Maximus69: All women are emotional my dear, even Sarah grew emotional when Ishmael (Abraham's first son) was falling Isaac (Ishmael's junior brother) who is just learning to walk! Genesis 21:9 She couldn't stand the sight of the boy mocking her own son, forgetting that they are brothers!
So never mind my dear, you are blessed!
Post early believers people mostly read more into Pauline epistles, just like as in that 1 Peter 3:7, were comparative emotional state and not mental is what the verse is discussing. Most times, its men who aren't mentally strong enough. Adam wasn't mentally strong enough to stand his ground not to take the fruit from Eve. Abraham wasn't mentally strong enough to stand his ground and not yield to Sarah offering him, her maidservant Hagar to have and sleep with and thereby give them both a heir. Job, went against the grain. He stood his ground and refuse his missus' plea that he should curse God and die. He told her that's nonsense and that she's speaking as a foolish, and/or senseless woman speaks (i.e. Job 2:9-10) Zipporah, Moses' wife is another stronger Biblical woman
delkuf: Have you across the verse of the Bible that says they defeated the dragon by the words of there mouth and the blood of the lamb. Don't tell me you don't know that the Lord Jesus Christ is the lamb, because that will be another schooling all together
See, this is why I wish people would at least try to read their Bible with their eyes open... Right there in the Vision, John tells you exactly who defeated the dragon and how. But rather than take it whole, many of you chuck aside the who and run off with the how, thinking you have bagged yourself another deity to add to the Godhead.
The angels, who would have otherwise not been able to approach the dragon beforehand, were able to defeat the dragon by the blood of the lamb, and this in a vision that John was having. John never told you that it meant Christ's apostles could now deify the blood of Jesus. Jesus never told His disciples to deify His blood... He made it known that only by HIS NAME, not His Blood, can anything be done.
Please enlighten me on who you know that deified the blood of Jesus and how or where this blood is worshipped et cetera
delkuf: And you said you have the Spirit of God in you. I don't think so. If you have the Holy Spirit, you will read the Bible and understand. That Bible clearly stated that they defeated the dragon with the words of there mouth and the blood of the lamb. And if you don't know that the Lord Jesus Christ is the lamb that will take away the sins of the world, then you need to start Sunday School beginner class
There are 9 manifestations of the spiritual gift of the Holy Spirit.
Acehart: What church do you worship in on Sundays?
Maximus69: It's human laws that can't see the true murderer in our society, Jesus understood perfectly the real murderers in the human society!
He said "the one making his brother annoyed" So to Jesus, if a man provoked his fellowman to the point that one got annoyed and kill him, the one who provoked the killer is guilty of murder NOT the killer!
Because he provoked him!
In the same manner, once you know you're dealing with a woman, you must choose your words carefully and wisely, otherwise whatever she does (even if she killed you) she will be punished, but your blood is on your own head o! So i'm supposed to apologise to khia because if i knew i'm chatting with a female, i shouldn't have expected her to think of loving the rapist that violated her! I thought i was chatting with a man, that's why God's word admonished us not to disclose confidential matters to females in the congregation because of their weakness emotionally speaking! 1 Corinthians 14:35
Baba, what are you going on a tangent on, not that I am interested, but if you ask me, I'll tell you that khia deserved what came her way.
Now, I was talking of your interpretation of weaker vessel in 1 Peter 3:7, as meaning women are generally and/or overall weaker than men and not about khia. That was why I gave a list of strong women examples, you can't say are weaker mentally
Maximus69: At first i felt offended, but knowing i was actually chatting with a female, i realized my mistakes! However you're lovely my dear, God bless you!
So you are sexist then, with this kind of stereotyping.
When God's word called women the weaker vessel the weakness is not about Physical Mental nor Spiritual
It's emotional
That's why in Jehovah's Witnesses Organization, if a Christian beats his wife he will be penalized if his wife beats him he will be penalized
Because women are weak emotionally, so we must treat them gently so as not to hurt their emotions!
Baba, you're mixing up emotion activities with cerebral activities. Your picture depicts a woman going physical with a probably abusive partner, as opposed to intellectually dealing with the man
Maximus69: Oh, so khia is even a female! Wow! Well they're exactly what God's word calls them "the weaker vessel" 1 Peter 3:7 We all have them at home!
Chief, I am sure Baba is not a sexist and knows that the word "weaker" as used in 1 Peter 3:7 is used relative to the body sha, (i.e. vessel) hmm?
Our women, are not weaker mentally, this is why we have the Folorunsho Alakija, Margaret Thatcher RIP, Theresa May, Nicola Sturgeon, Angela Merkel, Mary Robinson, Mary McAleese, et cetera of the world including my missus too.
God is Self Existent, not that you know what means
VBCampaign: You should understand that your life philosophy, irreligion, is as much your right as those who choose to be religious. But when you disparage religious people in general, you leave yourself to scorn also.
The thread is not criticizing religion. It is criticizing false religion.
nnenneigbo: Wow, coming from someone who believes that everyone else, who doesn’t believe is hell bound, that’s rich, coming from you.
Seeing as your religion also was spread through violence, please, turn the mirror on yourselves first.
VBCampaign: Thanks for the compliment. Thank you for also getting the message.
Dont mind her ojaare, especially when its obvious she is cutting off the nose to spite the face
donnie: Forget those stupid lies, we know your tricks... They are white and fake.
Baba, I told you, to go have a late siesta and rest your tired brains, but you are still here busy, tap dancing. Smh. White kọ. Whyte ni There's nothing more fake than an African, finished done identity theft, thereafter start parading himself, to be a black-skinned Israelite
donnie: Even their name OTOMAN JEWISH community betrays your whole effort to present whites as Jews.
1. OTOMAN was a Turkish Empire established by descendants of ESAU/EDOM which also dominated North Africa at a point in history. The fake white Jews in the so-called middle East are mostly from Turkey. So they will always promote their own wherever they are.
2. You called them JEW-ISH... But I'm talking about the real Jews (YAHUNDE)... Hebrews. Try all you can, these whites will never pass for the seed of YAKUBI (Jacob).
When we speak of Jews who migrated through Egypt, Nubia, Ethiopia, down to sub-saharan Africa, we know who we are talking about. It's simple ask your village elders how they came to where they are or whether the popped out of the ground.
So, sorry to spoil your party, it's a useless post you have there.
Smh, you just always don't cease to not disappoint. I have never in my lives appropriated Jews and/or Israelites to be whites or white skinned, but hey complete incomprehension, as always been a handicap for you.
Baba, please go and take a late siesta, go rest that your already overworked brain. Mtcheew.
This picture makes it very clear that she sell food for someone who probably owns a canteen. She must have stolen the chicken. But if u feel like it's juju there is nothing I can do about that
You are Liquid metal in 2016. Indaboski bahose in 2017. Inda boski dahosa/indaboski daosa? in 2018. Inda boski kapache, baloskicalabash etcetera, lol, you are the virus itself. You are in 2020, " ... his medicine", you are the lion et cetera
You are upon all the shakara and DEMONStrations, the lion himself who cowers in fright at the 2:00 minute afterwards mark, lmao.
rationalhuman: Lol you said it right man, This is the common problem here not here but this is common issue with this continent, Not only we are ignorant but we dont want to learn as well, every issue becomes question of ego.
People argue to much with their fairy tails or They will copy some Cheap blog image and they are so dumb that for them every third rate cheap web page is reference.
As in your case someone referred these African People as Jews, In another Thread one great fella is stating them something else. lol
I know exactly how you mean "... stating them something else ..." because I have those books doing exactly how you mean of "... stating them something else ..." If you aren't standing on a solid foundation and top of that, if you are incapable of separating the wheat from the chaff, then your whole world can shatter and the ground you're standing on, cave in beneath you, from reading them circa 1800s books.
There is a local colloquial thats says: "Even when one is crying and with tears streaming down from eyes, one does & still manages, to see the path clearly enough to walk and not trip or fall over objects, left lying about in the way"
What donnie, doesnt realise, is that, it was a Zondervan editor employee, who unauthoritatively inserted that remark of Negro, into the Zondervan Bible Dictionary around circa 55 - 60 years ago (i.e. the 1960s)
Except for the Young's Compact Bible dictionary, who took lead from Zondervan of course, this is the reason why you cant find and will never come across another dictionary(ies) and/or any other source(s) backing up what Zondervan published, but people like Mr d, Oga Baba donnie, will just latch on that one sentence remark about Negro, read into it, then make a meal out of it, by giving it meaning(s) that suits his racist, bigoted, intolerant and perverted agenda.
The Zondervan Bible Dictionary editor, didnt explicitly say anything about the Negro talkless the Israelites, but oh no, people like donnie and Company, decided to eat that meal of a remark, and make some trouble for themselves with it.
When we look, read and keep quiet, it isn't because we don't know things, but its because we just look and laff, keeping and enjoying our peace
pablobellins: u seem to know much; i doubt u garner this knowledge by mere reading of the bible
MuttleyLaff: ... Travel is the antidote to ignorances, prejudices, discriminations, bigotry, homophobia, chauvinism, misogyny, fundamentalism, narrow-mindedness etcetera, and so I enjoy travelling. I visit many good books to read, lol, I visit many good deepweb stuff internet sites and/or other varied online resources, but I live in the Bible, lol, I chose to live in the Bible because there is no such place better than home, home, sweet bible home lol.
If you want to shine your eyes and free yourself, lol, well, if you need milk to make your own cheese with then, lol you can get some from listening/watching/reading/visiting any of the following online dairy farms, lol, Professor Michio Kaku, Professor Sophie Bosede Oluwole RIP (i.e. aka Mamalawo and/or Iyanifa, was a practitioner of Yoruba philosophy) Dr Myles Munro RIP, Dr Aajonus Vonderplanitz RIP, Bill and Joan Donahue, Dr. Sebi RIP was born Alfredo Bowman, Dick Gregory RIP, Segun Olawoye c/o Objectv, Dr. Shola Jordan Adeoye, Dr Sunday Adelaja, Patrick Bet-David, Omoyele Sowore, Joseph Okechukwu, Adeyinka Grandson, Rabbi ManisFriedman, Alan Watts, Daddy Freeze, Dr. Michio Kaku, Dr. Michael S. Heiser et cetera. In other words, use them to do your own research, get informed and come up with your own cheese (i.e. your own facts/opinions)
I thank you for your kind words, but as for the glory that is for God and He is the Source of all knowledge.
What Makes Man? Or better still what is man? Man is a spirit being, residing or housed in a Body and possessing a Soul, so Man is made up of Body, Soul (i.e. uses the heart as an outlet) and Spirit. The Soul has the body and spirit on each opposite sides of it. In a nutshell, Man essentially, is a spirit being with a soul, housed, encapsulated, and/or wrapped up in a human being body suit
The spirit and soul have different faculties, and so the faculties of the spirit, comprises ofFellowship, Conscience, Discernment or Intuition, whilst the faculties of the Soul comprises of the Mind (i.e. consciousness and sub consciousness) or Intellect, Will or Freewill, and Emotions and the Body has 5 faculties of senses, which are, to see, via the eyes, hear, via the ears, feel, via applicable part of the body, smell, via the nose and taste, via the mouth.
Some people have lost that ability to know bad from good. It's similar to losing sense of taste, smell, sight, hearing, feeling pain or not et cetera
"And Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” And they were amazed at Him" - Mark 12:17
Render unto physical things that are physical, and to conceptual things, render that are conceptual
petra1: Yes true. People can violate the conscience. But conscience in its neutrality is pure.
Adam and even already had a "law" they dont need any conscientiousnes except its based on the instruction or "law God gave them but they acted against the instruction. Conscience ought to fall in line with the light they have been given
Well, true, true, well said.
What Makes Man? Or better still what is man? Man is a spirit being, residing or housed in a Body and possessing a Soul, so Man is made up of Body, Soul (i.e. uses the heart as an outlet) and Spirit. The Soul has the body and spirit on each opposite sides of it. In a nutshell, Man essentially, is a spirit being with a soul, housed, encapsulated, and/or wrapped up in a human being body suit
The spirit and soul have different faculties, and so the faculties of the spirit, comprises ofFellowship, Conscience, Discernment or Intuition, whilst the faculties of the Soul comprises of the Mind (i.e. consciousness and sub consciousness) or Intellect, Will or Freewill, and Emotions and the Body has 5 faculties of senses, which are, to see, via the eyes, hear, via the ears, feel, via applicable part of the body, smell, via the nose and taste, via the mouth.
petra1: That's true . But when you do bad you know. Even though you justify it but you still know it's bad. E.g revenge .
Some people have lost that ability to know bad from good. It's similar to losing sense of taste, smell, sight, hearing, feeling pain or not et cetera
pablobellins: Somewhere in your last paragraph sir; what will be the judgement standard for those before the old covenant?
petra1: Conscience . The conscience is Gods witness in every generation
pablobellins: Then by this; you mean the end should justify the means.
petra1: Conscience is a witness of right and wrong. That is why we have judicial system in every culture. Murder,stealing will always be wrong. God judge people based on the light they have
MuttleyLaff: Some people come into each other lives to sharpen themselves
The truth is priceless especially in these times its rare and the only people who are mad at anyone writing the truth, are those people who are living a lie
That picture is a typical case of, a moment of choice, is a moment of truth. Unleash the dogs, set them free with a cat, straying with no care in the world Will their nature get the better of them? Will self-restraint, self-control and self-discipline rule the day?
Looks like there is no situation problem going on in the picture The fox can be set to guard the henhouse and nothing will happen to the chicken. The cat can be set to guard the cream/milk and nothing will happen to the cream/milk.
What will become of Satan, if My resting Hand on Satan is lifted off? What will become of Adam and Eve, if I trust them to be left alone with an unguarded tree they are forbidden not to eat from? When faced with an adverse condition, will Satan withstand it or will Adam and Eve overcome it? What choice will they make and/or take?
Let the die be cast. Whichever way the wind blows, God will be at the end of the choice(s) made
The destination, is that picturesque
Your teacher, is so spot on with that it was through that fruit that we received an expanded conscience.
Adam and Eve's conscience, prior to eating the fruit, importantly only had to contend with whether it was right or wrong to eat the fruit
I once read that the true test of a man's character is what he does when no one is watching but Adam and Eve, prior to eating the fruit, because of lack of experiences (i.e. as in, no experiential knowledge of Good and Evil) were character-less.
The faculties of the spirit, comprises of: Fellowship, Conscience, Discernment or Intuition, but conscience, zeroing on it, after the spiritual disconnect brought, about by death, from eating the fruit, became marred
Conscience, then, being no longer under the influence of divine grace and greatly weakened, can no more be trusted to do its work and so man's character, that needs to be shaped or built up, had experiences to look up to for this to be done Man's character is shaped from his/her scraps with danger, from cuts and bruises of life, from pleasurables, thrills, sweetness of life etcetera
Mr A's character is different to Mr B's character This is because our different experiences, shapes our individual character, and its practically, character that determines what right or wrong action we take about a matter
I totally agree with you that Adam and Eve did not need to know about good and evil in the Garden since everything was perfect. There was no need for them to have experiential knowledge of Good and Evil They didn't need to personally experience all that is "Beautiful" and all that is "Adversity"
Actually they had more than one rule (e.g. rule to multiply, replenish etcetera) and significantly only had one specified forbidden rule, Its directive was clear and pretty straightforward about not to eat the fruit of the, "the Tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil"
I believe their conscience guided them how to behave towards the tree and even reminded them not to eat the fruit of the tree This is evident from the conversation that transpired between Eve and the serpent Eve wrestled with her conscience, trying to justify the reason, why she ought to eat the fruit
They had a sense of right and wrong but overruled conscience. Eve's defence is, from being deceived and Adam's defence, was to blame God, saying God was responsible
Anyway, they had a guilty conscience afterwards over their "... be like God, knowing good and evil" desires, and ultimately ended up hiding from God This obviously, after they decoded that, they have been sold down the river by the serpent and that their hopes, expectation and desire to ... be like God, knowing good and evil" actually comes with a huge price The enormity of what, knowing good and evil, means, and the extent of it, was soul wrecking and wrenching experience, Eve was inconsolable (i.e. Genesis 3:16)
The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was tucked away in a corner of the Garden of Eden It was prominently and centrally placed in the middle of the Garden of Eden alongside with the Tree of Life. It is because of the Tree of Life that they were evicted from continuing living in Eden, barred from reentering and prevented from squatting
From eating the fruit, death, the dividing line, has separated them from God. The spiritual disconnect, came in from eating the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil Now they have to take on and put up with the spewing contents of death's pandora box
Abel's murder at the hands of his brother Cain, is one of the by-products of eating the fruit
Sorrow actually made an appearance first before murder came on to the scene To God that was mediocre sorrow, as so declared, sorrow will be greatly multiplied to experience
Once they ate it, they opened a "Pandora box" or floodgates for all sorts of by-products
As earlier mentioned, the Tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil figure of speech, is a merism.
Good, in that context, is translated from a word, that means and typifies "Beautiful" Evil, in that context, is translated from a word, that means and typifies "Adversity".
The "Beautiful", is, as in, all and everything in between, thats dandy and good and the "Adversity", is, as in, every hardship, bad and ugly, difficult or unpleasant situation that possibly can happen.
Once they ate, it paved the way to begin having first hand experiences of several parts of all that's "Beautiful" and all that's "Adversity" They have become gods, to begin judging between beautiful and adversity. Good times, bad times, what's pretty, what's ugly, what's bitter, what's sweet, what's pain, what's pleasure, what's orgasmic, what's frigid, screaming, laughing, smiling, crying, commotion, tranquility, mourning, partying etcetera
Essentially after eating the fruit, the whole shebang spectrum will unleash into the world.frank\317 are you of the view, it is unfair on Adam and Eve for God to trust them and be left alone with the The tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil?
petra1, but some people having a seared conscience
pablobellins: Actually i know. But some christians still perform fetishness, say the C&S
Some people are still rooted to the ground and not in the air soaring and flying because they dont appreciate and embrace the law of aerodynamics that defies and renders impotent and powerless, talking here of the law, that obeys the principle of gravity (i.e. what goes up, must come down)
petra1: The Bible never said God cannot change in his opration. He does change his operation . He even repents . He changes his mind . Is that not why we pray and intercede for siners?
Exodus 32:11-13 And Moses besought the LORD his God, and said, LORD, why doth thy wrath wax hot against thy people . . . repent of this evil against thy people. . . . .And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people.
Gbam!
The method can change, but the method Handler doesn't change.
If you know, you know. Who no know, well sorry for you.
OkCornel: Are you sure you understood the basic question I asked you?
I asked for the link/source to your interpretation of Sudan/Yudan, and not an article about the Jews of Sudan.
Please help us with the link/source to that. The reference you put here says absolutely nothing about your meaning of Sudan, and where Sudan is a variant of Judah.
We are all waiting.
I am asking for something specifically, and you bring up something else altogether.
If donnie, the Oga, chief evangelist of the claim that Abraham, Jesus and the Israelites are blacks, just as himself is, cant give you the meaning of Sudan, and where Sudan, is a variant of Judah, how do you expect his bom boy to.
They both aren't just up to the task. This is like you telling them to go sell ice blocks to the Eskimos. They are too lazy to read history properly, correctly and well enough. Too dense to understand history properly, correctly and well enough. All donnie and his bom boy are good at, is picking up rotted and/or rotting low hanging fruits, posting maps, pictures et cetera circa 1400s only
Sudan's lost Jewish community - in pictures A recent call by a minister in Sudan's new government for Jewish people to return to the country and reclaim citizenship has shone a light on a small but once-thriving community.
Oral historian Daisy Abboudi, herself descended from Sudanese Jews, has been talking to members of the community and collecting their photographs.
David Gabra can still remember the exact date he left Sudan. "Twenty fifth of May 1965," he said with certainty when talking about his departure. At that time, things were getting increasingly difficult for Jewish people because of growing anti-Semitism. "There was chaos... I remember one time we closed ourselves up in our home, and they were throwing stones at us, at our home." David decided he could no longer stay in the country https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-49728912
The Ottoman Jewish Community of Sudan By Ibrahim M. Omer
This is a summary for a research work that I conducted on the history of the 19th century Ottoman Jewish community of Sudan, who were trapped in harsh conditions of the Islamic fundamentalism of El-Mahdiya during 1881-1898. The purpose here is to call for research and scholarly attention to a source of primary information that may be soon lost and for ever.
Unfortunately, information on the Ottoman Jewish Community of Sudan is of extreme scarcity; the only known works that are focused on the topic are Jacob's Children in the Land of the Mahdi: Jews of the Sudan by Eli Malka (1997) and the more expanded work The Jews in Sudan: Readings on the book of Eli Solomon Malka "Jacob's Children in the Land of the Mahdi" (in Arabic) by Sudanese author Maki Abu-Garja (2004). Although both works are the outcome of extensive and painstaking research, they still remain short of documenting such an important topic with all its vital consequences to a fair extent.
Eli Malka's father, Rabbi Solomon Malka visited Sudan in 1906; after the end of the Mahadiya. Upon arriving to Sudan, Rabbi Solomon furnished a Hebrew document in which he recorded information about the old and new-- by then-- Sudanese Jewish community. Sadly enough, the document was lost. The valuable information provided by Eli Malka, to whom we owe much of our knowledge of the Sudan's Jewish community, is derived from information he gathered from members of the once Sudanese Jewish community, as well as from his own memories (Warburg, 2001).
Abu Garga's book, on the other hand, is a remarkable work of documentation in which a large number of contemporary Sudanese families that have well known Jewish descent are listed. He provides elaborate reports on some of these families who now play leading roles in the country. Unfortunately, the bulk of the individuals he named are descendants of Jewish immigrants who came only after the Mahadiya period and thus, never had to hide their Jewish identity.
Sudan was a colony for the Ottoman Empire since 1583; Sudanese towns like El-Khandaq, and Suakin,were once major bustling Turkish centers. In1820, under Mohammed Ali Pasha, Sudan was incorporated as part of a new Turkish rule centered in Egypt, also known as the Turko-Egyptian conquest. A dual colonization by the Turks together with the British was put in order in the late1870s.
In 1881, Mohammed Ahmed El-Mahdi, a Sudanese religious figure, declared him self the Mahadi meaning "the expected one" or the Messiah as percieved in Islamic traditions. Motivated by resisting the foreign conquest of Sudan and inspired by the principles of Jihad, he led a war against the Turko-Egyptian conquest. In 1881, El-Mahdi succeeded in ending the Turkish colonization. In less than 17 years, however, the British returned to Sudan and reinstated their rule and again in cooperation with the Turkish rule that was regionally centered in Egypt by then.
Under the Mahadiya, Sudan came under an Islamic conservative violent rule. The horrors of the Mahadiya are still recognized by the older Sudanese generations. Executions were rampant as the former colonists and those accused of being their collaborators were punished as "infidels". The non-Muslim communities that settled in Sudan since the Ottoman conquest of Sudan in the late sixteenth century (which included Copts, Syrian Christians, Armenians, and Jews), were forced to convert to the "Mahdi Islam" under the threat of death.
All the converts were forced to change their names to Arabic-Muslim names and many women were taken as concubines by Mahadists. The descendants of these marriages, however, were cautious to keep their Jewish origins a secret and their number is not a small one. Due to the peculiar social structure and the inherited perception towards the Jewish faith, the majority of these families remained with fates unknown, untraceable, and not enlisted anywhere.
Unfortunately, we have the names of only eight Jewish families who document that state in the Mahadiya. The names are found in a poor record prepared by the Sirdar of the Egyptian military for the ministry of war in which information on the subjects of the former colonial Turkish rule that stayed in Sudan were recorded.
Seven of the eight names belonged to a group of Sephardic families and only the single Ashkenazi family of Mendel (Arabized Mandeel) was documented. The document may have been drawn even without the knowledge of the Jewish families. http://www.jewishmag.com/138mag/jews_ottoman_sudan/jews_ottoman_sudan.htm
PS: PLEASE TURN YOUR SMARTPHONE OR TABLET SIDEWAYS TO LANDSCAPE MODE, IN ORDER TO PROPERLY ENJOY VIEWING THOSE JEWS OF SOUDAN PICTURES
eplanning: Here's the link to the book. Page CVI describes the Jews of Soudan. I had to search for this for you. You're all so lazy. Only know how to sit around and blab like drunkards without sense.
MuttleyLaff: You're just reinforcing my point that they are all variations of the original word, lmao
It just like Michael, with variants like: Micael, Mikael (Swedish) Mikael, Mikkel (Norwegian) Mikael, Mikkel (Danish) Maikel, Michaël, Michel, Michiel (Dutch) Michal (Czech) Mikhael (Biblical Greek)
You are nothing than just an over inflated hypocrite, sitting on a high horse.
We know its in your DNA to covet other people's identity. It is in your DNA to blatantly and barefacedly lie
It is only a smh for you, poor history student/teacher like you, who wouldnt know that Sunni Ali reigned from about 1464 to 1492 and that the guy was mixing animism with his Islam practice faith.
Your egungun, in full masquerade regalia, don do mistake, go cross expressway during rush hour, lmao.
Israel, the Nation, was formed 400+ve after Israel, the man aka Jacob went to Egypt. Now upon arriving in the Promised Land, that of course, is Canaan. Israel were exiled at various time, namely the Assyrian exile first, then the Babylonian exile second and then the Roman obliteration and annihilation of Jerusalem in 70 AD
Where in the Bible or extra biblical source(s), does it say that, the Israelites migrated from Egypt, before the Exodus of Moses?
MuttleyLaff: donnie, doesnt read posts more than two to three sentences, because he is lazy, so is the reason why he didnt respond to defend his Muslim Israelite king Sunni Ali in exile on the west coasts of Africa, lmao
Why should I bother look up what I already know, hmm? As you can read from the two above mention of mine, didnt I say that its only a poor history student/teacher like donnie, who wouldn't know that Sunni Ali reigned from about 1464 to 1492 and that the guy was mixing animism with his Islam practice faith
They have no shame. I didnt expect him to descend that low in the gutter to do something like that. Smh. Just show how desperate someone like him is and the kind of dirty tricks they have upgraded to
OkCornel: That's why I've been insisting on his sources/links. Especially after passing off pictures of a lost African tribe in India as 'Indian Israelites'.
OkCornel: That's why I asked for your link/source, or is it not on the internet? Pictures only won't suffice, especially after passing off a lost african tribe in India as 'Indian Israelites' earlier on.
Done my search, there's no correlation between the words Yudan and Sudan.
Please help us with source(s)/ links to your meaning of Sudan.
Pictures only is what donnie is fraudulently good at doing. Also his Achilles heel is that he can't present anything down to the 10th century. He is limited to the 1400s
"For the king of Assyria will take away the Egyptians and Ethiopians as prisoners (i.e. the Cushite exiles/the exiles of Cush/exiles from Sudan/Nubians who lived in what is Southern Egypt) He will make them walk naked and barefoot, both young and old, their buttocks bared, to the shame of Egypt" - Isaiah 20:4
The first picture above uploaded by donnie, is not an Israelite, as he would like to make others believe, but rather is an Cushite/Nubian, just as with the second picture above, that shows Egyptians and Nubian slaves. It is a black-skinned Cushite exile/exile of Cush/exile from Sudan/Nubian who lived in what is Southern Egypt that donnie is portraying to be an Israelite.
Cush or Kush was, is the eldest son of Ham, who was one of the three sons of Noah. Cush/Ethiopia/Sudan was the brother of Canaan/pre-Israelite inhabitants, Mizraim/Egypt and Phut/Ancient Libya, and the father of the biblical Nimrod mentioned in the "Table of Nations"
Cush/Cushite, incidentally, found its way into Greek in the LXX as "Ethiopian" (i.e. LXX is the abbreviation for Septuagint or The Greek Old Testament) Just because Israelites were slaves, doesn’t make them black. The picture donnie plastered is not a picture of an Israelite. Israelites are not black skinned. Skin colours doesn't bother God. Just come to Him as you are. God is more interested in bloodline, not a race, not colour of your skin, not if you are black, white, green, purple, or blue.
The Graeco-Roman Period (332 BC -395 AD) marked the end of Persian rule over Egypt. The Persians (i.e. who came from what is now Iran) were defeated by the Greek conqueror, Alexander the Great, who occupied Egypt and founded a new capital city at Alexandria, so your picture titled Terracotta head of Semite, marked "Hebrew" by Petrie, is an Israelite, but not a black man.
Now about the Messiah, that you say, he was a black man with wooly hair and skin like burnt brass or bronze. HERESY! He is not a black man with wooly hair. If you really want to know how an Israelite looks like, go read Song of Solomon 5:10-16, the verses describes Solomon, a real, bona fide proper, true born Hebrew Israelite King, lmao, not the fake arsed, Israelite wannabe, plastic Bantu African, donnie falsely parading himself to be an authentic Israelite that he isn't.
I keep telling you baba d, that I have more than I say, and speak less than I know. donnie, you know I am 24/7/365 watching & have my eyes locked on you.
I am sure most have followed that Bible translations interchangeably used Cush, Ethiopia and Sudan for each other, and so giving the impression that they mean the same thing.
Christianity Etc › Re: Is God Really The Same Yday; Today And Forever More. by MuttleyLaff: 5:30am On Jun 10, 2020
