Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do God Have To Create People GAY? Why? by MostHigh: 2:28pm On Nov 06, 2013 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do God Have To Create People GAY? Why? by MostHigh: 2:26pm On Nov 06, 2013 |
Gombs: Ok you win...can you now stop derailing? Nothing to win here.  You are also guilty of derailing as you call it.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do God Have To Create People GAY? Why? by MostHigh: 1:37pm On Nov 06, 2013 |
Gombs: Elijah is not john the baptist, neither is john the baptist. That John the baptist was sent in the spirit of Elijah does not mean Elijah was to reincarnate. It meant john the baptist will function in the likelihood of Elijah with same zeal and prophetic auction.
past sin...they were asking Jesus who knew berra, they asked according to Judaism, and not Christianity.
I'm from a spiritual israel, where are you coming from? As above so below  if you are spiritual Isreal then you must manifest as Isreal in the flesh, stop imagining things that are not  Just a reminder yashua practiced judaismPaul practiced judaismAs did all the desciples and apostles as is testified by scripture, which one come be your own  You are practicing christianity  The Christopagan nation is the seat of SATAN  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do God Have To Create People GAY? Why? by MostHigh: 1:17pm On Nov 06, 2013 |
Gombs: Abeg...reincarnation is not biblical, don't even bring up the case of whr d bible said Elijah shall reappear as an excuse...go study it tho Only Elijah? What about the man that was born blind? The desciples asked if it was because of his past sin or his parents sin how can past sins warrant him being born blind? We are coming from an isrealite background, where are you coming from?  Ignorance is no excuse.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do God Have To Create People GAY? Why? by MostHigh: 12:52pm On Nov 06, 2013 |
obadiah777: hey brother MostHigh its been like forever mayneeeeeeeeee where you been hiding at chief ? trust all is well ? abi you are hibernating in the cold lol. good to see you again bros  Same here Sire. Been ontop of mount hermon doin some meditation Sire  But it can get lonley up there so I have decided to come back down |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do God Have To Create People GAY? Why? by MostHigh: 12:48pm On Nov 06, 2013 |
obadiah777: reincarnation is real whether you choose to accept it or not. everything i have put up there is biblical. whatever was locked into your spiritual dna in past life due to your deeds and actions will express itself when you are reborn. The keyword here Sire is spiritual DNA.  As you sow so shall you reap. Top of the morning to you Sire. |
Christianity Etc › Re: REVELATIONS Chapter 13! (discussion Thread) by MostHigh: 10:14am On Nov 03, 2013 |
Abu Mikey:
The United Nations is the last super-power of Earth.
In Daniel Chapter 2 Legs of iron with feet of iron and clay
Interpretation given: A fourth kingdom, strong as iron. The feet and toes partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, show it shall be a divided kingdom.
The Feet and Toes represents the United Nations.
The Roman kingdom is the last Gentile power to rule the earth.  Rome= dragon Papal Vatican and by extension the holy roman empire = Beast America is just an Image of the beast, a facist Sh1tstem.  |
Health › Re: Lagosians In Highbrow Areas May Be Drinking Own Faeces –investigation by MostHigh: 4:40pm On Nov 02, 2013 |
obadiah777: i hear ya bruv. i tried to get into that football thing. i just cant. the whole football culture i find extremely irritating 1-the idolatry ( even village men in naija wear football jerseys idolizing europeans who look down on them ) 2-the extreme capitalism of it. paying an id-iot half a million pounds a week for kicking a ball 3-too many caucasians in it ( not saying i am racist but i see enough of them as it is. i dont need to watch them kicking a ball on tv ) 4-the yob culture and violence and drunkeness that comes with it
lol ermm yup, i find the whole thing extremely annoying. but thats just me lol  The edomite soldiers did the same with the severed head of John the Baptist, play football that is.  "And we shall create for them enchantments and the like that we may control their minds." An excerpt from the protocols of the learned elders of Zion. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Jesus Was A Total Complete Utter Failure! by MostHigh: 4:23pm On Nov 02, 2013 |
Alfa Seltzer: Jesus’ mission on earth was to modify Judaism for the Jews, as their Messiah. In Matthew 15, Jesus said: “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” And, in Matthew 10, Jesus told his disciples: “Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
Now, given that very few Jews converted to Christianity, so few that Paul later put the focus almost entirely on Gentiles (non-Jews), it becomes apparent that Jesus failed in his primary mission. But, not only did he fail to convert many Jews, he also failed to foresee that failure. Remember that in Christian dogma, Jesus is a god and can foresee the future: “Now I tell you before it come, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that I am he (John 13:19).”
Now, recall that the Jews were fully primed to expect a Messiah; they were told in the Old Testament that the Messiah would be one of them, a Jew, and would lead them to renewed greatness in the world. They should have been eager to accept a reasonably convincing candidate.
Further, Jesus was born into, and spent virtually his entire ministry in Jewish lands. He also took special care to act in ways which would fulfill Old Testament prophesies concerning the Messiah. In entering Jerusalem, for example, to accord with scripture: “And Jesus, when he had found a young ass, sat thereon; as it is written (John 12:14).”
Interestingly, the Gospels disagree on just what Jesus rode, but all were trying to make the passage fit what they thought the Old Testament called for. John says Jesus rode on an ass, Mark and Luke say he rode on a colt, while Matthew says he rode on both an ass and a colt . . . somehow.
The Gospels also claim that Jesus was regularly followed by great crowds of mostly Jews. For example, Luke 12 reads: “In the mean time, when there were gathered together an innumerable multitude of people, insomuch that they trode one upon another, he began to say unto his disciples first of all . . . “
Tens of thousands of Jews must have been eyewitnesses to his sermons and miracles. Yet, they were largely unconvinced. Many would have seen him turn water into wine, heal the sick, cast out demons, and resurrect the dead. Why didn’t the word travel like wildfire throughout the Jewish world of this miracle worker, a hero of their own, given all those eye witnesses?
According to Judaism, Jesus was seen as a false Messiah by the Jews in part because he was not an ordinary human being, as was prophesied, but claimed to be a “son of god.” Perhaps those early stories about Jesus and his miracles “oversold” him?
Whatever the reasons, so few Jews bought into the Jesus-as-Messiah story that Paul decided to concentrate on spreading the “Good News” to the Gentiles instead. Of course, the Jews’ rejection of Jesus doesn’t prove he wasn’t the son of god, but it should raise a very large red flag. Something very strange is going on here. Think about it: The son of god was sent to god’s chosen people and they largely rejected him, so god didn’t get what he wanted? How can such a story make sense to anyone?
According to the words of the Bible, it seems pretty clear that Jesus not only failed to convert the Jews, largely, but he also failed to foresee that he would fail. Does this sound like the work of a god to you? Ignorance is not an excuse.  You have been warned, now is judgement time. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Jesus Was A Total Complete Utter Failure! by MostHigh: 4:17pm On Nov 02, 2013 |
|
Fashion › Re: Worm-infested Weaves Now In The Market by MostHigh: 5:23pm On Oct 30, 2013 |
trendystuf: Irene Myangoh, a personal assistant working at a law firm in Nairobi went to an upmarket hair salon along Kenyatta Avenue, and spent more than N5,500 on a human hair weave. Two weeks later she started suffering from severe headache that would not go away. She would wake up with severe headache at night. She went to a private doctor who gave her drugs for the relief of mild to moderate pain of inflammatory origin with or without fever; they would only work for a few hours and then the headache would be back worse than even before. Desperate, she went to see a specialist who did blood tests and even a brain scan. All the tests were negative but the headache persisted, making her unable to concentrate at work and sleeping very poorly. She went back to her doctor who decided to examine her scalp and under the beautiful weave he found worms!
The worms were burrowing into her skull and after sending the samples to the lab they found that the hair had eggs from which the worms had Irene had to shave after this ordeal and took antibiotics for two weeks. Elsewhere, 16-year-old girl from Buruburu, a Nairobi surburb, also suffered the same fate but unfortunately for her she died. Cobweb eggs were found in her hair after she died.
There was a profound cobweb design in her weaved hair. She dropped dead after constant headaches. The root cause? The weave had unnoticed spider eggs. The warmth produced after weaving provided a very conducive environment for the eggs to hatch. A spider grew in her scalp and bit her. The poison found its way to her blood. She could not survive the attack.
http://trendysturvs..com/2013/10/weaves-alert-worm-infested-hair-from.html http://www.stelladimokokorkus.com/2013/10/check-your-weaves-ladiesworm-infested.html And I shall smite with a scab the head of the daughters of zion.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Could Jesus Easily Keep The Law, But We Can't by MostHigh: 2:48pm On Oct 25, 2013 |
okeyxyz: Jesus was speaking into the future(ie: prophetic). The master he was referring to was not himself pre-crucifixion but himself post-crucifixion. The pre-crucifixion christ was the Law in flesh, the post-crucifixion christ was the spirit(liberty from the law) in flesh. Though the same physical entity, they are different personalities. Just like you going to school, then graduation and moving on to professional life: You are the same physical entity but different personalities, different experiences, different expectations. Are you saying yashua Ibn Joseph practiced LAWLESSNESS "post crucifixion as you put it". Pure sorcery.  My guy check am now, you are not making any sense pre and post crucifixion.. what the.......  These are doctrines of decievers AKA demons Go back and read the masters words again he never made any claim of having a multiple personality disorder, So how come its so easy for you to make such a claim. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Could Jesus Easily Keep The Law, But We Can't by MostHigh: 9:24am On Oct 25, 2013 |
okeyxyz: Firstly, you are not meant to be like Jesus.
Jesus was able to keep the laws perfectly because he was the physical incarnation of the law itself. He had perfect understanding of it, lived as the law and died as the law, thereby fulfilling it. After this fulfillment, then paves the way for the abolishing of the law, so no christian is expected to meet the obligations of the law anymore. It is abolished and you are free. So the Jesus you should follow is not the one who lived as the law of Moses, but the one who rose from the dead and lives as the law of liberty through the true spirit of God. They are not the same christ: The one who kept the law died, another rose from the dead. (2 Corinthians 5:16) In respose to the bolded.... To be exactly as your master is the ultimate goal of any disciple in any culture worldwide. This is true of the Isrealitish culture as well. Not knowing the true meaning of descipleship is no excuse for you blasphemous statement, you have recieved your reward already. That being said I would like to know how you personally validate your descipleship If living as the master lived is not the standard then what is? You are truly a child of the little horn.  Lawless man. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Could Jesus Easily Keep The Law, But We Can't by MostHigh: 9:19am On Oct 25, 2013 |
Goshen360: Who told you Jesus did not break the law? Jesus broke the law yet, he did not sin.  Complete Madness. An Inherently satanic statement.  Stop decieving the children. Is sin not transgression of the law? why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing. |
Christianity Etc › Re: God Is Not The God Of All. by MostHigh: 5:15pm On Oct 23, 2013 |
Tgirl4real: lol
Hello bro Most high. 
And I see Mr. President too.
This no is finally getting complete.  My beloved sistah.  Greetings in the name of the most high God. I trust all tins cool with ya.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: REVELATIONS Chapter 13! (discussion Thread) by MostHigh: 4:43pm On Oct 23, 2013 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: God Is Not The God Of All. by MostHigh: 4:08pm On Oct 23, 2013 |
Mr President: Greetings Sire!
yaya kwana biyu?  Kwana dubu. Ka je ka buya a wani waje kuma ko you have been Dragon slaying I am sure. |
Christianity Etc › Re: REVELATIONS Chapter 13! (discussion Thread) by MostHigh: 4:06pm On Oct 23, 2013 |
obadiah777: exactly as it is written bros. its like reading the blueprint to the world and its future. Like a time machine bro.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: God Is Not The God Of All. by MostHigh: 4:04pm On Oct 23, 2013 |
Mr President: My Mammy be a rich woman!  Presidooooooooo. Greetings Sire  |
Christianity Etc › Re: God Is Not The God Of All. by MostHigh: 4:00pm On Oct 23, 2013 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: REVELATIONS Chapter 13! (discussion Thread) by MostHigh: 3:51pm On Oct 23, 2013 |
obadiah777: my brother on the money as usual. top of the morning to ya chief MostHigh  Blessed Sire woa gwan over there.  We have to say it as it is no time for fear. The Image of the beast that the over 2billion people worship is the BLOND HAIRED BLUE EYED JESUSYashua never appointed no assistant or vice (ponder on this well well all) but rome claims the title the assistant of the son of God AKA vicarius fillie dei. The whole purpose of this title is to further subjugate the masses. Each pastor and head of church has automatically recieved this title from the vatican seeing its the same type of shop they all run.. A heiriachial sh!tstem.  excuse my french. There is no heirachy amongst the sons of God, only gifts and talents. Vicariuis= vicar= vice Fillie dei=son of God =Yashua Hence vicarius fillie dei= vice of the son of God=satan himself VICARIUS FILLIE DEI IN ROMAN NUMERALS SUMATES TO 666 |
Christianity Etc › Re: God Is Not The God Of All. by MostHigh: 3:43pm On Oct 23, 2013 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: REVELATIONS Chapter 13! (discussion Thread) by MostHigh: 10:42am On Oct 23, 2013 |
The name of the beast is this dispensation and time is Democracy .  like My brother has siad the roman numerals are a key part of this revelation and they all sumate to 666. The roam empire is the cradlebed of democracy. |
Health › Re: What Is The Alternative To Handshake? by MostHigh: 3:07pm On Oct 21, 2013 |
ChiSun27: Sincerely from my heart...I want to stop shaking people...the stuff I saw yesterday actually wanted to make me regurgitate. It was quite appaling to the eyes.
Saw someone yesterday sneezing and blowing catarrh with his bare hands and afterwards rubs the hands together.
And I was like, "sheeeey this guy go still carry this hand go shake person".
So since that yesterday...I have been finding it difficult shaking peeps.
My question is; how can one avoid hand shakes? Why not chop knuckle instead, AKA the hamfist.  At least that way you have an outstreched hand as well.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: There Will Be Slavery In Heaven So I Hope Yall Are Ready To Own White Slaves by MostHigh: 2:52pm On Oct 21, 2013 |
obadiah777: revelation 13 vs 10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.
jeremiah 30 vs 16 Therefore all they that devour thee shall be devoured; and all thine adversaries, every one of them, shall go into captivity; and they that spoil thee shall be a spoil, and all that prey upon thee will I give for a prey.
this is the lords program. i cant do anything about it even if i wanted to  Its called karma Sire.  As you sow so you reap Whats good with ya Sire, Lang Lang time.  And before you ask, I had to take an extended break from nairaland. The Scoffers are to blame Sire  . How is your endzzz brother. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is The New Testament Rightly Labeled New Testament? by MostHigh: 3:43pm On Oct 20, 2013*. Modified: 4:15pm On Oct 20, 2013 |
maximunimpact: @op d new/old testament dichotomy depends on d translation u ar using. Some other bible translation rightly separated it as ''the hebrew scriptures'' and the ''christian greek scriptures''. There is notin like old or new testament, all scriptures is inspired by God and its beneficial 4 teaching, correction, 4 settin tins straight........ So 4get abt d new/old diachy, its either the hebrew scriptures written in Hebrew language, or the Greek scriptures written in Greek language. Make ur research u will find a bible version dat xplains dis. Spot on. smiley Now if only they would heed to your voice and see reason, and the most high would heal them. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is The New Testament Rightly Labeled New Testament? by MostHigh: 6:48pm On Oct 19, 2013 |
Joshthefirst: please tell us where the bible says the order of melchizedek is for all believers? The question you should be asking rather is if you yourself as a professed believer are a king priest.  And if peradventure your answer is yes then what is the name of the order to which you belong.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is The New Testament Rightly Labeled New Testament? by MostHigh: 5:26pm On Oct 19, 2013 |
dami_paul: An access we didn't have until Jesus died and ascended to heaven. Besides, before we start bringing Melchizedec into this communion let's remember this; Heb 7:17 For it is declared: "You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek."[t]
18 The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless 19 (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.
20 And it was not without an oath! Others became priests without any oath, 21 but he became a priest with an oath when God said to him: "The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind: 'You are a priest forever.'"[t]
22 Because of this oath, Jesus has become the guarantor of a better covenant.
23 Now there have been many of those priests, since death prevented them from continuing in office; 24 but because Jesus lives forever, he has a permanent priesthood. The priesthood of Melchizedek is untransferable, not to humans or anybody but to only Jesus who lives forever and intercedes daily on ourbehalves Why do the heathens rage and the people imagine a vain thing?.  The order of Melchizedek is for all true believers. For he has made us kings and priests unto our God. If I remember correctly Melchizedek is a King Priest. Correct us if we are wrong.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is The New Testament Rightly Labeled New Testament? by MostHigh: 10:50am On Oct 19, 2013 |
Alwaystrue: ^^^^^^ Pondering a little on what you said and you are right. Moses had to veil his face in the first place as Hebrews attested so he was behind the veil also the priests were the only ones that had access to behind the veil from time to time till it was rent in 2. Nice.
No wonder even Paul could understand this well due to his being a Pharisee himself. Acts 23:6. Surprisingly Jesus sent a pharisee to preach to gentiles but He had given a teaser in Matthew 13:52. True words.  Things new and old indeed... spirit and truth can never be seperated Also what this means by extension is that at the death on the cross as the veil was rent all of us were presented with equal opportunity to be as Moses, Elijah Arron and the host of heaven. Living an examplery life of self sacrifice. these ones saw God face to face, as in behind the veilThese ones were set Apart, Holy, Qoudesh.  These are the sons of the most high God.  The order of melchizedek. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is The New Testament Rightly Labeled New Testament? by MostHigh: 9:09am On Oct 19, 2013*. Modified: 9:32am On Oct 19, 2013 |
ayoku777: Hmm, so Aaron and Moses didn't need the death and resurrection of Christ to find justification? Jesus only died for the 'rest of us'? The Order of Melchizedek and hence the priesthood of Melchizedek and all the sacrifices pertained therein predate the birth of yashua. Yasua Ibn joseph and all his true followers are of the order of Melchizedek.  Your statement is that none could perceive what was behind the veil before it was rent from top to bottom. And my response is, that is completely false.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is The New Testament Rightly Labeled New Testament? by MostHigh: 8:07pm On Oct 18, 2013 |
ayoku777: Hmm, food for thought bro. What really puts me off is the pride many have. We argue doctrine like there's a trophy.
Simple truth is this, the passover (the sacrifice of the lamb) is the first feast of the Lord. When did the passover of the new covenant take place? Coz that is when the new covenant was 'launched'. And it took place on the cross.
If the new covenant was inforce anytime before the death of Christ and the shedding of his blood, why wasn't the veil torn before then? The old covenant was inforce until the cross.
Goshen, dogmatism is the pride we have in the church. In answer to the bolded question.... The veil you speak of was non existent for some such as Aaron and Moses, the elect.  With the coming of Yashua and by his exemplary sacrifice the number of the same elect has increased exponentially.  It is the priesthood that has been changed and not the Law Different priesthood different ordinances that's all. The elect are of the order of Melchizedek. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is The New Testament Rightly Labeled New Testament? by MostHigh: 10:26am On Oct 17, 2013*. Modified: 11:01am On Oct 17, 2013 |
Alwaystrue: Daniel 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time
Daniel 7:25 fully makes sense to me now...it just dropped into my spirit and clicked....
1. trying to belittle Jesus's (THE WORD OF GOD) Life and work on earth, 2. recycling questions and scorning the saints thus trying to make them derail 3. trying to change the law of God 4. thinking to change the time when the New Testament began.
What more?! Its called changing of times and traditions of the most high God That is the chief calling of the little Horn.  |