants. He has the attitude of minding his business and you won't see him here doing nonsense. SMH. |
Akinbahm:Ministry is fine. |
Akinbahm:This is their modus operandi: discard the parts that doesn't align with their crafy games while embracing the parts that align with their cunning games and female imperative. ![]() |
heartofcity12:They never get tired. |
Smartb0y: I only mention religion when it is necessary (ie. when it pertains to or help illustrate this thread's topics of interest). However, when it comes to issues such as the truth of the existence of God and the truthfulness and authenticity of the Holy books, I dodge them because they are not relevant to what we discuss... red pill is irreligious as it is amoral. *coughs* Stay chosen. |
heartofcity12:I edited the first paragraph of that post in case an error sent the wrong. Nevertheless, thanks. |
Martinez39s:The fact that this trick works on blue pill men shows something about men in their naivety: a man can love a woman despite her flaws as long as she is a decent and faithful human being at heart and he thinks she loves him as much as he loves her. But are women worth this compromise and delusion? Hell no! Never! Men ought to be realistic, have good standards, and ruthlessly put themselves first. Being a Christian doesn't mean you should overlook a woman's past, marry a post-wall woman or get yourself saddled with a "retired" thot/sperm bucket, or single mom. Being a Christian doesn't mean you must get another man's scrap. No matter how Jesus forgives a thot, there is no requirement for you to marry that thot. So don't let rubbish talk to lead you astray. Don't blindly listen to any pastor who claims to have heard from the Spirit that a certain lady is your wife; do your investigation. If she turns out to have a sordid past or is a post-wall woman, ignore your pastor. A loving God won't serve his child a "retired" hoe or scrap. Lastly, be careful of these religious girls, even the one that speaks in tongue. Anyone with a good little experience in life wouldn't see anyone, man or woman, in a favourable light just because they are religious or claim to be; take religious affiliation with a pinch of salt when judging people's moral uprightness and their dedication in following every rule in their holy book. I understand that people naturally judge from appearance. The religious girl that you think the Lord is leading you to or is decent is usually another man's hoe. As I have always said, one man's hoe, past or present, is someone else's nawalt somewhere. A Christian sister is somewhere accommodating d!ck while a Christian brother is somewhere thinking the Lord is leading him to her. |
Impressive! I am glad that people here are aware of how religion, particularly Christianity, can be weaponised to keep a man stuck in the matrix, make blue pill decisions, and fulfill the female imperative. > "Thou shall not judge", > "Anyone in Christ is a new creature, and old things have passed away", > "Let anyone without sin cast the first stone", > "Forgive, just as Christ forgave you" > "No one is perfect. Everyone has a past" > add yours The above list has been used by "retired" hoes and the church to make blue pill men overlook the sordid past of these hoes. Please, say no to retired hòes, nonvirgins, single moms, infertile women, feministic women, post-wall women, etc. Don't let any church or religious chick, especially one who falls in any of these categories, use any of the aforementioned quotes to beguile you into settling with any of these types of women. As the wall approaches, many women who have been hopping on d!cks during their younger years (and enjoying the company of bad boys) start trying to appear conservative, mature, and religious, and they plant their tents in churches hoping to fool and cuff a Christian brother with their religious/conservative affectations. Even when their pasts are told, under the pretence of regret, to these blue pill and simple men, these men are still exhorted or compelled to overlook the past using one of the quotes in my list. Since these quotes come from the bible, which is presumed to be the inspired word of the Almighty, these men think they are not doing anything wrong. SMH. The thing that makes me angry is that this brutal trick and fraud depends on and exploits the inherent capacity of men to genuinely love a woman in the ideal sense. It also exploits a natural and understandable mistake that men who are yet to take the red pill make: they unknowingly project they capacity to love, reciprocate love, psyche and virtues on women. It takes what it is good in a man and uses it against himself. This is why the red pill is very important. It's a cold world out there, even religious institutions don't have your back as a man in the intersexual dynamics. |
Skepticus:It's sad. Will Smith deserves better. I hope he takes the red pill and divorces her for his peace, no matter the cost. His only mistake which gives him so much pain and disgrace is that his blue pill mindset met Jada, Tupac's alpha widow. Let's not even talk about Jada's mother. ![]() Imagine sitting down with your wife and having the public see your wife telling you about her entanglement, how you can't satisfy her in bed or love her as she wants, etc. and you are laughing like a fool and agreeing with her. Jeez! I understand that the marital laws which gives her leverage can't be ignored, but sometimes you have to count your losses and move on. Anyway, it's easier said than done. |
Junnior:Good question! It depends and discretion must be applied. If you are walking on the road with your wife and someone insults her, you ignore the person and immediately tell your wife to ignore the person. Both of you should ignore and move on. If your wife decides to disobey you and confront the man, tell her that she would be on her own if worse comes to worse. The same applies if you are in other public places eg. Bank, restaurant, church, etc. Protection is a male traditional role and only traditional wives (who are submissive, OBEDIENT etc.) will get that. If the insult was said in your house or any event you are organising and presiding over (eg. a party etc.), don't get physical with the man, simply order him to leave immediately. Tell your wife to ignore. If the man works for you, fire him. Only confront the man if he is keeps following you two closely (not at a distance) and keeps harassing your wife. You do this by sternly warning him to back off and watch himself; do this with discretion. If you are in a dangerous area and he happens to be a thug closely following you and harassing your wife along or in a group, you should tell your wife to ignore and stay close to you. Tell her that if she falls to ignore, then she is on her own. There are more possible scenarios. If you have any, bring it up and I will advise you on what to do. I presumed that the wife wasn't at fault and didn't warrant such. I believe, before marriage, you must have discussed with your wife not go out and make trouble and rope you in, expecting you to come to her defence. ====== Only physically confront your fellow man if he tries to, or does, physically attack your wife or sexually harasses her. Deal with him if you can and apply discretion. Note that such protection are reserved for traditional wives since protection is a male traditional role. Don't risk your life or stress yourself protecting a woman that doesn't see you as the head of the house. Don't do such for a woman that disrespects you or sleeps with other men. Don't do such for a woman that sees it as inappropriate to cook your food and serve you the food. Don't protect a woman who goes about causing trouble with anyone; such a woman can get you killed or maimed by dangerous folks whose wrath she incurred. Only traditional wives should get your protection when it is warranted. Liberal wives should look out for themselves and call the police; only help out a liberal wife by calling the cops where need be. By the way, what is a redpiller doing with a liberal wife? ====== As for Will Smith, he should have known better the work of a comedian. Comedians can crack all sorts of joke they want. You have the right to be offended, but you don't have the right to have people not say things that you consider offensive. People have the freedom to express and say things you consider offensive, but you don't have the right to hit them. The best he could have done was speak to Chris Rock after the show. Besides, a wife like Jada is not worth the protection. The effort and love Will puts in for Jada will never be seen from Jada's end. Marrying a woman like Jada will drain you and cause you mental anguish. It's so sad that a high achieving man like Will who has a kind soul got entangled with a dysfunctional and crazy woman like Jada. |
luminouz:The person is probably a troll. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 (of 238 pages)
and she went offline. Since that day to this moment she always call me “fake Alfa” just because she failed to manipulate me in tying knot with her.
I find this quality of theirs remarkable. Their persistence and stubbornness in playing their games and getting their egoistic and emotional fill are unrivalled. Do you know how childish, emotional, jobless OR retardèd one must be to engage in such behaviours?
Red pill 101.