rohit200742:
Who's that Dad.. Every parents in the world loves their children more than their life.. they do anything for Us.. And this is some huge disappointment and disgusting.. By seeing these pictures, it's proved that his father is Mentally abnormal. Forced his dad in to the Prison by Immediate act.

No, not every parent. Most part of the world put their kids first but not in Nigeria. they'll tell you the bible says spare the rod and spoil the child.

This is a very bad photoshop work. Very poor skills.

Mellin:
first lemme see a note from your mother that certifies your father(black man) is the real one really gave birth to u. Then I will show u not just a note but my real self so we can sit and talk and know who is really mentally deranged

you walked right into that one. The god you claim to have seen seem to have replaced your brain with wool.
you know it's a lie, all the other Christians and Muslims here know you are lying because none of them can claim they've heard or seen God. so you're in a special situation which is fantasy land.

Mellin:
Do u really want to see the real God? Open ur 3rd eye. It's in the middle of ur forehead. I have seen, interact, play, joke with gods not with my naked eyes but my 3rd eye.

2ndly we are God. Forget everything about religion it's just a tool to enslave and control u.

Take your time to read my story on how I encountered the real God

www.nairaland.com/2338294/must-read-why-how-became

First, you and I know you are lying about seeing God. Let's get that out of the way.
But if you insist, I'll like to see a note from your Psychiatrist that gives you a clean bill of health.

coogar:


you are talking nonsense....
the laws of US/UK do not recognise a man can be räped.



•a woman cannot räpe a man in nigeria
•a husband cannot rape his wife in nigeria


irrelevant!
norway is neither in the US nor in the UK. and i don't think norway is in nigeria


her räpe charge was re-amended to sexual assault. she is going down for assault, not räpe.



cierra ross was charged with sexual assault, not räpe. sexual assault is a less serious offence like a man touching a woman's breäst. even though she forced him to have intercourse with her at gunpoint, she was only charged with sexuäl assault. reverse the roles and the man would be charged with räpe.

that's the difference you are refusing to see...

australia isn't also in the jurisdiction i mentioned earlier. this is also irrelevant to the discourse.



i wish it was that simple!
when women get drunk & have sex - someone must have taken advantage of her.

when men get drunk & have sex he must definitely be a räpist! the law is an asś.

Here is the us defination of r@pe http://www.justice.gov/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape
couldn't find that of UK.

But please, show me why you are convince those two countries defines r@pe as just a male thing. I'll need to see the law you're referencing.
I hope we have some lawyers here from US and UK to help put this to rest.

as for cierra ross, you realize there was another woman in that story? I assume that second woman got the r@pe sentencing.

omartins:


Truly the dethrone king beat his wife but the acid aspect is staged, she is alive.
After she was used and dumped she regretted her actions, she is one of the points the case is still in court.
For your information, I know the woman and the dethrone king's lawyer.

any man who beats a woman is not worth his salt. divorce her and let her go her way.

byrron:


http://livefootballvideo.com/streaming/world/womens-world-cup/sweden-w-vs-nigeria-w

Your link has a Trojan on it.

RYANAYO:
watch live at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_GrM_MUM0o

why would someone want to watch this rubbish feed with unknown elements at the back?

Here we go!

byrron:
just watching a documentary now on Lotta, the lady that will be striking for the Swedish female national team against the falcons, she is really good and our defenders should really do a thorough job on her but she looks unstoppable.

Not just the prolific Lotta Schelin, they also have Nilla Fischer. we should be sh%$ing our pants now. I just hope they pity us

lusciouslex:
When two Lesbians fight, the lubricant suffers. Am looking forward to seeing super busty women with deadly curves do some hard tackling, stretching, bending and running. How I wish am part of the coaching crew either as a security or a cleaner. #team vaseline, #team women football.

go away... let's celebrate the sport and not your dirty mind

mattodunsi:
What i learnt when i was younger was that if the reigning king is not dead, there can never be emergence of new one. How come the rule is now breaking at will now. Moreso, i thought there are traditional way of selecting king through a king maker, but am suprised that governor has now turned to king maker. Could it be that king making is more of political now than traditional?

look at history, if a king is deposed, the kingdom appoints new king.

original poster, sorry to ask, but what's a "staunch on the back"?

Mogidi:
HYPOCRISY!!

If a dwarf can't rule Akure why is Prof Yeye Osinbanjo ruling Nigeria?

mumu... do you know the definition of a dwarf? yet, you guys would call yourself Christians or Muslims. doesn't your book say all are equal before your god?

Eurosport is showing it live.

dalaman:


The books of James and Jude were both written in the 2nd Century by Christians and not the brothers of Jesus. Authorship was given to those names but they never wrote down those books.

No. most biblical scholars agree the book of James and Jude were written in the 1st century and most of them think James and Jude has something to do with it (it could have been written or dictated by them or by their direct disciple) not by a disciple of a disciple that.

Mind you, I'm not saying any of the events they have in those book are true. in fact, I think most of the writers in the new testament pulled it right out of their back side because the historical events they have in the book are sometimes 5-10 years away from the mark.

before the Muslims here come and say their book is more superior I'll say shove it! Yours is based on a book that's made of lies (the bible), with the ridiculous stories in the bible filtered a little. zero x zero still equals zero.

coogar:


in which country?
you are talking rubbish - in the US/UK and even in nigeria.......a woman cannot legally räpe a man. most countries do not recognise a man can be räped by a woman.

the only time women get done for räpe is if the victim is a child(statutory räpe) or she's an accomplice to another male räpist. don't come here talking about what you have no clue about. the worst a woman can get is sêxual assault.

I'm fairly certain the laws in US, UK and Europe defines räpe the same way or has been amended to cover both genders. So the person talking rubbish here is you sir.

About Nigeria, I'm not sure, but it would not come as a surprise considering the mentality of most Nigerians. Some Nigerians can't even understand what r@pe is. That's why some people find it difficult to understand how a man can r@pe his wife. Most Nigerian men consider their wife a property.

The case against Cierra Ross in US comes to mind. I remember first hearing about it on the radio here in Ukraine and the bigot dj thought it was funny - it was in the "strange news" part of the news bulletin.

here are some cases to educate yourself -

Norway - Woman jailed for räping man -
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/apr/28/2

US - Seattle woman pleads guilty to attempted räpe of sleeping man -
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/seattle-woman-guilty-rape-sleeping-man-article-1.2229559

US the case of Cierra -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2414136/Cierra-Ross-25-accused-forcing-man-gunpoint-sex-friend.html

Australia - Woman, 39, accused of breaking into house and r@ping man
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2118300/Rebecca-Helen-Elder-accused-raping-man-breaking-house-stand-trial.html

Bottom line, don't do anything drunk - don't drive, don't go swimming, don't go partying...

coogar:


the law says its räpe....
but logically, it's harsh on the guy. if the woman is too drunk to give consent, why does the law assume the man must always be sober? when guys get drunk & girls sleep with them, how come the women don't get slapped with a rape charge?

The law says it is and logic says it is too.
I've seen countless cases where men accuse woman of räpe, it goes to court and they win.

coogar:


it depends on what you consider räpe...
we have been told there's räpe räpe & theres grey räpe and all other different flavours.

a guy & a babe went out clubbing. they were both drunk, they had sex. the next morning, the girl regretted what happened & then alerted the cops. is that rape to you?

In the scenario above, yes, it is räpe.
never do anything drunk - that advice would save you some gray hairs

starlingslimnet:
Well I must say this is justice pursued at it's highest course.It seems to me Ladies are meticulous beings sometimes their emotional derangement and physical instability coupled their medulla oblangata to reject simple sense.It takes me with much surprised that even beings with such beauty have in them not a iota of wisdom suffice to say their paragmalophobic nature has succeeded in transforming the entity of their personality to a beframe of nonentity.It serves her well hope others will learn

Prof Wole Soyinka, is that you? make you see me see grammar!

mustymatic:

The people who wrote the Bible neva met, seen, or
talked to Jesus? Who are Matthew, Luke, Paul?
Paul who? Matthew who? they don't even kno their
Bible had anonymous writers wit no surname. they
record "according to" even in d modern world it'll
not be accepted, only Christians. . ... different
versions, who wud follow that for God sake?

Paul never met Jesus. He never did. period! Mathew, that wrote the first book of the new testament never met Jesus. He is basically retelling the stories from Mark and didn't meet Jesus. The writer of Mark is not the same as Mark the Evangelist.The writer of Luke is not the same as Luke the Evangelist. All those books were written 30 to 80 years after Jesus. The only books in the bible possibly written by someone who knew or met Jesus is James, written by Jesus's younger brother James, and his And Jesus's 3rd brother Jude. that's it.

malvisguy212:
from the op:
Polytheism is a belief that multiple gods
created the universe. Even though this
could be true, the universe is one. In
fact, the word "uni-means one." There is
only one universe and the entire
universe is subject to the same laws and
is connected to the whole. Therefore, it is more likely that only One Being created the one universe.

actually, you are wrong. Some scientist think we have a multiverse or parallel universes.

malvisguy212:
what kind of evidence do you want? Is it possible to proved God does not exist?

The burden of proof is on you. You're claiming 100% certainty so we'll like to see your evidence.

Like the great Christopher Hitchens said "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof"

This proves religion only brings evil.

miraakas123:
[b]No one can tell us with certainty what tomorrow's weather will be except the one who causes it - God - but by listening to the weather report or looking at the sky, people use their eyes and their brains to at least make an educated guess about tomorrow's weather. Likewise, no one can tell us with certainly when the exact timing of Jesus' return will be except the one who will cause it to happen, God the Father (Mt. 12:36), but by listening to the right information sources, people can use their eyes and their brains He Is Called Faithful and True to at least make an educated guess about how close we are to the return of Jesus Christ. Jesus said that when you see certain things begin to happen, "Look up and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near," and "when you see them happen the kingdom of God is near" (Luke 21:28,31). Jesus and Paul both taught that the proper way to wait for His return is to therefore be watchful, ready and sober (Matthew 24:42-44,25:13; 1 Th. 5:6).[/b]

You should go see a doctor.

finofaya:


You missed the mark everywhere, tbh. I can only address the first two paragraphs however, which fortunately contain the major errors.

The agnostic claim that God cannot be known borders on the means through which we can obtain knowledge of God. You didn't address that in your OP. You focused instead on asking why God wouldn't want to reveal himself. Skirting past the fact that you left your questions unanswered, I'm happy to point out that the agnostic claim is not affected by any supposed desire by God to reveal himself. Imagine that God is by definition invisible. Would any degree of longing on his part make us able to see him?

There is the over arching agnostic claim that it is impossible to have certainty, given that we can only attempt to confirm one subjective experience by another subjective experience.

I think you'll get better results explaining this to a cat. Being religious means being ignorant. they've closed all leaning avenues and blindly follow illogical scriptures that defies common sense.

Phizzlephizz:


First, with the bolded statement above are you saying you acknowledge the fact these superstitions are most true but Atheist just don't belief in such. Bro if you say money ritual don't work permit me to say who ever told you that take him down to ijebu-ode and see if it would work or not and belief me he wouldn't have to be killed to make u money. The truth is you know money rituals work but you just don't belief in such,so is our stands as Christians. So I would tell it to you that you Atheist know God exists and is alive but the religion you've chosen teaches you to believe otherwise as our religion(christianity) teaches us to believe in God our creator and every other thing that doesn't glorify him we don't believe in but that doesn't mean we do not acknowledge the fact that such things exist.
And bro there are other things in article let's touch it or wat do u think

You are a confused man as I can see. That's what religion do to your brain. Atheists don't believe in superstition because like your religion, they are made up by men to deceive or control others. Because you believe in a God that can automagically bring things into existence doesn't mean he is true.

What exactly do you think you have in life as a believer that I as an atheist don't have? I can see you lack any sense of morality or decency so it would be interesting to know what your wasted time buys you.

mpowa:


The problem with knowledge is that it ends in foolishness, I mean, how many things can you prove really? Many people in modern times pride themselves of being enlightened, the Jews ask for a sign, the Greek wants wisdom ( like science), but we preach Christ is crucified. Life becomes meaningful only for those who have faith God. Even the science most people hide under ( as cover to runaway from God) has a lot of loopholes, I mean, you need more faith to believe in the evolution story than the Bible - since we've known, no body have seen ape coming close to becoming human beings, and the incredible story of giraffe growing a long neck while eating leaves from trees?

But science have in many times discovered the truths of the bible after laborious years of research, example for many years people believed that the world was flat, while the bible have simple stated it in many places that the earth is round (example isah 40:22, job 26:10). and all the things happening in the world now don't surprise us (Christians) because we know what the future holds, how the world will end, the wiser thing to do is to just have faith, but I guess, most people want it the harder way, the feeling of challenge, of wisdom - Life is CHOICE.

Please drop it. No scientist in their right mind would claim the earth is a circle. A circle, by definition is a flat surface. verses you listed said nothing about a round earth because the same authors in the same book claim either 4 corners or 4 edges of earth, or pillars in their book(Isaiah 11:12 and Job 38:13 ). Pick a ball and try to find its 4 corners. You see how absurd it is?

Next claim please.

bukatyne:


How would I explain without the Bible when that is the basis of my belief?

You see how silly that argument is now. Don't you?
Science on the other hand proves your bible is nothing but fabrication.

Darevofpeace:
For you peeps that do not believe in the existence of God,I have just one question two questions for you. For always attacking the Supreme being you have never seen and denying his existence, it does shows you believe he is very real and that one day you would be made to face him one on one. To help you,as a person I believe in God because I have seen his power demonstrated in my little life on earth far beyond any religious hearsay. If after my death and I got to heaven and I met God in absence,I. e not existing, I loose nothing but you atheist, here on earth you said he is not real, but if you also die like everyone is destined to, and you got to heaven and you are to face him personally in judgment, Chai! you are in real double suit. Because you are damned already. Shalom.

You are basically making a wager that there's god. In this case Pascal's Wager. The argument has like 1 million holes in it.
Let's say you are right there is God and heaven. What would you do when you get there and find out he is one of the Hindu gods - let's say Shiva for argument sake. What would be your excuse to Shiva? Have in mind Hinduism predate any religion.

Danhumprey:
Do we have real atheist in Nigeria? Or just bunch of confused people parading themselves as atheists?

What would you define as "Real Atheist"? I was a "born again" and I've been an atheist for 20 years. convinced by science and nature.