Toaskarity: I love that country!! Exactly what biafra will look like.. hardworking and no religion fanatics

nickz: where I come from they burn a̶̲̥̅ particular leaf with salt and the person that does this doesn't eat.I know the leaf and I ƇΛИ do it.there's nothing spiritual ℓ̊n it.its the fumes from the burnt leaves that simply hold back the rain.#thats what I was told

deji2009:

blue=on, red=off my prev msg. i ask u for d full model number

ikaboy: "ihein Emeiyii Jim, Ijen ya Lua"!!




Somebody say Amen.

onegig: it should be blue and not red for the wireless to work.

deji2009:
the full model no is presario cq50 110US vista. The wireless button is always red





Please consider previous advice.
Somwhere alongside your computer is a switch that enables/disables wireless.
It should have the word Wireless next to it, on the top of your computer.
If the light is blue, wireless is enabled. It it is red, it is not. it

Pls flip d laptop upside down and look for the full model number, for example
compaq cq50-124. each model is different. vista or windows 7

Good question, brighttk how was it disabled ?

Onegig, nice 1 bro

onegig:

Restart the system and tap the "F8 key" continuously until you get the startup menu.

select safe mode and press enter..

When it loads . i guess you are using windows 7

Using System Restore in Windows

There are two places that you can use the system restore feature from. From within Windows, you can just type restore into the Start menu search box, and yotu’ll immediately see System Restore at the top of the start menu:
You will immediate see a screen where you can choose to roll back the system to the last restore point. You can select “Recommended restore”, and just click next, or you can choose a different restore point.

If you do choose a different restore point, you will see a list of restore points that you can choose from.

Restart the system and you should be okay.

REVOLUTNIS: When will MASSOB be serious and take up gun for goodness sake

ndu_chucks: This is a done deal, Amnesty will be accepted by BH. The group would have dismissed the offer outright if they had no interest. The good news is that their leaders are considering the offer and will accept it soon enough..

Sincere 9gerian: Typical of SR. Is this not the same SR that has been the mouth piece of Boko haram all the while? SR is the NUMBER ONE propagator of the activities of Boko haram.

Since the Boko haram mayhem started, no suggestion of possible ways of ending the crisis has emanated from SR. Not even one. All we read is criticisms of any strategy adopted by govt.

What do I expect next from SR? I expect SR to blast us very soon with a news report with a headline like "Boko haram rejects amnesty". Watch out!

The conclusion that can be drawn from the attitude of SR is that they want the crisis to continue. SR is profiting from the crisis.

Even if the president had said no to amnesty to Boko haram and 99% of leaders from that region are suggesting amnesty as the way forward, it is only wise and sensible for the president to give amnesty a try. Otherwise, leaders from that region would accuse the president of being insensitive.

Again, if the leaders of the north are clamouring for amnesty, and the govt bends backwards to consider amnesty, the onus will be on the leaders in the north to persuade Boko haram members to come out from hiding and embrace amnesty.

And Why should military chiefs be enraged over amnesty? I'm sure the foot solders that die daily in this conflict wouldn't mind amnesty if that will bring peace.

Though, I'm skeptical about whether Boko haram will accept amnesty and peace but the leaders of the north know better. In any case, if the govt eventually grants amnesty and certain elements of Boko haram remain recalcitrant, then the president would be justified in using maximum force.

Furthermore, elements of Boko haram that remain recalcitrant after amnesty will lose a measure of sympathy they currently enjoy from some segments in the north.

Consequently, any subsequent action of the govt will enjoy greater support and cooperation in the north.


However, the security forces should be very vigilant even if the govt goes ahead to offer amnesty. This is to avoid the sect re-grouping within the period.

But my attitude has always been, if amnesty will bring relative peace and allow us to move on as a country, why not? If asked to choose between amnesty leading to immediate relative peace and another 5 to 10yrs of fighting and killings, which will you choose?

Imanuelle: Just 14?


A woman and a child?


Damn!