Christianity Etc › Re: What Is God? by MuttleyLaff: 6:36am On Feb 21, 2018 |
jerflakes: God is not a person God is a thing. A force Your " God is not a person, is a thing, a force" input is welcome and taken on board but remember for balancing, we're being asked to sit on a three-legged stool |
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is God? by MuttleyLaff: 9:46pm On Feb 19, 2018*. Modified: 6:29am On Feb 21, 2018 |
budaatum: This question was asked of me by MuttleyLaff here. I have created a thread for it to share it with others who may not wish to derail John's Gospel.
His question has provoked thought in me and I believe it would provoke thought in you too. So, no knee jerks please. Think before you respond.
What is God? " What is God?" is an incomplete and isolated enquiry The stool presented by OP ought have at least three legs and not this a one-legged stool, that's doomed to topple whoever sits on it The subject of discussion requires a 3-legged stool of understanding, which are: 1) " What is God", 2) " what is god(s)" and 3) " compare & contrast God and god(s)" So, in a thorough manner, convincingly describe what God and god(s) are, Describe compare & contrast each, in all ways and manner you've come to understand what both noun words are and mean. Also give, as much examples as can muster, that illustrates God and god(s) Exhaustively and to the best of your understanding, do it Dont hold back, dont pull punches, give both your best shot, like as if your life depended on it. With the full force of all your understanding, smash both, with examples and/or explanations, that blows them out of this world I second OP's advice, about no knee jerks please, Considering thread is Rated M, please no trigger happy, typing from the hips, with really, very little reason to |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Gospel Of John - A Study by MuttleyLaff: 8:31am On Feb 19, 2018*. Modified: 8:56am On Feb 19, 2018 |
budaatum: John 1
Let There Be Enlightenment!
The chapter begins by stating the importance of the word. At the time, the written word itself was deemed of great importance amongst the Jews, to whom this was most relevant. It was even deemed holy amongst some and not meant for those who were considered unholy so this would have been like Prometheus who defies the gods by stealing fire and giving it to humanity thereby enabling progress and civilization.
"The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us".
Behold, the Tree of Life!
A correction was necessary in light of conversation with MuttleyLaff. See posts below. I had previously written, [s]Behold, the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil![/s] budaatum: Stagnant? Hmmmmm
I expected no one else but you to contribute to this thread! As to others, if the Gospel has Power, why should I have to bother if they flock or not?
Lets call it our bedroom for you and I until others arrive and turn it into the living room. Emmanystone: I think i'll like this guy. Don't get me wrong pls. I think, he is, someone matured and with an educated mind I liked how he paid attention and took enough notice of what was said of his " Behold, the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil!" remark Notice, how, in his John chapter 1, second post of the thread, he edited it, by striking out the " Behold, the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil!" remark, this shows he listens and is open to correction |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Gospel Of John - A Study by MuttleyLaff: 4:59am On Feb 19, 2018*. Modified: 8:19am On Feb 19, 2018 |
budaatum: John 3 The Kingdom of God? There is much more to this chapter than I will touch on in this post. I will begin with verse 4, knowing I do a disservice to even that verse If you're bent on going through the entire book chapter by chapter, then you need to be careful though because remember the bible wasnt originally in chapters and verses budaatum: 4 “How can someone be born when they are old?” Nicodemus asked. “Surely they cannot enter a second time into their mother’s womb to be born!”
Nicodemus here asks a question you would hear many of us atheists ask when we attempt to ridicule religious belief Well, Nicodemus in that verse, as a matter of fact, was completely discombobulated and certainly wasnt deliberately attempting to ridicule any religious belief Jesus, even, was telling Nicodemus off, for him being a teacher and not knowing about these basic factual stuff Also dont you notice that Nicodemus, was fishing for information during the clandestine informal investigation meeting, but actually hadnt at all, asked a question yet before Jesus straight up and straight to the point told Nicodemus that: except a man is "born from above", he cannot see the kingdom of God (i.e. recognise demonstrations & power of the kingdom of God) budaatum: Our failing, (on both sides, I would claim), is a misunderstanding of what may have been meant.
To be born, is to become as a baby, completely devoid of ideas, like an empty vessel waiting to be filled up, which unfortunately, we just are not. We hold on to preconceived ideas that act like sunglasses distorting reality. It is like Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, we all see things from our own subjective viewpoint and lack objectivity. We are people in the darkness grabbing on to bits of an elephant and defining what the entirety is from the little we know. Any filling of the vessels we are would involve emptying its current content and refiling us with new stuff. I love John chapter 3 a lot and have noticed that John chapter 3 actually should have appropriately started from John 2:23 but it sad to see, many, be under a delusion, living in a fool's paradise and cavorting with the born again cliche Most familiar with driving a car or riding a motor-cycle know how a car's flat/dead battery is brought back to life or how a motor cycle thats being lying sitting for months/years is brought back to life Many so-called believers, "believers" and/or christians, misunderstand John chapter 3 and as a result, unnecessarily slip into resorting to using a born again cliche I am unable to understand why some and/or others dont ever wonder why Jesus never publicly gave, not even one born again teaching I guess it's because born from above aka born again, actually isn't a badge of honour, but is a matter of just fact Humans comprise of body, spirit and soul. The most sought after out of all, is the soul. The body goes to the ground, spirit goes back to God, and the soul goes a place to awaiting to be brought forward to hear a pronoucement of judgment There is and was no John Chapter Three ignored elephant in the room The arresting point that got Nicodemus captivated was regeneration Jesus said to Nicodemus, it takes one having a spirit renewal or spirit re-birth, to see and recognise the kingdom of God He said, except born from above, one cant accept the truth of nor admit the existence of the kingdom of God If one isnt, then such one, will rubbish, ridicule, make fun of, poke fun at, make jokes about, scoff at, be sarcastic about the kingdom of God Such one not born from above, will take the mickey out of demonstrations & power of the kingdom of God Notice, it's, born from above, in order to be able to acknowledge the demonstrations & power of the kingdom of God and its' born of water and born from above, in order to enter into the kingdom of God Here is an illustration, to explain " see the kingdom of God" and " enter into the kingdom of God" When you're on a plane from France to Ghana, with a connecting flight at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, you see Holland you dont go beyond Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, you see Amsterdam city and/or Holland from inside Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Except you have the correct travelling documents etcetera, you cannot enter into Amsterdam city and/or Holland budaatum: The Kingdom of God cannot be comprehended within the limits of the ideas that we have especially if we are opposed to it, or comprehendeth it not. It will sound as ridiculous as describing an elephant by knowing only its trunk, or as being born again sounds to Nicodemus. Perhaps what we need do is be willing to suspend our beliefs, and not assume we already know it all. "How can this be?" Indeed, this is going to prove as difficult as reentering ones mother's womb! It is not impossible though, if not taken literally, and if you were to try to consider.
Anything said on the entire chapter would be ignoring the elephant in the room if I do not mention verse 16. 16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
I personally have issues with the word "believe" in that verse. My preconceptions get in the way, so to speak, as while I believe some things - I believe I will wake up tomorrow, for instance - I require evidence for the things I believe. I have woken up everyday so far is evidence that I will likely wake up tomorrow. Weh done Sir, this is so spaghetti messy. You're all over place, you cut corners and so ended up with a muddled mess summary of John Chapter Three You are and/or were just like a chameleon dropped in a bag of skittles budaatum: I have always claimed that I cannot 'believe' in the existence of a God, or gods. If I were a Christian, I would know there is a God would have to arrogantly state, "I know there is a God", and my Bible will read as follows:
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever knows him shall not perish but have eternal life. There is a difference, in my opinion.
I am hoping more flesh would dress the idea of "The Kingdom of God" as we step forward. It is a reality there is God and god(s) but you say: Perhaps what we need do is be willing to suspend our beliefs, and not assume we already know it all OK, I can live with that and what good are wings without the courage to fly So bud, test your sails Describe, the nouns God and god(s) with god(s), as in, being all you understand a god to be Explain in details, with as much examples, you can muster what god and God is |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 10:49pm On Feb 18, 2018 |
Emmanystone: Mehhhn, the guy spews out trash the way he breaths in air. 
Happy Sunday servant of God. MuttleyLaff: My sister, there must have been a mix-up Think about it, would you call your daughter or son a servant of Emmanystone? Honestly, would you take to your daughter or son being called a servant of Emmanystone? Emmanystone: I will call him/her son or daughter of Emmanystone. I thought as much |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 2:31pm On Feb 18, 2018 |
superhumanist: Stop speaking in parables.
Na butterflyl1on be light? Christian wey wet dey lie pass devil? https://i57.tinypic.com/34sp9j4.gifbutterflyl1on:

You are speaking mysteries which he cannot decipher. 
He does not realise that light cannot be denied. Once someone who has been in darkness and it's torment for years sees light and the freedom and peace it brings he cannot deny it and would never want to return to darkness again not even when coerced. He can decipher with the Idi Amin meme |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 1:59pm On Feb 18, 2018 |
Emmanystone: Mehhhn, the guy spews out trash the way he breaths in air.  Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated... By the way miracles do happen Emmanystone: Happy Sunday servant of God. My sister, there must have been a mix-up Think about it, would you call your daughter or son a servant of Emmanystone? Honestly, would you take to your daughter or son being called a servant of Emmanystone? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 1:43pm On Feb 18, 2018 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 1:34pm On Feb 18, 2018 |
superhumanist: Lol. They don't realise it that they are changing.
Butterflyl1on no later Nigeria argues like a Christian. He is now arguing like a deist.
Vaxx is now trying to be logical albeit failing. butterflyl1on: Stop seeing things that are not there. Claiming I am arguing like a deist is a failed statement of huge proportions. Stop consoling yourself. There is not enough darkness in all the world to put out the light of even one small candle |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 1:30pm On Feb 18, 2018 |
Tohzara: [s]I know quoting me gets you wet down there. But, while you may think it's fun, unfortunately for you, it's your dissolved brain dripping like sewage outta your pussy. Keep squirting over my posts[/s]. Emmanystone: Your mouth is a pit toilet. A good man produces good out of the good storeroom of his heart. An evil man produces evil out of the evil storeroom, for his mouth speaks from the overflow of the heart- Luke 6:45 SMH. His heart must be a soakaway |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 8:12pm On Feb 17, 2018 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 7:48pm On Feb 17, 2018 |
hopefulLandlord: Don't get me wrong cuz I chose my words carefully, as I've almost always done, I'm not being biased here I'm not supporting insults and if I post the insults I receive from theists/Christians it'll fit pages upon pages.
if you even search for my monicker you'll see I've received quite a few today alone but you'd be find it hard to see me insult those I'm talking to However I'm just stating an observation that "some" Christians here that usually throw insults cower whenever they face someone that goes toe to toe with them at it. They want to dish it but do not want to take it OkCornel: I'm laughing so hard at the bolded... It's well... unless we all realize that we are all human beings first...before being divided along the lines of theism and atheism...the better for all of us...
I have hardly come across anyone who says no to true, sincere and sacrificial love... I'm just looking forward to a day where everyone who is open minded will sit at the same table and tell themselves the bitter truth without exchanging needless insults...
Where we all love ourselves by holding dearly to the things we have in common...while we deal with our differences amicably...
For example...irrespective of the fact you are an atheist...see us holding a meaningful conversation here...for goodness sake, is this not possible in the majority if not entirety of nairaland? Honestly...I am tired of logging online to see unprintable insults flying up and down on a popular platform like this...
We are all bothered about the afterlife...when the problems of the current life is not even sorted out. We are all bothered about who created this world...when nothing is done about those destroying it...
Just tiring mehn... https://gifyu.com/images/steadylaugh.gifMakes two of us laughing |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Gospel Of John - A Study by MuttleyLaff: 4:07pm On Feb 17, 2018 |
budaatum: I see your point. And would have to reconsider. I suppose they ate of the fruit of that tree, as it wasn't forbidden to them. Will research it and come back to you. Yes, the tree of life wasn't off-limits like the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was. But you are aware that the tree of the knowledge of good and evil eventually became absent but the tree of life lives on its presence, aren't you? |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Gospel Of John - A Study by MuttleyLaff: 11:20am On Feb 17, 2018 |
budaatum: I've limited myself to the bits in purple. Yes. I notice your signature is a refererence to this fact. It is echoed in the Gospel of Thomas, and experienced by Saul on the way to Damascus.
Ok, maybe not totally devoid. Some other text claim Adam named all other animals, so a level of consciousness must have entailed. I think we are in agreement that awareness increased.
As to who first saw the lamb, well,....... My signature? Which one? Which part of it? You shouldn't limit yourself to the bits in purple alone, because remember you wrote: "Behold, the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil!"aiming to equate the Word as being beheld as the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, when in actual fact, the Word is the Tree of Life Yep, awareness, sure indeed increased. The good, the bad and the ugly flooded in |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Gospel Of John - A Study by MuttleyLaff: 9:38am On Feb 17, 2018*. Modified: 10:19am On Feb 17, 2018 |
budaatum: There is no indication in the text from which I can say 1 applies. I have no evidence to suggest they were cool with their unclothedness. What the text implies is that they became aware that they had been unclothed and they were not happy that they were When one puts on righteousness as a clothing, you'll be cool with whatever your unclothedness is The moment one takes off righteousness as a clothing, one wont be happy and will hide budaatum: The text says, God knows that when you eat it your eyes will be opened. You'll be like God, knowing good and evil." So, I assume they got to know both good and evil, both of which the text implies they were not, prior to that, conscious of. I agree with you totally The phrase "the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil", as a matter of fact, actually is a merism. The Good in "the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil" signifies, all that's beautiful in life and the Evil in "the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil" signifies, all that's about adversities in life Without mincing words, whoever eats of the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil, is going to be forced to deal with a whole gamut of beautiful and adversity Dont take my word for it, go check out the meaning of "towb" (i.e. the original word Good was translated from) and "ra" (i.e. the original word Evil was translated from) budaatum: Kind of makes me think they could have been like apes. Totally devoid of conscious states of awareness. Totally devoid of conscious states of awareness? But before the fall from grace, Adam was aware of Eve But before the fall from grace, both Adam and Eve were aware of the tree budaatum: Ok. Though, the text points to John the Baptist becoming aware of Christ. And then making others aware of him when he told them to "Behold, the Lamb of God". Perhaps being conscious of Jesus, and becoming aware of Jesus' Glory, are separate incidences. I can live with that. You seem to be conflating persons here, combining John the Baptist, together with, John, the brother of James John the Baptist, said: " Behold, the Lamb of God..." meaning: "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!" Meanwhile, John, the brother of James, reliving what he beheld, as in what he saw in company of Peter and James, in seeing Jesus transfigured before them, said, they, the three, have seen: " We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son," |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Gospel Of John - A Study by MuttleyLaff: 2:45am On Feb 17, 2018*. Modified: 3:00am On Feb 17, 2018 |
budaatum: I did type "unclothedness", to get around the sanitiser. Coolio budaatum: I take the actual verse in the Bible to mean "they lacked awareness of the state they were in" What state? Which state? Is it the pre-Genesis:3-7 state or the Genesis:3-7 state? There are at least two states 1) There was a state, they knew they had clothedness, and were cool with it 2) and there was a state, they knew about unclothedness to an extent, and got disturbed about knowing this budaatum: Behold, as in, 'become conscious (and aware)" of that which was at the beginning, and is, and always will be..
I personally hold that the "In the beginning" in Genesis, and in The Gospel of John, are connected. The Fruit of Knowledge of Good and Evil is some sort of 'Light" both it, and John's Word, enable seeing (awareness, consciousness) In a laboured way, it is some sort of " 'Light" albeit, in regards, to the Knowledge of Good but what about, in regards to the Knowledge of Evil? After all, it was a tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, wasnt it? A combination?, as it were budaatum: We have the whole of John to find an answer to your last question. The simple, off the cuff, not think too much response, however is that which some call Christ. It was, the three inner caucus disciples, as in, Peter, James, and John, that, at first, beheld the glory of Jesus |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Gospel Of John - A Study by MuttleyLaff: 1:53am On Feb 17, 2018 |
budaatum: Of course I can see. That's why I wrote it Coolio. budaatum: Adam and Eve became conscious of there unclothedness Did you type " unclothedness"? Or is it one of those amazing miracles that happen on Nairaland where what you type gets changed to a sanitised equivalent word version If you did, do type " unclothedness" verbatim, then explain what you mean by: Adam and Eve became conscious of their unclothednessWhat is " unclothedness" If Adam and Eve became conscious of there unclothedness, then they must before have been conscious of clothedness of some sort, do you accept budaatum: "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us", is another instance of a making humans consciously aware. I still dont see the correlation between the below, reproduced, your earlier remark "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us" and Behold, the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil! What is this "behold, the fruit" bit on about? What is being beheld, what and/or who is the fruit, in your "Behold, the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil!" statement? |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Gospel Of John - A Study by MuttleyLaff: 1:22am On Feb 17, 2018 |
budaatum: The first mention of consciousness of the being in the Yahweh Book was when Adam and Eve ate the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Genesis 3:7 is a galloping verse, with lots of dots in it though budaatum: I am proposing that when it is written that "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth", that we are being made conscious of things again, just like Adam and Eve were. I can see, do see, how you are trying to align John 1:14 with Genesis 3:7 however elaborate with further detail what you mean by: "... conscious of things again, just like Adam and Eve were" |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Gospel Of John - A Study by MuttleyLaff: 12:54am On Feb 17, 2018 |
budaatum: John 1
Let There Be Enlightenment!
The chapter begins by stating the importance of the word. At the time, the written word itself was deemed of great importance amongst the Jews, to whom this was most relevant. It was even deemed holy amongst some and not meant for those who were considered unholy so this would have been like Prometheus who defies the gods by stealing fire and giving it to humanity thereby enabling progress and civilization.
"The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us".
Behold, the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil! What's the correlation between "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us"and Behold, the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 12:01am On Feb 17, 2018*. Modified: 5:17am On Feb 19, 2018 |
budaatum: Which gauntlet? Me no see it! Let's have a quick game now Invite xxxxxxxxx, as your setting declined invites from me |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 11:37pm On Feb 16, 2018 |
Budaatum take up the gauntlet thrown at Gameknot |
Christianity Etc › Re: Bishop David Oyedepo Prays For The Death Of Ritual Killers In Nigeria by MuttleyLaff: 11:01pm On Feb 16, 2018 |
CaptainJeffry: Hahaha Nigerians can be so gullible.  Captain Mr smarty-pants can't be so gullible bwahahahaha |
Christianity Etc › Re: Bishop David Oyedepo Prays For The Death Of Ritual Killers In Nigeria by MuttleyLaff: 9:49pm On Feb 16, 2018 |
PrecisionFx: I'm sure ur heavily confused. It takes one to know one |
Christianity Etc › Re: Bishop David Oyedepo Prays For The Death Of Ritual Killers In Nigeria by MuttleyLaff: 8:15pm On Feb 16, 2018*. Modified: 8:45pm On Feb 16, 2018 |
Seun: Do people really think his curses, which are at odds with the teachings of Jesus in the gospels about blessing your enemies, are effective? He has decreed death on so many groups of bad people; how many of them have died, though? (a honest question) He has decreed death to their antics. Not death to the person but death to the principality and/or personality hiding behind the person(s) or group of people behaving badly I am sure some hearing the damnation, out of fright would have leapt out from whoever they were squatting in |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 7:51pm On Feb 16, 2018*. Modified: 8:12pm On Feb 16, 2018 |
Tohzara: If the universe is eternal, it's its own cause, and a first cause becomes superflous and meaningless. You are conflating the object with the Creator The universe and God are distinct from each other. The universe isn't the same with the its Creator Tohzara: Creation out of nothing is impossible Talk for yourself. Is there anything hard for God Creating out of nothing is a piece of cake, walking in the park matter for God to do Tohzara: There's no such thing as nothingness. Nothingness is meanigless and undefined. It is NOTHING (!) How did you spring up this straw man? Tohzara: Which God? No argument so far has been able to establish his existence. Your house of cards just keep collapsing I have no house of cards, but know you are living in denial Tohzara: The universe doesn't have a designer. It is self-propelling.  The universe has a Designer. The universe isn't self-propelling. It is propelling alright, yeah, and the propelling will at some time end Tohzara: You can rap.  Sit down there, you want to see my tap-dance and/or me doing the lambada dance too |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 7:21pm On Feb 16, 2018 |
sonofluc1fer: Exactly. A world without God won't make sense to you. Chaotic Don't sweat it. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 7:17pm On Feb 16, 2018 |
Tohzara: The man who designed the website IS EXTREMELY MORE COMPLEX THAN THE WEBSITE, therefore the God who designed the universe MUST BE ENORMOUSLY MORE COMPLEX THAN THE UNIVERSE TOO, and if complexity implies design, who designed the one who designed the universe? And who designed whoever designed that one too? Don't you get it? This argument is dead----it kills itself deader than the coldest corpse Nothing because Whoever designed the universe is the Caused First Cause Tohzara: What's more, I told you earlier that the universe is an entirely different ball game, compared to the website. Man created the website from already existing raw materials. Did God create the universe from pre-existing materials that he didn't create out of the blue----out of absolutely nothing No, God called out and/or calls the things that are not, as though they were Tohzara: The OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE is proven to have a beginning. The universe might go beyond that. The universe created at the Big Bang might just be the transformation of pre-existing energy of a completely different form, changing into a new form, AND THE BIG BANG WAS THE BEGINNING OF THAT FORM, not necessarily the beginning of THE UNIVERSE. The universe can be eternal The universe is subjected to God, not the other way round Tohzara: Does this COMPLEX DESIGNER (he MUST be) also have a designer, and does his designer have a designer too? This dead argument will ALWAYS summon an infinite regress, and there can be NO SPECIAL PLEADING No, the Designer doesn't have a designer. The designer is an unmoved Mover Tohzara: The universe might have MIND FUNDAMENTAL TO IT. It gave rise to beings with consciousness and intelligence. How can a system which is at root MINDLESS achieve that? The universe can have its own mind. Again, the universe is subjected to Nature, which essentially is God. Out of the ground, out of the universe everything came out from, out of it was man made. Without God, the universe is an empty. It won't make sense without a God In the beginning the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 5:20pm On Feb 16, 2018*. Modified: 6:02pm On Feb 16, 2018 |
budaatum: No. That's just how 'they' understand it, or chose to see it. The Bible itself says nothing!
Or, has the Trinity now become a Quarternity and I missed the memo? No, not in the remotest, trinity actually is a systematic phase, and the memo has Infinity written boldly on it all over |
Christianity Etc › Re: Speaking In Tongue; A Great Lie By Olakunle Allison by MuttleyLaff: 8:07am On Feb 16, 2018*. Modified: 8:29am On Feb 16, 2018 |
budaatum: Hey, in chess, its kosher to play for a draw. One does it in order not to rack up a loss! I may hate when one draws a game on me, for they'd only go for a draw if they were likely to lose. I love when I get a draw though, because it saved me from losing.
But chess is a rather different kettle of fish to what we do here. Here don't have the nicely laid out established rules of chess!
If anyone wants a game, join me on Its free to play. budaatum, hi, holler whenever you're going to be between up 1-2 hours uninterruptedly online please. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 10:38pm On Feb 15, 2018 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 10:10pm On Feb 15, 2018 |
Emmanystone: It was sent back saying the address was not found.  Sorry, try the second one, I'll will reply back with the first thats playing up |
Christianity Etc › Re: Seun Doesn't Exist by MuttleyLaff: 10:04pm On Feb 15, 2018 |
Emmanystone: Okay sir. Done.
Lolzzz @t the email id  My sister, profuse apologies, technical issues. Know you're prolly tired already Mail to this one instead: jehec@youzend.net Thanks |