₦airaland Forum

omenka:
OMG!! You must be kidding me!! So who was the guy the military killed??

musiwa112: [size=38pt]stop deceiving people. that is not the lagos --ibadan expressway because there is no gap in between the road.[/size]

[img]http://1.bp..com/-h26UQnGVaSM/TywqzaVqv6I/AAAAAAAAB7k/H_AoR_ZMvOk/s320/lagos_ibadan.jpg[/img]

https://media.punchng.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Lagos-Ibadan-Express-360x225.jpg

how long has musiwa left Nigeria? That is the Lagos-ibadan express road, and it has gap I the middle. Most part of the gap is been covered due to the expansion

https://img.naij.com/1200x627c/n/06/c/lagos-ibadan-expressway_-_2.jpg
https://en.africatime.com/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/photo-articles/route3_14.jpg?itok=kifvBlmx

PAGAN 9JA:
^YEs . because you fellows are the biggest hypocrites.

criticising Pagans and then following our customs.

phuck_NL: Try and read from the first page before jumping into conclusions. If I analyze your statement, the deduction about who is or who isn't a f00l might backfire on you.
I do not think anyone disputes that NOAH's ARK was built. Heck, the title of the thread is "how big was it"
The question is how possible would it have been to build an ark so big, it would house all the animals for one year amongst other things.

phuck_NL: Exactly. The take it or leave it doctrine. If you believe in it so much, don't you think it is your fundamental duty to make sure I "see" the light.
Won't you be penalized for letting a fellow human go astray? No one is argueing with you. I am simply asking fundamental questions that need answers. I am a fully grown adult and I think if anyone just tells me something and expects me to "take it or leave it", then my parents have wasted money raising me.

flexible1: I dont think you'd be wrong if you call them Power Bikes. It's a slang (perhaps coined in Naija).Just the way we call cars by slangs such as ''Ride".As for your interest in Biking , before starting you may wish to consider some factors - for instance how far out do you wish to ride mostly - long or short distances ? What type of roads would you be riding on most of the times ? Would you be riding everyday of the week ? etc.
There are various types of Bikes each designed for a purpose.Not to say they cant serve other purposes but best suit a particular purpose. eg in cars we have the SUVs, Sedans, Coupes, Estates, Heavy duty etc. Now imagine buying a heavy duty truck for your everyday commuting ! Driving it to and from work everyday. Not that it wouldnt serve your purpose.But it just was not designed for that !
You can easily categorise Bikes based on purpose or engine capacity. There are Sports Bikes, Touring Bikes, Dirt Bikes etc. Then the 250CCs, 500CCs, 600CCs, 750CCs,1000CCs, 1100CCs, 1400CCs etc. The 1000CCs and above are called Super Bikes. They can hit 0-160 KM/H in less than 5 Seconds !! If you are a fan of accelaration ! Needless to say - these are the Bikes to avoid if you are just starting.

Me_Aboki: OP is just advertising his sheer ignorance, so IBB (gwari), Aliyu Attah (Igbira) and Abacha (Shuwa) are all Hausa-Fulani? SMH.

As for the so called northern dominance, lets examine how things should have played out if the rules of democracy and simple majority were to apply.
Accordingly southerners would never have had a whiff of the presidency or its equivalent because the majority of the monolithic north would always come up trumps first.

Southerners know and are jealous of this and had since been manipulating the rules (shifting the goalpost so to speak) to overcome the northern majority.

When they failed through the ballot box they took power forceful through Nigeria's first coup and failed subsequently after the tables were turned.

Secondly, they tried with some degree of success to forment the seeds of discord along ethnic and religious lines between the core north and the middle belt (though I am not saying that the Hausa/Fulani/Kanuris played no role in this) so as to reduce this majority, and continue to use their southern owned newspapers to stoke the flames of unrest between these northern groups, so that today the north is divided more than ever before.

Thirdly, they introduced the concept of rotational presidency thereby distorting the very principle of democracy - which northerners accepted if only to have peace.

Fourthly, they also introduced the concept of geopolitical zoning for the same reason - which again the north accepted only for sake of peace.

In addition, after laying down these ground rules, who was first to break them out greed? Yes, it was the southerners who insisted on taking over when it was clearly not their turn - even so, the northerners reluctantly accepted just to have peace.

Currently, who is also breaking a gentlemen's agreement to run for only one term so that north could resume its missed turn; if not our present retardeen - where even credible sources such as the BBC have reported on the said agreement, yet in the face of it all this, he and his lying cheating southern folks wish to pretend otherwise.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-1233901

It is very rare in history and highly unlikely for ppl to voluntarily give up power just like that, yet northerners have ceded power to the south for sake of peace.

It is therefore extremely painful to hear some southerners, still wet behind the ears and without thinking, repeatedly spewing out the myth and false propaganda accusing northerners of having a born to rule mentality - wherein it is actually the southerners who have always demonstrated the propensity, via their by hook or by crook attitude, for I must rule mentality.

In view of the foregoing, it should be evidently clear that there would be no formula under which the southerners will be satisfied with the north, due to their (southerners) greed and selfishness.

Therefore the only way forward is for this country to divide - the north would actually be far better off on its own in the long run; while southerners can go on and self implode, consuming themselves in their own greed.

PasD: you're mixin up two things here. To reject the Spirit is not same as blasphemy! So therefore, not believeing in Jesus is definitely NOT the sin against the HS. This is the part I needed clearity which was the reason I posted this topic.

You rightly said that the pharisees are not christians (but they knew who exactly Jesus was). I'm even confusing my self sef lol.

But I knw you did not get the answer shaa