₦airaland Forum

Jarus:
@Muhsin, we'll jam in Kano one of these days insha Allah

Nezan:
There were referred to in your hadiths by al-tabari and bin-sa'd, uninformed muslim

Nezan:
olabowale is my age mate, you are not.

Abuzola:
Haaaa !
Nezan don't lie my friend, must you lie to gain prestige ? If you are old enough i will surely respect you

Nezan:
Then why was he given satanic verses??

Nezan:
But you referred to his write ups as if he is a christian scholar

Nezan:
is abuzola a christian scholar? let us return back to your satanic verses

Nezan:
No, I no go go school, I be boko-haram. mo was a[b] prophet of the devil[/b]

Nezan:
No christian writer has alluded to satanic verses in the bible, why should islamic writers allude to satanic verses in the koran?

Nezan:
Nope.
Mo was possesed by a demon.
He uttered satanic verses.
Turn to justify it by falsely accusing older prophets of uttering satanic verses too.
This in itself is satanic since no true prophet of God ever uttered satanic verses.

Nezan:
May be he discovered that mohammed was a fraud?

Nezan:
Then why accuse Christians of promoting the satanic verses since they were not the authors?

Nezan:
As can be seen from al-Tabari's writings, the evidence is conclusive that Muhammad was used by Satan. To excuse his own conduct, Muhammad blamed Satan, and then he defamed all the prophets when he claimed that Satan casts words into the mouths of all the prophets. In other words, Muhammad charged that all the prophets uttered words under the inspiration of Satan!  This Qur'anic verse is itself a Satanic Verse woven into the very fabric of the Qur'an. Muhammad offered not the slightest proof to substantiate his wicked defamation of Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Elijah, etc.

Never did We send a Messenger or a Prophet before you, but; when he did recite the revelation or narrated or spoke, Shait? (Satan) threw (some falsehood) in it. But All? abolishes that which Shait? (Satan) throws in. Then All? establishes His Revelations. And All? is All-Knower, All-Wise: Sura al-Hajj 22:52 (Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din Al-Hilali & Muhammad Muhsin Khan's Translation)

Nezan:
Al Tabari and Ibn-sa'd were islamic writers, not christians.

Nezan:
Was Rushdie a Christian? Why declare a fatwa on him if the tale was baseless?

Nezan:
were the verses written by christians?

Nezan:
You are misunderstanding me, Al-Tabari's account came from contemporaries of the prophet, or did Al-Tabari based his account on Christians who transmitted the story? the story was transmitted by contemporaries of mohammed.

Nezan:
Then why are you discrediting Al-tabari and ibn sa'd?

Nezan:
The statement that Allah was involved with female goddesses while Muhammad and his people were left with men, was cynically discussed by author Salman Rushdie. He made the impure account even more obscene. His book was regarded as utterly blasphemous by all Muslims.

Nezan:
Sura an-Najm (Star) 53:19-22
Now tell me about Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, and Manat,
The third one, another goddess.
What! For you the males and for him the females!
That indeed is an unfair division.  
أَفَرَأَيْتُمُ اللَّاتَ وَالْعُزَّى
وَمَنَاةَ الثَّالِثَةَ الْأُخْرَى
أَلَكُمُ الذَّكَرُ وَلَهُ الْأُنثَى
تِلْكَ إِذًا قِسْمَةٌ ضِيزَى. سورة النجم - سورة ‏٥٣: ١٩-٢٢‏

Nezan:
Al-Tabari mentions the so-called 'Satanic verses' story in his Tarikh as well as an important set of statements in the introduction of his book, which states:

   
Let him who examines this book of mine know that I have relied, as regards everything I mention therein which I stipulate to be described by me, solely upon what has been transmitted to me by way of reports which I cite therein and traditions which I ascribe to their narrators, to the exclusion of what may be apprehended by rational argument or deduced by the human mind, except in very few cases. This is because knowledge of the reports of men of the past and of contemporaneous views of men of the present do not reach the one who has not witnessed them nor lived in their times except through the accounts of reporters and the transmission of transmitters, to the exclusion of rational deduction and mental inference. Hence, if I mention in this book a report about some men of the past, which the reader of listener finds objectionable or worthy of censure because he can see no aspect of truth nor any factual substance therein, let him know that this is not to be attributed to us but to those who transmitted it to us and we have merely passed this on as it has been passed on to us.
So the satanic verses emanated from contemporaries of your prophet, it was not a Christian forgery, okay?

Nezan:
very interesting, so some islamic writings were forgeries?

Nezan:
You mean some muslim scholars were event fabricators? interesting,,,,,,,,,like the flying fire horse and transfiguration where mohammed met Jesus?

Nezan:
Your argument is tainted, you accused Christian missionaries of fabricating lies, now you are mentioning muslims as sources of the story?

queen01:
Ramadan mubarak to ya'll.

@mukina2, are u muslim?

Nezan:
must you abuse people? ok, so you are an entity, and the other person is a non-entity because the person is not made of matter?