₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,330,568 members, 8,446,077 topics. Date: Thursday, 16 July 2026 at 04:39 AM

Toggle theme

Ono's Posts

Nairaland ForumOno's ProfileOno's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 (of 132 pages)

FamilyChild Dedication by ono(op): 12:50pm On Jul 19, 2007
My baby girl is more than three months old now. She's my first child. Pastors and elders of my Church, including members have come to see and pray for both parents and daughter. Many of my colleagues have come around too. But some of my colleagues in the office are on my neck about dedicating the child - a sort of ''welcome to the world'' ceremony for my baby.

Somehow, my wife wants us to cancel all our plans for the ceremony. No reason given other than it's not compulsory. My people must one do child dedication after having a child?
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 9:13am On Jul 19, 2007
laudate:
Why are you exaggerating?? In what way has Ono expressed a perpetual dependence on the Hausa for salvation?? I don't get it o! Everyone has a different perspective on the causes, and the aftermath of the civil war. It happens the world over. The guy simply has a different viewpoint. Refute his allegations with facts. Simple. I have tried to set him straight on a few occassions. I don't believe in conjecture. Its' better to place the facts on the table & let people judge for themselves.
I have tried, using available facts at my disposal, plus rational thinking to simulate the events in the country that led to the Biafran War. I have a reasonable match in the end. I have read books on the war. I have also read several articles written in the past on this war. And like you, Laudate, said earlier, Ojukwu has consistently maintained an ominous silence on the role he played to execute that war. So are many of his Igbo brethren who partook in the war. I wonder why they do not want to say anything. Could it be that they admit they were at fault? So far I have painted the picture of that war as I see it. If anyone has any disputable facts to present, let him/her do so without making snide remarks or making derogatory statements about me, my tribe and my people in the Delta.

Maybe you can take me back to those few occassions where had to quanta- argue, Did I budge in the end?

@Prizm,
1.0 Much as what you've posted about the coup that led to that war is true, you need to look at the ''general mood'' in the country after the January 1966 coup. You need to in particular zero in on the people of Northern Nigeria, who are predominantly Moslems, proud, Jihadists, mostly Illiterates and are very many. Killing their Sardauna along with several other ministers of non-Igbo extraction spelt trouble.

Please read this link from wiki. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biafran_War and note this.

It is important to note, though, that most of the oil produced in Nigeria is from the non-Igbo Niger Delta

Wiil continue later.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 2:33pm On Jul 18, 2007
denex:
@Laudate

do you understand French? I'd like to show you some articles but they are written in french.

By the way, I didn't say the Ibos fought for Crude Oil. They fought for self preservation.

But Ojukwu machinated them on purpose into the situation they found themselves.
Please tell me the difference between fighting for self preservation and fighting for what you will use to do just that.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 2:22pm On Jul 18, 2007
laudate:
Abeg, make all of una cool down!!  shocked

@denex,

I have read about the TotalFinaElf angle to the civil war, but since I do not have any facts to disprove or corroborate it, I will keep mute. But please note: you got it wrong when you implied the Igbo fought the war due to oil. NO sir!! angry The Igbo fought the war, because a large number of them had been killed in the North, and they needed to defend themselves. Period. Along the line, when resources were being depleted as the war was being fought, maybe the thought of using oil revenue to finance the acquisition of arms that would be needed to defend Biafra, may have arisen. But that war was not fought primarily to annex the oil fields in the Niger-Delta. NO!! Read up on the events that led to the 1966 coups and the eventual declaration of seccession. Nowa Omoigui as well as some British historians, have published some facts about what took place between 1966 and 1970. There have also been some non-fiction books written about the war. Draw your own conclusions, after you must have gone through them.

What I believe till date, is that all the peaceful avenues known to man were not fully explored to resolve the situation, before the nation was plunged into war. Like I keep saying "War is nothing, but the absence of wisdom." Those are not my words, but those of people who have seen enough bloodshed, to know that conflict resolves nothing.
Its in Dawodu.com that you would see all the write up by Omogui. There's no way Igbos will be killed by northerner without some form of provocation from some quarters. And judging by the mood of the northerners at the time, it would be rather impossible for people who are muslims, jihadists et al, uneducated lot, volatile people, at the time to spare anyone tagged enemy of their progress. Even if I were in their shoes, although I wll not go as far as killing innocent people, but I will be angry at the people who killed my leaders for flimsy reasons. Just the way I'm angry at the people of the three ethnic groups milking us dry in the Delta. And just like Afam, Mckren and other Igbos are up in arms defending their people's action. It's a natural thing to defend what's yours.

Is it because an Hausa man has not come to say anything yet that you guys think you're having some say? Let the Danmasanis and other northern people of the NL forum come and say something about what they know of the Biafran war. It's then there will be a balanced view of the facts that led to the war.
PoliticsRe: Do You Believe The Official Report On 9/11 by ono(m): 1:51pm On Jul 18, 2007
TayoD:
@Ono,
You need to have an understanding of the mechanics of materials to understand the diffenre in this case. Concrete is very difficult to destroy by impact, including explosive impact. Why do you think countries today are seeking technology for bunk-shattering bombs?

Have you ever considered that bomb shelters are made of reinforced concrete and not steel? Accepted, if the WTC was built with R.C., it likely would not fail like that if the perimeter walls were thick enough. But that is not the case. High rise buildings are built with steel and not R.C. because of the inherent properties of each. And the higher you go up on the high rise, the lighter the steel material used for the columns due to the lighter loads.

The bottom line is that you need to compare apples to apples. You can not expect steel to behave like reinforced concrete and vice versa. Each material has its advantages and disadvantages.
Ok. But I read somewhere, that those towers were built to withstand some brute force- equal to or even greater than that of reinforced concrete (will get the links). I mean, technology improves with years of understanding of the behaviours of materials. I did a bit of Structural Mechanics and materials science too - though not in details. Every engineering student must do those courses, along with other foundation courses. But that's not what we're talking here.

Except I get some other concrete evidence that it's those planes that crashed into the buildings that caused such a disaster, I will not believe anything that's posted in here as facts.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 1:27pm On Jul 18, 2007
Yes:
Greed: Ojukwu wants all the oil to himself and his people

Pride: You were very proud indeed at the time. A lot of the brilliant men around were Igbos. Part of the facts the British knew they can't handle a Nigeria led by the Southern people. Yes, your people stood up for what was right. It's like an ant standing up to an elephant at the time and telling the elephant to his face that he's stupid. You knew the Brits will support a united Nigeria, yet you stood in their way. We know better today.

Self Delusion: To your leaders, who thought they were dealing with stupid and foolish people in other regions of Nigeria, until the war came and prove them wrong.

Any other thing?
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 1:11pm On Jul 18, 2007
angel101:
From what I understand of the war, it was the North that started the agitation to seceed. But they were cajoled by the British govt to remain because that was the only way they (british) could be sure of benefiting from the natural resources in the country (oil). As it is well known that the colonialists could not govern the country through the south.
Now tell me, what manner of man will see death on the horizon by taking a wrong step, and will go ahead to take that step? If you ask me, that man is someone who thinks he can play a fast one on other peoples intelligence and get away with it. Only a fool will do that.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 1:07pm On Jul 18, 2007
I'm waiting for a Non-Igbo to come here and state with facts, how he/she believes that greed, arrogance, pride, self delusion on the part of Igbo leaders (Ojukwu being the rallying point at the time) was not the major cause of the Biafran War.

All these people posting are Igbos, by ethnic affiliation and otherwise, so they can pass with their facts. We know why they're reacting like this. I will do thesame if I were in their shoes. I want someone else to contribute
PoliticsRe: Do You Believe The Official Report On 9/11 by ono(m): 12:14pm On Jul 18, 2007
I was watching the History Channel yesterday, and the documentary was on how the Germans lost the Battle of Stalingrad during WWII. Stalingrad was the old name of the present day Russian city called Volvograd - the administrative center of Volgograd Oblast.

That documentary showed how the stuff - Concrete and Cement mixed together (called reinforced concrete) with which the city was built at the time (way back 1944-1945), helped prevented the total destruction of that city by the invading German armies. German bombers and artillleries rained bombs of up to a100 thousand tonnes on that city, but those bombs, according to the man who went up to view some of the photographs of the ruins of the city in their museum,  did not penetrate deep into the structures   So, with partially destroyed buildings sheltering very determined people, the stage was set for guerilla type warfare against the invading German armies. The city inhabitants, thought to have been exterminated by German bombs, put up one of the greatest resistance to a brutal army in human history. They defeated the Germans, who believed they did everything right to destroy Stalingrad and do not have a clue as to how they were defeated by the inhabitants of the city.

After that documentary, I thought about the incidents at WTC on 9/11. I knew I might be wrong to conclude that there was more to the destruction of those buildings than meet the eye. So, I decided to share the bits and pieces of the documentary as I saw it with our learned audience on Nairaland.

If bombs could not reduce a number of once standing edifices in Stalingrad at the time to rubbles, how on Earth did planes laden with jet-fuel only caused such catastrophic destruction of lives and a well fortified structure as the WTC at New York in 9/1/1/2000 AD?
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 6:54pm On Jul 17, 2007
I hate no Igbo person.

This ''Igbo Hater'' tag should be removed from me immediately. I have Igbo links. Lineage actually.

There are no assumptions. It's impossible that the whole of Nigeria armoury, at the time, would wake up one day and just go all out the annihilate the Igbos. Or what do you think? Something pushed them into doing just that.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 6:43pm On Jul 17, 2007
Afam,
Please don't take these things to heart for too long. I have read several of your posts on Nairaland and I respect many of your views (and you know that too).

But, on this one, if you remove ethnic sentiments, and put on your ''Objectivity Cloak'', you will agree with the views of Omaseye. The central theme of the Biafran War was the OIL in the NIGER DELTA. And since Ojukwu and other selfish Igbos, who could not get what they want at the time, lost the war, they come around again singing a new song in 2007.
PoliticsRe: 1998 Obasanjo Worths N20,000, Today He Worth N180 Billion ! by ono(m): 6:35pm On Jul 17, 2007
MILITIA:
Please, like we need evidence to show who the lynchpin looting mafia boss is? shocked  They confess with their mouths everyday declaring "mind boggling' assets in an environment that defies any economic planning and investment strategy! Like Judge Judy over here will say----------PLEASE DO NOT PEE ON MY LET AND TELL ME IT IS RAINING!-----------If you are blind, deaf and dumb, you can smell abi?  Nigerians have even lost the ability to smell!  So rain water and piss water can be used to cook their meals since they cannot tell the difference!  TUFIA-KWA! embarassed
Ermm, thank you sister Militia.

The pivot of my first statement is could. I did not use is. Why can't people understand simple English in the morning or evening?
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 6:30pm On Jul 17, 2007
All thess ones na late coming. Ojukwu (and all Igbos) lost the Biafran War. His people surrendered the Biafran flag to OBJ somewhere in their own territory.

But, in order not to make them feel too bad about the war, Gowon said ''No victor, No vanquished''. What else do the Igbos want now? Gowon should go kill his people and the rest of Nigeria for the Igbos mistakes?

If the Igbos did not consent to the war, how is it possible that Ojukwu alone orchestrated that war without the active participants of loyalists and others who stand to gain something from the war?
PoliticsRe: 1998 Obasanjo Worths N20,000, Today He Worth N180 Billion ! by ono(m): 6:14pm On Jul 17, 2007
So, then, it's true that OBJ could be worth 180 billion Naira (todays money), at least going by the evidence graciously dished out by Ugwumba. Need we any further proof that OBJ is the lynchpin of all the thievery that was and is still going on in this country?
PoliticsRe: Do You Believe The Official Report On 9/11 by ono(m): 9:34am On Jul 17, 2007
Is it possible that the plane was laden with explosives by those Terrorists, such that on impact and detonation of these explosives (in the building), we had such debris jutting out of the building like shown above?
PoliticsRe: Do You Believe The Official Report On 9/11 by ono(m): 9:28am On Jul 17, 2007
The painful bit about that 9/11 event is the number of lives lost (no, sacrificed) to satisfy the sinful desires of a greedy few. Reminds me of what happened during Biafra.

I just hope all these events will not lead us to WW3.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 2:20pm On Jul 16, 2007
I will not reply you (Mckren) on this issue again. I am not known for making rash comments on this forum, and whoever I have offended by my last post should please accept my sincere apologies. It's just a forum, air your views. Live and lets live.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 1:37pm On Jul 16, 2007
McKren:
Ono

Someone thinks you are a bad student of history, I don't think so. I think you are plane misguided and stupid. Sometimes I wonder if you are a 5 year old kid. Some people gave Your forefathers other people's properties which they aquired through hard work in exchange for your so-called birthright (oil). 47years latter you don't control your oil, you have sold most of those properties out of hunger, yet you have no peace in your hometown.

Instead of regretting your forefathers cowardice and mortgaging your future just for peanuts which accounts for the crisis in your region today you come here typing loads of rubbish.

If Nigeria decides to have a debate today for local control of resources in the NASS, the Igbo senators will be the first to vote for it.

I think you should be ashamed of yourself that 47years after your fathers betrayed you, you are betraying yourself.
I have said it, at least on this thread, that we're not discussing Niger Delta here. There are several other threads you can latch up to and say whatever you like there.

Anyways, true, our forefathers sold their birthright. No doubt about that. But your forefathers, led you to a needless war, where you lost out woefully, with millions of your people killed like cockroaches and rats. But for the intervention of well meaning countries and individuals alike, your type and generation would not be here talking today. You probably would have been killed with your parents, while you're still in his prick or womb.

You come here to tell the world that you fought for dignity, pride and other bullcrap, when we all know that it's your forefather's greed to amass wealth that does not belong to them to themselves that led to a war that would have resulted to the complete annihilation of your ethnic group.

Today, your type cannot become the president of this country. All of your efforts continue leading you backwards in the scheme of things. You're even regarded as third-class citizens. Now tell me, what could be worst than this?


Sincere apologie to my good Igbo friends, but I need to put this McKren where he belongs - in the trash can.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 1:00pm On Jul 16, 2007
Planner:
@Ono,
you said:

Either you are very p[oor student of history or you are just being mischievous. How could you say or any other person for that matter to say that the Nigerian Civil War was fought because of crude oil? THAT IS VERY VERY WARPED. Instead the foriegn governments that supported either Nigerian troops or the Biafran troops had motives behind it. Britain preferred Nigeria to be united so that she can maximise her neocolonialist policies. So was France. So try and read up and stop engaging in intellectual mastrubation.
See, there's no need for mudslinging here. I do not know you from Adams. This forum merely enables people to hide behind a computer and type whatever they like. And when knowledgeable people talk - as it is in this political section of the forum (not all the time though) I expect the utmost sense of responsiblity, decorum, respect and clarity. You need to bring yourself to that level, so that we can both reason together. And if my terms are too much for you to bare, please try someone else.

You never said anything about Frenchmen and their armies until now. You brought this up, cause Denex said something about it.

Whatever addition there is to the Nigerian Civil War (Biafran War), the truth is that the Igbos in particular, created the fertile ground for that war to thrive. It's possible you guys went into some form of alliance with France (Ojukwu being the arrow head at the time), with the intention of sharing the proceeds from crude sales from the delta. And since the Igbos generally lost out, that deal came out bad.
Foreign AffairsRe: Terror Plot In London by ono(m): 9:26am On Jul 16, 2007
.
Foreign AffairsRe: Terror Plot In London by ono(m): 9:24am On Jul 16, 2007
David,
Lets talk on YIM. I never believed I will be talking like this after what I saw on TV on 911. But sometimes, people change. Don't take a rigid position on all issues, be fluid and listen to others too. They might have something you never know.

As per the radioactive stuff missing from Nigeria, well denex has done swift justice to that. Lets talk.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 9:04am On Jul 16, 2007
RichyBlacK:
@Ono
You seem to place a lot of emphasis on crude oil, as if that's the holy grail of development. Look at this issue globally, Japan (not a crude oil heavy weight) has 13 times the GDP and 2.5 times the GDP per capita of Saudi Arabia (260.1 billion barrels of oil reserves - about 24% of the world's proven total petroleum reserves). Having crude oil does not guarantee that every child that falls sick will get adequate health care, or that the schools will be well funded, or that basic amenities like power, good roads, etc. will be available. Nigeria is a good case study; with all the crude oil we have, how has it made life better for the average Nigerian? Though natural resources played a role in the Biafran War, the main reason for the war was survival. I see the war as a statement of survival. War has ended, Igbos have learnt a lesson or two, and they are doing an excellent job in surviving.

Today, decades after the Biafran War, the people of the Niger Delta are (still) being dispossessed of the resources (that you attach inordinate value to). As far as I'm concerned this (the plundering) is atrocious, however, if the thinking of the present leaders of the Niger Delta is anything remotely close to yours (I make no claim on your background), then the problems of the ND region will only persist, unfortunately.
The problem with you guys is that you all like going out of context. The crux of this discussion, if I'm not wrong, is the Reasons for The Biafran War, which took place in the late 60s- early 70s. We're trying to get the reasons why Nigeria went to War with the Igbos at the time. We're not talking here about Igbos, Hausas or Yorubas potential as at today. Why don't you just face up to the issue on discourse and lets reason them out?

And I can say that, part of the reasons why you guys became so ''strong'' in every sphere of human ''endeavour'' is because you learnt quite a lot from that War. Nigeria did learn a lot too, though.

Donzman:
What the hell?. . .Biafra was fought because of oil? We have people replying this retard!
Na you be retard. Yeye man.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 8:55am On Jul 16, 2007
Wishy wishy wish. Keep on wishing.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 4:26pm On Jul 13, 2007
My people, we're talking about 1966, where and when the oil and gas resources of the Igbo speaking areas were yet to be discovered. You guys are talking about them now because they are recent discoveries.

Besides, we're not talking about the Niger Delta here, are we? What you need to prove wrong is the facts that led to the Biafran War and nothing more. You don't want to take me on the Niger Delta issues, please hold your peace.
Foreign AffairsRe: Terror Plot In London by ono(m): 4:16pm On Jul 13, 2007
TayoD:
Anyway, for those who care to know the truth here's a link to the facts about the 4,000 Jews that Afam now wants us to believe as good information: http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2005/Jan/14-260933.html
Until such a time as GW Bush is out of the White House, and the place is swept clean of all his cohorts and replaced with duely elected President of the USA, I will not believe anything as information coming out from that place.

If GW Bush can lie about the WMD stuff, to invade Iraq, he can lie about the 4000 missiong Jews at the WTC.
Foreign AffairsRe: Terror Plot In London by ono(m): 4:01pm On Jul 13, 2007
Denex has made some startling revelations. And Afam, much as I don't agree with many of your views on a number of issues on this forum, issues which I believe you know and I need not mention them, I will agree with you fully on this one.

We need to be veru careful the way we look at things. We need to be much more objective, vigilant and pro-active now than ever before. As far as I'm concerned, all those London bombings were stage managed - until proven by irrefutable facts.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 3:06pm On Jul 13, 2007
McKren:
Afam

Some posts don't need to be dignified with a reply.

Some of us honestly need to go and research who make up the today Niger-Delta.

There are 9 States in Niger-Delta Development Commision (NDDC), Imo, Abia, Rivers, Delta, Cross River, Akwa Ibom, Edo, Bayelsa and Ondo.

The first 2 are total Igbo States, in the next 4 there are apreciable amount of Igbos. That is 6/9 and someone will come here asking why the then Map of Biafra reflected parts of Niger-Delta.

Ono better don't start what you can't finish. You are the only person I have had confrontations with in Nairaland and I will not hessitate to do it again. Better don't start what you can't finish.
At this point I can safely sit back and watch the show as it unfolds. I know that discerning minds are reading and thinking. I have thrown spanners in the works. Let the action starts.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 2:59pm On Jul 13, 2007
My dear Afam,
I quite understand why you respond like this. We're talking about something that affects your ethnic group. It's only normal for you to stand up in defence of your people, and look like a hero. But the truth must be told - as it is. And from the mouth of two or three witnesses, the truth will be established.

I did not know that the Yoruba Major (1 out of the 5) was from Ironsi's tribe, please educate me on this fallacy
1.0 When 5 people (4 Igbos, 1 Yoruba) exterminate a sitting government, in order to restore sanity in the system, sanity that has never seen the light of the day up to today as we discuss, what would you do to persuade me to believe that even the lone Yoruba man does not have some Igbo blood flowing through his veins? or he's even married to one Mbaise woman from present day Imo state? or he was mistaken to be a Yoruba man, when in reality, he was Igbo. In times like we have way back in 1966, where one Kaduna Ezeogwu, who speaks Hausa fluently but he's actually Igbo, can pool resources together and unseat a democratically elected government, I tell you anyone could have been mistaken for anybody.

And one can safely say that the Igbo military group organised that coup, looking at the number of participants - for majority normally carry the day. So, stop pointing accusing fingers at the lone ''Yoruba'' Major. Let him rest in peace.


Since this was a military uprising any soldier (let alone a higher officer) has the option to fight against the uprising or become part of it. Ojukwu chose to fight because he was not part of the coup and the coup was targeted at the Igbos so what's your point?
2.0 Well, Major General Aguiyi Ironsi is late now. We all would have loved to ask him why he did not fish out the perpetrators of the January 1966 coup that led to his own enthronment as CIC. From what I gathered, he had all the time in the world to prosecute the offending Majors or officers. But he choose to keep calm in the face of tyranny. Anyone, including myself, will quickly conclude that the Igbos are at work, trying to take control of the country. So, why are you complaining about the Northern Military elements' acts to restore normalcy and take vengeance on those who killed their leaders?. Sometimes silence can be misconstrued to mean accent to an act.

Beside, until Ironsi decided to keep mute, there was nothing like military uprising in the Nigerian Army at the time. His silence led to the uprising and his untimely death.

I am sure not every Igbo speaking part of the Eastern region was happy about the administration and by the way oil wasn't the main stay then, so get your facts right or are you referring to palm oil?
3.0 Well, like I used to say here on Nairaland, when a thief goes to other places to steal, the way to go after the operation is home So, if your people were complaining at the time, I bet theirs couldn't have been as loud as the ones from the Niger Delta, with varying dialect, and languages Igbos do not understand.

As some other posters have queried -  so the innocent Igbos living in the North had to die for what 4 out of 5 Majors did in the army?
4.0 The country was in chaos. Everywhere you go, there was confusion, and up North I don't know how the Igbos living there could have survived being in the presence of those who want them dead. No doubt, it was an unfortunate incident. And Gowon has said ''no victor, no vanquished''. What else would you have him do? Stab himself and other people for the Igbos mistakes?

You surely don't know the facts. Ojukwu was in charge of the Eastern region and that included the present Bayelsa, Rivers, Cross Rivers and Akwa Ibom states. Your analysis about crude oil story is not based on the reality on ground then abeg
5.0 Ojukwu was one of the best trained soldiers at the time. A Sandhurst trained soldier. He is a bright chap from what I gathered. He couldn't have denied ever looking ahead into the future of Biafra with a juicy Niger Delta under his command And even if he denies it, of what effect would that make when we all know that at the time, the Delta oil resources were largely untapped, ripe, and waiting to be sucked up? I mean, who would not like to fight for such things? Abeg spare me about analysing the oil stuff on ground at the time.


6.0 True, Isaac Boro is dead. He's done his bit to better our lot. His legacy lives on. Today, even the Igbos are enjoying the dividends of what he fought for - well at least, the thing is being shared all over the place now and they're receiving a fair enough share, abi?


Put differently, the Igbos fought a noble war but Nigeria fought to secure the oil rich areas, little wonder a lot of Niger deltans today are shouting resource control.
Hear this - LOVE THE IGBOS OR HATE THEM, YOU CANNOT CERTAINLY IGNORE THEM
7.0 I do not hate anybody or tribal group. If anyone should be angry in present day Nigeria, it's the Delta people, of which I'm one - a bonafide one with both paternal and maternal links to several millions of cubic feet of untapped gas resources, billions of barrels of crude oil underground and other resources too numerous to mention. It is I who should be angry at the three major ethnic groups in this country hell bent on killing us and taking our lands. But I will be quiet, for a while, until I can smile once again!
PoliticsRe: MEND, NDVF, And The Rest Of Them Are Mere Criminals by ono(m): 10:52am On Jul 13, 2007
angel101:
If the palce is developed by force, they will have no more excuse to continue their criminal acts and then they will be seen by all and sundry as what they truly are. In which case, they will not be spared under any circumstance. thats what i think.
My dear sister, no mind them. They sincerely don't want to develop the place.

I have said it times and again on this forum that if the FG truly want to develop the Niger Delta, no amount of hostage taking and community disturbances can stop them. Let the FG show true zeal and interest in developing the area, and lets see who will stop them.
PoliticsRe: Two Lies As Biafra Turns 40 9/7/2007 by ono(m): 10:24am On Jul 13, 2007
Afam,
But it is also true:

1. That Ironsi (of blessed memory) did not show any sign of seriousness, while he was CIC, at prosecuting the soldiers who executed the assasination acts on January 15, 1966, that took the lives of several senior government officials at the time, including the late Sardauna of Sokoto, and Prime Minister of Nigeria, Late Alhaji Sir, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa. The thinking in most circles at the time was that Ironsi did not want to prosecute these people because they were from his ethnic group.

2. That this singular act, led to the bloody counter-coup, championed by the angry northern military elements in July 29, 1966, that led to the death of General Aguiyi Ironsi, his aides and other senior military officials at Lalupon, Ibadan, at the time, and led to the emergence of Lt. Col Yakubu Gowon as military head of state and CIC.

3. That at the time, the people of the Niger Delta were sorely displeased at the high handed way the majority Igbos, in the then Eastern Region of Nigeria administered the region from Enugu.

4. That there were reported cases of uprisings in the northern part of the country. Cases of what can be termed genocide today, were reported. The ethnic groups in the north were up in arms against the Igbos in particular, and other ethnic groups in general in the Northern cities of Kano, Kaduna, Zaria and Sokoto. Many people lost their lives in the ensuing violence, including Igbos, Yorubas, Hausas and other ethnic groups. No doubt, the Igbos were hard hit because of the ''political mood'' at the time in the Northern parts of the country.

5. That Ojukwu, leader of the secessionist group carved up the Niger Delta as part of the breakaway republic of Biafra, to seize federal powers in the Eastern region for himself, the most consequential of which was his decision to take control of all Federal Statutary Corporations in the region and to retain all revenues collected for his own government - including oil revenues from the non-Igbo Niger delta region, which while not yet great in scale, were expected to increase in the coming years, huge reserves having been discovered in the area in the mid-1960s.

6. That Isaac Adaka Boro fought on the Federal troops sides largely to unite the country, and contribute his bit at reducing the influence of the Igbos on the people of the Niger Delta.

7. That as soon as the oil rich areas of the SE region were secured by the Nigerian troops, access to food, water, and other munitions that would have helped Ojukwu and his armies was terminated. The bloody game was up.

The Biafran War was was largely an Oil War People with interests in controlling the oil deposits of the delta were at each others throat.
PoliticsRe: 1998 Obasanjo Worths N20,000, Today He Worth N180 Billion ! by ono(m): 8:37am On Jul 13, 2007
Iyke-D,
You don't have to insult people in here simply because they do not share your views. If you don't like what you read as posts from other people, go fry yourself somewhere and stop dissing people!

I just hope the long arm of the law on this forum grabs you soon.


debosky,
True, OBJ's not obliged to declare his assets publicly. But, someone who preaches transparency, accountability and strict adherence to the rule of law must himself lead by example, the way his successor - Umoru Musa, has done recently.

I don't think there was anything like the Bells University of Technology, pre-1999 at Otta. I will check the records and feedback, asap.


http://www.sunnewsonline.com/webpages/news/national/2007/july/12/national-12-07-2007-001.htm
And if that link is the source of this news, then, I personally believe the write up in there because it looks credible and makes sense to me.
Foreign AffairsRe: Terror Plot In London by ono(m): 8:09am On Jul 13, 2007
ono:
And for the first time, I'm beginning to believe denex.

So, far, all of the bombings and terror scare in the UK has not resulted to anything catastrophic. I think they want to initiate GB into their fold.  And if he proves stubborn, or develop thick skin for this, they might go gaga!

The depraved world we're living in now.
TayoD:
@Ono,
What is your definition of catastrophe? So the lives lost on 7/7 are irrelevant? Until a member of your family is killed before you declare terrorism a catastrophe? Do you realise a Nigerian was killed during the 7/7 bombing, and his mother was seen weeping and wailing on CNN! I just can't believe the writings coming forth from fellow Nigerians here.

We don't even need to look far to see terrorism at work. The same muslims driven by same ideology have killed thousands of Christians here in Nigeria. Thank God I escaped their clutches during the mayhem they brought on Abuja by reason of the beauty contest.

You guys remind me of the toad who kept accustomed to the gradual rising temperature of the water it was placed in. Eventually, the hot water killed it becuase it kept accomodating the "not-so-bad" rise in temperature. No wonder Naija is still the way it is today. We are suffering and smiling in the hope that tomorrow will be better. How insane! Doing the same thing over and over and yet expecting a different outcome. Una do o!
My intention, actually was to add to denex's explanation on what's on ground in the UK. True, I may not be able to grasp in totality, the gravity of what the folks up there are facing. Since I'm in far away N'Djamena. No harm intended, and I really sympathise with the families of people who have lost their dear ones to attacks, which were attributed to terrorists networks and muslim insurgents.

I find it rather hard to believe that just a few days after the ''swearing'' in of G.Brown, terrorsists will spring up from nowhere to make ''their presence felt''!. And to think these are UK trained medical doctors. Much as this is not impossible, and I know there are quite a lot of muslim die-hards out there,  I think the timimg is rather suspect. Some questions are begging for answers.

* We know terrorists are still on the prowl everywhere, why would they want to get GB's attention so early into his premiership?

* What effect, or impression are they trying to make that we do not know already?

* GB has always been one that's against the war in Baghdad, and he has often voiced out his rejection on the way things were handled since it became clear to the world that the so-called WMD, claimed by US military intelligence to be in Baghdad, were non existent.

* Discerning minds would quickly reason out, the way denex has done, that there must be a link between these stage-managed attacks and the initiation of G.Brown into the Anti-terrorists Group, made up of a few[b] but powerful oil-thirsty countries[/b]. 

* There are quite a lot of die-hard muslim fanatics out there but, that's not a licence for any one or group to scheme out a plot geared towards giving all the muslim folks a bad name.

Don't get me wrong, I do not like the muslim religion. And I will never encourage anyone to be a muslim. But we must imbibe the culture of religious tolerance across the world for peace to reign.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 (of 132 pages)