Offpoint1:

Too much nonsense in your write up. Sorry there's no word to best describe it than nonsense.

The Lazarus and Rich man story, was an illustration and not a real life story. Remember Jesus was used to speaking in parables.

You can't feel no pain without flesh, spirit has no form.

Spirit feel no hunger or taste.

Once you're death you stop existing both in physical and spirit. The life in you went back to its owner until the day of resurrection...


If there's was a spiritual realm for death humans, those Jesus resurrected would have given an account, but non gave anyone.

Lazarus story was an illustration? That's nonsense. It was a true life story, was Abraham not a real person, why would Jesus make up a fake story about him? And you say spirits feel no pain? So why did Jesus in Matt 13:42 say "And shall cast them into a FURNACE OF FIRE: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth."; why would those spirits in hell be crying if they are not in pain? Rev 14:11: "The smoke of their TORMENT ascends up for EVER AND EVER: and they have NO REST DAY NOR NIGHT." Why would the Bible call it "torment" if those spirits don't feel anything? If spirits can't feel pain then why or how come they are being "tormented", can you be tormented if you can't feel pain? Also, there are many scriptures that suggest and imply spirits can eat, and do eat and angels eat, and we will eat in Heaven, but we are not going to be eating so we can "survive", no. God is our sustenance in the new world, he is our source of energy and strength, and like the Bible says we won't"thirst" or "hunger" anymore. But we can and will still eat food and drink, not for survival or for energy, but for pleasure. Obviously, you don't understand anything about spiritual matters, and don't even understand the Bible too. I'm in no mood for arguments today. When everyone dies, we will know what is what. Whether your spirit can feel pain or not, you will know.

Funny comments plenty for dis thread

Beard gang nation has lost an illustrious member

I so much enjoyed watching his wrestling fights with Rowan, and the the entire Wyatt Family including Brawn and Bray aka the Fiend. Chaiii, this world, na God hand we dey. May God continue to have mercy on me.

NkemChukwudi:


Marriage that is already scattered? What is it with you people and marriage sef? How many Nigerian marriages are truly functional in the UK sef?
Toxic relationships don’t usually change.

How is it already "scattered"? Did the OP say she wants divorce? Did the man try to divorce her? What they have is a matter of misunderstandings and disagreements. They are just having a power tussle as to who is in charge of their relationship. She is still interested in the marriage, and of course the man is still interested too, but obviously very angry with her right now. She is still his wife and he is still her husband. They can sort out this matter between themselves with wisdom and maturity in play. What's your definition of "toxic" marriage? There's is no marriage without ups and downs, there is no marriage without disagreement or conflicts from time to time or maybe even ocassional confrontations and physical or verbal attack. It is normal, it happens. Marriage is not always 24/7 Romance and Love. This is the real world, not a Disney Cinderella story. But judging from her write-up, she still loves her husband and they can still fix their marriage. This case is not beyond repair. She should reach to him and make peace and go and join her husband over there, or if they decide they want to come back here, that's up to them. 3rd party people can't just be sitting in one corner amd pushing people to destroy their marriages just like that. If your car gets broken down on the highway, do you just throw it away just like that, or you try to fix it?

STORY FOR THE GODS!!! Na d same oyinbo wey do pencil, na dem do eraser. Those 2 conditions are the loophole any smart man will capitalize on to use this law to clean his butt like tissue paper, flush it and escape . Una neva wise reach. Thank God for the red pill

The Supreme Court per Niki Tobi J.S.C. held thus:

“In view of the fact that the case of the respondent is breach of agreement on the part of the appellant to marry him, I will take here what constitutes breach of agreement to marry. Two elements are necessary to constitute a breach of agreement or promise of marriage. First, the party jilted must prove to the satisfaction of the court that there was in fact a promise of marriage under the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1990, or under Islamic Law or under Customary Law, on the part of the other sex. Second, the party reneging has really, and as a matter of fact, failed or refused to keep to the agreement of marriage… A mere convivial or romantic relationship without more is not enough for a court to found an agreement to marry… I could not place my hand on any evidence by the witnesses that the property in dispute was developed because the appellant and the respondent agreed to marry. If anything, appellant said in her evidence that there was no issue of marriage between them.”

AreaFada2:

Dude, the more you learn, the more you know how much you don't know and therefore remain humble.
Also many top consultants have foreign degrees, have travelled widely doing research, as examiners, etc. They have seen the humility of the very best experts abroad.

You see the people who develop therapies, pioneers in certain surgical procedures, win Nobel Prizes, and so on, they are so down to earth. In UK your top surgeon will be called Mr Jones, Mr Davies, not Dr Jones or Dr Davies unless he is also a professor. It is for historical reasons.
But 9ja surgeons did not copy that "Mr" bit from the British despite being our colonial master. We too like title to copy that.

You have said it all. I respect your wisdom and analysis 100%. These kind of people are a huge inspiration, especially for someone that is a hothead hot-blooded kind of person like me. They rub off that gentility aura on you when you are around them and make me wanna b calmin dan like Jesus calmed the waves on the sea

MD, PhD, FRCOG, FACOG

oh boy, u go fear qualifications wonderful!!! The best part I like about people like this is that when you meet them one-on-one, they are usually so jovial, gentle, soft spoken and humble. You will see many of them like that as senior consultants in Govt hospitals, very calm decent well mannered people that are humble, dem no dey carry am for head even though they are OVER-qualified with qualifications longer than 3rd mainland bridge . They still mingle with regular folks in a cool way. But you see those Doctors that just did Msc, chaiii, those ones dey too dey feel like people are beneath dem, shakara tew mush

Offpoint1:

Give me a logical explanation how *Spirit* will burn.

Your hell will be here on earth and your heaven will be here on earth. Your flesh will receive punishment for his sins and rewards for his good deeds.

God will not punish a spirit for the sins of the flesh and God will not reward a spirit for the righteousness of the flesh.
Spirit is incapable of feeling pains, it's indestructible hence there will be resurrection of both the just and unjust.

The statements in bold is inaccurate. You are wrong. And then to answer your question, read this below:

Luke 16:19–31
19 “There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. 20 At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores 21 and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores. 22 “The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. 24 So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’ 25 “But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. 26 And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’ 27 “He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my family, 28 for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’ 29 “Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’ 30 “‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’ 31 “He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”

What is "Hades"? Hades is the ENTIRE realm of Hell itself. Hades means the entire realm or dimension of Hell. In that realm, there are 2 different "worlds" existing side by side and they are separated by distance but there is an impenetrable barrier inbetween. One side can't access the other side and vice versa.

But Satan was the ruler of that dimension. The Devil himself was the King of Hell, that realm was under his authority and control. No human spirit could come out of Hell without his approval, no demon spirit could do anything against his wish. Satan was the most powerful being in that realm, even though he was not based there. He ruled the Hell realm from the heavenly realms where he was based. He put his angels (demons) in charge to carry out his orders.

In one world of the Hell dimension, there is no fire, this was the good side of Hell. This part of hell is referred to as "Abraham's bossom", because Abraham was the one that received the promise of God's salvation to man. This was the world where the spirits (of those who were deemed "upright people" by God during their lifetime) were taken to after they died. Since the time of Adam, nobody that died who was a "good" person could go to Heaven because their good deeds or self righteousness was not enough and couldn't meet up with God's standard of righteousness, not even Adam and Eve.

To qualify to go to Heaven, you have to meet up with God's standard of righteousness but no single human being since Adam could meet up to that standard, not even God's own personal friend Abraham. All those "good" people who died before Jesus came and suffered and died and resurrected and ascended to Heaven etc, the angels (demons) came and took their spirits to Hell, but it was the good part of Hell, the world inside the Hell realm that had no "fire".

Those spirits were "imprisoned" there...until Jesus died to save humanity and meet up to God's standard requirement for righteousness. Jesus himself went to Hell when he died, the world that had no fire. BUT when he got there, it was not business as usual for the demons. He thrashed them all, he was the most powerful being ever, all the demons in Hell couldn't withstand his power.

So they sent an SOS to Satan himself that there's a new prisoner that's about to run a jailbreak, and he has kicked all their demon asses and defeated them. Satan knew Jesus, they already met, He knew Jesus was the son of God but what he didn't know was that Jesus was also God himself, he was the Creator. This was the most painful knowledge for Satan to know and when he later found out, he was bloody suicidal, he knew it was over for him.

He blamed himself for setting up the stage that led to the crucifixion of Jesus. He said to himself, If I knew Jesus was God I will never have allowed them to crucify him. Satan would have stopped the Jews from killing Jesus if he knew Jesus was God, but he didn't know. This was Jesus' #1 best kept secret. Nobody knew he was God, everyone thought he was just the son of God like Adam was. They didn't know he was God himself. Even the angels in Heaven didn't know. Only the Godhead knew and it was kept a secret from everyone else.

So there was a war in Hell, Satan fought against Jesus and he lost woefully. Jesus all by himself alone defeated Satan so quick, so easily, so shamefully, all the demons in Hell saw it; all the devils in the heavenly realms saw it; all the angels in Heaven saw it and all the spirits of men imprisoned in hell, both worlds saw it. They saw Satan lose to Jesus, he was soundly beaten like a nobody, a total KO, so fast, so magnificent.

Satan had never seen that kind of power before. He was the most powerful being in the entire celestial realms outside of Heaven. It was at that point of defeat Satan realized Jesus was God, he worshipped his Creator and he BOWED to Jesus. All the Powers in Hell and in the heavenly realms bowed to Jesus. Then Jesus went to set all those spirits free, he opened up the good side of Hades when he resurrected and he took all those spirits to Heaven with him when he ascended.

Since Jesus ascended to Heaven, now whenever a "good" person dies, the angels of God will come and take that spirit to Heaven. The spirits of the upright people don't go to Hell anymore, that is the good part, the world of Hell where there is no fire. Human spirits that have good standing with God now have direct access to the realm of Heaven when they die. But a spirit deemed wicked will still be taken to the other second world of Hell, that is hell fire.


So, the 2nd world in the Hell realm had FIRE, what you call "hell fire", a place of torment and suffering, where spirits are put in fire to burn continuously, and because spirits can't die but can feel pain, they will be in continuous unending agony. If you want to know what that feels like, just put your hand inside fire, that pain is exactly same thing with a spirit inside spiritual fire.

The world in the hell realm that has fire is what is commonly called Hell Fire. This is where demons take the spirits of sinners to after they die and are deemed as people who are not upright or wicked people, people that did evil and wickedness to others when they where alive in their physical bodies. Their spirits will burn "forever" until Judgment Day, the "last day" in the way what I explained before in that write-up. So now you know that "spirits" can burn.

As you can see from the narrative Jesus himself gave, Lazarus was a poor man but he was a "good" person and then there was a rich man that was wicked. They both died, and they both were taken to the Hell realm by angels (demons). But Lazarus was taken to "Abraham's Bossom", that is the world of Hell without fire. Lazarus was there with the rest of the saints that had died before. But the rich man was taken to be 2nd world in Hell, the one we call Hell Fire and he he was burning 24/7 in torment, agony and sorrow there. Remember, these 2 men had died, so it was their spirits that went to Hell. Their bodies were inside their graves. The rich man cried to Abraham, this fire is too much etc. Now you know!

OP first learn how to use pronouns properly . Your friend is a male but you kept using "her" to qualify him several times in your sentences. Maybe, just maybe that's one of the reasons why your friend doesn't want you to date his sister. A woman is far more intricate, complex and complicated to understand than simple pronouns of "his" and "her". Learn the easy things first.

Am juz here to read d comments

Buhari will never kill them na, the news even said huge ransom was paid I think. Na to shoot peaceful unarmed protesters dey always hungry Bokóhari. He massacred peaceful unarmed Shiites protesters, massacred peaceful unarmed Lekki tollgate protesters etc but he will negotiate ransom with killer terrorists and bandits, they won't be killed. What a useless regime... Tuehhh!!!

Chaiii , so sad . About to lose her life for 2 trips with about $6k or less. Money she will not even have the opportunity to spend if they execute her. May we never be unfortunate to work for crooks and criminals. One kobo made through legitimate earning will always be better than 1m made through evil means. Iffa hear anything like, 'When you are traveling, can you help me carry this load to..............

Kikikikiki, people dey be oh . That car that was wrapped in celotape abi na nylon . Very educative and funny thread. Nice job OP.

AdaNri1:
What are you talking about? It’s your type that will not let his wife sit in the living room with him, just to prove that he is the boss. I have no business with your likes, now shift.

You have no business with my likes, so why are you mentioning my comment on this thread, when I never even quoted you before? Your self-confusion is legendary. Do I look like a man that wants anything to do with your likes of ultrasensitive bitter super-nagging low-IQ confused triggered females? Definitely not me! I only relate with and appreciate decent, graceful, well-mannered, refined, classy, humble wise women with maturity who respect, honor and are loyal to their husbands and use their wisdom and good character to build their home and marriage, and not tear it apart like tissue paper. You're obviously not in that category of women, so what's my concern with you? And I'm not responsible for your heartbreaks so don't wail at me abeg.
(☞ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)☞ That's the way out of my mentions.

Some little trivial facts:
✓ Who committed the first "crime" in the world? A woman! Eve intentionally disobeyed God himself.
✓ Who was the first kind of our species to talk to the DEVIL himself? A Woman. Satan saw the male and female, he chose to talk to the female. Apparently, he obviously knew the proverbial "FISH BRAIN" was not a myth. He was right!
✓ What does a world without women look like? PERFECTION! Because there was a time the world was without women and it was a perfect world. Just read Genesis Chapter 1.
✓ What does the world look like with women in it? The BLOODY MESS the world is right now. You are living in that world right now, so now arguments on this.
✓ What would the world look like without men in it? The world wouldn't exist. Because the world was created for man, and because of man. It is a Man's world.

In conclusion OP, we own this world and we are not the ones that will leave this world for you. You are the one that will pack your bags and enter a one-way NASA intergalactic space shuttle trip and toodles, off you go from here. Try Pluto or Jupiter.. Don't forget to take your baggage of frustrations and bitterness along, you will need it where you are going. You won't be missed

wwwkaycom:
A married female magistrate told me this many years ago. She said a man cannot be found guilty of raping his legally married wife except if either of the party (husband and wife) have filed for divorce in a court.

Your magistrate is correct. He can be ACCUSED, but he can't be proven guilty of rape. It is almost impossible to prove and the Court is about judgment based on proofs and evidence, not word of mouth alone. Unless maybe she has a camera that videoed the whole event when it happened. But which kind of couples will keep a camera recorder viewing themselves anytime they want to have sex, when it's not like they are shooting a porn movie.

The terminology for it is "marital rape". In the past, marital rape was unrecognized and you couldn't legally prosecute a man for raping his wife. But during this new era of "women rights", more and more countries have began to recognize marital rape as a crime. However, it is still NOT a crime that can be readily prosecuted because HOW DO YOU PROVE A MAN RAPED HIS WIFE? They are legally married, he is not a stranger, they usually have been or have consensual sex, now suddenly the woman says the last sex we had was rape. But the 100 sex before that wasn't rape, so how does she prove the rape? Her testimony is not enough, and her penetration or semen deposit is not evidence of rape because her husband is her husband, not a stranger. So it is almost impossible to prove, even physical abuse or marks doesn't prove the sex was not consensual. Couples can have wild disagreement then next minute have make up sex. So because it is nearly impossible to prove, it is almost impossible to prosecute that in a court and win. You can take the case to court but since you can't prove your husband raped you, same guy you have always been having sex with all the time before, then end of case. So I agree with this student lawyer below:

Flows001:
All of the above comments are wrong.
@Op. Legally speaking, a man CANNOT rape his legally wedded wife. The consent she gave during the wedding runs throughout and the Law does not insist on her consenting to every sexual attempt by the man.
Summary: A man cannot be guilty of RAPING his lawfully wedded wife.
#Law Student.

InvertedHammer:

/
She is volunteering to help while infact she is planning to throw fuel into the fire. Such toxic women search out for others to lead astray. Let her go ahead and work with the AdaNri1 of a lady. I give it 6 months and she will open another thread for lamentations.

/

Guy those evening newspapers gang need new members na, to keep their inflated balloon ego afloat to carry the load of sadness, bitterness and frustration and loneliness hanging on their necks. When they see a happily married woman, they are not happy. How dare she have a husband that she submits to? When they see a marriage with issues, they jump out like a pack of hungry wolves ready to help their new prospective recruit tear whatever is left of her marriage into pieces so she can join their club of frustrated man-haters.

They can't get a man, and even if they get one, they can't keep him cuz they are toxic mannerless low IQ females, so everyone else must suffer and be blamed for it. As if we send u msg. All the married women out there that have a man to call the head of their home, may God continue to bless your union and make your bond stronger and give you more wisdom to understand and appreciate your man as the head of your family and know your role as his deputy, not Co-captain, not 2nd President but DEPUTY. Una go dey love oh ,

Don't mind all these frustrated ones that call themselves evening newspapers, they will be more than happy to help you destroy your marriage

UDUJ:


You just dey burst mynd44 head with all these praisings, but truth be told the dude is a hardworking moderator sha. You have to give that to him.

Honestly, i'm not trying to praise him. I'm just being factual and honest. He is the most objective and neutral moderator on Nairaland. The rest of the bunch are mostly biased or have vested interests. Let me give you a simple example of his neutrality. If 10 people create a thread on the same topic, maybe like a news in politics section, he will check all those threads and the person that first posted the news, as per the earliest time, that's the thread he will push to front page. That is unique to him.

Even when it comes to mediating between conflicting parties, yes the "human" factor can come in sometimes, but he's mostly objective in most situations and he doesn't show favoritism or this clique is my clique so let me use my mod privilege to suppress the other voices or not even the level playing field etc. But some other mods here, all kinds of bias and stuff. Also most of the relevant useful meaningful topics that hit front page, na him dey push am there.

JustforMen:


Wetin come bring Jesu enter this yeye matter?
It's such attempts to relate everything to religion to that makes nonsense of sense and reason.
Jesus did not bear the name of any father, my friend! Stop being crazy.

if you want to see who is being crazy, then I suggest you look in the mirror cuz from your comment I can see that you must be very MAD.

Matthew 1: 1 An account of the genealogy* of Jesus the Messiah,* the son of David, the son of Abraham.

2 Abraham was the father of Isaac, and Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers, 3 and Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar, and Perez the father of Hezron, and Hezron the father of Aram, 4 and Aram the father of Aminadab, and Aminadab the father of Nahshon, and Nahshon the father of Salmon, 5 and Salmon the father of Boaz by Rahab, and Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth, and Obed the father of Jesse, 6 and Jesse the father of King David.

And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah, 7 and Solomon the father of Rehoboam, and Rehoboam the father of Abijah, and Abijah the father of Asaph,* 8 and Asaph* the father of Jehoshaphat, and Jehoshaphat the father of Joram, and Joram the father of Uzziah, 9 and Uzziah the father of Jotham, and Jotham the father of Ahaz, and Ahaz the father of Hezekiah, 10 and Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, and Manasseh the father of Amos,* and Amos* the father of Josiah, 11 and Josiah the father of Jechoniah and his brothers, at the time of the deportation to Babylon.

12 And after the deportation to Babylon: Jechoniah was the father of Salathiel, and Salathiel the father of Zerubbabel, 13 and Zerubbabel the father of Abiud, and Abiud the father of Eliakim, and Eliakim the father of Azor, 14 and Azor the father of Zadok, and Zadok the father of Achim, and Achim the father of Eliud, 15 and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob, 16 and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called the Messiah.

From the human genealogy of Jesus given above, didn't his lineage come from Joseph his "father", or did you see his mother Mary's lineage attributed to him? Mtchwwwww!!!

JoeEeL:


Small small o. Na mod be that guy so. Nor too wash am.

He's a great guy, and can be very objective and neutral. We don't have issues, even though we don't always agree on certain political views, social or societal issues, we agree to disagree, we argue to learn and improve. Mynd44 is the best moderator on Nairaland. I have examined all of them. He stands heads and shoulders above the rest! And he is the most hardworking mod too. 4am he don dey push topics go front page. He is a correct somebody.

Kelvinhunta:
U said it all! Plus is he is over smart he can also get a written consent letter authorizing him to travel with d kids signed by d wife, though he will forge d signature and make it look real. That will nail it above any question

He DOESN'T need any consent letter from his wife. All he had to do, which he has already done, is to prove fatherhood. If it is a baby, or little child, they will accept authentic recognized Government birth certificates, naming ceremony pictures etc. If it is a grown child, they might require DNA test too. Once they verify etc, and the man satisfies other requirements like funding to take care of himself and the children, accomodation in the UK etc, his VISA and approval for his children to travel with him is a done deal.

The man obviously met all the requirements. But some wailers are crying here and wailing like someone stole the air they are breathing because a father took his OWN biological children to the UK. Not uncle, not guardian, not surrogate, not godfather BUT the biological father himself. I want to believe that most if not all the men talking nonsense about it are obviously not fathers themselves most likely and so don't know what it means to be a father.

As if he needs anybody's permission to take his children wherever whenever. God bless him wherever he is. I don't know what transpired between him and his wife, that's another subject and topic and I can't judge matter I know nothing about, and even in this case pointing fingers and blame is not the solution.

The solution is diplomacy and peace. If the woman is still interested in her marriage and coexisting with THEIR children, of which she is the mother that gave birth to the children for her husband, who is the principal rightful "owner" of those children, then she should humble herself, find a way to reach out to her husband, apologize, sue for peace and accept to work out whatever issues they have (obviously there are issues), then submit to his authority as the head of their marriage and Captain of their relationSHIP.

Then she can go and join them in the UK too and leave Nigeria for those wailing on this thread forming Bruce Lee and bounty hunter and ICE agents because a father LEGALLY relocated with his children abroad. OP if you like, let them mislead you and help you DESTROY whatever is left of your marriage.

I think all these people pushing you to create more problems for yourself, they have new husband and new marriage they kept inside their pocket to give you, fah? You better check them, most of them are mannerless ungraceful misandristic females that can't even keep a boyfriend, not to mention a husband or marriage.

Don't let them help you destroy your marriage oh, cuz they want all ladies to be single, bitter, frustrated, empty and lonely like them. So helping you destroy your marriage is just another day in paradise for these low-budget misandristic females here. They call themselves evening newspapers, that's an accomplishment they are so Proud of and won't mind if you join their club. Be wise. Make peace with your husband so you can go and join your family in the UK

For those people claiming they can deport the man, this is UK Embassy info for you below. Oya show your power fast fast and go an deport him na, shebi u be Superman. You will tell me whether the man passed through Libya desert to go to the UK, or whether he passed through UK Embassy itself and they stamped a VISA for him and minuted on it that he is carrying his children with him on flight. Whether he didn't submit his fatherhood documents at the embassy, you will tell me. Whether immigration at Heathrow airport didn't check his papers and check his children before granting him entry into UK, you will tell me. Mtchwwwww!!! Oya go and deport him na, shebi na u get power wey pass UK govt wey give am legal entry with his children. Nonsense!


British Deputy High Commission Lagos
11 Walter Carrington Crescent

Victoria Island
Lagos
Nigeria

Telephone+234 (1) 277 0780/ 0781/ 0782

Use our contact form for consular enquiries:
www.gov.uk/contact-consulate-lagos

Access to the Consular Section is strictly by appointment only. Please call +234 (1) 277 0780/ 0781/ 0782 and select the consular option 24/7 for consular assistance or an appointment.

humilitypays:
if she tries this your advice and those kids gets deported back to Nigeria, when they grow up and find out their mom was the reason they are stuck in Nigeria, they will forever hate her!


Op better follow family mediation and don't listen to all these evil advisers.


In the long run, it will pay off for you.

Don't make any formal complaint to British High Commission that may lead to their deportation pls. For the sake of your kids don't do it

Oga they CAN'T deport him. He is the FATHER. If he can prove that with their birth certificate and/or DNA test to verify his claim of fatherhood, then nobody is going to deport him. Don't let anyone be giving you fables. Anybody that wants to form Superman should go ahead and contact UK Embassy. Abeg just TRY IT. The man will NOT be deported, unless his Visa is not genuine. If he sure for you, let me go to UK embassy page and post their contact here for all those Jackie Chan and Bruce Lee making noise. Can you imagine saying a Father that took his own children has committed abduction crime, mtchwwww. OP if you like yourself, find a way to message your husband and make peace with him, that's your only solution.

North East tour You get mind oh! Me I can't even go to Kaduna again, talkless of NE Na "man" u be, safe journey to u

cococandy:
seems like you enjoy yarning nonsense

seems like you want to wail about your gender equality rights bs again

As a father, my first son was at 81 Division. My 2nd son was at Ayike House. I bloody filled, signed and collected birth certificate from Government as the Father. They are my children, and I can take them anywhere I want , anytime I want without the permission of anybody. They are my responsibility, and they are my personal "property", they are my "load" to carry, not anybody else.

Until they are old and wise enough to sail their own ship, I remain the Captain of their ship and nobody in this world can tell me rubbish that I abducted my children if I take them away. It is me that can arrest anyone else for kidnapping or abduction, including their mother if they take my children away without my authorization.

My children bear my surname, they don't bear nobody else's name but mine. If any woman wants the exclusive right of child "ownership" then go and do gender reassignment surgery to become a man first , then marry your own wife or get a baby mama or surrogate mother, so you can now have children that will take after you. But if you can't do that, then forget it, the Father "owns" his children. It's a man's world, if you don't like it, CRY ME AN OCEAN

Mynd44:

1. I didn't see where she said her husband is a citizen.

2. If he is, he can be arrested for abduction and trafficking (serious crimes)

3. If he is a citizen and the children are deported, they can still go to the UK as the recordswill show that they were innocent victims of a crine

Abduction and trafficking, do you even hear yourself at all? Abduction and trafficking for children that are his biological children, for a man that is the father of the children. No bloody Jupiter can arrest him anywhere, not in the UK, not the UK government, nobody. Unless, maybe you can go and arrest him yourself na, since you are the Bruce Lee of the wife that wants to charge a man according to your own personal laws that a father taking his children away is abduction. Kikikikiki, you funny oh

cococandy:
Nonsense

Sherrup!

Make peace with your husband, apologize and submit to him, that's your only viable option. Even though you are both the parents, the children are HIS, not yours. That's why children bear their father's surname, not mother. Even Jesus bore his father's name and took after the Lineage of Joseph, not Mary. That's the law of Nature, that's the system God put in place.

If you report to UK embassy, it won't change anything. You will only worsen the situation for yourself.