Oahray's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Oahray's Profile › Oahray's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 (of 379 pages)
superbloke: Not in our solar system, and they are official. There's one said to be a twin of earth.No. In the outer part of our solar system. Here is an example from nasa website: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2005/29jul_planetx/ hope pyguru doesnt ban me for this. |
[quote author=Mynd_44]Well In the context where it was used, it was refering to out solar system and the new ones found are out of it. Planets are found everyday no doubt but in our solar system, there are 8 simple[/quote]lol. Yeah. Noticed it ![]() |
binger: Rating: 9.9%waaaaat! 9.9% =9.9/100 =0.99/10 which is approximately 1/10. seriously? ![]() |
There have been some vague reports of discoveries of other planets tho, but none official as yet. |
[quote author=Mynd_44]I can't resist criticising the lines there so I wanna do it here. How many planets are in our solar system?[/quote]8. Pluto has been stripped of its planetary status. |
Sijo01: [s]what a man can do, a woman can do farrr better![/s]..... Ride on, babe. ![]() |
newacca: Hi dude! how r u doing? It's PM here.thanks sire/ma'am. I'm good. |
[quote author=Mynd_44]I called only oaharay oooo. ID wetin na? Oaharay, are you a science student? I have a question[/quote]Yes I am. Ask. |
Idowuogbo: ^ evening! Wetin u dey find hia?ha! You asking me? |
Good evening all... Or whatever the time is in your zone. |
Idowuogbo: Leave kini? I no understand dat part now... Wen d tin stop, na binger go do d mouth to mouth?b4 nko? Abi you go like do am? |
@Sijo, nice lines... |
Idowuogbo: Her breathe stops ke? I no understand o!leave am jawe ![]() |
@itsmodella's lines, DAYUUUUUM! love dis. ![]() |
Idowuogbo: Hin name Kunle? Hmmmm.. Na so underground paroles dey unveil olmao ![]() |
ooman: Thank you for your questions, i like your persistencehahahahaha... Now that is hillarious. 'A unicellular organism has no spirit that goes to heaven or hell' automatically translates to 'there is no spirit in lifeforms'? Lmao. First of all, I believe the spirit is our life force, present in all living things. I do not believe in an immortal soul, but that's besides the point. The fact that those actions happen when it is supposedly 'dead' only shows there is more to it than meets the eye. Someone once said atheists are more logical than theists. You prove them wrong everytime. Does that bacteria have a brain? No. Does it think? No. Can it talk or post on nairaland? No. By your own (il)logic, is it safe to assume there are no creatures who can do the above. Mehn, you are funny .That is still no proof bro. Science is restricted only to the physical, so do not expect to see a spirit with your microscope when you have not even seen the force of gravity which you believe in. I do not want to deviate into metaphysics with you, as I am not impressed with your power of logical reasoning yet. If there is any thing I can grab from this thread, it is the fact that atheists' sense of logic is seriously flawed. Like your fellow atheists, you have not proved that God does not exist. |
ooman: Well you seem not to check the right place, see thisI hope you took note of the wordings used, 'the microbe can repair its broken DNA', and not just the words of the scientist. That phrase denotes internal activity. Years ago, scientists made bogus claims, many believed in the piltdown man, and I am sure many ardent followers like you quoted them. Your bolded quote is as effective as my using the bible to convince you of anything. Let me add the other parts you cunningly left out of your post: " It turns out there are two stages to this process. In the first stage, the short fragments of (single-stranded) DNA are gradually reassembled into longer and longer pieces, until they are complete again. This is possible at all only because of the unique structure of DNA — DNA segments will stick together only when they have precisely matching base sequences in common. The process is facilitated in bacterial DNA by an enzyme called DNA polymerase I. The enzyme is encoded by a gene known as polA, which is present in all prokaryotes. However, the DNA polymerase I found in D. radiodurans apparently performs its job much more efficiently than its analogue in other bacteria. This natural process is similar to the laboratory process known as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which also uses a polymerase enzyme. But it's the second stage that is really special in D. radiodurans, and which has just been elucidated in the latest research: ... single long strands of DNA do little to resurrect the microorganism until the second stage of the newly discovered process kicks in: the simple pairing discovered by Watson and Crick decades ago — adenine (A) bonds with thymine (T), and cytosine (C) bonds with guanine (G). By inserting a special version of the nucleotide thymine that only binds to single strands of DNA — known as 5- bromodeoxyuridine — the researchers could observe as the single strands bonded with complementary strands to form complete chromosomes. "Once the chromosome is functional, the synthesis of all cellular components starts, and the cellular life is back," Radman says. " 1st question (hope you answer this): How does a 'clinically dead' microbe manage to resurrect itself? Chance? No? 2nd question: If it can perform those actions, why is it tagged 'dead'? Your bacteria example simply survives desiccation and radiation, and repairs itself. That is not 'resurrection'. Your quote does nothing to prove otherwise. Even if it can rightly be termed resurrection, how is that proof there is no God? ![]() Lmao. Atheists only pretend to be guided by logic. |
ooman: Well you didnt google completely. Radiodurans are tough for real but the only thing different about them is that they can "resurrect". This proves that there is no spirit in living things that gives life . Death means degeneration of genome, life means complete sequence of genome. Got it?The bolded is yet another attempt at proof with fraudulent means. The Deinococcus radiodurans does not 'resurrect' by any stretch of that word. It is simply highly resistant to radiation and and desiccation (extreme drying), that is why it is tagged the world's toughest bacterium. It also has a unique quality in which it can repair both single and double-stranded DNA. When a mutation is apparent to the cell, it brings it into a compartmental ring-like structure, where the DNA is repaired and then is able to fuse the nucleoids from the outside of the compartment with the damaged DNA. Is that what resurrection means? The bacteria simply survives very tough conditions. Desiccation is not death. Where your conclusion is based on a flawed premise, your whole argument is unsound. You have not provided the slightest of proof of your claim of the non-existence of God. Try harder. |
#smh... Extremists. Where is sexkillz when you need him to hide derailing posts? *waiting for wooing contest to begin* |
ooman: Lets just wait and see science triumph again, as before.while you wait, pls answer the questions posed in my posts. Quit dodging! ![]() |
Lovethywilbedon: PLEASE CAN YOU TELL ME SOME EXPERIMENTS THAT PROVED THAT THERE IS NO GOD. I googled the Radiodurans and it says that it is simply a bacterium that made the Guinness Book of Records as the world's toughest bacterium and I don't see how this proves the non existence of God just as the world's highest mountain "Everest" doesn't prove the non existence of God.Its no use. He has no proof. No atheist or evolutionist has proof of non-existence of a Creator. They simply deny proof of existence. Too bad they do not know that its not the same thing. Illogical minds, all of them. The ones on nairaland are just clueless followers. |
ooman: You compare the existence of the brain to God's. Well tell you what, take an X-ray scan of your head, you'd see your brain. What scan must i take to see your God?the same kind of scan you would need to see gravity and air. People have had experiences that reinforced their belief in God and the supernatural. That is like taking a scan. You havent had such experiences, so you do not believe in God or people who claim they have. Well, I also believe you havent had a brain scan either. So why do you believe you have a brain? Why do you believe other people who have had scans? Belief in evolution only encourages dogmatism. You do not have proof for your claims, yet you dismiss other opinions as false cos you think there is no proof. You dodged one of my earlier questions. Do you believe in the metaphysical or paranormal? Oh, yes, and another. Why is it the supposed biggest proof of evolution, The Piltdown Man, turned out to be a forgery? |
ooman: Well sorry but you are. One thing you dont know is that if there is any evidence for God that I cannot refute, just one, then i will believe in God. But there isnt, instead of you to prove your God, you are getting soppy . I know about intelligent design ID, but is it ever taught in schools? No, have you every wonder why? because it is not true, it is just a wish that cannot be proved. God is no longer taught in science classes because experiments have proved there is no God . Why not start with radiodurans, you can google that.I'd only answer the bolded. Its the only thing worth commenting on in the pile of illogical trash you posted. For the first bolded part. I do not need to prove that God exists. Why? Its like asking you to prove you have a brain. There is evidence, but I could still attribute your intellect to something else. If I do that, just as you evolutionists attribute the wonders of the universe, our world, and even our bodies to blind evolution, its sheer stupidity. Why do you believe only what is taught in schools to be true? Its because you are gullible. Tell me, do you believe in the metaphysical, the paranormal? The second part shows your gullibility and overdependence on science. Ever heard of the biggest scientific fraud ever? Scientists forged the supposed 'missing link' (the Piltdown skull) just to back their claims. Go do your research on Piltdown skull. There is more scientific fraud like it, such as: The Sokal Affair, Lamarckian Inheritance, The Great Moon hoax, Discoveries of Shinichi Fujimura, The Tasaday Tribe, The Lying Stones, The Cold Fusion or Low Energy Nuclear Reactor invention The Perpetual Motion Machine, The Gardiff Giant, The works of Jan Hendrik Schön... and lots more. Google each one to confirm. Would you really wanna base your beliefs on people who would forge 'evidence' to support their baseless claim? You do not need to answer that if it would be embarrassing. |
Double post |
ooman: If there were evidence of creation, why are almost all biologists evolutionists exist the gullible onessame reason people like you who have made no impact whatsoever on science believe them. Reason: An illogical mind which believes that whatever is not perceived by the senses does not exist. Do you have any proof that God does not exist? No. Even the major proponents of evolution do not. Contrary to your claim, many scientists believe in intelligent creation. Those who do not, leave room for skepticism. Scientific knowledge has been changing over time and will still change. Why? Cos there is a limit to the certainty of human knowledge. Yet you believe their every theory. Now tell me, who is a gullible mind? |
@op, GBAM! There is overwhelming evidence all around us, of intelligent design (creation) by a creator. Even if there wasnt, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. To think atheists claim to be logical minds. |
Kai! Gals! #smh It would always be a man's world jawe ![]() |
lalaosky: lol..real female fans i know are chelsea fans.they even come to viewing centers without their bros or bfs to partake in the sheer fun that footie bringsThose one's wey no even know who coach chelsea b4 mourinho? They just like the noise associated with the club, and most are fans cos of their brothers and bfs. |
Onaedo, how far? (hope I got that name right) ![]() |
lalaosky: so you are a man u fan?...oya chop amabeg e. Na dia bros or bf dem dey follow. Real female fans I'v seen dey arsenal. Dem know ball die. |
lalaosky: lol...ac milan of yester-years aint the same again.btw, i'm a man utd fan till tribalism stop in NLtrue. No Ibra or Tiago Silva. But they are not that bad sha. Just that the malaga we beat on a regular basis came tops in their group ![]() |
[quote author=gree-die]excuse me, u don't talk abt man u lyk dat [/quote]Ok, I won't. Madrid is enof problem for you guys ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 (of 379 pages)




