₦airaland Forum

boyjo:
My guy, GOD bless you.
My guy, you are blessed. Infact
My guy, GOD bless the day our path cross.

boyjo:
E yah, this one frontal lobe don disappear commot.

boyjo:
Do not take the vaccine o

MagicBishop
Slap44

Please hep spread the news.

boyjo:
Why are almost all Mega Churches in Nigeria silent on Endtime Message?

Like...the thing dey baffle me anyhow.

Shey na politics cause am?

GIANTPLUSHUB:
This year took a lot of our intellectual people. The year should end already joor. Rest in peace sir!

thinkmoney:
What's your point exactly? I have only quoted Bible above

Do you want to rewrite the Bible?

What does it mean when the Bible says "ALL THINGS WERE CREATED BY HIM".

Who created Hevean and Earth? Answer: GOD

Jesus said in

Revelation 1:8 "I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty."

Has plain English become too hard for an English speaker?

DappaD:
The illustration of the rich man and Lazarus is completely symbolic which means it has an underlying meaning. There's a reason why it's always referred to as a PARABLE
So since the rich man and Lazarus symbolizes the Pharisees and the common man who was spiritually hungry, their deaths are also symbolic and not literal.
If you insist it's meant to be understood literally then please answer the following questions for me.
1. Since the rich man died and was buried, why wasn't Lazarus buried? So angels normally carry people after they die now?
2. What did Lazarus do to merit going to Abraham's bosom and what wrong did the rich man commit? Because the account simply said that the rich man received good things and there was no mention of any crime he did.
3. Does one NOW become acceptable to God by listening to the Mosaic Law or by obeying Jesus Christ?
Of course there's nothing else you have to say on the issue that's why you keep clamouring for your worthless hellfire doctrine that some of your religious leaders have branded as nonsense and illogical.

GOVERNMENT2:
NUMBERS 23:19 READ!

thinkmoney:
The concluding words clarified the whole thing; FOR IT PLEASED THE FATHER.
The father made him and used him to create all things. Another part of the Bible said all things are placed under him, however that same part quickly went further to clarify that if all things were 'placed' under him, those things doesn't include the person placing it under him. That person is God the Father, Jehovah. That part of the Bible then ends like ; "so that God can be all in all". The absolute. The finality!

Jiokejohn:
QED!
Bible stated and clarified so.
Read Hebrew chapter 1 : 1 - 14 comprehensively.
I lay emphasis on verse 8 and 9.
{Hebrews 1:8-9
[8]But to the Son He says: “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom.
[9]You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness; Therefore God, Your God, has anointed You With the oil of gladness more than Your companions.”}
When words are written in quotes, we know what it implies, who is speaking, who is referring and who is being directed to.
Please, let us read and become wiser.

Paretomaster1:
Olodo! When Jesus himself pray, and constantly mentioned the father.... Was Jesus praying to himself, or asking for help from himself?

And don't give us the 3 in 1 bullshit...

Michoous:
Very selective in your scripture quotation.Why didn't you start from verse 15?

patomberekpe:
You just quoted john1:1 Can You read the same verse 10? I just noticed You only quote the verse that justify your claim,But put blind eyes to the rest,Please read Bible to the fullest, Jesus have a title, Lord God, As well As God and Lord himself.

Youngzedd:
There are so many scriptures that counters this claim. Below are some of them

a voice from the cloud said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. Listen to him!”
but have eternal life.

.
.
Can God stand at the right hand of God?

Revelation 5:7
He (Christ) went and took the scroll from the right hand of him (God) who sat on the throne.


In conclusion: Christ is the son of God, not God himself.

Cc: divinemichael
enilove

BigBrother9ja:
The God who couldn't defend himself?

Even your Bible will rebuke you and be ashamed of you...

‘the man Christ Jesus’ (Tim. 2:5)

The Bible says that God is not a son of man

‘God is not a man nor a son of man’ (Numbers 23:19)


The Bible often calls Jesus ‘a son of man’ or ‘the son of man.’

‘so will the son of man be’ (Matthew 12:40)

Lastly,
Is it your god that was crying and felt FORSAKENED BY GOD?
Father father WHY HAVE THOU FORSAKEN ME...

There are plenty of reasons to avoid the many COVID-19 vaccines that are being pushed on us, but Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of Children’s Health Defense recently drew attention to some of the most concerning aspects of these vaccines.

Chief among his concerns is the fact that the messenger RNA, or mRNA, vaccines are the first vaccines in history to intervene directly in patients’ genetic material and alter it, posing problems when it comes to health, ethics and morality.

These vaccines involve injecting a sequence of genetic RNA material that was made in a lab into the body, where it invades the cells and takes over their protein-generating ribosomes to produce the coronavirus’s famous spike protein that gives it the crown-like appearance that inspired its name. Then, your body should, at least in theory, be trained to fight the virus if it encounters it later. In short, these vaccines turn your body’s cells into factories that create proteins that spur a pathogen-specific immune response.

mRNA vaccines are being hailed in some quarters for their breakthrough technology, and while they do have some advantages over traditional vaccines, the fact remains that we simply do not know anything about their long-term effects. While we definitely don’t want to downplay how devastating this disease can be to a small percentage of patients, the massive vaccination campaigns that many countries around the world wish to embark upon could be putting a huge percentage of the population at risk of a slew of unknown problems.

Too many unknowns with rushed vaccines

Many experts have acknowledged that there are lots of unknown and unique risks involved in mRNA vaccines, including local and systemic inflammatory responses that may spur autoimmune conditions, cancer or organ damage. Another worry is the potential for mRNA vaccines to be maliciously deployed to trick a person’s body into attacking critical functions like cell repair, fertility and neurological function.

There’s also the fact that mRNA is extremely fragile, so some vaccines, such as the Pfizer vaccine, have to be kept at -70 degrees Celsius or the vaccine could spoil and be rendered ineffective – and those receiving the shots will really have no way of knowing if they were stored properly.

We also don’t know if people will be able to enjoy an immune response that offers enough protection from the disease; if it does, it is not clear how long any immunity would last. Individuals who get vaccinated may engage in risky behaviors because they believe they are immune when they might not actually be, and the results could be devastating.

Moreover, the genetic damage that such vaccines can cause would be irreversible and irreparable. Genetic defects simply cannot be removed from the body.

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a German physician and epidemiologist, said: “In fact, this ‘promising vaccine’ for the vast majority of people should be FORBIDDEN, because it is genetic manipulation!”

Vice Chair and General Counsel for Children’s Health Defense Mary Holland warned: “New vaccine technology will likely mean new kinds of vaccine injuries. Because there’s never been a licensed mRNA vaccine before, we really don’t know what injuries are going to look like. In that the vaccines were developed so quickly, with such short clinical trials, the long-term injuries are a complete unknown.”

She and others are worried that this new technology and the looser requirements for fast-track approvals, along with the general panic about the disease, is a recipe for unprecedented numbers of vaccine injuries, and many of them could be serious. The side effects of such a vaccine might take months or even years to become apparent, and by then it may already be too late for much of the population.

Sources for this article include:

HumansAreFree.com

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Laura Ingraham, Fox News channel host: On the social distancing and the mask, just to focus on that for a moment, which of those two in your research and your work has been the most displaced?

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: Both.

Ingram: Both. Not backed up by the science.

Bhakdi: Zero science.

Sucharit Bhakdi was born in Washington, D.C., and educated at schools in Switzerland, Egypt, and Thailand. He studied medicine at the University of Bonn in Germany, where he received his MD in 1970. He was a post-doctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg from 1972 to 1976, and at The Protein Laboratory in Copenhagen from 1976 to 1977. He joined the Institute of Medical Microbiology at Giessen University in 1977 and was appointed associate professor in 1982. He was named chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz in 1990, where he remained until his retirement in 2012. Dr. Bhakdi has published over three hundred articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology, and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate.

Nanavati:
My problem is not with buhari but the people that voted for him

Calabar1stSon:
Nigerians have this built-in mentality of always electing the wrong people into power and then complain later.

tillaman:
Hang him by his balls
He doesn’t deserve to live

DappaD:
I just felt like throwing you off your feet.

You're actually the one who doesn't understand the parable well enough.

Jesus had in mind the Pharisees when he used that illustration. Because they were present when he was given counsel to his disciples(Luke 16:14)

The rich man clothed in purple signified the religious leaders in Judea then, that is, the Pharisees .
Lazarus signified the common man who is aware of his spiritual need—or as the KJ put it, ‘poor in spirit’ or beggars for the spirit. (Matthew 5:3)
Meaning that ‘Lazarus’ or the common man was normally looked down by the ‘rich man’ or Pharisees and that what they received as spiritual food from the ‘tables’ of the Pharisees amounted to nothing. Lazarus or the common man in Judea was in a spiritually deprived state.


However a drastic change was to occur. The Mosaic Law and Prophets were meant to lead to Jews to the Messiah. So after John cleared the way for Jesus(Isaiah 40:3, Malachi 4:5), Jesus then arrived on 29CE and was baptized by John.(Mark 1:9)

Shortly after that, on one particular Sabbath, Jesus entered into their synagogue and read a scroll from Isaiah 61:1 that says “Jehovah's spirit is upon me...he anointed me to declare the good news to the poor...”
That is, those who are poor in spirit or aware of their spiritual need.(Luke 4:18)

The Pharisees were in a “place of torment” because of the teachings of Jesus Christ. They felt “tormented” and were often disturbed because Jesus taught real truths about God and God's Kingdom and healed the sick etc.

The rich man in purple, i.e. the Pharisees ask for Lazarus or the common man to quench his thirst i.e. they want to be relieved if Jesus and his disciples would stop preaching the truth about God which exposed all the lies and tradition of the Pharisees.

The religious leaders, i.e. the Pharisees openly claim to obey the Law of Moses meanwhile they were actually following man-made traditions(Matthew 15:3)
So that's why ‘Abraham’ in the illustration said: “If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead”
In essence, saying that if they actually listened to Moses and the Prophets then they would realise that the Law was meant to lead the Jews to Jesus Christ.(Deuteronomy 18:15,18; Galatians 3:24)
But since they don't obey Moses, then there's no way they will be persuaded if Jesus performed many powerful works.(see also John 5:46)

The parable of the rich man and Lazarus has nothing to do with your mythical fake hellfire.

DappaD:
Luke 16:30:
“But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to these.’”

So that means in your hellfire, they use to teach people Law of Moses? Or is Moses in hellfire?

DappaD:
Of course, the only two scriptures which hellfire propagators know in the entire Bible and they will do their best to miscontrue.



Remember that when Jesus was telling this parable, his audience had in mind a location that was familiar to them where rubbish was burned—Gehenna, located outside Jerusalem. So in their minds, what will they throw into Gehenna? Living or dead bodies?


Does MrPrevailer agree that the parable of the rich man and Lazarus is meant to be understood LITERALLY while the other parables be understood SYMBOLICALLY?

haddeylium:
Nowhere did I say bad people will be resurrected. Read slowly.

Romans 6:23-For the wages sin pays is death, but the gift God gives is everlasting life by Christ Jesus our Lord.
The wages of sin is death, nothing more.
Unless you mean bad people will be given eternal life.
God's word say
Rom. 6:7: “He who has died has been acquitted from his sin.”
No further punishment for bad people after death. They have been aquinted from theirs Sins. They have no hope of being resurrected like faithful ones and those that excercise faith In Jesus' Christ



This is symbolic also
I'll explain if you want