Muhsin's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Muhsin's Profile › Muhsin's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (of 101 pages)
Parade of ignorance. ![]() |
I don't know. |
;d |
[quote author=tpia. link=topic=393789.msg5458635#msg5458635 date=1265420377]@ poster beware of generalization and asking silly questions[/quote]Where is illusion2? |
This really is a sad news. I wonder why those people keep doing same thing for long? What benefit are they getting from that? None I can think of. May Allah curse them, amin. |
ElRazur:Play that on others. . . ![]() |
[quote author=t.truth link=topic=319217.msg5454537#msg5454537 date=1265381668]You are the one who is suffering from sheer ignorance, stupidity and madness. I am simply saying the truth and if you don't like the truth about the peaceful nature of Islam, you can cry about it [/quote]![]() |
illusion2:Why? What do you mean ‘carelessly composed’ ? Do you want the Bible to leave out historical facts so as to be ‘politically correct’?No! I want the bible to be carefully composed so there would be no faction (i.e. fact+fiction). For example I can't believe a God's prophet had committed incest or drinking, etc. Isn’t it recorded in the Koran that the holy prophet mohammed (pbuh) married a six year old & slept with her at nine?I'll give you myself or anything I've if you show me that verse. If you say hadith I can then agree. But that is not reported anywhere in the Qur'an. Does that account excite you? So because something is ‘filthy’(in your own opinion) ,it should be left out?Not actually or particularly my opinion; peoples' opinion. Majority. Accounts that say prophet of God had sex is unanimously filthy. Or the fact that people were beheaded in God's name ,slavery was rampant, women given half the rights of men etc?Only where bold is contained in the Qur'an. This is one. Tell me where you get others. Historical facts are historical facts, whether a prophet drinks, has intimacy with anyone, if it happened, it should be documented.Historical facts? My foot! How could it happened? God's prophets? A'uzubillah! I don’t jump to conclusions. . .you are the one not reading.What facts? The ones you merely refer to as facts? I'll inshaAllah never know them; and you too hope you'll know a better side of them soonest or later. Remember Mr Farouk Abdulmuttalab ? Was he representing your muslim constituency when carrying explosives in his under wear in Dec 2009?I know of him. You yourself firstly uttered that I must be kidding as far as mutilating the Qur'an issue is concerned, which impliedly means I was lying. I then proved my earlier assertion. My point : just as you ask people not to judge islam by the alleged actions of individuals . . . apply the same to yourself & christianity.This is good. Yet some practices are along the line of your bible. Your quote below refers; just replace Muslims with Christians:This is another good input, illusion. Thanks May God, the Creator, guide us to the right path, amin. |
Sawdust. ![]() |
[quote author=Abuz©la link=topic=109952.msg5459599#msg5459599 date=1265449320]As a young muslim growing up,we were taught how to be a terror in d quranic school.Our teachers taught us Jihad as early in d 80s. I wont lie touting in Nigeria is part of islam[/quote]You are NOT a Muslim; and everybody knows that. You are hiding under a facade using our real Abuzola's name in order to dent Islam. . . Die trying. ![]() |
monkeyleg:If it's in another country the minister would have "sacked" himself. . . |
[quote author=tpia. link=topic=391381.msg5455655#msg5455655 date=1265389039]is this the first time you're hearing of someone converting to Islam? ![]() why are you so disturbed by what i posted? olabowale and some other ones post regular updates about people they or their friends converted to islam. So what's your point exactly? [/quote]How disturbed? Wonder o! are you new to this place?Don't you have answer to this? I sure know you do. ![]() |
RichyBlacK:It means more than that, at least to me. Look at the present day Iraq and Afghanistan; where is left unturned? Of course nowhere is saved. Thus it is not possible that Riyadh is the only site to be affected/attacked. Other sanctified places will certainly be demolished--an action which Muslims worldwide will not stand seeing without responding. Also, do not forget so quickly that Saddam Hussein was ready to roll his tanks straight through Kuwait and then to downtown Riyadh, if not for US intervention. If the US (or Russia) had not intervened on SA's behalf, no country in the middle-east could have stopped Saddam's tanks. Iran would have done nothing because they're not really in good terms with the House of Saud.That was a pure bluff; am sure he would not dare. Had he lest succeded he would not near totching those sacred sites. . .at least because of his being a Muslim, even a Sunni. He would do as much as he could not to let a thing happen to those cites. But could that be the case if its America? And in case you're not aware, parts of present-day SA (including Mecca and Medina) were at one time under Ottoman (present-day Turkey) control, so don't make it seem as if SA has not been occupied before.Was Ottoman Emphire not Islamic? Was America Islamic? In summary, I'm not advocating for the occupation of SA, however, I think George Bush had more reasons to invade Saudi-Arabia (15 of the 19 9-11 hijackers were Saudis, none was Iraqi; Wahhabism is the main source of extremist teachings in Islam and its nerve center is SA; the tyranny and double standards of the House of Saud has fueled extremism within SA; these extremist ideas have been exported to other countries creating sinister organizations like al-Qaeda and al-Shabab; Osama bin Laden is a Saudi; etc.)Thats what has been said on the Western media, and other non-Islamic (or Shiites) sources. But that is far from fact but pure fiction. I am, for example, a Sunni (whom you referred to as Wahhabi). I can, in some ways, say I follow Wahhabism order. YET I denounce any act of "terrorism" carried out by kinds of al-Qaeda and al-Shabab, others. Go through my postings on NL and see. Many of their actions and inactions are entirely not Islamic. More-over, following poor Farouk's saga I sent an e-mail to my brother studying in SA about tha boy. He categorically explained to me that Shura of SA's scholars condemned the boy's intended action. We can again understand that knowing well that Osama, his being a SA citizen, is also on SA wanted list. Again, have you forgotten many instances when SA forces had combats with alleged al-Qaida militias? Haba Richy? |
Assalamu alaikum, [center] Abu Musa Al-Ash`ari (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: I asked the Messenger of Allah (PBUH): "Who is the most excellent among the Muslims?'' He said, "One from whose tongue and hands the other Muslims are secure.'' [Al-Bukhari and Muslim]. [/center] |
toba: ![]() |
illusion2:I respect this input. . . |
Hi, I read something like this somewhere: Is it not a shame on us that Dubai city alone, with a population of 1.19 million people, generates 16,000MW? Poor ‘Yar Adua proudly said to Nigerians that he is ready to provide 6,000MW for the entire nation of 140 million people. South Africa currently generates more than 40, 000 MW of electricity- a country that got independence in 1994 exactly 34 years after Nigeria became a nation-state. Toyota Motors Company in Japan alone generates more than 36,000MW of electricity from its own private generating plants. Singapore, a city of only 4.8 million people, generates 68,000MW. U.S.A with less than double our population generates 3.2 million MW. But we are still talking of nonsense 6,000MW. If that is really true Nigeria is on it way of becoming a fail nation. |
mukina2:Amin to the du'ah, Mukina. Thanks Those are nice du'ahs. I urge any Muslim undergoing some difficulties in his/her life to do them seriously. May Allah bless and reward you, Mukinat. |
@Bashbaba, I am very sorry to hear about your situation. Allah's intervention is on its way, inshaAllah; may He solve it and punish the culprits, amin. Beside, I'm actually left wondering: what reason(s) did they give you before carrying out that operation? Is it the site/plot that was gotten illigally, or the building that was built not in accordance with rules or what? Or they just don't want to see mosques being built because it may yield "terrorists"; or simply they are fighting Islam and Muslims? I can't understand it, wallahi. May Allah come to your rescue, amin. |
[quote author=tpia. link=topic=3410.msg5455622#msg5455622 date=1265388868]interesting how the OP refused to quote any bible verse because of course we all know where he's going.[/quote]Where is that? Don't just reach that conclusion. . . Joagbaje:I quite don't get your point there: is it good or bad/wrong accepting and/or giving usury according to Christianity? Thanks |
RichyBlacK:I read the story some days ago on Daily Trust newspaper. The dictionary he memorized is Oxford Advance Learners' Dictionary 6th Edition. |
illusion2:Don't be that blind to facts, illusion. Put on your glasses. I see you have cleverly replaced ‘corrupted’ with ‘interpolated’ ?That was done not to mislead you or any other reader. Now unlike the Qu’ran, the source texts of the Bible are available in their original languages –Greek, Hebrew etc for references, hence people been able to interpret & ‘interpolate’ (whatever that means).So we've been hearing on news, dude. But none is yet presented to people. BTW, which language was bible originally written with? Why are there numerous versions and editions? Where are the original texts of the Koran ?? Caliph Usman burnt everything. . . so how do we know he did not remove/add his own words?? Or mistranslate some parts ?Can you tell me where you read about that; and finish the story (from any reliable source)? The present Qur'an writing procedures and processes are there available for challenging folks like you to read, which you never do. You simply jump to shaky and groundless conclusion that Qur'an is this and that. Don't let yourself be carried away by illusion. ![]() King James had a similar opportunity in early Christianity, he didn’t destroy the original texts.When was that? How many years after Jesus's death? Look, the Koran has a lot of enlightenment, but trying to prove that the Koran is a ‘better’ Holy book than the Bible is indeed laughable.Is not that; for it has been successfully and convincingly done, and will be done again and again. You remind of the things I was telling one guy here that Bible suffers a lot. It's sorry to say carelessly composed. Thats why it contains filthy accounts of prophets doing unmentionable things, e.g. sex, incest, drinking, etc. And you are well aware, Muslims hardly encourage people discussing their Holy books critically, unlike Christians who more than welcome thorough analysis of the Bible.Muslims? Who among them. . . unenlightened ones, am sure. I can well agree with you if you say unconstructive and thoughtless questions about the Creator/the Book/other precepts things are even severely unwelcome and discouraged. You won’t die in Jesus name. Again , you’re being clever by half. How can you say it is the ‘word of God’ when you only accept the part that suits you? I am a Christian, I have to accept ALL the Bible not only the parts that suits me. So please either accept it wholly or don’t.Did you really read my words? I don't modify it. . .read it again. To help you out: I put the words in commas, which clearly means I don't mean the words to mean the words you are referring. And I won't inshaAllah die in his name, as I hope you too won't. As per mutilating the Koran. . . you must be joking !Remember Mr. Gideon Akuluka? Nobody in his right senses will ever try such a thing. . . even if we don’t believe what’s in it, the fear of instant extra-judicial death via mob action will clearly dissuade anyone in his right senses, by the way what does one stand to gain from ‘disrespecting ‘ another person’s holy book?But your people passionately do it. And you know am certain. Why? For a quintessential example: hardly a Muslim on NL talk about Jesus (p.b.u.h) with disrespect. I know some--a few, do but after being tempted beyond bearing. But what of your people talking about Muhammad (p.b.u.h)? However, what I think Muslims need to learn is that if indeed the Koran is inspired by God. . . the printed material in itself isn’t God’s word. . . God’s word is eternal, so remove emphasis on the printed matter, which will perish one way or another & focus on the words in your heart.If there is no "printed" stuff there will certainly be no scriptures--Qur'an, Gospels, etc. So this sounds naive of you, illussion. May Allah, the Exalted, guide us all to the right path, amin. |
ElRazur:Why the mentioning of Allah (or is it the Qur'an?) got your hair arose? Forget that Allah stands for God, at least in that context? Thus can you say that that has nothing to do with God's intervention? Of course no unless if you are an atheist, which I hope you are not. |
toba:Don't loose the peck of respect I have for you. Look above and read what a sensible person says in response to what you wrote. |
Kx:Which I doubt could happen in another world but Nigeria. |
Hmm. . . I mean no insult, Richy. I don't believe in anything like abuse especially on discussion fora like this one. And if you felt it, as it seems, forgive me. Thanks That aside, I know, as everybody does know, that SA is a centre of Wahhabism, but what that sect got to so with terrorism? More-over, don't be that unfair to the SA government for they fight religious extremism in their country to the best of their ability. Maybe you don't know but a plethora of Muslims severely criticizes them for that. YET you come here saying they should be attacked! And for your info: no American or any other country president will dare attacking SA, and not because of their military might, if they have any, but for the country's being a sacred place for Muslims. If anybody dares it means an end of the world. |
Why We Failed To Meet 6000mw – Minister Written by By Doris Igyor, Abuja Friday, February 05, 2010 12:41:26 PM Minister of Power, Dr Lanre Babalola, has said that the major reason why the ministry did not make the required deadline of 6,000mw was largely due to the constraints of gas supply. He said that poor quality of gas, inadequate volume of gas and the vandalisation of pipelines all contributed to the inability of government to meet the deadline of December 2009. Dr. Babalola, who was speaking at the ministerial press briefing of the ministry at the auditorium at the Presidential Villa yesterday, said that project delivery slip dates, infrastructure inadequacy, funding and operational issues were some other contributing factors. He said that project slip date was directly responsible for government's failure, in that the Chevron Phase 1 Pipeline, one of the major pipelines that was supposed to convey enough gas to aid distribution of 7,00mw, had been vandalized and left idle for over a year, and that the expected 6,000mw had been based on the assumption that the pipeline would be completed before the end of the year, but the delivery date of the project had slipped to February this year. The minister also stressed that his approach to reforms in the ministry was to decentralise the approach to power through the of new small and medium hydro-electric power projects, HEPPs. The chairman of the event, Prof. Dora Akunyili, the minister for the transparency in the session, saying this was in line with the on going rebranding campaign currently going on in the country. She also advised the minister to look closely into private sector participation as it is very important. Leadership Nigeria |
Source? |
What will that solve? NOTHING. ![]() |
karo93: ![]() Intelligence is indeed expensive, as said Lagosboy. |
@All true Christians, Any answer to this OP, please? ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (of 101 pages)




